Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Y. Zhang
Author of
-
+
P2.04 - Clinical Design, Statistics and Clinical Trials (ID 705)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Clinical Design, Statistics and Clinical Trials
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.04-003 - Phase II Trial of X-396 (Ensartinib) for Chinese Patients with ALK (+) Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Progressed on Crizotinib (ID 8849)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Y. Zhang
- Abstract
Background:
Crizotinib has been established as the standard first-line treatment for patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. However, despite its superiority to chemotherapy, resistance occurs within approximately 12 months. New ALK-inhibitors are needed to overcome the resistance to crizotinib and to increase drug penetration to CNS. X-396 (ensartinib) is a novel, potent ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Its phase I/II study showed X-396 is well-tolerated with favorable anti-tumor activities in both ALK TKI-naïve and crizotinib-resistant NSCLC patients, as well as patients with CNS metastases. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was established at 225 mg, once daily.
Method:
A phase II, multi-center study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of single-agent X-396 in Chinese patients with ALK (+) non–small-cell lung cancer after progression on crizotinib. Eligible patients will have documentation of a positive ALK rearrangement and progression on crizotinib. X-396 225 mg is orally administered until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is RECIST 1.1 response rate. Secondary endpoints include PFS, duration of response, and safety. The sample size is calculated using the test for inequality method, assuming that X396 have an ORR of 50% in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, 15% higher than that from existing second-line therapy. Therefore, up to 144 patients will be enrolled with a significance level and power of 5% and 90%, respectively. Recruitment will be started on September, 2017.
Result:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
-
+
P3.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 621)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.01-036 - A Phase IIIb Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC: An Interim Analysis (ID 9251)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Y. Zhang
- Abstract
Background:
In the Phase III LUX-Lung (LL) 3 and LL6 trials, first-line afatinib significantly improved PFS vs platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC (independent review; LL3: 11.1 vs 6.9 months, HR=0.58; p=0.001; LL6: 11.0 vs 5.6 months, HR=0.28; p<0.0001). In the Phase IIb LL7 trial, afatinib significantly improved PFS and TTF vs gefitinib in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations (PFS, independent review: 11.0 vs 10.9 months, HR=0.73; p=0.017; TTF: 13.7 vs 11.5 months, HR=0.73, p=0.0073). Here we report interim analysis results of a large Phase IIIb study of afatinib in a broad population of EGFR TKI-naïve patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.
Method:
In this Phase IIIb trial with a similar setting to ‘real-world’ practice, EGFR TKI-naïve patients with locally advanced/metastatic EGFRm+ NSCLC were recruited from centers in China, Hong Kong, India, Singapore and Taiwan and received afatinib 40mg/day until investigator-assessed progression or lack of tolerability. Primary endpoint: number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included: number of patients with afatinib-related AEs; time to symptomatic progression (TTSP). Other assessments included PFS (investigator review).
Result:
At data cut-off (13 Feb 2017) 479 patients were treated with afatinib (median age: 59.0 years; female: 52.4%; common [(Del19 and/or L858R) with or without uncommon]/uncommon only EGFR mutations: 86.0%/14.0%; ECOG PS 0/1: 19.8%/78.1%; brain metastases: 19.2%; 0/1/≥2 lines of prior chemotherapy: 59.7%/30.1%/10.2%. 24.8% of patients required dose reductions to 30mg; 6.1% had further reductions to 20mg. Median (range) treatment time was 9.7 months (0.2–38.6). SAEs were reported in 115 (24.0%) patients and afatinib-related SAEs in 29 (6.1%) patients. Grade ≥3 afatinib-related AEs occurred in 122 (25.5%) patients; diarrhea (n=50; 10.4%) and rash/acne (n=38; 7.9%) were the most common (≥5%). 18 (3.8%) patients discontinued treatment due to afatinib-related AEs. Median TTSP (15.3 months [95% CI: 13.4–17.5]) was 3 months longer than PFS (12.1 months [10.8–13.7]), suggesting afatinib may be continued beyond progression, and both were longer in patients with common (with/without uncommon) vs uncommon only EGFR mutations (PFS: 12.6 vs 9.1; TTSP: 15.8 vs 10.0 months).
Conclusion:
The safety data of afatinib from this interim analysis of a large-scale population of EGFR TKI-naïve EGFRm+ NSCLC patients are consistent with LL3/6/7 and confirm that most afatinib-related AEs are manageable and result in few treatment discontinuations. Afatinib also demonstrated encouraging efficacy in patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations. Data from larger patient populations will be evaluated in further analyses of this trial.
