Virtual Library
Start Your Search
K. Politi
Author of
-
+
OA 12 - Emerging Genomic Targets (ID 679)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Oral
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:H. Akita, Maurice Pérol
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, F203 + F204 (Annex Hall)
-
+
OA 12.01 - The Preclinical and Clinical Activity of Poziotinib, a Potent, Selective Inhibitor of EGFR Exon 20 Mutant NSCLC (ID 10369)
11:00 - 11:10 | Author(s): K. Politi
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Approximately 10% of EGFR mutant NSCLCs have an insertion/mutation in exon 20 of EGFR resulting in primary resistance to currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We previously reported that the structural features of poziotinib could potentially enable it to circumvent the steric hindrance induced by exon 20 mutations. Here we further characterize the preclinical activity of poziotinib and report on initial clinical activity of poziotinib in patients with EGFR exon 20 mutations from an ongoing phase II study.
Method:
We evaluated poziotinib activity in vitro using human NSCLC cell lines and the BAF3 model as well as several patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of exon 20 insertion. We launched a phase 2 investigator-initiated trial of poziotinib in patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions (NCT03066206).
Result:
In vitro poziotinib was approximately 100x more potent than osimertinib and 40x more potent than afatinib against a common panel of EGFR exon 20 insertions. Furthermore, it had ~65-fold greater potency against common exon 20 insertions compared with EGFR T790M mutations; 3[rd] generation inhibitors osimertinib, EGF816, and rociletinib were all significantly less potent for exon 20 mutations/insertions compared with T790M. in vivo poziotinib led to >85% reduction in tumor burden in GEM models of EGFR exon 20 insertion (D770insNPG) NSCLC and the PDX model LU0387 (H773insNPH). To date, 8 platinum-refractory patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation metastatic NSCLC have been enrolled in the clinical trial and treated with poziotinib at a dose of 16 mg PO daily. Two patients have reached the first interval-imaging time point (at 8 weeks of therapy per protocol). Both patients exhibited dramatic partial response, with one patient reporting improvement in dyspnea and cough at one week of therapy. In this early stage of the study, one case of grade 3 paronchycia was observed. One additional platinum- and erlotinib-refractory patient with EGFR exon 20 insertion was treated with poziotinib on compassionate basis. The patient achieved partial response after three weeks of treatment.
Conclusion:
Poziotinib has selective activity against EGFR exon 20 mutations and potent activity in cell lines, PDX, and GEM models. Three platinum-refractory patients with EGFR exon 20 mutations have been treated thus far and are evaluable for response; all three had partial responses at the time of the initial scan. Updated data from the ongoing phase 2 clinical trial of poziotinib will be presented at the meeting.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P3.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 621)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.01-046 - Longitudinal Analysis of Plasma CtDNA in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: SWOG S1403 Trial of Afatinib with or Without Cetuximab (ID 9535)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): K. Politi
- Abstract
Background:
Detection of actionable mutations using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) isolated from patient plasma is now accepted as clinical practice in NSCLC. Nevertheless, the full extent to which longitudinal plasma analysis can be utilized to guide clinical decision-making has yet to be realized. We prospectively incorporated serial next-generation sequencing (NGS) of ctDNA into the ongoing SWOG S1403 clinical trial (NCT02438722) of afatinib+cetuximab vs afatinib in treatment-naïve NSCLC patients with EGFR-mutant tumors.
Method:
Time points for specimen collection were pre-treatment, after two months of therapy on Cycle 3 Day1 (C3D1) and at progression. Objectives were to: 1) determine the prognostic and predictive significance the EGFR mutant allele frequency (MAF) at each time point; 2) correlate changes in MAF over time with regard to patient outcome, and 3) identify putative emergent resistance mechanisms and companion mutations. Specimen analysis was conducted using the Guardant360 73-gene digital NGS panel.
