Virtual Library
Start Your Search
G. Richardson
Moderator of
-
+
O15 - NSCLC - Chemotherapy II (ID 109)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Oral Abstract Session
- Track: Medical Oncology
- Presentations: 8
- Moderators:G. Richardson, J.V. Heymach
- Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 10:30 - 12:00, Bayside Auditorium A, Level 1
-
+
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
The current treatment paradigm for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes systemic therapy, radiotherapy or both. A “watch and wait” approach (WW) is commonly used in clinical practice. Whether this approach would have any effect on survival outcomes has not previously been evaluated.Methods
The British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) provides comprehensive cancer care to a population of 4.5 million across 944735 sq kms. A retrospective review was conducted of all referred patients diagnosed with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC from January to December 2009 in BC who saw a medical oncologist (MO). Patient characteristics, treatment recommendations, and outcomes were abstracted. WW-treated is defined as initial observation with chemotherapy > 8 weeks from MO consult. WW-missed are patients who were on a WW strategy that did not receive chemo. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was compared using log rank test. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate prognostic factors and control for potential confounders.Results
710 patients were seen by a MO. Median age 66 years (29-90), ECOG 0-1 51%, male 52%, non squamous/squamous/NOS 40%/19%/41%, rural/urban 19%/81%. 327 received upfront chemo, 171 WW and 209 deemed chemo ineligible due to poor ECOG, and comorbidities. Of the 171 patients on a WW approach 44% missed an opportunity for chemotherapy (Figure 1). Reasons for WW-missed included poor ECOG (50%), death (47%), asymptomatic (1%), and illness (1%). Median OS was highest in the WW-treated 16.5 months (CI 12.7-20.3), followed by 13.9 months (CI 12.0-15.8) in the upfront chemo and lowest in the WW-missed 5.9 months (CI 4.4-7.4), p<0.0001. On multivariate analysis, factors predicting a poorer OS included ECOG >2, squamous histology, and a shorter the time from diagnosis to referral and referral to MO consult. When controlled for confounding factors (age, sex, ECOG) OS was similar between the upfront chemo and WW-treated (HR 1.16, CI 0.849-1.58, p=0.353), while those who were in the WW-missed had a significantly lower OS (HR 5.54, CI 3.00-10.24, P<0.0001). Figure 1Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that a “watch and wait” strategy is potentially detrimental to patients because a significant proportion never receives chemotherapy. A decline in ECOG status accounts for 50% of the “missed” chemotherapy. Frequent follow up should be employed for patients who are on a WW approach to ensure the window of opportunity for chemotherapy is not lost.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.02 - The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) BRCA1-RAP80 Expression Customization (BREC) randomized phase III trial of customized chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (NCT00617656/GECP-BREC) (ID 1157)
10:40 - 10:50 | Author(s): R. Rosell, T. Moran, M.A. Cobo Dols, M. Domine, M. Sanchez-Ronco, I. Bover, M. Provencio, B. Massuti, A. Vergnenegre, G. Lopez-Vivanco, G. Robinet, A. Insa, M. Majem, R. De Las Peñas, M.A. Sala, D. Isla, N. Baize, J. Garde, I. Chaib, C. Camps
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
RAP80, a component of the BRCA1 complex, influenced outcome both in p with low BRCA1 expression treated with cisplatin (cis)/gemcitabine (gem) and in p with intermediate/high BRCA1 levels treated with cis/docetaxel (doc) or with doc alone in the SLCG phase II customized chemotherapy trial (NCT00883480). Based on these findings, the SLCG and the French Lung Cancer Group performed a prospective, randomized phase III trial in metastatic NSCLC patients to compare non-customized cis/doc with customized therapy customized according to BRCA1 and RAP80 mRNA expression levels.Methods
