Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

K. Kubota



Author of

  • +

    MO13 - SCLC I (ID 118)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO13.08 - A pilot study of adjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin for completely resected high grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinona (Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung cancer) (ID 1562)

      11:15 - 11:20  |  Author(s): K. Kubota

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are recognized as high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung. In patients with completely resected HGNEC, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered. However, the optimum chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. We conducted a multicenter single-arm phase II trial to evaluate irinotecan and cisplatin in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for HGNEC patients.

      Methods
      Patients with completely resected stage I- IIIA HGNEC received 4 cycles of irinotecan (60 mg/m[2], day 1, 8, 15) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m[2], day 1). This regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. Other eligibility criteria included ECOG PS 0–1, age 20, and <75 years old, adequate organ function, and no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Patients with UGT1A1 polymorphisms (homozygous for *6 or *28, or simultaneously heterozygous *6 and *28), associated with irinotecan-related severe toxicity, were excluded. The primary endpoint was the rate of completion of chemotherapy (defined as underwent 3 or 4 cycles), and secondary endpoints were 3-year relapse free survival (RFS), rate of 3-year survival and toxicities.

      Results
      Forty patients were enrolled between September 2007 and April 2010. Patients’ characteristics were as follows: median age (range) 65 (45-73) years; male 85%; ECOG-PS 1 60%; LCNEC 57% and SCLC 43%; stage IA/IB/IIB/IIIA 32/35/8/5%; 95% received lobectomy. The rate of completion of chemotherapy was 83% (90% C.I.; 71-90%). The rate of overall survival at 3 years was estimated at 81%, and of RFS at 3 years was 74%. The rates of overall survival and RFS at 3 years were 86% and 74% among 23 LCNEC patients, and 74%, 76% among 17 SCLC patients, respectively. Nineteen patients (48%) experienced grade 3 or 4 neutrophils, but only five patients (13%) developed febrile neutropenia. Two patients (5%) developed grade 3 diarrhea, and 4 patients (10%) had grade 3 nausea. No treatment related deaths were observed in this study. All 40 specimens were also diagnosed as HGNEC at pathological central review among 7 pathologists. There were two specimens that showed the difference in between institutional diagnosis and central pathological diagnosis.

      Conclusion
      The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was feasible and possibly efficacious for resected HGNEC.In Japan, a randomized phase III trial is ongoing to evaluate adjuvant chemotherapy of irinotecan and cisplatin, compared with etoposide and cisplatin, for completely resected HGNEC.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    MO25 - NSCLC - Combined Modality Therapy II (ID 112)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Mesothelioma
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO25.11 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3948)

      11:30 - 11:45  |  Author(s): K. Kubota

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    MO27 - Patient Centred Care (ID 141)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Nurses
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO27.03 - Rapport between cancer patients and physicians is a critical issue for patients' satisfaction with treatment decision. (ID 1530)

      10:40 - 10:45  |  Author(s): K. Kubota

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Cancer patients' satisfaction with their treatment decision has been proven to be associated with improved health outcome, but few studies have been conducted in Japan. Doctor-centered medicine has been prevailing in the area of cancer treatment in Japan. It has been common among Japanese physicians to withhold "bad news" from patients. Several studies have reported that cancer patients were dissatisfied with this situation and desired to participate in the decision -making on their cancer treatments. Such trends led to the enactment of Cancer Control Act in 2006.The purpose of this law was to establish an environment in which cancer patients were informed about their diagnosis ,and allowed to participate in making decision on their treatment. In this study we hypothesized that cancer patients' satisfaction with their treatment can enhance their psychological outcomes. Furthermore, we hypothesized that cancer patients' satisfaction with their treatment was associated with a rapport established by patient-centered communication with their caregivers. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 576 Japanese cancer patients.

      Methods
      We conducted cross-sectional questionnaire surveys among patients who had received cancer treatment. One source was inpatients of a Cancer Center Hospital, and the other a website of Japan's biggest newspaper. The questionnaire included demographics, and general self-rated life status such as peace of mind, quality of life, daily activities, family relationships, rapport with attending physician, assessment of physician's explanations and feeling of happiness during the previous week.

