Virtual Library
Start Your Search
N. Yamamoto
Author of
-
+
MA 16 - Mediastinal, Tracheal and Esophageal Tumor: Multimodality Approaches (ID 675)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:K. Shibuya, Francoise Mornex
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 15:45 - 17:30, Room 313 + 314
-
+
MA 16.04 - Phase II Trial of S-1 Treatment as Palliative-Intent Chemotherapy for Previously Treated Advanced Thymic Carcinoma (ID 8627)
16:00 - 16:05 | Author(s): N. Yamamoto
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare cancer with minimal evidence of survival with palliative-intent chemotherapy. Sunitinib and everolimus monotherapies have been proposed as active molecular-targeted approaches based on phase II (Ph II) trials, and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, has been described in the NCCN guideline as an active cytotoxic agent for refractory TC based on a case series. Therefore, we conducted a Ph II trial to study the result of S-1 treatment in patients with refractory TC.
Method:
In this Ph II study performed at three cancer centers in Tokyo, we aimed to enroll 26 TC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients received S-1 orally twice daily at a dose of 40–60 mg/m2 for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicities. S-1 was used off-label. The primary end-point was determining the objective response rate, and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities.
Result:
Twenty-six patients (10 males) were recruited between November 2013 and May 2016. The median age was 63 (27–74) years. Among the 26 patients, 23 had squamous cell carcinoma histology and 10 had an ECOG performance status of 0. Additionally, one patient showed complete response and seven patients showed partial responses, resulting in a 30.8% response rate (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5–50.0) and a 65.4% disease control rate (95% CI, 46.2–80.6). After a median follow-up of 13.4 months, the median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3–7.6 months) and median OS was 23.4 months (95% CI, 12.8–not reached). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 included neutropenia (12%), skin rash (8%), elevated ALT, decreased WBC count, and fatigue (4%). No treatment-related death was observed. However, treatment was discontinued in three patients (12%) because of AEs.
Conclusion:
S-1 for refractory TC confirmed clinical activity with good tolerability. Clinical trial identification: UMIN000010736
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MA 17 - Locally Advanced NSCLC (ID 671)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Locally Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:S. Jheon, Georgios Stamatis
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 15:45 - 17:30, F203 + F204 (Annex Hall)
-
+
MA 17.06 - Safety Data from Randomized Phase II Study of CDDP+S-1 vs CDDP+PEM Combined with TRT for Locally Advanced Non-Squamous NSCLC (ID 8296)
16:20 - 16:25 | Author(s): N. Yamamoto
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Both cisplatin (CDDP)+S-1 and CDDP+pemetrexed (PEM) can be given at full systemic doses with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and CDDP+PEM is one of the standard chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced non-squamous (non-sq) NSCLC. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II study (SPECTRA) compared the efficacy and safety of the two above-mentioned promising regimens combined with TRT in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-sq NSCLC.
Method:
Patients were randomly assigned to receive CDDP+S-1 (CDDP 60mg/m2, d1, and S-1 80mg/m2, d1-14, q4w, up to 4 cycles) or CDDP+PEM (CDDP 75mg/m2, d1, and PEM 500mg/m2, d1, q3w, up to 4 cycles) combined with TRT 60Gy in 30 fractions. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. If the 2-year PFS rate is assumed to be 25% in the inferior therapy group and 15% higher in the superior therapy group of this study, the sample size needed for selection of the optimum treatment group at a probability of approximately 95% will be 51 cases/group with the Simon’s selection design. The sample size was set at 100 patients.
Result:
Between Jan 2013 and Oct 2016, 102 patients were enrolled in this study from 9 institutions in Japan. All 102 patients were eligible and assessable, of whom 52 were assigned to CDDP+S-1 and 50 to CDDP+PEM. Baseline characteristics were similar (CDDP+S-1/CDDP+PEM): median age (range) 64.5 (39-73)/63.5 (32-74) years; women, n=17 (33%)/n=17 (34%); stage IIIB, n=21 (40%)/n=20 (40%); ECOG PS of 1, n=14 (27%)/n=14 (28%); never smoker, n=12 (23%)/n=12 (24%); and adenocarcinoma, n=47(90%)/n=45(90%). Completion rate of TRT (60Gy) and chemotherapy (4 cycles) was 92%/98% and 73%/86%, respectively. Response rate was 60%/64%. Grade 3 or higher toxicities included febrile neutropenia (12%/2%), anorexia (8%/16%), diarrhea (8%/0%), esophagitis (6%/8%), pneumonia (4%/4%), neutropenia (38%/52%), anemia (8%/12%), thrombocytopenia (4%/6%), and hyponatremia (12%/12%). Grade 1 radiation pneumonitis was observed in 8 (15%)/2 (4%) patients on the basis of the data collected 30 days or less after the discontinuation of protocol treatment. No treatment-related death was observed. The data on PFS and overall survival are immature.
