Virtual Library

Start Your Search

F. Detterbeck

Moderator of

  • +

    ORAL 11 - Clinical Trials 1 (ID 100)

    • Event: WCLC 2015
    • Type: Oral Session
    • Track: Thymoma, Mesothelioma and Other Thoracic Malignancies
    • Presentations: 8
    • +

      ORAL11.01 - Bevacizumab 15mg/kg Plus Cisplatin-Pemetrexed (CP) vs CP in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): IFCT-GFPC-0701 MAPS Randomized Phase 3 Trial (ID 2142)

      11:07 - 11:18  |  Author(s): A. Scherpereel, J. Mazières, J. Margery, L. Greillier, C. Audigier-Valette, D. Moro-Sibilot, O. Molinier, R. Corre, I. Monnet, V. Gounant, F. Rivière, H. Janicot, R. Gervais, C. Locher, B. Milleron, Q. Tran, M.P. Lebitasy, C. Creveuil, J. Parienti, F. Morin, G. Zalcman

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      MPM median overall survival (OS) did not exceed 13 months with pemetrexed-platinum doublet, with virtually no surviving patients at 5 years. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a potent mitogen for MPM cells.

      Methods:
      In this French multicenter randomized phase 3 trial, eligible patients had unresectable, histologically proved MPM, age < 76, no prior chemo, PS 0-2, no thrombosis, nor bleeding. Randomized patients (1:1) received pem 500 mg/m2, CDDP 75 mg/m2 at D1, with (arm B) or without bevacizumab (arm A), 15 mg/kg Q21D, for 6 cycles. Arm B non-progressive patients received bevacizumab maintenance therapy until progression or toxicity. Primary endpoint was OS. 445 patients were to be randomized, and 385 events observed, to show a significant OS improvement, with 80% statistical power, 5% a-risk.

      Results:
      From Feb. 2008 to Jan. 2014, 448 patients were included in 73 centers. Males: 75.4%, median age: 65.7 years (range 34.7-75.9), PS 0-1: 96.7%. The IDMC recommended a second interim analysis after 85% of events. On 01-Jan-2015, the duration since last news was < 30 days in 105 out of 106 still living patients. Overall survival was significantly longer in the experimental arm (median: 18.8 months, 95%CI[15.9-22.6] vs. 16.1 months, 95%CI[14.0-17.9] for the reference arm, (adj.HR = 0.76, 95%CI[0.61; 0.94], p = 0.012). With only 46/448 non-progressive patients at the date of analysis, median PFS was 9.6 months, 95%CI[8.5-10.6] in bevacizumab arm vs. 7.5 months, 95%CI[6.8-8.1] (adj.HR = 0.62, 95%CI[0.50-0.75], p < 0.0001). G3-4 hematological toxicities did not significantly differ in the two arms (49.5% vs. 47.3%). Significantly more G3 proteinuria (0.0 vs. 3.1%), G3 hypertension (0.0 vs. 23%), G3-4 arterial thrombotic events (0.0 vs. 2.7%) were observed in bevacizumab arm. QOL and exploratory biomarkers studies will be also presented at time of the meeting.

      Conclusion:
      Bevacizumab addition to pemetrexed/cis-platin provides a significantly longer survival in pts with MPM, with acceptable toxicity, making this triplet a new treatment paradigm.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      ORAL11.02 - Phase I Study of Anti-Mesothelin Antibody Drug Conjugate Anetumab Ravtansine (ID 1574)

      10:45 - 10:56  |  Author(s): R. Hassan, J.C. Bendell, G. Blumenschein, Jr., H.L. Kindler, K.N. Moore, A.D. Santin, S.M. Seward, J. Nemunaitis, P. Rajagopalan, A. Walter, N. Sarapa

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      Anetumab ravtansine (BAY 94-9343) is a novel fully humanized anti-mesothelin IgG1 antibody conjugated to a ravtansine, a maytansine derivative DM4 antitubulin cytotoxic agent. We report results from a phase I study evaluating the safety, PK and tumor response in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors treated with anetumab, with a particular focus on patients with mesothelioma.

