Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Rafael Rosell
Moderator of
-
+
MS 25 - Novel Molecular Targets (KRAS/MET/Novel Fusions): Druggable or Not? (ID 547)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Symposium
- Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy
- Presentations: 5
- Moderators:Rafael Rosell, Isamu Okamoto
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 14:30 - 16:15, Main Hall
-
+
MS 25.01 - Discovery of Novel Molecular Targets (ID 7759)
14:30 - 14:50 | Presenting Author(s): Pasi A Jänne
- Abstract
Abstract not provided
Information from this presentation has been removed upon request of the author.
-
+
MS 25.02 - KRAS-Targeted Therapy or Angiogenesis: Still a Viable Target? (ID 7760)
14:50 - 15:10 | Presenting Author(s): Ravi Salgia | Author(s): I. Mambetsariev, I. Amanam, A. Nam
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
NSCLC is a heterogenous disease withvariable molecular mutations. Vi-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) is one of the most common oncogenic drivers, especially in lung cancer, found in around 25-30% adenocarcinomas. The other molecular abnormalities related to RAS pathway are EGFR (10-23%), BRAF (2%), MET (2%), HER2 (1%) and NRAS (0.2%). Within KRAS, the most common mutations are G12C (40%), G12V (21%), G12D (17%), G12A (10%) and other (12%) G12 and G13 mutations [Dogan. Clinical Cancer Research 2012; 18: 6169-6177]. KRAS mutations are associated with poorer outcomes in NSCLC. Renaud et al, showed that KRAS mutant patients had worser outcomes compared to wild type cases[1]. KRAS may be a negative predictor of responsiveness to cytotoxic therapy based off of retrospective data. In addition, Renaud and colleagues have shown that KRAS mutations may be predictive of resistance to radiation therapy. Identifying ways to target these KRAS mutations may lead to benefit for patients in combination with other traditional means of treatment. Directly blocking RAS activity has remained difficult to attain, due to a variety of mechanisms and yet to demonstrate efficacy clinically. Therefore, much more focus has been spent on downstream targets of KRAS. Selumetinib an oral inhibitor of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) 1/2 had promising phase II results in combination with docetaxel in comparison to docetaxel alone. Unfortunately, in the multicenter Phase III, SELECT-1 trial with 510 patients, PFS and OS were no different in the selumetinib and docetaxel arm versus docetaxel alone. This may be in part due to an increase in RAF-depedent MEK phosphorylation that may interfere with its efficacy. Combining inhibitors that target different components or parallel pathways have yielded success in other tumors like melanoma with combination MEK and BRAF inhibition. For KRAS mutant tumors, the PI3K-AKT- mTOR pathway has also been examined as it has been thought it can bypass resistance to MEK inhibition. The combination of MEK in addition to PI3K-aKT-mTOR has yet to yield any clinically impactful results. Inhibtion of the cysteine residue on KRAS G12C, which makes up more than 40% of KRAS mutants, has been shown to have some activity preclinically [2, 3] Our preliminary data shows that, KRAS is frequently associated with co-occuring mutations. The most common of these were TP53 (n=15, 25%), ATM (n=9, 15%), LRP1B (n=9, 15%), ARID1A (n=8, 13%), STK11 (n=8, 13%), ARID1B (n=7, 12%), TERT (n=7, 12%), EGFR (n=6, 10%), RBM10 (n=6, 10%), SPTA1 (n=6, 10%). We still are not clear on the role of co-mutations and their specific function as sensitizers or agents resistance. It was previously shown that KRAS plus TP-53 mutations had impaired response to docetaxel monotherapy. The addition of selumetinib provided substantial benefit in mice models [4]. Also, STK11 mutations in conjunction with KRAS mutant NSCLC has been shown to infer resistance to PD-1/PDL-1 blockade [5]. Lung cancer frequently exhibits upregulation of angiogenesis and has been reported to be associated with a negative prognostic factor. Over the past decade, novel insights into the role of angiogenesis in NSCLC tumor growth and progression have provided a rationale for the development of anti-angiogenic agents. The use of anti-angiogenic agents to treat NSCLC gained clinical interest in 2006, when the results of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Trial 4599 were published in the New England Journal of Medicine and showed for the first-time improved overall survival(OS) and progression-free survival after the addition of bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech), a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the process of angiogenesis by binding to the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) protein, to treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel in 878 patients who had recurrent or advanced NSCLC [6]. Since then, no other anti-angiogenic agent (such as sunitinib, sorafenib, etc.) has been able to demonstrate improved OS for patients with lung cancer. This may be in part because the mechanisms of actions for those drugs is completely different from bevacizumab; they work by inhibiting the internal tyrosine kinase domain of the VEGF receptor and are also not completely selective for the VEGF receptor and also hit other targets (such as PDGF, FGFR, etc.) [6]. This may play a role in the increased toxicity for these inhibitors and the subsequent lower OS. Since the recent positive data showing benefit of first-line carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab may lead to expedited FDA approval, the utility of anti-angiogenic drugs may enter a renaissance as a second-line therapeutic option. However, another consideration has to be made in the pursuit of improved anti-angiogenic drugs where the clinical and financial “value” for the patient are factored in clinical decision making. Though the VEGF/VEGFR pathway is seen as a crucial mediator of tumor survival and growth, the treatments currently available are overshadowed by excessive costs and several cost-effective analyses of bevacizumab have shown that the use of the drug can cost up to 350,000 per life-year gained [7]. References 1. Renaud, S., P.-E. Falcoz, M. Schaeffer, et al., Prognostic value of the KRAS G12V mutation in 841 surgically resected Caucasian lung adenocarcinoma cases. Br J Cancer, 2015. 113(8): p. 1206-1215. 2. Ostrem, J.M., U. Peters, M.L. Sos, J.A. Wells, and K.M. Shokat, K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature, 2013. 503(7477): p. 548-51. 3. Patricelli, M.P., M.R. Janes, L.S. Li, et al., Selective Inhibition of Oncogenic KRAS Output with Small Molecules Targeting the Inactive State. Cancer Discov, 2016. 6(3): p. 316-29. 4. Chen, Z., K. Cheng, Z. Walton, et al., A murine lung cancer co-clinical trial identifies genetic modifiers of therapeutic response. Nature, 2012. 483(7391): p. 613-617. 5. Skoulidis, F., M.D. Hellmann, M.M. Awad, et al., STK11/LKB1 co-mutations to predict for de novo resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, 2017, American Society of Clinical Oncology. 6. Socinski, M.A., ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITION FOR THE TREATMENT OF NON–SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER. CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016. 14(5): p. 336-338. 7. Goulart, B. and S. Ramsey, A trial-based assessment of the cost-utility of bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Value Health, 2011. 14(6): p. 836-45.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS 25.03 - MET-Related Molecular Targets (ID 7761)
15:10 - 15:30 | Presenting Author(s): Alexander Drilon
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
MET activation in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) can occur via mechanisms including mutation and amplification. MET exon 14 splicing alterations and MET amplification are clinically actionable genomic alterations. Response to MET-directed targeted therapy has been reported for both subsets. In a phase 1 study of crizotinib for patients with MET exon 14-altered NSCLCs, the overall response rate (ORR) was 39% and the median progression-free survival was 8 months (Drilon et al, ASCO 2016). In the same phase 1 study, the ORR for crizotinib in patients with MET-amplified NSCLC was 17% and 50% for tumors with a FISH MET/CEP7 ratio of >2.2 to <5 and ≥5, respectively (Camidge et al, ASCO 2014). Furthermore, acquired MET amplification is associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Response to combined EGFR- and MET-directed therapy has been reported in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers with acquired resistance to prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Prospective clinical trials of various MET inhibitors as single-agents or in combination with other therapies are ongoing. A number of different MET inhibitors have been tested in the clinic, including multikinase inhibitors with activity against MET such as crizotinib and cabozantinib, MET-selective inhibitors such as capmatinib, and MET antibodies such as onartuzumab and embituzumab. Newer agents such as MET antibody-drug conjugates are being explored. Data on acquired resistance to MET-directed targeted therapy has begun to emerge. The MET D1228N and D1228V kinase domain mutations have been identified as acquired mechanisms of resistance to MET tyrosine kinase inhibition (Heist et al, J Thoracic Oncol 2016; Bachall et al, Cancer Discov 2017)). The detection of MET mutation and