Result:
To date, 53 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC have contributed baseline samples. Of these, 46 had ctDNA detectable at baseline (87%). 39 of these 46 (85%) had detectable, tissue-identical EGFR mutations, for an overall EGFR detection rate of 74% (39/53). A positive finding for EGFR amplification (Amp) in plasma correlated with high ctDNA MAF: median for Amp 16.9 vs nonAmp 0.9 (range/n: 11.6-43.7/10 vs 0.11-7.7/17; p<0.0001). Of patients with detectable EGFR mutation at baseline, 27 had analyzable ctDNA collected at C3D1. Of these, 26/27 showed decreasing MAFs on-treatment (mean for baseline: 9.8 vs C3D1: 0.14; p<0.0001), with 20 cases having no detectable EGFR mutation at C3D1 (mean of 7 positives at C3D1: 0.55). At progression, samples were collected from 14 patients and 10 had EGFR mutations detectable, with T790M present in 3. Another patient had an FGFR3 fusion at PD, but no previous draws were available to determine if it was emergent.
Conclusion:
Longitudinal analysis of plasma ctDNA in S1403 patients demonstrated significant treatment-induced changes in mutation burden and identified resistance mechanisms at progression. EGFR gene amplification, as assessed in plasma, was significantly associated with increased ctDNA MAFs. Patients showed a significant, one-to-two orders of magnitude decline in EGFR MAF after two months of therapy, with 74% dropping below detectable levels. At progression, EGFR mutation detection rates increased, often concomitantly with a putative emergent resistance factor. Accrual to S1403 is ongoing and patient treatment and outcomes remain blinded. The prognostic and predictive utility of baseline and therapy-induced changes in ctDNA MAF kinetics will be determined at study unblinding.
-
+
P3.03 - Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy (ID 719)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.03-007 - LCMC2: Expanded Profiling of Lung Adenocarcinomas Identifies ROS1 and RET Rearrangements and TP53 Mutations as a Negative Prognostic Factor (ID 8338)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): K. Politi
- Abstract
Background:
The Lung Cancers Mutation Consortium (LCMC) is a multi-institutional effort where 16 sites identify oncogenic drivers and pool data to assess the impact of targeted therapies in patients with lung adenocarcinomas. We now report the results of the second patient cohort (LCMC2) with an expanded multiplex molecular panel to include RET and ROS1 and tumor suppressors.
Method:
904 patients with centrally confirmed stage IV lung adenocarcinomas who were candidates for therapy had at least one of 14 oncogenic drivers assessed in a CLIA-compliant laboratory using genotyping, FISH, massively parallel sequencing (NGS), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses.
Result:
Among 423 patients tested for all 14 targets, we found a driver in 65%. Mutated KRAS was found in 31%, sensitizing EGFR in 14%, MET amplification in 5%, ALK rearrangements in 4%, BRAF V600E in 3%, and HER2 in 3%. Rearrangements in RET and ROS1 were each found in 2% (CI 1 to 3%). Using IHC, PTEN loss was found in 8% (CI 6 to 11%) and MET expression in 58% (CI 55 to 61%). Use of targeted therapies in patients with EGFR, HER2, or BRAF mutations, ALK, ROS1, or RET rearrangements, and MET amplification was associated with a gain in overall survival of 1.5 years relative to those with the same drivers not receiving targeted therapy and a gain of 1 year relative to those without an actionable driver. Current and former cigarette smokers derived a survival benefit from targeted therapies similar to never smokers (p=0.975). Among 154 patients who had all drivers assessed and NGS testing in addition, any TP53 mutation was associated with poorer survival among those with EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 (p=0.014). STK11 was detected in 11%, all in patients with KRAS mutations.
Conclusion:
Using an expanded testing panel, LCMC2 demonstrates the survival benefit of matching targeted treatments to oncogenic drivers in patients with lung adenocarcinomas, identifies additional prognostic factors, and supports the performance of multiplex molecular testing on specimens from all individuals with lung adenocarcinomas irrespective of clinical characteristics. We detected either MET amplifications or HER2 mutations in 7%, together more than the 4% with ALK. A targeted drug is available in the United States for 35% of patients with lung adenocarcinomas. The routine use of massively parallel sequencing (NGS) detects both targetable drivers and tumor suppressor genes that have significance for therapy selection and prognosis. Supported by Free to Breathe