      Results
      Of 576 participants who responded, 383 subjects were satisfied and 193 dissatisfied. The dissatisfied group included more females and fewer mandatory retired subjects than did the satisfied group. The patients in the more satisfied group had a more favorable subjective opinion on their recent life. Assessment of physician's role showed significant differences between the two groups; the patients in the satisfied group felt more than those in the dissatisfied group that the doctor's explanations of treatment were sufficient and were satisfied with the rapport with their doctors. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that rapport with their doctors showed a significant odds ratio (3.79, 95% CI, 2.25-6.39).

      Conclusion
      Cancer patients' well-being is associated with treatment satisfaction. Rapport between physicians and patients is the most important key factor for patients' satisfaction with their treatment decision.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    O15 - NSCLC - Chemotherapy II (ID 109)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      O15.05 - Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 plus Cisplatin versus Docetaxel plus Cisplatin for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (TCOG0701): Subgroup Analysis. (ID 1895)

      11:15 - 11:25  |  Author(s): K. Kubota

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) is the only third-generation regimen that has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in overall survival and QOL by head-to-head comparison with a second-generation regimen (vindesine plus cisplatin) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) has shown activity and good tolerability in phase II settings. Molecularly targeted agents including bevacizumab (BEV) have shown activity and safety in non-squamous (non-Sq) NSCLC.

      Methods
      Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, an ECOG PS of 0-1 and adequate organ functions were randomly assigned to receive either oral S-1 80 mg/m[2]/day (40 mg/m[2] b.i.d.) on days 1 to 21 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m[2] on day 8 every 5 weeks or docetaxel 60 mg/m[2 ]on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m[2] on day 1 every 3 weeks, both up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A non-inferiority study design was employed; the upper confidence interval (CI) limit of the hazard ratio (HR) was <1.322. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response, safety, and QOL. Subgroup analysis by histology (non-Sq vs Sq) was conducted.

      Results
      From April 2007 through December 2008, 608 patients were randomly assigned to SP (n=303) or DP (n=305) at 66 sites in Japan. Patient demographics were well balanced between the two groups. Non-Sq and Sq patients in SP/DP arm was 251/247 and 50/48 respectively. Two interim analyses were preplanned. At the final analysis, a total of 480 deaths had occurred. The primary endpoint was met. OS in the SP arm was non-inferior to that in the DP arm (median survival, 16.1 vs. 17.1 months, respectively; HR=1.013; 96.4% confidence interval, 0.837-1.227). PFS was 4.9 months in the SP arm and 5.2 months in the DP arm. The rates of febrile neutropenia (7.4% vs. 1.0%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (73.4% vs. 22.9%), grade 3/4 infection (14.5% vs. 5.3%), and grade 1/2 alopecia (59.3% vs. 12.3%) were significantly lower in the SP arm than in the DP arm. In terms of physical functioning and global functioning on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and lung cancer module (LC-13), QOL was better in the SP arm (repeated measures ANOVA: p<0.01). Subgroup analysis by histology revealed that the median OS of non-Sq and Sq patients in SP/DP group was 17.4/19.1 months and 12.3/11.7 months respectively, of which hazard ratio was 0.973 (95% CI, 0.797-1.187) and 1.239 (95% CI, 0.819-1.874). Interaction P value was 0.3004.

      Conclusion
      S-1 plus cisplatin is a standard first-line chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced NSCLC both non-Sq and Sq histology. Favorable toxicity profile of the SP regimen and encouraging outcome in patients with non-Sq prompted us to conduct a prospective study of SP plus BEV and maintenance S-1 BEV for non-SQ currently underway.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.10 - Poster Session 2 - Chemotherapy (ID 207)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.10-016 - Phase II study of gefitinib and inserted cisplatin plus docetaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutation (ID 1107)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): K. Kubota

      • Abstract

      Background
      Gefitinib yields a longer progression-free survival (PFS) period than platinum-doublet chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutation, but most patients develop resistance against gefitinib after the initial response. We hypothesized that the insertion of platinum-doublet chemotherapy during the initial response could prevent the emergence of acquired resistance and prolong survival, compared with gefitinib monotherapy.