amplification in the clinic is thus important, but is associated with specific challenges, and requires a comprehensive approach to testing. Notably, molecular profiling should not be restricted to the classic population of younger, never or former light cigarette smoker patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas where other drivers such as sensitizing EGFR mutations and ALK or ROS1 rearrangements are enriched; MET exon 14 alterations, for example, are found in older patients with a more substantial prior smoking history, and in sarcomatoid carcinomas of the lung. The role of MET immunohistochemistry in selecting patients for MET-directed targeted therapy in the absence of comprehensive molecular profiling remains controversial, although the experience with this approach in prior prospective clinical trials has been disappointing. Advances have clearly been made in the development of MET-directed targeted therapy for subsets of patients with advanced NSCLCs that are hopefully moving the field closer to the regulatory approval of one or more these agents in the future.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS 25.04 - FGFR-Related Novel Molecular Targets (ID 7762)
15:30 - 15:50 | Presenting Author(s): Kazuto Nishio
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Aberrant activation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling due to up-regulation of FGF receptor gene (FGFR) expression, alternative splicing of FGFR transcripts, FGFR mutations or translocations, or increased availability of FGF has been found to contribute to prognosis in several types of tumors(1, 2). Our previous evidence suggest that these gene alterations increase the sensitivity to multi-kinase inhibitors (3, 4, 5). FGFR gene alterations are relatively frequent in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and are a potential targets for therapy with FGFR inhibitors. However, little is known regarding the clinicopathologic features associated with FGFR alterations. The angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib has shown promising activity in preclinical and clinical studies for non-small cell lung cancer and other solid tumors (6,7,8). We have now applied next-generation sequencing (NGS) to characterize FGFR alterations in LSCC patients as well as examined the antitumor activity of nintedanib in LSCC cell lines positive for FGFR1 copy number gain (CNG). The effects of nintedanib on the proliferation of and FGFR signaling in LSCC cell lines were examined in vitro, and its effects on tumor formation were examined in vivo. A total of 75 clinical LSCC specimens were screened for FGFR alterations by NGS. Nintedanib inhibited the proliferation of FGFR1 CNG-positive LSCC cell lines in association with attenuation of the FGFR1-ERK signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. FGFR1 CNG (10.7%), FGFR1 mutation (2.7%), FGFR2 mutation (2.7%), FGFR4 mutation (5.3%), and FGFR3 fusion (1.3%) were detected in LSCC specimens by NGS. Clinicopathologic features did not differ between LSCC patients positive or negative for FGFR alterations. However, among the 36 patients with disease recurrence after surgery, prognosis was significantly worse for those harboring FGFR alterations. Screening for FGFR alterations by NGS warrants further study as a means to identify patients with LSCC recurrence after surgery who might benefit from nintedanib therapy. 1) Mizukami T, et al. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56(1):106-117. 2) Matsumoto K, et al. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(4):727-32. 3) Arao T, et al. Hepatology. 2013;57(4):1407-15. 4) Sakai K, et al. Oncotarget. 2015;6(25):21636-44. 5) Kaibori M, et al. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(31):49091-49098. 6) Kudo K, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17(6):1373-81. 7) Okamoto I, et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010; 9(10):2825-33. 8) M. Takeda K. et al. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(4): 748–750.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS 25.05 - Novel Fusions (ID 7763)
15:50 - 16:10 | Presenting Author(s): Robert C. Doebele
