Virtual Library
Start Your Search
J. Qian
Author of
-
+
Immunotherapy and next-generation TKIs: From second to frontline treatment (ID 55)
- Event: ELCC 2018
- Type: Poster Discussion session
- Track:
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:P. Garrido Lopez, S. Ekman, S. Ortiz-Cuaran, E. Wauters
- Coordinates: 4/12/2018, 07:45 - 09:00, Room A
-
+
140PD - Complex epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced lung adenocarcinomas (Now Available) (ID 411)
10:54 - 10:54 | Author(s): J. Qian
- Abstract
Background:
Two or more different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations can be detected within a single tumor sample, which represents complex mutations. However, the frequency and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatments for patients harboring these mutations are unknown.
Methods:
From January 2011 to January 2017, patients diagnosed with EGFR mutation were screened. The effectiveness of TKIs in patients with complex mutations was retrospectively analyzed.
Results:
A total of 16,840 subjects were screened, with 5898 positive patients. 187 patients (3.2% of all EGFR mutant patients) had complex EGFR mutations with 95 of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients were treated with TKIs. The objective response rate (ORR) for patients who had Del-19 + 21L858R (Group A, n = 27), Del-19/21L858R + atypical mutations (Group B, n = 28), double atypical mutations (Group C, n = 20) and complex mutations with primary drug-resistant pattern (Group D, n = 20) were 72.7%, 54.2%, 66.7% and 15.0%, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) in the four groups were 18.2 months (95% CI, 12.0 months to 24.4 months), 10.1 months (95% CI, 6.5 months to 13.7 months), 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.8 months to 15.4 months) and 1.4 months (95% CI, 0.2 months to 2.5 months), respectively.
Conclusions:
These results suggest on the largest sample size that EGFR–TKI therapy is effective in patients with Del-19 + 21L858R, Del-19/21L858R + atypical mutations and double atypical mutations, but less effective in patients with primary drug–resistant pattern. Patients with the Del-19 + 21L858R mutations may therefore benefit more from treatment with first–generation TKIs.
Clinical trial identification:
Legal entity responsible for the study:
Bo Zhang
Funding:
Has not received any funding
Disclosure:
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
-
+
Poster Display session (Friday) (ID 65)
- Event: ELCC 2018
- Type: Poster Display session
- Track:
- Presentations: 2
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 4/13/2018, 12:30 - 13:00, Hall 1
-
+
104P - Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve prognosis in surgically resected stage I NSCLC with lymphovascular invasion (Now Available) (ID 481)
12:50 - 12:50 | Author(s): J. Qian
- Abstract
Background:
The 8[th] edition of the TNM classification for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently been approved. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has been reported to be a strong risk factor for stage I patients. Meanwhile, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resected pathologic stage I NSCLC is controversial. This study aimed at exploring the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in stage I NSCLC patients with LVI.
Methods:
A total of 2600 patients with stage I NSCLC treated in the Shanghai Chest Hospital (2008–2012) were included in the analysis, of which 221 were pathologically diagnosed with LVI. We divided these patients into an ACT (adjuvant-chemotherapy) group and a surgery alone group. By using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression model, we explored whether lymphovascular invasion was a poor prognostic factor and the application of adjuvant chemotherapy could improve the prognosis.
Results:
For all stage I NSCLC patients, it was observed that patients with LVI had an unfavorable Lung-cancer specific survival (LCSS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.604; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.124–2.289; P = 0.009) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR: 1.943; 95% CI: 1.491–2.532; P < 0.001). The presence of LVI was suspected to be correlated with larger tumor size, and adenocarcinoma. Analysis of 221 patients with LVI indicated an increased LCSS (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.161–0.595; P < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.530–0.286; P = 0.044) with adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. We saw significant differences in LCSS and RFS in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with both stage IA and stage IB disease.
Conclusions:
For all stage I NSCLC patients, LVI was correlated with poorer prognosis, which was improved by adjuvant chemotherapy. Our preliminary study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy might be an appropriate option for stage I NSCLC patients with LVI.
Clinical trial identification:
Legal entity responsible for the study:
Wang Shuyuan
Funding:
Has not received any funding
Disclosure:
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
-
+
167P - Efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with ROS-1 rearrangement (Now Available) (ID 413)
12:50 - 12:50 | Author(s): J. Qian
- Abstract
Background:
When chemotherapy is commenced as first-line treatment in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with ROS-1 rearrangement, it is unclear that which agent should be preferentially administered. The aim of this study is to compare the therapeutic efficacy of pemetrexed-containing (Pem-C) and non-pemetrexed-containing (Non-Pem-C) chemotherapy in these patients.
Methods:
We retrospectively identified patients who were demonstrated to be ROS-1 positive by multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between October 2014 and December 2016. Those who received platinum-based dual agent chemotherapy as palliative treatment were included for further analysis.
Results:
A total of 4596 consecutive individuals were screened and 55 eligible individuals were enrolled into this study. In first-line treatment, patients who received Pem-C treatment (n = 39) derived a higher objective response rate (ORR, 40.0% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.02) and progression-free survival (PFS1, 7.0 months vs. 3.9 months, P < 0.01) compared with those who received Non-Pem-C treatment (n = 16). However, in later-line treatment, progression-free survival (PFS2) was not statistically superior in the Pem-C group (3.1 months, 95% CI: 0.6–5.6 months) compared with the Non-Pem-C group (1.9 months, 95% CI: 0.1–3.1 months, P = 0.12).
Conclusions:
Pem-C treatment resulted in better clinical outcomes compared with other agents in patients with ROS-1 rearrangement when initiated as first-line treatment.
Clinical trial identification:
Legal entity responsible for the study:
Bo Zhang
Funding:
Has not received any funding
Disclosure:
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