      Methods:
      Anetumab was given IV every 21 days (q3w) in 77 pts: 45 pts in 10 dose escalation cohorts from 0.15 to 7.5 mg/kg (21 mesothelioma, 9 pancreatic, 5 breast, 4 ovarian, 6 other), and 32 pts in 2 expansion cohorts (12 mesothelioma and 20 ovarian); 38 pts were treated at MTD in escalation and expansion cohorts (16 mesothelioma, 21 ovarian, 1 breast). Clinical and laboratory safety assessments were made on D1, D8 and D15 in C1-C3 and on D1 in subsequent cycles. Tumor assessments were made q6wks up to C8 and q12wks thereafter. Mesothelin expression in archival tumor samples was assessed retrospecively by IHC (SP74, Ventana).

      Results:
      Thirty-two males and 45 females were treated [mean age 62 yrs (range, 18-84 yrs), body weight 77 kg (44-113 kg), ECOG ≤1, median prior cytotoxic regimens: overall 4 (1-9), mesothelioma 1 (1-4)]. Non-tolerated anetumab dose was 7.5 mg/kg (DLTs: 1 pt with G2 keratitis and G3 neuropathy, 1 pt with G4 keratitis and G2 neuropathy). Anetumab MTD was 6.5 mg/kg (DLT: G3 AST increase). Only one DLT occurred at doses below MTD (G3 hyponatremia, 5.5 mg/kg). No drug-related deaths and few drug-related SAEs (7 total and 5 at MTD) were reported. Seventeen of 38 (45%) pts total or 7 of 16 (44%) mesothelioma pts at MTD had drug-related AE requiring dose reduction (G1-4 keratitis, G2-3 neuropathy, G3 fatigue, anorexia, asthenia, diarrhea, N&V, AST increase). LFT increases were the most common drug-related laboratory abnormality at MTD: AST in 7 pts (2 G3), ALT in 6 pts (no G3), alkaline phosphatase in 4 pts (one G3) and bilirubin increase in 1 pt (no G3). There were no drug-related G3 hematological abnormalities at any dose. Fourteen of 38 (37%) pts total or 4 of 16 (25%) mesothelioma pts at MTD had G1-4 keratitis (worst G3-4 in 3 pts, blurred vision in 10, dose reduction in 8, dose delay in 11, all fully reversible). Anetumab at the MTD showed a PR in 6 pts (19%) and SD in 18 pts (47%) overall. Five of 16 (31%) mesothelioma pts at the MTD had durable PR (>600 days in 4 pts) and 7 (44%) had SD. Five PRs occurred in 11 mesothelioma pts who received anetumab as second line treatment (45% response rate).

      Conclusion:
      Anetumab at the MTD (6.5 mg/kg) showed encouraging efficacy with durable PR in pts with advanced mesothelioma. At the MTD, all drug-related AEs were reversible and non-life-threatening but required dose reduction in about half of pts, most commonly due to G1-4 keratitis and G2-3 peripheral neuropathy. Given this benefit-risk ratio, the recommended phase II dose of anetumab in second line treatment of advanced mesothelioma is 6.5 mg/kg IV q3w.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      ORAL11.03 - Single-Agent Pembrolizumab for Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) (ID 3011)

      10:56 - 11:07  |  Author(s): E.W. Alley, J.H.M. Schellens, A. Santoro, K. Beckey, S.S. Yuan, J. Cheng, B. Piperdi, L..R. Molife

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      Targeting the programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) pathway is a valid therapeutic target in a variety of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) is a potent, highly selective humanized monoclonal antibody against PD-1 and is approved in the United States for the treatment of advanced melanoma that progressed following ipilimumab and, if BRAF[V600] mutant, a BRAF inhibitor. We have previously reported preliminary antitumor response and safety data for pembrolizumab in patients with MPM enrolled in the KEYNOTE-028 study. Here we present updated safety and efficacy data, including survival, for these patients.

      Methods:
      KEYNOTE-028 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02054806) is a nonrandomized, multicohort phase 1b trial of pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1–positive advanced solid tumors. Other key eligibility criteria included measurable disease, failure of standard therapy, ECOG PS 0-1, adequate organ function, and no autoimmune disease or interstitial lung disease. PD-L1 positivity was defined as expression in ≥1% of tumor cells by IHC at a central laboratory. Patients received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1 by investigators every 8 weeks for the first 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter. Primary end point was the ORR. Secondary end points included safety and tolerability and PFS.

