Virtual Library
Start Your Search
S. Antonia
Author of
-
+
OA 07 - Biomarker for Lung Cancer (ID 659)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Oral
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Philip Christopher Mack, Shinichi Toyooka
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 15:45 - 17:30, Room 503
-
+
OA 07.03a - Impact of Tumor Mutation Burden on the Efficacy of Nivolumab or Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of CheckMate 032 (ID 11063)
16:15 - 16:25 | Author(s): S. Antonia
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
CheckMate 032 is a phase 1/2 clinical trial evaluating nivolumab ± ipilimumab in solid tumors, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Initial results have shown durable responses and encouraging survival, with benefit seen regardless of PD-L1 status. There is a need for improved biomarkers in SCLC. SCLC is nearly universally found in smokers and is characterized by high tumor mutation burden (TMB). The association of high TMB and clinical benefit from nivolumab ± ipilimumab in patients with SCLC was evaluated in an exploratory analysis of CheckMate 032.
Method:
CheckMate 032 evaluated nivolumab ± ipilimumab in non-randomized and randomized cohorts, which were pooled for this analysis. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was conducted on tumor and matched blood samples. TMB was defined as the total number of nonsynonymous somatic mutations. For the exploratory analyses, patients were equally divided into TMB tertiles (defined as low, medium, and high). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Result:
Among 401 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 211 (53%) had an evaluable TMB result for these analyses (86% of the 246 patients with tissue available to attempt WES). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were similar between the ITT and TMB-evaluable populations. In TMB-evaluable patients treated with nivolumab (n=133), objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS were improved in the high TMB cohort vs the medium and low TMB cohorts (ORR: 21.3% vs 6.8% and 4.8%; 1-year PFS: 21.2% vs 3.1% and not calculable; 1-year OS: 35.2% vs 26.0% and 22.1%). Similar benefits were seen in TMB-evaluable patients treated with nivolumab + ipilimumab (n=78) in the high vs medium and low TMB cohorts (ORR: 46.2% vs 16.0% and 22.2%; 1-year PFS: 30.0% vs 8.0% and 6.2%; 1-year OS 62.4% vs 19.6% and 23.4%).
Conclusion:
In patients with SCLC, efficacy with nivolumab ± ipilimumab was enhanced in those with high TMB. Among patients with high TMB, ORR and 1-year OS rates were approximately double with nivolumab + ipilimumab compared with nivolumab monotherapy. TMB has a potential role as a biomarker in lung cancer. Optimization of TMB cutoff and prospective investigation are warranted.Acknowledgements: All authors contributed to and approved the abstract; writing and editorial assistance was provided by Beth Burke, PhD, CMPP, of Evidence Scientific Solutions, funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01928394
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA 17 - Immunotherapy II (ID 683)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Oral
- Track: Immunology and Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Yuichiro Ohe, Anne Tsao
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 14:30 - 16:15, Room 301 + 302
-
+
OA 17.03 - First-Line Nivolumab plus Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy for Advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 012 3-Year Update (ID 9043)
14:50 - 15:00 | Author(s): S. Antonia
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is the standard-of-care first-line treatment for most patients with advanced NSCLC, but responses are not durable (~4.5–6 mo). Chemotherapy may sensitize NSCLC tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nivolumab, a fully human programmed death (PD)-1 antibody, demonstrated long-term survival benefit in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. Here we report the 3-year update of safety and efficacy of first-line nivolumab combined with chemotherapy in the phase 1 CheckMate 012 study (NCT01454102).
Method:
Chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned based on histology in 3 cohorts combining nivolumab Q3W with 3 platinum-based doublet chemotherapy regimens: nivolumab 10 mg/kg + gemcitabine-cisplatin (all squamous histology), nivolumab 10 mg/kg + pemetrexed-cisplatin (all non-squamous), and nivolumab 10 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg + paclitaxel-carboplatin (any histology). After 4 cycles of nivolumab plus chemotherapy, patients received nivolumab monotherapy until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was safety. ORR, PFS, and OS were secondary/exploratory endpoints.
Result:
56 patients were treated. Median age was 63.5 years, 46% were male, and 14% were never-smokers; 29% of tumors had squamous histology. At database lock (September 19, 2016) the minimum follow-up was 45.5 mo. Median duration of chemotherapy treatment was ~12 weeks (4 cycles; range: 3–18 weeks) and median duration of nivolumab treatment was 17–22 weeks across cohorts (range: 3–204). No new safety signals were observed in patients receiving nivolumab maintenance compared with the September 2014 database lock. ORR was 46%. Median duration of response was 10.4 mo (95% CI: 5.1, 26.3). Median PFS was 6.0 mo (95% CI: 4.8, 8.3). Median OS was 19.2 mo (95% CI: 14.1, 23.8), and the 3-year OS rate was 25%. ORR and OS were similar in patients with tumor PD-L1 expression <1% (n=23) vs ≥1% (n=23): ORR 48% vs 52%; median OS 19.2 mo (95% CI: 12.2, 23.8) vs 20.2 mo (95% CI: 10.9, 27.2). The 3-year OS rate was 22% in both PD-L1 expression subgroups.