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Chromosomal rearrangements or deletions can generate novel gene fusions that lead to the expression of chimeric proteins with oncogenic activity in lung and other cancers. The paradigm for gene fusions in lung cancer is the EML4-ALK gene fusion which is found in approximately 5% of lung adenocarcinomas.[1] Once identified, drug development for this target proceeded rapidly and crizotinib was the first approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer based on its ability to generate substation objective response rates and prolonged progression free survival (NSCLC).[3,4 ]The development of CNS penetrant and/or next generation ROS1 inhibitors including lorlatinib, entrectinib and TPX-0005 is ongoing. RET gene fusions are also found in 1-2% of NSCLC, but the use of multiple different RET inhibitors have failed to reproduce the success of targeting ALK or ROS1 fusions.[5 ]The development of more selective RET inhibitors such as LOXO-292, BLU-667, and RXDX-105 are currently in clinical trials for RET+ lung and other cancers. NTRK1 fusions were recently identified in NSCLC and homologous NTRK2 and NTRK3 fusions are found in multiple tumor types.[6,7, ]Early clinical trials of larotrectinib showed an impressive objective response rate of 76% for 12 different tumor histologies harboring NTRK1/2/3 fusions and the CNS-penetrant entrectinib is similarly being evaluated in a basket trial. Other rare, novel fusions have recently been identified in NSCLC including EGFR fusions or MET fusions.[7] Early evidence suggests that these fusions may also respond to cognate TKIs. EGFR fusions break the paradigm of ALK and ROS1 fusions in which the 5’ end of ALK or ROS1 is replaced with the 5’ portion of another gene. EGFR fusions retain most of the EGFR gene, with the unrelated gene sequencing fusing at the 3’ end of EGFR. A related oncogenic EGFR mutation in which the kinase domain of EGFR is duplicated in tandem has also been described and appears responsive to EGFR TKIs.[7] Additional fusions involving the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) encoding genes AXL, PDGFRA, and ERBB4 fusions have been described, but little is known about the true incidence in lung cancer.[8,9] The fusions described thus far all involve genes that encode RTKs, but additional gene fusions have also been identified in lung cancer including BRAF fusions.[7,9 ]BRAF fusions replace the 5’ region of BRAF, including the Ras-binding domain (RBD), with sequences from another gene. Anecdotal evidence suggest that these alterations may be responsive to MEK inhibition. Analogous splice alteration which remove a region including the RBD have also been described in cancer and are oncogenic. Finally, gene fusions involving NRG1, which encodes the HER3/4 ligand neuregulin-1, have been described, mostly in invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas of the lung.[9,10 ]Several challenges exist to the development of targeted therapies for these novel fusions. Even in the era of next-generation sequencing tests these alterations may go undetected due to limited testing of genes to those with approved therapies (ALK, ROS1, EGFR, and BRAF) and not all assays are designed to detect all of these alterations. Furthermore, the rarity of some of these alterations may make clinical trials for these novel fusions less appealing, although amalgamating some of these alterations with analogous mutations, e.g., MET gene fusions with MET exon 14 splice alterations or MET gene amplification, may allow for a more rapid path to approval. References 1. Chia PL, Mitchell P, Dobrovic A, et al: Prevalence and natural history of ALK positive non-small-cell lung cancer and the clinical impact of targeted therapy with ALK inhibitors. Clin Epidemiol 6:423-32, 2014 2. Camidge DR, Bang YJ, Kwak EL, et al: Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. The lancet oncology 13:1011-9, 2012 3. Davies KD, Le AT, Theodoro MF, et al: Identifying and targeting ROS1 gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 18:4570-9, 2012 4. Shaw AT, Ou SH, Bang YJ, et al: Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 371:1963-71, 2014 5. Gautschi O, Milia J, Filleron T, et al: Targeting RET in Patients With RET-Rearranged Lung Cancers: Results From the Global, Multicenter RET Registry. J Clin Oncol 35:1403-1410, 2017 6. Vaishnavi A, Capelletti M, Le AT, et al: Oncogenic and drug-sensitive NTRK1 rearrangements in lung cancer. Nature medicine 19:1469-72, 2013 7. Stransky N, Cerami E, Schalm S, et al: The landscape of kinase fusions in cancer. Nat Commun 5:4846, 2014 8. Seo JS, Ju YS, Lee WC, et al: The transcriptional landscape and mutational profile of lung adenocarcinoma. Genome Res 22:2109-19, 2012 9. Nakaoku T, Tsuta K, Ichikawa H, et al: Druggable oncogene fusions in invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 20:3087-93, 2014 10. Fernandez-Cuesta L, Plenker D, Osada H, et al: CD74-NRG1 fusions in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov 4:415-22, 2014
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
PL 04 - Closing Plenary: Where We Are Now, and Where We Will Be in 10 Years (ID 587)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Plenary Session
- Track:
- Presentations: 4
- Moderators:H. Kato, Rafael Rosell
