Virtual Library
Start Your Search
J.Y. Lee
Author of
-
+
MINI 05 - EGFR Mutant Lung Cancer 1 (ID 103)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Y. Yatabe, R. Perez-Soler
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, Mile High Ballroom 2a-3b
-
+
MINI05.06 - A Phase Ib/II Study of Afainib plus Nimotuzumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Acquired Resistance to Gefitinib or Erlotinib (ID 667)
17:15 - 17:20 | Author(s): J.Y. Lee
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Afatinib (A) is a potent irreversible EGFR TKI and nimotuzumab (N) is a humanized anti-EGFR mAb. In this phase Ib/II study, we aimed to assess the safety and activity of A plus N in advanced NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib.
Methods:
Major inclusion criteria were advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutation or disease control for at least six months with previous gefitinib or erlotinib therapy. In the phase Ib study using classic 3+3 dose escalation method, patients were treated with A 40mg/d or 30mg/d in combination with N 100mg/w or 200mg/w. One cycle was composed of 4 weeks of treatment. In the phase II study, patients were treated with A plus N in the level of RP2D defined in the phase Ib study.
Results:
Overall, fifty pts were enrolled and treated: 13 in phase Ib and 37 in phase II. At the starting dose level (A 40mg/d + N 100mg/w), one out of 6 pts experienced end-of-cycle 1 DLT (G3 diarrhea), and the dose was up to the next level of A 40mg/d + N 200mg/w. Out of 6 pts at this level, 2 pts experienced DLTs (G3 diarrhea and G3 neutropenia, respectively), and RP2D was accordingly determined as A 40mg/d + N 100mg/w. In the whole treatment duration of the phase II, there was no treatment related death and 10 pts (20%) experienced any grade 3 adverse event, including diarrhea and skin rash. Out of evaluable 50 pts in the phase Ib/II study, the response rate was 36% (18 achieved partial response out of 50) and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI:3.2-5.5 months).
Conclusion:
A and N showed an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MINI 26 - Circulating Tumor Markers (ID 148)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:M. Macmanus, C. Aggarwal
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, 205+207
-
+
MINI26.11 - Longitudinal Monitoring of EGFR Mutations in Plasma of EGFR Mutant NSCLC Patients Treated with EGFR TKIs: Korean Lung Cancer Consortium (ID 1130)
17:40 - 17:45 | Author(s): J.Y. Lee
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is mainly based on tissue biopsy, which is invasive and time consuming. Furthermore, there is still a need for serial monitoring of EGFR mutations and detection of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resistance. We hypothesized that plasma-based EGFR mutation analysis may be feasible for monitoring response to EGFR TKIs and could be used to predict the resistance.
Methods:
From January 2012 to October 2014, 200 EGFR mutant NSCLC patients were enrolled and treated with EGFR TKIs (141 patients for gefitinib, 46 patients for erlotinib, and 13 patients for afatinib). Plasma samples were prospectively obtained every 2 months from baseline until disease progression. The longitudinally collected plasma samples (n = 368) from 81 patients who progressed were analyzed using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). We identified an association between serial EGFR mutant titers in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples and the patient’s clinical response to EGFR TKIs.
Results:
Of a total 58 baseline cfDNA samples available for ddPCR, 43 (74%) samples demonstrated same mutation in the matched tumors (i.e. sensitivity: 70.8% (17/24) for L858R vs 76.5% (26/34) for exon 19 deletions). The concordance rate of plasma with tissue results of EGFR mutation was 88% for L858R and 86% for exon 19 deletion, respectively. Of the 54 patients with both before and after treatment plasma samples, 40 patients showed a dramatic decrease of mutant copies (greater than 50%) in blood in the first 2 months after treatment. We also found the secondary mutation (T790M) emerged in 28 patients around 3~13 months after treatment and in 4 patients before the treatment. Elevated circulating mutations (L858R/ex19/T790M) can be detected in 5 patients before disease progression as determined by CT scan.
