Virtual Library
Start Your Search
G. Sozzi
Author of
-
+
Epidemiology and innovations in biomarker development (ID 42)
- Event: ELCC 2017
- Type: Poster Discussion session
- Track:
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:P. Boffetta, S. Lantuejoul, R.A. Stahel
- Coordinates: 5/06/2017, 16:45 - 17:45, Room W
-
+
LBA3 - Correlation between clinical outcomes of patients treated within the tailor trial and next-generation sequencing (NGS) results: Analysis of genes associated to KRAS mutations (ID 463)
16:45 - 16:45 | Author(s): G. Sozzi
- Abstract
Background:
rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn
TAILOR (NCT00637910) was a phase 3 randomized trial comparing erlotinib over docetaxel in second line treatment in EGFR wild-type patients. The prognostic and predictive value of KRAS is still debatable. Taking advantage from the available tissue samples and clinical data of this trial, we performed sequencing of a customized gene panel in order to identify novel biomarkers and new potential therapeutic targets specifically associated to KRAS.
Methods:
NGS was performed on PGM Ion Torrent platform and involved 111 genes. 5% of frequency was used to define mutations. Association with clinical features or between genes was performed with non-parametric test. Cox regression model was used to define the prognostic role of mutated genes on survival.
Results:
188 out of 222 randomized patients had available tissue. 134 tissues were successfully sequenced. 3 were EGFR mutated, 47 were KRAS mutated (36%). 68 were in erlotinib arm and 63 in docetaxel arm. Biomarkers associated to KRAS were 21 LKB1 (16%) and 61 p53 (46%). Survival results are described in the table.rnTable: LBA3rn
rnrn PFS PFS OS OS Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate HR (95%CI) p-value HR (95%CI) p-value HR (95%CI) p-value HR (95%CI) p-value KRASwt/LKB1wt reference rn rn rn KRASmut/LKB1wt 0.76 (0.51-1.15) p 0.19 0.79 (0.51-1.22) p 0.29 0.78 (0.51-1.19) p 0.25 0.75 (0.49-1.17) p 0.21 KRASwt/LKB1mut 1.42 (0.68-2.95) p 0.35 1.43 (0.67-3.08) p 0.35 1.69 (0.81-3.52) p 0.16 1.59 (0.75-3.4) p 0.23 KRASmut/LKB1mut 1.18 (0.64-2.19) p 0.59 1.29 (0.67-2.49) p 0.45 1.32 (0.72-2.45) p 0.37 1.34 (0.69-2.61) p 0.38 KRASwt/tp53wt reference rn rn rn KRASmut/tp53wt 0.80 (0.49-1.31) p 0.37 0.87 (0.51-1.46) p 0.86 0.88 (0.53-1.46) p 0.61 0.85 (0.50-1.46) p 0.56 KRASwt/tp53mut 1.23 (0.79-1.91) p 0.35 1.41 (0.88-2.26) p 0.15 1.38 (0.88-2.16) p 0.15 1.55 (0.95-2.55) p 0.81 KRASmut/tp53mut 1.07 (0.62-1.82) p 0.81 1.11 (0.64-1.94) p 0.70 1.14 (0.66-1.98) p 0.64 1.12 (0.63-1.97) p 0.70
Conclusions:
In TAILOR, KRAS was not prognostic. The association with LKB1 and p53 does not affect prognosis, while LKB1 mutation could be a negative prognostic factor (HR = 1.39). Further research is needed to prospectively assess this pathway.
Clinical trial identification:
Legal entity responsible for the study:
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan
Funding:
AIRC (Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro)
Disclosure:
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.