Conclusion:
Response rate was similar between the two arms. Toxicities were tolerable and manageable in both arms; however febrile neutropenia was more frequently observed in the CDDP+S-1 arm. We will present the updated safety data of this study at the conference. Survival data will be analyzed in late 2018.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.02 - Biology/Pathology (ID 616)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.02-035 - PD-L1 IHC Test on Cytological Cell Block Specimen; Potential Utility and Practical Issues (ID 9018)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): N. Yamamoto
- Abstract
Background:
PD-L1 IHC test is an important biomarker for predicting the response of the immune checkpoint inhibitor against the PD1/PD-L1 axis. The FFPE tissue sample is an only validated specimen used in the clinical study, although it is sometimes difficult to obtain an enough tissue sample in advanced stage patients. Cytology specimen is an expected candidate. In this study, we evaluated the PD-L1 IHC expression on cytology cell block specimen (CB) and compared to the corresponding formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sample (FFPE-T).
Method:
Nine primary lung cancer patients who have both surgical resected FFPE-T and pleural effusion CB were recruited. CB was prepared as following; pleural fluid was centrifuged to collect the cell pellet, then fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. PD-L1 expression was evaluated using two clones (DAKO PharmDx kit, 22C3 and 28-8). Three pathologists (two certified, one path-trainee) and one cytotechnologist reviewed the slides independently. The proportion score of tumor cell (TPS) was evaluated and divided into 2-tier (positive, negative for 28-8) and 3-tier (no, low, high expression for 22C3) categories, according to the manufactural protocols. The correlation between CB and FFPE-T and the inter-observer agreement (kappa value) were calculated.
Result:
All samples were acceptable for PD-L1 evaluation. FFPE-T resulted in 2 positive, 7 negative (28-8); 3 low and 6 no expression (22C3), respectively. CB resulted in 5 positive, 2 negative (28-8); 3 low and 6 no expression (22C3), respectively. The TPS and tiered-category of CB did not correlate to those of FFPE-T, statistically. The concordant rate of tiered-category between FFPE-T and CB resulted in 4/9 (45.4%) for both clones. It can be explained by the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression. The TPS and category judgment of two tests (28-8 and 22C3) within each observer were statistically correlated (R=0.588-0.951, p-value <0.001). The kappa value of the inter-observer agreement varied from 0.18 to 1.0, depending on the experience and education. Two certified pathologists reached moderate (kappa=0.59 for 28-8) to high (1.0 for 22C3) agreement on CB, but low (0.05 and 0.14) on FFPE-T. The kappa value between certified pathologist and path-trainee/ cytotechnologist was 0.6/ <0.01 for FFPE-T, and 0.18/0.57 for CB, respectively. These results seem to be influenced by the recognition of appropriate target tumor cells.
Conclusion:
Our study suggested that the properly processed cytology sample has a potential clinical utility for PD-L1 evaluation. The difficulty of target cell recognition on cytology specimen seems to be one of the critical issues of standardization.
-
+
P2.03 - Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy (ID 704)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.03-036 - Comparing the Efficacy/Toxicity of Osimertinib and First Line EGFR-TKI by Individual Patient Analysis (ID 9380)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): N. Yamamoto
- Abstract
Background:
Osimertinib is a third generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), which showed its efficacy for T790M resistant mutation in patients with advanced and recurrent non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy and toxicity of osimertinib comparing to previous EGFR-TKIs are not fully elucidated. Since every patient receiving osimertinib has received previous EGFR-TKI therapy, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of those agents in the same patients.
Method:
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with T790M mutation positive advanced and recurrent NSCLC, who had disease progression after previous EGFR-TKI, the standard first line therapy, and started osimertinib between April 2016 and March 2017 at National Caner Center Hospital. Progression free survival (PFS) of osimertinib, and 1st line EGFR-TKI PFS of the same patients were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed according to RECIST version 1,1. Adverse events (AEs) were also reviewed to evaluate the difference of safety profiles between osimertinib and previous EGFR-TKIs.