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 16:30 - 17:45, Main Hall
-
+
PL 04.01 - Where We Are Now, and Where We Will Be in 10 years: From North American Perspective (ID 7841)
16:30 - 16:50 | Presenting Author(s): Paul A. Bunn, Jr.
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Stage 4 NSCLC 1[st] line Rx: In addition to complete staging, all patients with any histology should have PD-L1 testing of their tumor. In addition patients with an adenocarcinoma histology and never smokers should have molecular testing that would include at least EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and BRAF. If NGS testing is selected that additional genes can be tested including MET,RET, HER2,and NTRK. Patients with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) >49% who do not have a molecular driver can be treated with pembrolizumab as their first therapy. This therapy is continued for 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. For those with a TPS score of 1-49, concurrent chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab may be considered based on the results of a small phase II trial. However, larger phase III trials are in progress and may alter this choice. Patients with a molecular alteration in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or BRAF are treated with the appropriate TKI or TKI combination in the case of v600E BRAF. Although all of the randomized trials comparing these new therapies to chemotherapy included only PS 0-1 patients, there is clear evidence that patients with PS 2 and even PS 3 and elderly patients may benefit from these therapies and should thus be tested. For patients with a lower TPS score or no molecular abnormality and PS0-1, the standard therapy is a platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. For patients with adenocarcinoma, the most frequently used regimen is pemetrexed with platinum. In North America the platinum is most often carboplatin because of its preferred toxicity profile. PS 0-1 adenocarcinoma patients may also receive bevacizumab if there are no comorbid conditions that would increase toxicity. A taxane doublet with or without bevacizumab is also acceptable. For patients with squamous carcinoma the platinum doublet usually contains gemcitabine or a taxane with carboplatin with or without bevacizumab. Patients receiving chemotherapy are restaged after 2 cycles. Those with progressive disease are offered second line therapy. Patients with stable disease or response receive 2 additional cycles and are then restaged again. Those with acceptable toxicity and continued response are offered 2 additional cycles for a total of 6. Those without further response or additional toxicity are offered maintenance therapy after the 4 cycles. Patients receiving 6 cycles are also offered maintenance therapy. Maintenance therapy may consist of continued pemetrexed or continued bevacizumab for those responding to these. Switch therapy to pemetrexed or to erlotinib or gemcitabine may be considered. 2[nd] Line Rx. For patients receiving 1[st] line pembrolizumab, 2[nd] line rx is first line chemotherapy as discussed above. For patients progressing on a 1[st] line TKI, the 2[nd] line therapy is most often a 2[nd] or 3[rd] generation TKI. When therapy with a TKI is exhausted, the next line of therapy is standard first line chemotherapy as described above. For patients who receive 1[st] line chemotherapy, the second line therapy is most often immunotherapy which can be any of the 3 approved agents for patients with a TPS score of >1 or nivolumab or atezolizumab for patients with a TPS score of 0. 3[rd] Line Rx: Patients who receive 1[st] line I/O followed by chemo or who receive gene specific TKIs followed by 1[st] line chemotherapy, the 3[rd] line treatment would be what was previously considered 2nl line chemo such as docetaxel +/- ramicirumab. Other chemotherapy agents can also be considered such as gemcitabline, other taxanes or irinotecan. Clinical trials may be substituted for any of these treatments in any lines of therapy. Unresectable Stage III. The standard approach is currently concurrent chemotherapy with chest radiotherapy. This is likely to change as positive results of a trial comparing CT/RT alone to CT/RT followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab were announced in mid-2017. The chest RT is generally about 60 Gy given over 6 weeks. The chemotherapy is generally a platinum doublet with etoposide, paclitaxel or pemetrexed. At the time of progression the algorhythm described for stage 4 above can be instituted. Resectable stage I-IIIA. For stage 1A standard therapy is lobectomy alone or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for those who are medically inoperable. Patients with stage IB, especially