Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

Y.K. Shin



Author of

  • +

    P3.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 621)

    • Event: WCLC 2017
    • Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.01-088f - Droplet Digital PCR-Based EGFR Mutation Detection with an Internal Quality Control Index to Determine the Quality of DNA (ID 9895)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): Y.K. Shin

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) samples are invaluable sources for both clinical research and in vitro diagnostics. However, accurate detection of genetic mutations in FFPET is a major challenge due to artifactual results, due to sample age and quality.

      Method:
      In a pre-clinical study, we used 315 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) FFPET-derived DNA (FFPET-DNA) samples to establish sample criteria reflecting the minimum DNA quality suitable for PCR by comparing the results of droplet digital PCR-based mutation test (ddEGFR test) and qPCR-based EGFR mutation test (cobas[®] EGFR test). Using this criteria, we conducted a retrospective comparative clinical study of the ddEGFR and cobas EGFR tests of 171 NSCLC FFPET-DNA samples.

      Result:
      Based on the pre-clinical study, the FFPET-DNA sample criterion was established as internal quality control (iQC) index ≥ 0.5 (iQC copies ≥ 500, using 3.3 ng [1000 genome equivalents] of FFPET-DNA), indicating that more than half of the input DNA was amplifiable. Based on this iQC index, an independent clinical study revealed that both tests were significantly concordant (overall percent agreement (OPA) = 92.98%). Discordants not detected by the cobas EGFR test were detected using the ddEGFR test, indicating that the higher sensitivity of the ddEGFR test is due to its lower limit of detection.

      Conclusion:
      iQC index is a reliable indicator of the quality of FFPET-DNA and could be used to prevent incorrect diagnoses arising from low-quality samples. Compared with the cobas EGFR test, the ddEGFR test exhibited superior analytical performance and at least equivalent clinical performance.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.