Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

R. Corre



Author of

  • +

    O15 - NSCLC - Chemotherapy II (ID 109)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      O15.03 - Phase III, randomized, multicenter study comparing in elderly patients (≥70 years) with stage IV non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a standard strategy of treatment allocation (carboplatin based bi-therapy or monotherapy with docetaxel) based on performance status (PS) and age with an experimental strategy allocating the same chemotherapies or best supportive care (BSC) according to a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) - Study ESOGIA-GFPC-GECP 08-02. (ID 694)

      10:50 - 11:00  |  Author(s): R. Corre

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Incidence of advanced NSCLC in the elderly is increasing. The use of a CGA is recommended to detect the patient’s vulnerability but its integration in treatment decision making has never been prospectively evaluated. The main objective of this study was to show that, compared to a standard strategy based on PS and age, the use of a CGA can improve the management of NSCLC in first line.

      Methods
      Randomized, multicentric, prospective phase III study in patients ≥70 y, PS 0-2 with stage IV NSCLC. We compared in arm A a standard algorithm of chemotherapy allocation based on PS and age: carboplatin based doublet in PS≤1 and age ≤75y, mono-therapy in PS =2 or age >75y with in arm B an experimental strategy of treatment allocation based on CGA: carboplatin based doublet for fit patients, mono-therapy for vulnerable patients and BSC for frail patients. Carboplatin (AUC5,d1), was associated to pemetrexed (500 mg/m2,d1) in non-squamous tumors and to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, d1-8) in squamous tumors, monotherapy was docetaxel 38 mg/m2 (d1-8). Four cycles of chemotherapy were to be given every three weeks. The main endpoint was time to failure treatment (TTF=duration between the date of randomization and the date the patient was withdrawn from treatment for any reason (progression, toxicity, death), secondary endpoints were Overall Response Rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL), survival adjusted on QoL .

      Results
      493 patients were randomized from 01/2010 to 01/2013 by 45 centers. Patients characteristics were: male: 74%, median age: 77 (70-91) years, non-squamous histology: 71.8%, PS 0-1: 81.4%, ADL<6:13.9%, IADL<4:27.5%, Charlson’s index ≥2: 23%, score GDS 5≥3:2.5%. The 2 arms were well-balanced for patients characteristics except for ADL<6 (17.4% in arm A vs 10.3% in arm B). Respectively in arms A and B, 34.4% and 47% patients received a carboplatin based doublet, 65.6% and 31.5% received docetaxel and in arm B 21.5% received BSC. There was no significant difference in terms of TTF, respectively for arm A and arm B: median TTF was 99 days (d), 95%CI:[89; 126] vs. 98 d, 95%CI:[81;135], p=0.7149 and in terms of mOS: 196 d in arm A, 95%CI [171;231] vs. 185 d in arm B ,95%CI [148;235], p=0.7784. All grades toxicities were significantly less frequent in arm B than in arm A (93% vs.86.2%, p=0.016), but there was no difference in terms of grade 3-4 toxicities. All the secondary endpoints data will be updated at time of the meeting.

      Conclusion
      this large phase III study failed to show a superiority of a CGA based strategy of treatment allocation in terms of TTF. In experimental arm, 21.5% of frail patients according to Balducci’s criteria were enrolled and received an exclusive BSC management. Carboplatin-based doublets with pemetrexed and gemcitabine according to histology are feasible with a good profile of tolerance in selected elderly patients. This study will help to precise the most relevant geriatric tools and their cut-off in order to improve the management of the elderly with advanced NSCLC.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    O16 - NSCLC - Targeted Therapies III (ID 115)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      O16.03 - Cost-utility analysis of first-line treatment with erlotinib versus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): economic analysis of EURTAC trial (ID 1100)

      10:50 - 11:00  |  Author(s): R. Corre

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      The impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC is poorly documented. Two studies (Jacob et al, ISPOR2010, Brown et al, Health Technol Assess, 2010) are based on modelisation and indirect comparisons. The present study reports a cost-utility analysis of a phase III randomized trial (EURTAC).

      Methods
      A three state Markov model (first line PFS, second line PD and death) was built. Clinical data and resource assessment (drugs, drug administration, adverse events, second-line treatment) were collected from the trial. Utility values were derived from Nafees et al, as previously published (Vergnenegre et al. JTO 2011). Incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were calculated for the first-line treatment and the overall strategy until death from the perspective of different countries (2013 actualized euros). Sensitivity analyses researched the main cost drivers.

      Results
      The quality-adjusted life-years gained was 0.124 with erlotinib, which showed an improvement in the quality of life for these patients. Despite the extra treatment costs of second-line erlotinib in the chemotherapy arm, there was a cost benefit for erlotinib first, resulting in fewer patients receiving second-line pemetrexed along with other therapy. Cost gain in favor of first-line erlotinib was 8,918 Euros. The main results are depicted in Table1.

      First-line erlotinib First-line chemotherapy
      Average cost of first-line (euros 2013)
      Drugs 21,679 1030
      Administration 329 4,455
      Adverse events 546 2,686
      Cost of post-first progression care 40,467 67,281
      ICUR (erlotinib versus chemotherapy)
      ICUR France negative
      ICUR Spain negative
      ICUR Italy negative
      Sensitivity analyses will be presented at the meeting.