with poor prognostic features such as large size or vascular invasion may receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with a cisplatin doublet and surgery is standard while other smaller stage IB tumors are treated with lobectomy alone. Stage II and IIIA patients may be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant CT/RT followed by surgery. They may also receive surgical resection first followed by adjuvant CT or CT/RT. The future: It is highly likely that immunotherapy combinations will prove to be superior to single checkpoint inhibitors so that the majority of sage IV patients without a molecular driver are likely to receive an immunotherapy combination, likely irrespective of TPS score. For stage IV patients with a molecular driver, it is likely that initial therapy will consist of the TKI plus another agent that can affect the cells that persist after initial TKI therapy. It is likely that immunotherapy combinations and molecular combinations will be used in unresectable stage III disease before, after or during CT/RT and will improve cure rates. I believe that a large change in approach to early stage patients will occur with the development of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and molecular therapy. In these approaches we have the opportunity to improve cure rates as well as to more rapidly develop new therapies based on pathologic complete response rates as we now do in breast cancer. The future is also likely to see new ways to define risk in both smokers and non-smokers so that we can detect patients early and so that we can develop new prevention strategies for those at high risk. Figure 1
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
PL 04.02 - Where We Are Now, and Where We Will Be in 10 years: From Asian Perspective (ID 7842)
16:50 - 17:10 | Presenting Author(s): Nagahiro Saijo
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Where we are now, and where we will be in 10 years: From Asian Perspective Nagahiro Saijo, MD, PHD, Tokyo Medical University, Kinki University School Medicine Compared with 30 years ago non-small cell carcinoma(NSCLC) became a vast dominant type of lung cancer and majority of clinical trials focus on it. At the end of 20[th] century, effect of platinum doublet containing third generation cytotoxic drugs reached a plateau and thoracic oncologists felt skepticism to achieve the goal in lung cancer treatment. Development of EGFR-TKIs (Gefitinib and Erlotinib) was one of the biggest breakthroughs for rollback of chemotherapy in lung cancer. The EGFR mutation was discovered in 2004 but it took 5 years until there was general agreement that it was an important driver mutation which could predict for response to EGFR-TKI. Evolution of EGFR-TKI proceeds to irreversible 2[nd] (Afatinib and Dacomitinib) and mutation specific 3[rd] generation (Osimertinib) TKIs which can combat the issues of resistance. In Asia more than 50% of adenocarcinoma are EGFR-Mt+ and physicians experienced many long term survivors like surgical treatment in early stage lung cancer. In addition CTONG trial demonstrated that adjuvant EGFR-TKI (Gefitinib) delays recurrence in EGFR-positive surgically resected EGFR-Mt+ NSCLC. WJOG in Japan is conducting exactly the same schedules of trial. There will be a possibility to conduct study of EGFR-TKI combined with chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-Mｔ+ stage III NSCLC in Asian countries although this strategy was not successful in unselected population. Many driver mutations have been identified and its molecular classification made rapid progress in lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma. The identification ALK and ROS rearrangement quickly followed by the development of active drugs (Crizotinib, Alectinib, Brigotinib, Lorlatinib ). J-ALEX and ALEX trials clearly showed that Alectinib was extremely active drug against ALK rearranged NSCLC. The Nation Wide Genomic Screening Project (LC-Scrum-Japan) leaded by K Goto has been started on February 2013 in Japan. Under this project many driver mutations have been identified not only in non-squamous cell carcinoma but also in squamous and small cell lung cancer. Many clinical trials are ongoing targeting genomic alterations screened in LC-SCRUM-Japan. Among them LURET trial demonstrated that Vandetanib could show 53% response rate (9/17) in RET+ lung cancer and Crizotinib produced 69% response rate (89/129) in ROS-1+ patients in OxOnc12-01 Asian Global trial. Driver mutation targeted drugs showed dramatic effect compared with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy, however, there is so far no positive data of their combination in spite of clear preclinical synergistic or additive effect. Human RAS oncogenes are