From 2008 to 2013, patients with wild-type EGFR were randomized 1:1 to the control or experimental arm. Planned accrual was 391 patients. Treatment in the control arm was cis/doc, while patients in the experimental arm received treatment according to their BRCA1 and RAP80 levels: 1) those with low RAP80, regardless of BRCA1 levels, received cis/gem; 2) those with intermediate/high RAP80 and low/intermediate BRCA1 received cis/doc; and 3) those with intermediate/high RAP80 and high BRCA1 received doc alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).Results
At 15 October 2012, 279 patients had been included and the planned interim analysis was performed. PFS was 5.49 months (m) in the control and 4.38 m in the experimental arm (P=0.07). Overall survival (OS) was 12.66 m in the control and 8.52 m in the experimental arm (P=0.006). Response rate (RR) was 37.3% in the control and 27% in the experimental arm (P=0.07). In the multivariate analysis including PS, treatment arm, BRCA1, RAP80, histology, smoking status and metastatic site, only extrathoracic metastases were associated with an increased risk of progression (HR, 1.78; P=0.02). In a post hoc analysis restricted to patients with ECOG PS 0, PFS was 3.91 m in the control and 7.47 m in the experimental arm (P=0.01) for those with low RAP80 levels (experimental group 1). PFS for patients in experimental groups 1, 2 and 3 was 7.47, 7.01 and 3.22 m, respectively (P=0.02). OS for patients in experimental groups 1, 2 and 3 was 28.88, 15.86 and 11.81 m, respectively (P=0.04).Conclusion
Based on the negative results for PFS at the interim analysis, accrual was closed on this study. The negative results may be due to the poor predictive capacity of RAP80 and/or to the inclusion of doc alone as a treatment in the experimental arm. In addition, doc/cis may not have been the ideal combination for the control arm. Customized chemotherapy could be further encouraged in oncogene-driven pan-negative patients with PS 0.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.03 - Phase III, randomized, multicenter study comparing in elderly patients (≥70 years) with stage IV non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a standard strategy of treatment allocation (carboplatin based bi-therapy or monotherapy with docetaxel) based on performance status (PS) and age with an experimental strategy allocating the same chemotherapies or best supportive care (BSC) according to a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) - Study ESOGIA-GFPC-GECP 08-02. (ID 694)
10:50 - 11:00 | Author(s): R. Corre, C. Chouaid, L. Greillier, H. Le Caer, C. Audigier-Valette, N. Baize, H. Berard, L. Falchero, I. Monnet, E. Dansin, A. Vergnenegre, M. Marcq, C. Decroistte, S. Bota, R. Lamy, B. Massuti, C. Dujon, G. Fraboulet, J. Minguet, C. Plassot, H. Lena
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Incidence of advanced NSCLC in the elderly is increasing. The use of a CGA is recommended to detect the patient’s vulnerability but its integration in treatment decision making has never been prospectively evaluated. The main objective of this study was to show that, compared to a standard strategy based on PS and age, the use of a CGA can improve the management of NSCLC in first line.Methods
Randomized, multicentric, prospective phase III study in patients ≥70 y, PS 0-2 with stage IV NSCLC. We compared in arm A a standard algorithm of chemotherapy allocation based on PS and age: carboplatin based doublet in PS≤1 and age ≤75y, mono-therapy in PS =2 or age >75y with in arm B an experimental strategy of treatment allocation based on CGA: carboplatin based doublet for fit patients, mono-therapy for vulnerable patients and BSC for frail patients. Carboplatin (AUC5,d1), was associated to pemetrexed (500 mg/m2,d1) in non-squamous tumors and to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, d1-8) in squamous tumors, monotherapy was docetaxel 38 mg/m2 (d1-8). Four cycles of chemotherapy were to be given every three weeks. The main endpoint was time to failure treatment (TTF=duration between the date of randomization and the date the patient was withdrawn from treatment for any reason (progression, toxicity, death), secondary endpoints were Overall Response Rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL), survival adjusted on QoL .Results