      Results:
      Of the 84 patients with MPM screened for PD-L1 expression, 38 (45%) patients had PD-L1–positive tumors. Of these 38 patients, 25 met the eligibility criteria and were treated with pembrolizumab. As of March 20, 2015, ORR is 28% (n = 7); 12 (48%) patients had stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 76%. In the 15 patients with only 1 prior line of therapy, ORR and DCR are 20% and 73%, respectively. Responses are durable, and 10 (40%) patients remain on treatment (duration, 24+ to 36+ weeks). With a median follow-up duration of 8.6 months, median PFS is 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-NR), and the 6-month PFS rate is 49.4%. No new safety signals were observed. 15 (60%) patients experienced a drug-related adverse event (DRAE), including 3 (12%) who experienced grade 3-4 DRAEs. Only 2 patients required dose interruption because of immune-related adverse events (transaminitis and uveitis [n = 1 each]). There was no treatment-related mortality, and no patients discontinued because of DRAEs.

      Conclusion:
      Single-agent pembrolizumab has significant clinical activity in patients with PD-L1–positive MPM. The durability of responses and the 49.4% 6-month PFS rate in this pretreated patient population warrants further investigation. Updated safety and survival data, as well as the correlation of antitumor activity with the level of PD-L1 expression, will be available at the time of presentation.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      ORAL11.04 - Discussant for ORAL11.01, ORAL11.02, ORAL11.03 (ID 3317)

      11:18 - 11:28  |  Author(s): D.A. Fennell

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      ORAL11.05 - Phase II Trial of Single Agent Amrubicin in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Thymic Malignancies (ID 1288)

      11:28 - 11:39  |  Author(s): H.A. Wakelee, S.K. Padda, M. Burns, A.J. Spittler, J.W. Riess, M. San Pedro-Salcedo, K.J. Ramchandran, M.A. Gubens, J.W. Neal, P.J. Loehrer

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      Limited treatment options exist for patients with thymic malignancies (TM), and chemotherapy efficacy is often restricted by cumulative toxicity such as neuropathy (taxanes) and cardiomyopathy (anthracyclines). Single agent amrubicin, a third generation anthracycline and topoisomerase II inhibitor with minimal cardiac toxicity, was investigated in TM pts in this trial.

      Methods:
      This was an open-label single drug trial at 2 institutions. Eligible pts had TM (thymoma (T) or thymic carcinoma (TC)) with progression or relapse after at least 1 prior chemotherapy regimen, and adequate organ function including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of >50%. The initial treatment plan consisted of amrubicin at 40 mg/m[2] IV days 1-3 repeated in 3-week cycles.

      Results:
      From 7/11 to 4/14, a total of 33 patients (14T/19TC) were enrolled. There were 14 women and 19 men; age range of 30-81 years; 9 Asian, 1 African-American, 1 Hispanic and 22 non-Hispanic White pts. A high rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) led to an amended starting dose of 35 mg/m[2] days 1-3 repeated in 3-week cycles. In total, 7 pts experienced FN with 1 related death. Other grade 3/4 related events included: thrombocytopenia (n=2), neutropenia without fever (n=3), hyponatremia (n=2), hypokalemia (n=2), anemia (n=7), lethargy/fatigue (n=7), perirectal abscess (n=2), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (n=3), syncope (n=2), venous embolism (n=2), and 1 pt each with sepsis, oral abscess, mucositis, chest pain, and epigastric pain. Other toxicities were generally mild and well tolerated. No significant changes in LVEF were noted on serial echocardiograms. There were 6 partial responses (4T/2TC), 21 with stable disease, and 4 with progressive disease (PD) or death at or before first assessment for a response rate (RR) of 18% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 88% (29%/11% RR in T vs TC and 100%/78% DCR in T vs TC). All but 5 patients received at least 4 cycles, and 15 tolerated >10 cycles, with 36 cycles as the highest number to date. Five patients remain on therapy.

      Conclusion:
      Amrubicin, at 35 mg/m[2 ]IV days 1-3 on a 3-week cycle, shows promise as a single agent in pre-treated patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma with an 18% RR and no unexpected toxicity. Response rate and disease control rate was higher in the thymoma patients compared to the thymic carcinoma patients. Further exploration of amrubicin as a single drug or in combination is warranted in thymic malignancies.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      ORAL11.06 - A Prospective Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Cremorphor EL-Free Paclitaxel (Genexol-PM) in Patients with Unresectable Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Can 18F-FDG PET/CT Play a Role? (ID 2221)

      11:39 - 11:50  |  Author(s): H.S. Kim, M. Kwak, J.Y. Lee, M. Han, S.H. Lim, H. Song, K.S. Jung, J. Sun, S. Lee, J.S. Ahn, K. Park, M. Ahn

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      We conducted a prospective phase II study of cisplatin plus Cremorphor EL-free paclitaxel (Genexol-PM) in patients with unresectable thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) in order to determine the efficacy and tolerability of the combination.