the most commonly mutated gene family in Caucasian. About 35% (15% in Asian) of lung cancer are driven by activating mutations of KRAS. RAS is really an oncogenic driver and numerous preclinical studies suggest that KRAS is an excellent and well validated target. However, unlike EGFR, ALK, ROS, there is no effective drugs against KRAS. It will be extremely an important issue to develop KRAS targeting drugs. Robust negative data accumulate in immunotherapy for lung cancer including peptide vaccine therapy. Based on unique idea of Allison J. first immune checkpoint inhibitor, anti-CTLA4 antibody (ipillimumab) produced survival benefit in melanoma. PD-1 was cloned by Honjo T (Japan) on 1992 and antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 antibody was reported on 2002. During past 7 years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been an exciting new addition to the armamentarium fort lung cancer. Two anti-PD-1 antibodies such as Nivolumab and Pemblolizumab has become a standard for second line treatment of lung cancer based on durable response and marked increase in overall survival. In first line treatment Pemblolizumab prolonged OS and PFS compared with standard chemotherapy in NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression >50% (Keynote024). On the other hand, Nivolumab failed to show PFS benefit compared with cytotoxic agents because of poor patient selection. The most important issue will be how to concentrate responsive population and how to eliminate ineffective patients. Although there is a tendency of correlation between PD-L1 expression and objective response/PFS/OS, responders are experienced even in PD-L1 negative patients. Microsatellite instability has related with response to anti-PD-1 antibody in colorectal cancer. Mutation burden may influence on antigenicity of tumor cells. Infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes is also considered to be a predictive biomarker but it is too objective for precise quantification. The successful patient selection for immune checkpoint inhibitors may depend on the development of methods for quantitative measurement of tumor specific cytotoxic activity of CD8+ lymphocytes. Can cytotoxic drugs survive as one of the modalities for lung cancer treatment? Combination of cytotoxic drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors shows promising antitumor activity in lung cancer and gastric cancer. Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is a very interesting strategy for effective chemotherapy. DS-8201 targeting HER2, developed by Daiichi-Sankyo showed high response rate and favorable toxicity profile in previously treated HER2 positive gastric and breast cancer. ADC will be a potent strategy in future cytotoxic chemotherapy for lung cancer. Progress in the treatment of small cell lung cancer is very behind because of decrease in absolute number of SCLC patients and no discovery of driver mutations. JCOG conducted serial randomized clinical trials in SCLC. However, treatment result reached a plateau in both of limited and extensive diseases. Discovery of druggable targets in near future may have a significant impact in small cell lung cancer.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
PL 04.03 - Where We Are Now, and Where We Will Be in 10 years: From European Perspective (ID 7843)
17:10 - 17:30 | Presenting Author(s): Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
PL 04.04 - WCLC 2018 - Welcome to Toronto (ID 7844)
17:30 - 17:35 | Presenting Author(s): Andrea Bezjak, Gail Elizabeth Darling, Natasha B Leighl, Frances A Shepherd
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
MA 01 - SCLC: Research Perspectives (ID 650)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: SCLC/Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:John V Heymach, Eun Kyung Cho
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, Room 503
-
+
MA 01.02 - Multigene Mutation Profiling and Clinical Characteristics of Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers Versus Heavy Smokers (ID 10335)
11:05 - 11:10 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been occasionally detected in never-smokers as smoking rates decrease worldwide. We investigated the clinical and genetic characteristics of SCLC in never-smokers (Geno1.3-CLICaP)
Method:
A cohort of patients diagnosed with SCLC were grouped into smokers (n=10) and ever/never-smokers (n=10). For both groups, somatic mutation profiling was carried out using a comprehensive NGS assay (TruSight Tumor 170) targeting the full coding regions of 170 cancer-related genes. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was confirmed by RT-PCR (Cobas[TM]). The clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional models.