      Methods
      We performed a phase II study of the following first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation. Gefitinib (250 mg) was administrated on days 1-56. After a two-week rest, three cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m[2]) and docetaxel (60 mg/m[2]) were administered on days 71, 92, and 113. Gefitinib was re-started on day 134 and was continued until progression. The primary endpoint was the two-year PFS rate. The sample size was estimated at 33, and this treatment was considered worthy for further development if more than 11 of the 33 patients who started treatment had a 2-year PFS.

      Results
      Thirty-three Japanese patients were enrolled. Twenty-five patients could recieve the second gefitinib, 12 achieved a PFS period of over 2 years, and 7 continued to receive the protocol treatment without experiencing progression. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year estimated PFS rates were 67.0%, 40.2%, and 36.9%, respectively, and the median PFS time was 19.5 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year estimated survival rates were 90.6%, 71.9%, and 64.8%, respectively, and the median survival time had not been reached at the time of analysis. Treatment-related deaths and unexpected severe toxicities were not seen.

      Conclusion
      Our results indicated that first-line treatment consisting of gefitinib and inserted cisplatin plus docetaxel is promising in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation. A phase III study of this treatment compared with gefitinib monotherapy is warranted.

  • +

    P3.11 - Poster Session 3 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 211)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.11-007 - Preliminary safety results of MONET-A: A Prospective, Asian Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Trial of the Investigational agent Motesanib in Combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Asian patients of Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 889)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): K. Kubota

      • Abstract

      Background
      Inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) pathway appears to be an effective treatment strategy for frontline non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but small molecule VEGFR kinase inhibitors have failed to show survival benefit. Motesanib is an orally administrated small molecule antagonist of VEGFR 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and stem cell factor receptor (c-kit). In a subgroup analysis of Asian patients (n = 227) from the global phase 3 study (MONET-1), treatment of motesanib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91), progression free survival (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.79), and overall response rate compared to placebo. To prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of motesanib in Asian patients with NSCLC, this phase 3 study has initiated.

      Methods
      Stage IV/recurrent non-squamous NSCLC patients without prior chemotherapy receive oral motesanib (125 mg) or placebo once daily in combination with paclitaxel (200 mg/m[2]) and carboplatin (AUC = 6) every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles and continue motesanib or placebo until disease progression, consent withdrawal, or unmanageable adverse event. ECOG performance status 0 or 1 are eligible for this study regardless of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status. Patients with untreated or symptomatic central nervous system metastases are excluded. Approximately 400 patients will be randomized in a double-blind 1:1 ratio to motesanib or placebo. Stratification factors include EGFR mutation status, weight loss of ≥ 5% in the previous 6 months, and region. This MONET-A trial will be assessed twice by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC), at the time 50 and 150 patients complete their first cycle for unblinded safety data.

      Results
      This study initiated in July 2012 and is being conducted in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. The enrollment is ongoing. First evaluation by IDMC was performed using the data as of 26 December 2012. A total of 64 patients were enrolled and 63 patients (63 Japanese; median age, 64.5 years) received study treatment. All the blinded patients who received study treatment experienced adverse events (AEs); Grade 3 to 5 AEs were reported in 38 patients (60.3%). Common AEs included alopecia (63.5%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (57.1%), and decreased appetite (50.8%). 7 patients had 8 serious AEs (SAEs). SAEs considered to be related to blinded study drug were cholecystitis in 2 patients, gastric ulcer haemorrhage, nausea, and upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in 1 patient. A treatment-related fatal AE (interstitial lung disease) was reported in one patient (blinded). AEs leading to permanent discontinuation of unblindedunblinded study drug (motesanib or placeco) were cholecystitis (Grade 2), liver injury (Grade 3), purpura (Grade 2), rash (Grade 3), eye haemorrhage (Grade 2), upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (Grade 3), and gamma-glutamyltransferase increased (Grade 4).

      Conclusion
      The first IDMC recommended continuation of the study after the review of unblinded data of 63 patients. Updated safety data will be presented after the second IDMC (JapicCTI-121887).