      Methods:
      Patients were treated with cisplatin (70 mg/m[2]) and Genexol-PM (230 mg/m[2]) every three weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary end point of this study was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary end points included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), correlation between early [18]F-FDG PET/CT response and PFS, and correlation between baseline FDG uptake and histology.

      Results:
      Forty-two patients with unresectable thymoma (n=14) or thymic carcinoma (n=28) were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range, 25-77) and 30 (71%) patients were male, and 39 (93%) had an ECOG PS of 1. The median number of treatment cycles was six (range 1-6). For 40 assessable patients, the ORR was 62.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.6-77.4) with rates of 46% (95% CI 23.3-76.9) for advanced thymoma (n=13) and 70% (95% CI 52.0-82.1) for thymic carcinoma (n=27). With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the median PFS was 9.8 months (11.4 months for thymoma vs. 8.1 months for thymic carcinoma, with median follow-ups of 16.1 vs. 15.5 months, respectively). The two-year OS was 77.9% for thymoma and 65.9% for thymic carcinoma. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia in 11 patients (26%). Sixteen (38%) patients experienced grade 2 hypersensitivity reactions. There was no correlation between early PET response and PFS, but tumor histology (thymoma vs. thymic carcinoma) was correlated with SUV~max~ before chemotherapy.

      Conclusion:
      These data suggest that the combination of cisplatin and Genexol-PM is highly effective and tolerable for the treatment of unresectable TETs, especially in patients with thymic carcinoma.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      ORAL11.07 - Computed Tomography (CT) Characteristics Associated with the Proposed IASLC/ITMIG TNM Pathologic Staging System for Thymoma (ID 1603)

      11:50 - 12:01  |  Author(s): S.K. Padda, D. Terrone, A. Khuong, L. Tian, J.W. Neal, J.W. Riess, M. Berry, A.N. Leung, E.J. Schwartz, J.B. Shrager, H.A. Wakelee

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      Preoperative CT imaging assists in the management of thymic malignancies (TMs), discerning resectability and the need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here, we examine preoperative CT imaging characteristics in relation to the newly proposed IASLC/ITMIG TNM pathologic staging system for TMs.

      Methods:
      Inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were as follows: 1) diagnosis of thymoma, thymic carcinoma, or thymic carcinoid, 2) definitive primary surgery performed at Stanford University, and 3) pretreatment CT imaging available for review. From 01/1997-03/2015, we identified 119 TM patients who had surgery, and 47 TM patients met all inclusion criteria. The most common reason patients were excluded was for either a missing pretreatment CT (outside imaging not routinely uploaded until 2008) or having surgery for biopsy or recurrent disease. The radiologist (D.T.) was blinded to clinical data, and examined baseline CT imaging per the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) standard report terms: contour, calcification, internal density, size of longest diameter, infiltration of mediastinal fat, abutment of mediastinal vessels, vascular endoluminal invasion, abutment/invasion of mediastinal structures, elevated hemidiaphragm, pleural nodules, pleural effusion, mediastinal lymph node enlargement. A univariate analysis and a Lasso regularized general transformation prediction model were performed with all variables to examine the association with pathologic IASLC/ITMIG TNM stage (p<0.05 significant; p<0.10 trend).

      Results:
      Of 47 TM patients, 9 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. IASLC/ITMIG pathologic stage included 35 I, 1 II, 7 IIIA, 2 IIIB, 1 each of IVA and IVB. By T stage, there were 36 T1 (encapsulated or unencapsulated+extension into mediastinal fat or mediastinal pleura), 1 T2 (pericardium), 8 T3 (lung, brachiocephalic vein, SVC, chest wall, phrenic nerve, or hilar pulmonary vessels) and 2 T4 (aorta, arch, main pulmonary artery, myocardium, trachea, or esophagus). Only one patient each had N2 and M1a disease (separate pleural or pericardial nodule). Histologies included 5 A/micronodular thymoma, 13 AB, 5 B1, 14 B2, 5 B3, and 5 C/carcinoid. There was a significant positive association with aggressive histology and higher stage (OR=10.0;p=0.02). The following CT characteristics had a statistically significant positive association with higher stage (stage 1 vs. others, T1 vs. others) in a univariate analysis: lobulated contour, infiltration of mediastinal fat, invasion of mediastinal structures, vascular endoluminal invasion, elevated hemidiaphragm. There was a trend for higher stage with larger size and the presence of calcification. In a prediction model, vascular endoluminal invasion and elevated hemidiaphragm were the most important for predicting higher stage followed by invasion of mediastinal structures>abutment of mediastinal vessels>calcification>lobulated contour> mediastinal lymph node enlargement. When excluding clearly invasive CT characteristics, only abutment of mediastinal vessels was significantly associated with higher stage.