493 patients were randomized from 01/2010 to 01/2013 by 45 centers. Patients characteristics were: male: 74%, median age: 77 (70-91) years, non-squamous histology: 71.8%, PS 0-1: 81.4%, ADL<6:13.9%, IADL<4:27.5%, Charlson’s index ≥2: 23%, score GDS 5≥3:2.5%. The 2 arms were well-balanced for patients characteristics except for ADL<6 (17.4% in arm A vs 10.3% in arm B). Respectively in arms A and B, 34.4% and 47% patients received a carboplatin based doublet, 65.6% and 31.5% received docetaxel and in arm B 21.5% received BSC. There was no significant difference in terms of TTF, respectively for arm A and arm B: median TTF was 99 days (d), 95%CI:[89; 126] vs. 98 d, 95%CI:[81;135], p=0.7149 and in terms of mOS: 196 d in arm A, 95%CI [171;231] vs. 185 d in arm B ,95%CI [148;235], p=0.7784. All grades toxicities were significantly less frequent in arm B than in arm A (93% vs.86.2%, p=0.016), but there was no difference in terms of grade 3-4 toxicities. All the secondary endpoints data will be updated at time of the meeting.Conclusion
this large phase III study failed to show a superiority of a CGA based strategy of treatment allocation in terms of TTF. In experimental arm, 21.5% of frail patients according to Balducci’s criteria were enrolled and received an exclusive BSC management. Carboplatin-based doublets with pemetrexed and gemcitabine according to histology are feasible with a good profile of tolerance in selected elderly patients. This study will help to precise the most relevant geriatric tools and their cut-off in order to improve the management of the elderly with advanced NSCLC.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.04 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3940)
11:00 - 11:15 | Author(s): R. Lilenbaum
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.05 - Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 plus Cisplatin versus Docetaxel plus Cisplatin for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (TCOG0701): Subgroup Analysis. (ID 1895)
11:15 - 11:25 | Author(s): O. Ishimoto, A. Gemma, H. Sakai, N. Katakami, K. Kubota, M. Nishio, A. Inoue, H. Okamoto, H. Isobe, H. Kunitoh, Y. Takiguchi, K. Kobayashi, Y. Nakamura, H. Ohmatsu, K. Minato, M. Fukuda, A. Yokoyama, M. Takeuchi, H. Michimae, S. Kudoh
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) is the only third-generation regimen that has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in overall survival and QOL by head-to-head comparison with a second-generation regimen (vindesine plus cisplatin) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) has shown activity and good tolerability in phase II settings. Molecularly targeted agents including bevacizumab (BEV) have shown activity and safety in non-squamous (non-Sq) NSCLC.Methods
Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, an ECOG PS of 0-1 and adequate organ functions were randomly assigned to receive either oral S-1 80 mg/m[2]/day (40 mg/m[2] b.i.d.) on days 1 to 21 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m[2] on day 8 every 5 weeks or docetaxel 60 mg/m[2 ]on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m[2] on day 1 every 3 weeks, both up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A non-inferiority study design was employed; the upper confidence interval (CI) limit of the hazard ratio (HR) was <1.322. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response, safety, and QOL. Subgroup analysis by histology (non-Sq vs Sq) was conducted.Results
From April 2007 through December 2008, 608 patients were randomly assigned to SP (n=303) or DP (n=305) at 66 sites in Japan. Patient demographics were well balanced between the two groups. Non-Sq and Sq patients in SP/DP arm was 251/247 and 50/48 respectively. Two interim analyses were preplanned. At the final analysis, a total of 480 deaths had occurred. The primary endpoint was met. OS in the SP arm was non-inferior to that in the DP arm (median survival, 16.1 vs. 17.1 months, respectively; HR=1.013; 96.4% confidence interval, 0.837-1.227). PFS was 4.9 months in the SP arm and 5.2 months in the DP arm. The rates of febrile neutropenia (7.4% vs. 1.0%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (73.4% vs. 22.9%), grade 3/4 infection (14.5% vs. 5.3%), and grade 1/2 alopecia (59.3% vs. 12.3%) were significantly lower in the SP arm than in the DP arm. In terms of physical functioning and global functioning on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and lung cancer module (LC-13), QOL was better in the SP arm (repeated measures ANOVA: p<0.01). Subgroup analysis by histology revealed that the median OS of non-Sq and Sq patients in SP/DP group was 17.4/19.1 months and 12.3/11.7 months respectively, of which hazard ratio was 0.973 (95% CI, 0.797-1.187) and 1.239 (95% CI, 0.819-1.874). Interaction P value was 0.3004.Conclusion
S-1 plus cisplatin is a standard first-line chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced NSCLC both non-Sq and Sq histology. Favorable toxicity profile of the SP regimen and encouraging outcome in patients with non-Sq prompted us to conduct a prospective study of SP plus BEV and maintenance S-1 BEV for non-SQ currently underway.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.06 - Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine (G)/Carboplatin (C) with or without Iniparib (I) in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Stage IV Squamous Lung Cancer (ID 3322)
11:25 - 11:35 | Author(s): D. Spigel, E.S. Kim, T. Lynch, M. McCleod, D. Waterhouse, L. Paz-Ares, P. Harper, J. Hainsworth, F. De Marinis, F. Kabbinavar, R. Rosell, M.A. Socinski, A. Vergnenegre, I. Garcia-Ribas, H. Burris, F.A. Shepherd
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Iniparib is an agent originally thought to function as an inhibitor of the DNA repair enzyme PARP-1, which is overexpressed in squamous lung cancers. Promising phase II activity and safety were reported with iniparib in combination with GC in pts with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (O’Shaughnessy, NEJM 2011); however, subsequent phase III data were negative. Further study of iniparib’s mechanism of action suggests that this agent induces DNA damage, cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase, and potentiates DNA-damaging chemotherapies not through PARP inhibition. Herein we report the final results from an international Phase III trial (NCT01082549) of first-line chemotherapy and iniparib in pts with advanced squamous lung cancer.Methods
Pts were randomized 1:1 to GC or GCI. All pts received G 1000 mg/m[2] IV days (D) 1 and 8, and C AUC=5 IV D1 of each 21-D cycle. Iniparib was dosed 5.6 mg/kg IV D 1, 4, 8, and 11. All pts were assessed for response per RECIST 1.1 every 6 weeks. Pts without evidence of progressive disease (PD) or other reason for discontinuation could remain on treatment beyond 6 cycles. Accrual of 780 pts provides 89% power to detect an improvement in survival from 8 months (mos) anticipated with GC to 10.7 mos with GCI (HR of 0.75). Eligibility: Pts with newly diagnosed stage IV (M1a and M1b) squamous lung cancer, ECOG PS 0-1. Exclusion criteria included: history of recent cardiac disease, untreated brain metastases, and treatment for early-stage lung cancer within 12 months of study entry. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Interim analyses for safety and futility were performed by an independent data safety monitoring board.Results
780 pts were enrolled and randomized (GC, 390), (GCI, 390) from March 2010 to May 2012. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups (GC/GCI): median age 66 years (21-86); 74%/73% male; 30%/33% ECOG 0; 28%/33% current smokers; 66%/62% past smokers. The median number of cycles for GC/GCI were 4 (1-26)/5 (1-32). Dose reductions, dose intensity, and discontinuations due to tumor progression or adverse events were similar in both arms. The median OS for GC/GCI was 8.9 v. 8.9 months, HR 1.08 (0.92-1.28), p=.348. 1-year OS was 41 v. 40%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for GC vs GCI was 4.9 v. 4.8 months, HR 0.99 (0.83-1.19), p=.92. The objective response rate (ORR) for GC v GCI was 34 v. 32%, p=.648. The safety profile was similar in both arms; anemia (28/26%), neutropenia (31/35%), thrombocytopenia (27/28%), and fatigue (6/9%).Conclusion