Conclusion:
Nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in prolonged survival in a subset of patients, with a 3-year OS rate of 25%. In all patients, ORR and OS were similar irrespective of tumor PD-L1 expression. These results support further evaluation of nivolumab-chemotherapy combinations as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, which are being explored in CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826).
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.02 - Biology/Pathology (ID 616)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.02-030 - Bavituximab in Combination With Nivolumab Enhances Tumor Immune Response in a 3D Ex Vivo System of Lung Cancer Patients (ID 8683)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): S. Antonia
- Abstract
Background:
Bavituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) exposed on endothelial cells and cancer cells in solid tumors. Our previous studies showed that bavituximab enhances the activation of CD8+ TILs that correlates with increased cytokine production by lymphoid and myeloid cells in lung cancer with low PD-L1 expression suggesting that the interruption of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis by nivolumab may enhance the bavituximab effect in tumors.
Method:
Fresh tumor tissues obtained from consented patients with NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma or renal cell carcinoma at the time of surgical resection were utilized in a proprietary 3D ex vivo tumor miscrosphere assay, where 3D tumor microspheres were treated with bavituximab or nivolumab alone or in combination at 10 mg/ml for 36 hours. At the end of the treatment, a multiplex human cytokine assay was used to simultaneously analyze the differential secretion of cytokines, including human IFNg, in culture media as a surrogate of TIL activation. In addition, gene expression analysis of microspheres was performed using the NanoString PanCancer Immune Profiling panel which contains probes to quantitate 770 immune function genes.
Result:
Preliminary results indicate the combination treatment with bavituximab and nivolumab led to increased expression of genes involved in M1 polarization of tumor associated macrophages in a subpopulation of lung tumors that closely correlated with release of cytokines such as MIP1b (CCL4) which is a chemoattractant for natural killer cells, monocytes and a variety of other cells involved in tumor immune response.
Conclusion:
This lung patient derived ex-vivo approach indicates that bavituximab in combination with nivolumab may enhance immune response. This response likely involves M1 polarization of tumor associated macrophages and suggests potential clinical implications in the treatment of lung cancer.
-
+
P3.07 - Immunology and Immunotherapy (ID 723)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Immunology and Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.07-012 - Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Liver Metastases (ID 8484)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): S. Antonia
- Abstract
Background:
Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have metastasis to the liver have poor prognosis. The phase 3 trials CheckMate 017 and 057 demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and a favorable safety profile with nivolumab, an anti-programmed death-1 antibody, versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced squamous and non-squamous NSCLC, respectively. A prior subgroup analysis from these trials evaluated and demonstrated efficacy and safety with nivolumab in patients with asymptomatic central nervous system metastases (Goldman J. ASCO 2016). Here we report subgroup analyses from these trials of patients with baseline liver metastases.
Method:
In both trials, patients were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg/m[2] every 3 weeks until progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint of each study was OS. Patients from CheckMate 017 and 057 with baseline liver metastases reported as either target or non-target lesions were identified and pooled across studies by treatment.
Result:
Baseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with liver metastases randomized to nivolumab (n=99) and docetaxel (n=94). In the nivolumab group, 26% of patients had squamous and 74% had non-squamous NSCLC; in the docetaxel group, 36% had squamous and 64% had non-squamous NSCLC. The minimum follow-up was 24.2 months (Feb 2016 database locks). Nivolumab resulted in improved OS compared with docetaxel in patients with liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR]=0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50, 0.91), similar to findings from the ITT group (HR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.84). Median OS in patients with liver metastases was 6.83 months with nivolumab versus 5.93 months with docetaxel, both of which were lower than those observed in the overall pooled intent-to-treat (ITT) population (11.14 months vs 8.11 months). Two-year OS rates were 18% with nivolumab versus 6% with docetaxel in patients with liver metastases. Rates of grade 3−4 treatment-related adverse events in patients with liver metastases were lower with nivolumab compared with docetaxel (7% vs 53%), and similar to those in the ITT population (10% vs 55%).
Conclusion:
The lower median OS observed in this subgroup of patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC and baseline liver metastases corroborates previous findings that metastasis to the liver is an unfavorable prognostic factor. However, nivolumab demonstrated sustained OS benefit versus docetaxel in these patients, similar to the ITT population. The safety profile of nivolumab was favorable versus docetaxel in this subgroup, with no new safety concerns identified.