Result:
A total of 46 patients with T790M positive NSCLC received osimertinib after the failure of first line EGFR-TKI treatment. At May 2017, the median follow-up time since the start of osimertinib was 7.8months. The median age was 65 (range 36-82), the median number of treatment received before osimertinib was 3 (range 1-9), and the median wash out time of 1st line EGFR-TKI till the start of osimertinib was 14.0 months. The median PFS of osimertinib is not reached. The median PFS of first line EGFR-TKI was 15.2 months. ORR of osimertinib and first line EGFR-TKI was 56.0% and 65.2%, respectively. The most frequent AEs of any grade of osimertinib were rash, dry skin, paronychia, and diarrhea (39.4%, 35.8%, 32.1%, and 30.2%, respectively). Rash, paronychia, and diarrhea over grade 2 was 6.5%, 6.5%, and 0% with osimertinib, compared to 0%, 12.5%, and 4.1% with gefitinib, and 41.7%, 8.3%, and 0% with erlotinib. The incidence of pneumonitis with osimertinib treatment was 10.9% (5 cases) in any grade, and 6.5% (3 cases) in grade 3 to 4, though 2 of them (1 case in grade 1 and 1 in grade 3) had received nivolumab as the prior chemotherapy. Except for pneumonitis, there was no AE leading to permanent discontinuation related to osimertinib.
Conclusion:
Osimertinib showed the efficacy and feasibility even in practical use. Adverse effect of osimertinib was generally better tolerated than previous EGFR-TKIs, except for pneumonitis.
-
+
P2.03-048 - Mixed Response of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring the EGFR T790M Mutation to Osimertinib (ID 9807)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): N. Yamamoto
- Abstract
Background:
Although patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations respond well to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), most progress after approximately 1 year. At the time of progression, the EGFR T790M mutation is detected in more than half of these tumors. NSCLC harboring the T790M mutation shows a high response rate to osimertinib. However, the heterogeneous nature of NSCLC may limit the efficacy of osimertinib to those lesions with the T790M mutation, and a subset of patients may show a mixed response (MR), whereby some lesions shrink while others progress at the first evaluation. Previous study showed that about 20% of NSCLC patients exhibit MR to systemic therapies including EGFR-TKI. However, little is known about characteristics of MR to osimertinib.
Method:
To determine the frequency of a MR, we retrospectively reviewed patients treated with osimertinib for NSCLC harboring the EGFR T790M mutation at the National Cancer Center Hospital.
Result:
Between April and December 2016, 45 patients (median age 65 [36‒82] years, 19 [42%] males) who had NSCLC with the T790M mutation received osimertinib. The median numbers of previous chemotherapies and EGFR-TKI therapies received by the patients were 1 and 2, respectively. All measurable tumor lesions showed a response to therapy in 35 (77%) patients and progression in three (7%) patients. A MR was seen in seven (16%) patients. Of these seven patients, the re-biopsy specimens in which T790M was detected were derived from the primary lesion in six and a metastatic lymph node in one patient. Two types of MRs were seen among these seven patients: (1) the tumor including the re-biopsy site responded, while the other lesions progressed (five patients), and (2) the tumor including the re-biopsy site progressed (two patients). The most frequent progressive sites were liver and lung metastasis (four patients, respectively). Three patients continued to receive osimertinib after the MR, one of whom underwent drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for progressive liver metastasis and achieved disease control on osimertinib for an additional 4 months after the MR.
Conclusion:
A MR to osimertinib was seen in 16% of patients with NSCLC harboring the EGFR T790M mutation. This suggests that resistance mechanism of 1st line EGFR-TKI may differ by the site in same patient. Since benefit of osimertinib is mainly seen in T790M mutation, addition of local therapy may be beneficial for patients who develop a MR to osimertinib.
-
+
P2.07 - Immunology and Immunotherapy (ID 708)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Immunology and Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.07-011 - Long Follow up from Phase I Study of Nivolumab and Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ID 8156)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): N. Yamamoto
- Abstract
Background:
This phase I study investigated the tolerability, safety and pharmacokinetics of nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Method:
Patients who have stage IIIB without indication for definitive radiotherapy, stage IV，or recurrent NSCLC were eligible. nivolumab (10 mg/kg，day 1) and chemotherapy [arm A: cisplatin (80 mg/m[2], day 1) / gemcitabine (1250 mg/m[2], day 1 and 8), arm B: cisplatin (75 mg/m[2], day 1) / pemetrexed (500 mg/m[2], day 1), arm C: carboplatin (AUC 6, day 1) / paclitaxel (200 mg/m[2], day 1) / bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1), arm D: docetaxel (75 mg/m[2], day 1)] were administered every three weeks. Arm A and B were administrated for four cycles and arm C was for four to six cycles as first-line chemotherapy. After that, nivolumab in arm A, nivolumab / pemetrexed in arm B, and nivolumab / bevacizumab in arm C were continued every three weeks as maintenance therapy until disease progression. Arm D were administrated until disease progression as second-line chemotherapy.