The addition of iniparib did not improve the efficacy of GC in the treatment of pts with advanced squamous lung cancer. Further development of iniparib in squamous lung cancer is not recommended.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.07 - Final results of CTONG 0806: a phase II trial comparing pemetrexed with gefitinib as second-line treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR (ID 1920)
11:35 - 11:45 | Author(s): Q. Zhou, Y. Cheng, M. Zhao, J. Yang, H. Yan, L. Zhang, Y. Song, J. Chen, W. Feng, C. Xu, Y. Wu, C.T.O.G. (ctong)
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Both Pemetrexed and gefitinib are standard second-line treatments for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in East Asia. The CTONG 0806, a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy of pemetrexed versus gefitinib as second-line treatment in advanced non-squamous NSCLC with wild-type EGFR.Methods
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and with wild-type EGFR detected by direct sequencing were randomized to receive gefitinib orally 250 mg/day (G arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m[2] iv day 1 every 21 days (P arm) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included 4-month and 6-month PFS rate, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life and safety. Independent Review Committee (IRC) evaluated all pictorial data.Results
From Feb. 2009 to Aug. 2012, 161 patients were enrolled and 157 were evaluable (81 in G arm and 76 in P arm). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. The primary endpoint of median PFS was met with 4.8 months in P arm versus 1.6 months in G arm（HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40~0.75, P<0.001), which was confirmed by IRC evaluation (5.6 vs. 1.7 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38~0.75, P<0.001). Significant difference between two arms was also seen in terms of 4-month PFS rate, 6-month PFS rate and DCR (Table 1). Median OS showed the trend of superiority in P arm (12.4 vs. 9.6 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49 ~ 1.04, P=0.077). In 108 patients having enough tumor tissue, EGFR mutation status was tested again by Scorpion amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) and 32 were found to be positive. In 76 patients with wild-type EGFR confirmed by ARMS (35 in P arm and 41 in G arm), median PFS was 4.0 vs. 1.3 months (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26~0.67, P<0.001). More skin rash and diarrhea were seen in G arm while more fatigue and ALT increase were in P arm. CTCAE grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 12.3% in G arm and 32.9% in P arm (P=0.002). The detailed survival analysis and biomarkers analysis will be presented on the ground.Table1. Efficacy of pemetrexed and gefitinib evaluated by investigators and IRC
Evaluated by Investigators Evaluated by IRC Pemetrexed arm Gefitinib arm P Pemetrexed Gefitinib arm P PFS 4.8months 1.6months <0.001 5.6months 1.7months <0.001 HR 0.54，95% CI 0.40 ~ 0.75 HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38 ~ 0.75 4-month PFS rate 59.0% 33.0% <0.001 62.0% 37.0% <0.001 6-month PFS rate 43.0% 23.0% <0.001 48.0% 27.0% <0.001 ORR 13.2% 13.6% 0.938 14.5% 12.3% 0.695 DCR 60.5% 29.6% <0.001 61.9% 30.8% <0.001 OS 12.4months 9.6months 0.077 HR 0.72，95% CI 0.49 ~ 1.04 Conclusion
CTONG0806 is the first trial to show significant improvement in PFS, DCR and a trend of improving OS with pemetrexed compared with gefitinib in second-line setting for EGFR wild-type advanced non-squamous NSCLC.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O15.08 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3941)
11:45 - 12:00 | Author(s): J.S. Lee
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
O27 - Clinical Trials and Practice (ID 142)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Oral Abstract Session
- Track: Other Topics
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:J.S. Lee, J. Bishop
- Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 16:15 - 17:45, Bayside Auditorium A, Level 1
-
+
O27.04 - DISCUSSANT (ID 4014)
16:45 - 17:00 | Author(s): G. Richardson
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
