Virtual Library
Start Your Search
I. Uthman
Author of
-
+
Epidemiology and outcomes (ID 57)
- Event: ELCC 2018
- Type: Poster Discussion session
- Track:
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:A. Dingemans, D. Fennell
- Coordinates: 4/13/2018, 14:45 - 15:45, Room W
-
+
215PD - Survival patterns in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma using multimodality therapy (ID 525)
10:59 - 10:59 | Author(s): I. Uthman
- Abstract
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is no more considered a rare disease and its incidence is escalating. It became a must to develop innovative modalities for better survival rates. Up to date, there is no agreement on the effectiveness of multimodality in MPM patients. This study assesses the value of multimodality therapy and identify the demographic and pathological characteristics associated with better outcome.
Methods:
Using SEER database, we extracted the data of 681 patients with MPM from 2004 to 2013. We included all age groups and races, AJCC stages I-IV and all histopathological variants. Patients were divided into four groups according to the received intervention: surgery alone, surgery followed by radiotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy, and triple modality (combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy).
Results:
Out of 681 patients, 176 (25.8%) had surgery alone, 74 (10.9%) had surgery followed by radiotherapy, 307 (45.1%) had surgery and chemotherapy, and 124 (18.2%) had a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Highest one-year survival rates were observed among patients had the triple modality (79.6%, p value 0.000) in comparison to surgery alone (37.9%), surgery followed by radiotherapy (70.3%) and combined surgery and chemotherapy (62.2%). There is a statistically significant relationship between receiving the triple modality and each of the race, age, histopathology and nodal involvement.Table:One year survival rates among patients received the triple modalityVariables Survival rates N P value Sex Male 76.8% 97 0.504 Female 89.9% 27 Age 20–39 100% 1 0.000** 40–59 94.1% 31 60–79 76.5% 88 >80 26.9% 4 Race White 79.7% 115 0.017* Black 100% 3 Other 67.5% 6 Histopathology Sarcomatoid 15.0% 7 0.000** Epithelioid 81.9% 93 Biphasic 89.1% 24 N Stage N0 77.7% 63 0.02* N1 87.0% 35 N2 73.7% 22 N3 100% 3 AJCC Stage II 82.4% 21 0.50 III 85.5% 57 IV 71.0% 46
Conclusions:
Survival rates of MPM patients are the highest when receiving combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Further investigations are needed to study the long-term outcomes.
Clinical trial identification:
Legal entity responsible for the study:
Mariam Hassan
Funding:
Has not received any funding
Disclosure:
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
-
+
Poster Display session (Friday) (ID 65)
- Event: ELCC 2018
- Type: Poster Display session
- Track:
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 4/13/2018, 12:30 - 13:00, Hall 1
-
+
203P - Combined pulmonary metastasectomy and chemotherapy in patients with colorectal lung metastases and concurrent extrapulmonary disease (ID 282)
12:50 - 12:50 | Author(s): I. Uthman
- Abstract
Background:
Lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) with the presence of concurrent extra-pulmonary disease is considered a very poor prognosis. Chemotherapy was the only advised treatment. Nowadays with the evolution in surgical oncology techniques, imaging and medical oncology treatment, a better management is present for stage IV colorectal cancer with a prolonged overall survival. We aim to evaluate the benefit of adding surgical resection to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal lung metastasis and extra-pulmonary diseases.
Methods:
We extracted the data of 1423 colorectal cancer patients with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary metastases from 2010 to 2013, using SEER database. Ninety-nine (7%) patients had combined chemotherapy and pulmonary metastasectomy, while 1324 (93%) of them received chemotherapy only.