Result:
Six patients each in four arms, total 24 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up time was 20.4 months. Progression free survival [median (range)] were 6.3 (0.7-42.2+) months in arm A, 11.8 (1.4-47.4+) months in arm B, 40.7 (5.3-43.5+) months in arm C, and 3.2 (1.9-10.9) months in arm D. Three-year progression-free survival rates were 20% in arm A, 16,7% in arm B, 62.5% in arm C, and 0% in arm D.
Conclusion:
nivolumab 10 mg/kg showed acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging antitumor activity in combination with chemotherapies in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Especially, arm C showed favorable response rate and long progression free survival in this study.
-
+
P3.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 621)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.01-072 - Dacomitinib Versus Gefitinib for First-Line Treatment of Advanced EGFR+ NSCLC in Japanese Patients (ARCHER 1050) (ID 8476)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): N. Yamamoto
- Abstract
Background:
Second-generation EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor dacomitinib has shown encouraging activity as first-line therapy in patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive (EGFR[+]) advanced NSCLC. We performed the first randomized, open-label phase 3 trial comparing dacomitinib with gefitinib as first-line therapy (NCT01774721) which demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefit of dacomitinib versus gefitinib (PFS per IRC: HR, 0.59 [95%CI, 0.47–0.74]; 1-sided P<0.0001; median PFS, 14.7 vs 9.2 months). We present results from Japanese patients enrolled in this ongoing study.
Method:
Patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIB/IV recurrent NSCLC harboring an EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R ± exon 20 T790M) were randomized 1:1 to once-daily oral dacomitinib 45 mg or gefitinib 250 mg until disease progression or discontinuation. Patients with CNS mets excluded. Stratification was by race and EGFR mutation subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent review committee (IRC).
Result:
Among 452 patients enrolled in ARCHER 1050, 81 were Japanese. Slight imbalances in baseline characteristics were observed (Table). PFS and duration of response improvement in Japanese patients was consistent with global results.
Objective response rates per IRC were similar (dacomitinib, 75.0% [95%CI, 58.8–87.3]; gefitinib, 75.6% [95%CI, 59.7–87.6]; 2-sided P=0.9579). Overall survival data are not mature. All 81 patients received study treatment. No grade 4/5 adverse events (AEs were observed with dacomitinib, while 3 grade 4 AEs and 1 grade 5 AE (disease progression) occurred with gefitinib. The most common grade 3 AEs were dermatitis acneiform (27.5%) and paronychia (22.5%) with dacomitinib and alanine aminotransferase increased (12.2%) and abnormal hepatic function (7.3%) with gefitinib. No new safety signals were identified.Japanese Intention-to-Treat Population Dacomitinib (n = 40) n (%) Gefitinib (n = 41) n (%) Unstratified HR [95% CI] 1-sided p-value Male 15 (37.5) 20 (48.8) Age, years <65 ≥65 19 (47.5) 21 (52.5) 15 (36.6) 26 (63.4) Smoking status Never smoked Ex-smoker Smoker 19 (47.5) 20 (50.0) 1 (2.5) 24 (58.5) 16 (39.0) 1 (2.4) ECOG PS 0 1 28 (70.0) 12 (30.0) 21 (51.2) 20 (48.8) Median, months Median, months PFS per IRC 18.2 (95% CI, 11.0–31.3) 9.3 (95% CI, 7.4–14.7) 0.54 (95% CI, 0.31–0.95) P=0.0141 PFS per INV 18.3 (95% CI, 14.6–22.1) 10.2 (95% CI, 7.3–16.9) 0.61 (95% CI, 0.36–1.04) P=0.0334 DoR per IRC in responders # of responders=30 17.5 (95% CI, 10.2–34.3) # of responders=31 8.3 (95% CI, 5.6–12.9) 0.44 (95% CI, 0.22–0.84) P=0.0056 CI, confidence interval; DoR, duration of response; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HR, hazard ratio; INV, investigator assessment.
Conclusion:
Dacomitinib significantly improved PFS and duration of response over gefitinib in first-line treatment of Japanese patients with advanced EGFR[+] NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.