Conclusion:
These results suggest that ddPCR is an appropriate method for determining plasma-based EGFR mutation status and may aid in monitoring response to EGFR TKIs and early detection of EGFR TKIs resistance.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL 11 - Clinical Trials 1 (ID 100)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Thymoma, Mesothelioma and Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:A.K. Nowak, F. Detterbeck
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 10:45 - 12:15, 702+704+706
-
+
ORAL11.06 - A Prospective Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Cremorphor EL-Free Paclitaxel (Genexol-PM) in Patients with Unresectable Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Can 18F-FDG PET/CT Play a Role? (ID 2221)
11:39 - 11:50 | Author(s): J.Y. Lee
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
We conducted a prospective phase II study of cisplatin plus Cremorphor EL-free paclitaxel (Genexol-PM) in patients with unresectable thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) in order to determine the efficacy and tolerability of the combination.
Methods:
Patients were treated with cisplatin (70 mg/m[2]) and Genexol-PM (230 mg/m[2]) every three weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary end point of this study was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary end points included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), correlation between early [18]F-FDG PET/CT response and PFS, and correlation between baseline FDG uptake and histology.
Results:
Forty-two patients with unresectable thymoma (n=14) or thymic carcinoma (n=28) were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range, 25-77) and 30 (71%) patients were male, and 39 (93%) had an ECOG PS of 1. The median number of treatment cycles was six (range 1-6). For 40 assessable patients, the ORR was 62.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.6-77.4) with rates of 46% (95% CI 23.3-76.9) for advanced thymoma (n=13) and 70% (95% CI 52.0-82.1) for thymic carcinoma (n=27). With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the median PFS was 9.8 months (11.4 months for thymoma vs. 8.1 months for thymic carcinoma, with median follow-ups of 16.1 vs. 15.5 months, respectively). The two-year OS was 77.9% for thymoma and 65.9% for thymic carcinoma. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia in 11 patients (26%). Sixteen (38%) patients experienced grade 2 hypersensitivity reactions. There was no correlation between early PET response and PFS, but tumor histology (thymoma vs. thymic carcinoma) was correlated with SUV~max~ before chemotherapy.
Conclusion:
These data suggest that the combination of cisplatin and Genexol-PM is highly effective and tolerable for the treatment of unresectable TETs, especially in patients with thymic carcinoma.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.04 - Poster Session/ Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing (ID 234)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P2.04-004 - The BIM Deletion Polymorphism in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (ID 1126)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): J.Y. Lee
- Abstract
Background:
A germline BIM deletion polymorphism has been proposed to predict poor treatment response to certain kinase inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the BIM deletion polymorphism predicts treatment efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in Korean patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Methods:
Peripheral blood samples from a total of 205 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with EGFR TKIs between July 2008 and April 2013 were included. The incidence of BIM deletions in these samples was detected by polymerase chain reaction. We compared the clinical outcomes in patients with and without the polymorphism after treatment with EGFR TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib).
Results:
The BIM deletion polymorphism was present in 15.6% (32/205) of patients. One patient was homozygous for the deletion, and the remaining 31 had heterozygous deletions. The majority of patients were < 65 years old (74%), female (68%), never smokers (76%), and had stage IV NSCLC (67%). There were no associations between the BIM deletion polymorphism and clinicopathological features including gender, age, smoking status, histology, stage, and number of metastasis sites. Patients with and without the BIM deletion polymorphism had similar ORRs (91% vs. 84%, P = 0.585). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between patients with and without the BIM deletion polymorphism (median PFS 12 vs. 11 months, P = 0.160; median OS 31 vs. 30 months, P = 0.452). Multivariate analysis identified significantly predictive markers for clinical outcomes of EGFR TKIs including ECOG PS 0-1, adenocarcinoma histology, recurrent disease, and EGFR mutation type. The results were validated in an independent cohort of 69 NSCLC patients.
Conclusion:
It remains to be determined whether the BIM deletion polymorphism provides intrinsic resistance or decreased sensitivity to EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.