Results:
Patients who received combination of chemotherapy and pulmonary metastasectomy had better 1-year survival rates (83.5%), compared to those who received chemotherapy only (68.3%). We observed a statistically significant difference between the two modalities in white patients, patients aged between 40 to 59 years, tumors arising in sigmoid colon or rectum, patients with elevated CEA levels, and those with metastasis to the lungs only or both lung and liver.Table: (Abstract: 203P)Variables Combined Therapy Chemotherapy p value (difference in modalities p value (difference in combined therapy) Sex Male 79.4% 66.6% 0.007** 0.399 Female 87.1% 70.6% <0.001** Age 20–39 66.7% 77.8% 0.219 0.201 40–59 89.7% 74.2% <0.001** 60–79 73.0% 66.2% 0.159 ≥80 100% 43.2% 0.221 Race White 86.7% 69.3% <0.001** 0.687 Black 74.3% 65.4% 0.061 Others 77.9% 66.1% 0.036** Primary Site Cecum 76.1% 69.0% 0.750 0.003* Ascending Colon 70.0% 58.0% 0.401 Hepatic 0% 55.1% 0.361 Flexure Transverse Colon 100% 55.5% 0.605 Splenic Flexure 60.3% 59.2% 0.937 Descending Colon 75.3% 64.3% 0.068 Sigmoid Colon 85.5% 68.5% 0.002** Rectum 100% 74% <0.001** Distant Metastasis Lung Only 94.5% 78.9% 0.002** 0.007* Lung and Liver 77.4% 64.7% 0.002** Lung and Brain 100% 25.3% 0.198 Lung and Bone 50.8% 65.9% 0.783 CEA Level Normal 95.7% 81.4% 0.378 0.446 Elevated 79.9% 66.2% <0.001**
Conclusions:
Combining pulmonary metastasectomy with chemotherapy in CRC patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary metastases shows higher 1-year relative survival rates when compared to using chemotherapy alone.
Clinical trial identification:
Legal entity responsible for the study:
Inas Uthman
Funding:
Has not received any funding
Disclosure:
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
-
+
82P - Chemotherapy versus combined chemoradiotherapy: Survival patterns among patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ID 283)
12:30 - 12:30 | Presenting Author(s): I. Uthman
- Abstract
Background:
Extensive Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer (ED-SCLC) represents 30% of lung cancer. While surgery is not an option, chemotherapy is traditionally currently recommended as the standard treatment. As oncologists seek superior modality for better survival, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of combined chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy in improving the survival of patients with ED-SCLC, and to identify the characteristics of best candidates.
Methods:
Using the SEER database, we extracted the data of 5443 patients with ED-SCLC from 2010 to 2013. There were 2665 (49%) patients who underwent combined chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy, while 2778 (51%) of them received chemotherapy only. Patients’ demographics and TNM classification were assessed.
Results:
Patients with ED-SCLC had better outcomes when they received combined chemoradiation, compared with those who received chemotherapy alone, where overall 1-year relative survival rates were 40.2% and 24.1%, respectively (p value <0.001). All patients’ characteristics favor combination over chemotherapy except those aged below 40 years and those over 80 years. Subgroup analysis revealed better survival rates among female patients, patients aged between 40 and 59 years, and those with metastasis to the other lung or free regional lymph nodes. On the other hand, no advantage was allocated to those of specific race or primary site.Survival of Patients Variables Chemoradiation Chemotherapy p value Sex: Male 37.1% 21.5% <0.001** Female 43.9% 27.0% <0.001** Age: 20–39 28.6% 80.1% 0.914 40–59 43.3% 25.0% <0.001** 60–79 40.0% 24.3% <0.001** ≥80 21.8% 19.6% 0.6 Race: White 39.9% 23.7% <0.001** Black 42.5% 27.7% 0.002** Others 40.9% 25.4% 0.002** Primary Site: Upper Lobe 40.3% 24.3% <0.001** Middle Lobe 47.5% 22.6% 0.001** Lower Lobe 38.4% 23.9% <0.001** Overlapping Lesion 44.5% 25.4% 0.01* Lymph Nodes Involvement: No Nodes Involved 53.6%, 35.5% <0.001** Single Ipsilateral Node 46.8% 31.6% <0.001** Multiple Ipsilateral Nodes 37.5% 22.3% <0.001** Distant Metastasis: Lung 37.5%, 21.0% <0.001** Liver 30.2% 19.2% <0.001** Brain 31.5% 22.4% <0.001** Bone 31.6% 21.2% <0.001**
Conclusions:
Combined chemoradiation in patients with ED-SCLC shows higher 1-year relative survival rates when compared with chemotherapy alone. Further studies should be conducted to weigh the efficacy versus safety to consider using chemoradiation as an alternative modality for ED-SCLC.
Legal entity responsible for the study:
Inas Uthman
Funding:
Has not received any funding
Disclosure:
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.