      Conclusion
      ICUR favored first-line erlotinib in EGFR-mutant patients with advanced NSCLC, which is the widely accepted treatment compared to chemotherapy. The cost-utility of the overall strategy remained beneficial in three different European countries. On behalf GFCP,GEPC and AIOT groups

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.10 - Poster Session 2 - Chemotherapy (ID 207)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.10-013 - Randomized non comparative multicenter phase II study of sequential erlotinib with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of first line chemotherapy (TARSEQ): a GFPC 10.02 study. (ID 972)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): R. Corre

      • Abstract

      Background
      Erlotinib and docetaxel are approved in second line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Concomitant administration of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKi) of EGFR with standard chemotherapy in first line did not improve survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Preliminary studies support a possible efficacy of sequential administration of EGFR TKi and chemotherapy. Objective: This open randomized phase II trial (Tarseq) was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of second-line sequential erlotinib plus docetaxel in advanced NSCLC.

      Methods
      Patients were randomized (1/1, stratified by center, disease status: recurrent or refractory (no response observed after 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy))between sequential erlotinib 150 mg/d (day 2-16) + docetaxel (75 mg /m2 d1- 21) (arm A) versus docetaxel (75mg/m2 d1) alone (arm B) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the rate of patients with progression-free survival at 15 weeks (PFS15) ; second endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and tolerability. Main eligibility criteria were advanced NSCLC, EGFR wild type or unknown, performance status 0 to 2, failure of first line cisplatin based chemotherapy; main exclusion criteria were more than 2 lines of treatment, previous anti-EGFR or docetaxel treatment. Statistical analysis was based on a Simon’s optimal two stage design . The primary endpoint is rejected if the number of efficacy is less 33 over 66 pts (25+ 41) at the end of the two stages.

      Results
      147 patients were randomized by 33 centers: median age: 60 ± 8 years, PS 0/1/2 (44/83/20 pts) ; male: 78%, EGFR status: wild type 66%, unknown: 34%; recurrent patients: 65% (arms A/B :66%/65%), nonsquamous: 86% (arms A/B : 84%/90%), smoking status: smokers 35%, formers 57,5%, never 7,5%. Baseline characteristics were balanced between 2 arms. In ITT, the primary objective was not meet with 18/66 pts without progression at 15 weeks in arm A, 17 /66 pts in arm B. In arm A and B, median PFS was 2,2 (CI95% 1,6-2,8) and 2,5 (CI 95% 1,7-2,8) months and median OS was 6,6 (CI 95% 4,3-10,3) and 8,4 (CI 95% 4,5-11,3) months respectively. Toxicity was acceptable in both arms with 60.2 % and 54% of G3/4 toxicity in arms A and B, respectively.

      Conclusion
      The sequential combination of erlotinib with docetaxel did not demonstrate any benefit in second-line treatment of EGFR wild type or unknown advanced NSCLC, despite acceptable toxicity. The Pharmacological hypothesis of synergism between erlotinib given sequentially and standard chemotherapy is not confirmed in the present study. Clinical trial information: NCT01350817 / Supported by an academic grant from Roche, Chugai, Sanofi Aventis,with the help of clinical research direction ( Limoges University Hospital)

  • +

    P3.10 - Poster Session 3 - Chemotherapy (ID 210)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.10-041 - Impact of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment on management strategies in elderly patients with advanced no small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a polled analysis of two phase 2 prospective study of the GFPC group. (ID 2418)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): R. Corre

      • Abstract

      Background
      The impact of a systematic use of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) on management strategies in elderly patients with no small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not well established. The objective of this study was to analyze if items of CGA may predict overall survival of elderly patients with NSCLC treated by chemotherapy or erlotinib in first or second lines setting.

      Methods
      Individuals data’s of GFPC 0504 study (population of fit elderly patients) and GFPC 0505 study (population of frail elderly patients) were pooled. The aim of these two prospective phase 2 trials were to compare a strategy using chemotherapy (doublet in fit patients, monotherapy in frail patients) in first line followed by erlotinib in second line to the reverse strategy (erlotinib in first line, followed by chemotherapy), in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in second line period. Secondary outcomes were to compare first-line PFS, overall survival (OS), tolerance and costs. All patients had a complete comprehensive geriatric assessment, evaluating diverse areas as functional status, nutritional status, cognition, psychological functioning, and social support, at randomization. Predictive factors associated with OS were searched using Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank tests in the univariate analysis. A Cox model was used for the multivariate analysis.

      Results
      195 patients were included. Mean age was 77 years. 135 (70%) patients were males, 172 (89%) were stage IV and 109 (56%) were no or ex-smokers. At CGA assessment, 176 patients (70%) had an IADLD score of 3 or 4, 129 pts (66%) had a 0 or 1Charlson score, 167 pts (86%) had a simplified Charlson score < 8, 19 pts had a MMS score < 30, 146 pts (75%) had a situational score >10, 33 (17%) had a nutritional score <8. Factors predicting OS in the univariate analysis were 1-3 PS scores (1.5 [1.1 – 2.0], p=0.01); no or ex-smoker (0.70 [0.52–0.95], p = 0.02); 2-4 Charlson score (2.0 [1.4 – 2.7], p<0.0001, Simplified Charlson score ≥ 8 (1.50 [1.10–2.07],p=0.03), nutritional score>8 (0.60 [0.42 – 0.91], p= 0.01); 2 level mobility score (0.15 [0.04 – 0.62], p = 0.009). In the multivariate analysis, remained 1-3 PS (1.4 [1.02 – 1.9], p = 0.04), 2-4 Charlson score (1.46 [1.07 – 1.99], p=0.02), >8 nutritional score (0.69 [0.46 – 1.04], p= 0.07), level 2 mobility score level (0.25 [0.06 – 1.01], p = 0.06)

      Conclusion
      Comorbidities, nutritional and mobility scores, in this specific elderly population are predictive of OS. Prospective studies using large prospective cohort are needed to better select the more relevant management for elderly with advance NSCLC.