      Conclusion:
      Preoperative CT characteristics, especially those indicating clear invasion, are most useful in delineating more advanced stage disease by ITMIG/IASLC criteria in TMs. Other primary tumor characteristics including contour, calcification, and abutment of mediastinal vessels are moderately helpful. This study is limited by the small sample size, the predominance of stage I disease, the inclusion of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the inherent bias of a definitive surgically treated population.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      ORAL11.08 - Discussant for ORAL11.05, ORAL11.06, ORAL11.07 (ID 3473)

      12:01 - 12:11  |  Author(s): N. Girard

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.



Author of

  • +

    GR 03 - Extensive Small Cell with Excellent Response to 1st Line Rx (PCI, Chest and/or Oligomet RT) and Second Line and Treatment of Thymic Malignancies (ID 16)

    • Event: WCLC 2015
    • Type: Grand Rounds
    • Track: Small Cell Lung Cancer
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      GR03.02 - Treatment of Thymic Malignancies - Surgery (ID 1840)

      15:00 - 15:10  |  Author(s): F. Detterbeck

      • Abstract
      • Presentation

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

  • +

    P1.04 - Poster Session/ Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing (ID 233)

    • Event: WCLC 2015
    • Type: Poster
    • Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.04-010 - Pilot Internet Survey of Interobserver Variability in Pathology Diagnoses of Multiple Tumor Nodules (ID 2851)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): F. Detterbeck

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      The distinction between separate primary lung cancers (SPLC) or intrapulmonary metastases (IM) is of great clinical importance because of the substantial staging and prognostic implications. With the broad implementation of CT screening for lung cancer, the recognition of multiple tumor nodules is increasingly common. Currently, similarities and differences in histology between two tumors provide the most definitive distinction between SPT and IM. However, the level of agreement among pathologists regarding this question has not been tested. The IASLC Pathology Committee and the Multidisciplinary SPT Working Group has addressed this issue through a pilot online survey. This study assesses the feasibility and reports preliminary results of a web-based survey to determine interobserver variation in distinguishing SPT and IM.

      Methods:
      A pilot study was conducted to test whether multiple observers could assess a collection of 50 cases of multiple tumors through a digital web-based system. Five pairs of resected nodules were assembled from the University of Colorado and scanned into an image database using an Aperio AT2 slide scanner (Leica Biosystems) with a 40X objective. Reviewers were asked to review slide images, to provide a histological diagnosis according to WHO criteria, to answer questions regarding specific histological details related to each nodule and to determine whether the multiple nodules were SPT and IM. Combined results were evaluated for level of concordance on the central question of primary or metastatic status. Results were also correlated with EGFR, KRAS, ALK and TP53 mutational status.

      Results:
      A total 21 pulmonary pathology subspecialists completed the survey, evaluating 10 nodules from 5 patients. Ten of the reviewers were from the US, 3 from Japan, 2 from the UK, and one each from Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Korea and Sweden. On the question of SPLC vs IM, 10 reviewers agreed on all cases and these determinations were regarded the histological consensus. There was 85% overall concordance with the consensus diagnosis. Most of dissenting opinions related to a single case. In all but one instance, tumors from the same individual with different histological diagnoses were designated SPLC. However, in 30% of the cases, tumors from the same individual with identical histological diagnoses were determined to be SPLC. The histological attributes regardless of WHO diagnostic category that significantly (each p>0.0001) contributed to this conclusion included lepidic growth, cell size, nuclear pleomorphism and nucleolar prominence. The mutational status of these cases was in complete agreement with the histological consensus. Mutations that distinguished SPT included KRAS, EGFR or TP53 mutation in only one member of a tumor pair or different EGFR mutations in each member of a pair. In IM, identical KRAS mutation was found in both members of a tumor pair.

      Conclusion:
      In this pilot study a high level of consensus was achieved in separating SPLC vs or IM. A large minority (30%) of tumor pairs with identical histological diagnoses were determined to be SPLC suggesting that histological features beyond those used for WHO classification are taken into account when determining SPT status.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.