Virtual Library
Start Your Search
W. Mao
Author of
-
+
OA 16 - Treatment Strategies and Follow Up (ID 686)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Oral
- Track: Early Stage NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Jun Nakajima, T. Demmy
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 14:30 - 16:15, Room 315
-
+
OA 16.04 - Efficacy and Safety of Erlotinib vs Vinorelbine/Cisplatin as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage IIIA EGFR Mutant NSCLC Patients (ID 8717)
15:00 - 15:10 | Author(s): W. Mao
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Adjuvant chemotherapy remains the most important treatment for stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after radical operation, but its benefits has reached plateau and high risk of recurrence. Previous studies SELECT and RADIANT have suggested a trend of improving DFS of erlotinib as adjuvant therapy for patients with activating mutations. This study is designed as prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib (E) as adjuvant therapy in comparison with vinorelbine/cisplatin (NP) chemotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA EGFR mutant patients.
Method:
Patients aged between 18 – 75 with ECOG PS 0–1, stage IIIA, EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 or exon 21 L858R), reached R0 resection NSCLC were eligible. And patients were randomized(1:1) into either erlotinib (orally 150mg/day for 2 years, util relapse or unacceptable toxicity) or NP (vinorelbine 25mg/m[2] i.v. day 1, 8 and cisplatin 75mg/m[2] i.v. day 1, every 3 weeks for 4 cycles) group. Random assignment was stratified by EGFR mutation type (exon 19 vs exon 21), histology (adenocarcinoma vs non- ) and smoking status (smoker vs non-). The primary endpoint was 2-year disease free survival rate (DFSR), secondary endpoints include disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), safety (NCI CTCAE 4.0) and quality of life (QoL), and exploratory biomarker analysis.
Result:
From Sep, 2012 to May, 2015, in total 102 patients from 16 centers across China were randomized to receive E (N=51) or NP (N=51). Median follow-up time was 33 months for E and 28 months for NP. Baseline characteristics of age, sex, PS, histology, smoking status, EGFR mutation subtypes were well balanced in each arm. Two-year DFSR was 81.35% (95%CI: 69.63-93.08) in E arm and 44.62% (95%CI: 26.86-62.38) in NP arm respectively (P<0.001) in ITT population. DFS was significantly prolonged with E vs NP (median, 42.41 vs 20.96 months, HR 0.271, 95% CI: 0.137-0.535; P<0.001). OS data from our trial are still immature. In current, the number of death events were 2 (E) and 13 (NP) arm. Safety profile was similar to previous studies of each agent in NSCLC, no new unexpected AE were observed in each arms.
Conclusion:
As compared with NP, E showed superior efficacy and should be considered therapeutic option for patients with R0 resected stage IIIA NSCLC with EGFR-activating mutation. (EVAN, NCT01683175).
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.03 - Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy (ID 704)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.03-047 - The Main Treatment Failure Pattern for Completely Resected Stage II–IIIA (N1–N2) EGFR-Mutation Positive Lung Cancer (ID 9743)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): W. Mao
- Abstract
Background:
ADJUVANT (CTONG 1104) is the first randomized trial shows significantly prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) in completely resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through adjuvant gefitinib compare with vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VP). Further we aim to analyze the treatment failure pattern in ADJUVANT study.
Method:
In the ADJUVANT trial, a total of 222 patients with completely resected stage N1–N2 EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC were randomized 1:1 into gefitinib group (250mg, QD, 24 months ) or vinorelbine (25mg/m[2] Day 1/Day 8) plus cisplatin (75mg/m[2] Day 1) group (every 3 weeks for 4 cycles) respectively. Any recurrence or metastases occurred during the follow-up period was defined as treatment failure. Recurrent pattern in both group were analyzed with follow-up data (until Mar 9[th] 2017) integrated.
Result:
At the Data cut-off date for the primary analysis of DFS, 124 progression events (55.9% maturity overall) had occurred; 114 patients had disease recurrence，10 patients died before disease recurrence. Analysed recurrent pattern include lung, brain, liver, bone adrenal gland, pleura, pericardium, spleen and regional lymph nodes metastasis. Even no significant differences were found, highest proportion of patients in both group(18.9% for VP and 26.1% for gefitinib, p=0.199) surfer brain metastasis with lung metastases being the second common recurrent site. Time to brain metastases showed no significantly difference between the two groups (not reach vs 40.8m, p>0.05). Among the 29 brain metastases patients with gefitinib, the brain metastases occurred in 17 patients during the gefitinib treament, and 12 patients relapse after the gefitnib termination. Figure 1
Conclusion:
Compared with other site metastases, lung, brain and regional lymph nodes metastases account for major proportion of recurrence in ADJUVANT study. (NCT01405079)
-
+
P3.14 - Radiotherapy (ID 730)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Radiotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.14-015 - A Propensity Matched Analysis of SBRT and Sublobar Resection for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients at High Risk for Lobectomy (ID 9862)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): W. Mao
- Abstract
Background:
The aim of this study was to perform a survival comparison between stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and sublobar resection (SLR) in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at high risk for lobectomy.
Method:
All patients who underwent SBRT or SLR because of medical comorbidities for clinical stage I NSCLC from January 2008 to December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias between SBRT and SLR patients based on age, gender, performance status, tumour characteristics, pulmonary function. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated with Kaplan–Meier method.
Result:
Forty-nine patients were matched into each group of SBRT and SLR (include 27 underwent segmentectomy, 22 underwent wedge resection). There were 32 and 30 men with median age of 67 and 69 years, respectively. Median follow-up was 25 months. In terms of treatment-related mortality, the 30- day mortality rates for the SBRT and SLR groups were 0 and 2.0 %, respectively. Patients treated by SBRT had a tendency to increase 3-year OS compared with SLR (94.0% versus 78.1%; P= 0.064).There was no difference between two groups in 3-year RFS (61.8% versus 65.7%; P=0.864). In a subanalysis, 3-year OS after SBRT was greatly better than wedge resection subgroup (94.0% versus 67.4%; P= 0.026), but there was no significant difference between SBRT and segmentectomy in 3-year OS (94.0% versus 88.0%; P= 0.212).
Conclusion:
SBRT had a tendency to increase OS compared with sublobar resection in patients who are not medically fit for lobectomy with clinical stage I NSCLC. However, OS after SBRT was better than wedge resection subgroup. SBRT can be an alternative treatment option to segmentectomy for patients who cannot tolerate lobectomy because of medical comorbidities. A randomized prospective study is necessary to determine survival in compromised SBRT and sublobar resection.