Result:
Median age was 58 years (r, 46-81), 55% (n = 11) were men, most patients had extended disease (85%) and the dominant tumor involvement site was pleura and lungs (65%). No significant differences were found in age, disease distribution, baseline performance status and cerebral metastases in relation to tobacco exposure. The ORR to first-line therapy were 50% and 90% between smokers and ever/never-smokers, respectively (p=0.032). The median overall survival (OS) was 29.1 months in ever/never-smokers (95%CI 23.5-34.6) versus 17.3 months in smokers (95%CI 4.8-29.7; p=0.0054). Never-smoking history (HR 0.543, 95%CI 0.41-0.80), limited stage disease (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.40-0.91) and response to first line platinum based chemotherapy (HR 0.63, 95%CI 0.60-0.92) were independently related with good prognosis. Among ever/never smokers main genetic mutations were TP53 (80%), RB1 (40%), CYLD (30%), EGFR (30%), MET (20%), SMAD4 (20%) and BRIP1 (20%). None of the smokers had mutations in EGFR, MET or SMAD4, but there was a greater involvement in RB1 (80%, p=0.04), CDKN2A (30%, p=0.05), CEBPA (30%, p=0.05), FANCG (20%), GATA2 (20%), and PTEN (20%).
Conclusion:
Never-smokers with SCLC are increasingly prevalent and have a better prognosis than their smoker counterpart. EGFR, MET and SMAD4 are frequent mutations among SCLCs of ever/never smokers, and RB1, CDKN2A and CEBPA among smokers. Figure 1
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA 05 - Next Generation TKI (ID 657)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Oral
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:James Chih-Hsin Yang, Fiona Blackhall
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 15:45 - 17:30, Room 301 + 302
-
+
OA 05.01 - First-Line Dacomitinib versus Gefitinib in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutation Subgroups (ID 8555)
15:45 - 15:55 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
The ARCHER 1050 study (NCT01774721) demonstrated benefits of dacomitinib compared with gefitinib as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR-activating mutation. Here, we present the results of a prospective subgroup analysis by EGFR mutation subtype.
Method:
In this ongoing phase 3, open-label study, eligible patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIb/IV or recurrent NSCLC and EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation ± T790M mutation) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 were randomized (1:1) to receive dacomitinib or gefitinib, stratified by race and EGFR mutation subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent radiologic central (IRC) review. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and objective response rate (ORR), as determined by IRC and investigators’ assessments.
Result:
A total of 452 patients were randomized (dacomitinib, n=227; gefitinib, n=225). Among the dacomitinib and gefitinib arms, respectively, 134 (59%) and 133 (59%) had exon 19 deletions and 93 (41%) and 92 (41%) had L858R mutations. The Table shows PFS, ORR, and duration of response by EGFR mutation per IRC. Results based on investigators’ assessments were consistent with those based on IRC review. Overall survival data are immature.Exon 19 Deletion L858R Mutation Dacomitinib (n=134) Gefitinib (n=133) Dacomitinib (n=93) Gefitinib(n=92) PFS per IRC Median, months (95% CI) 16.5 (11.3–18.4) 9.2 (9.1–11.0) 12.3 (9.2–16.0) 9.8 (7.6–11.1) Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1-sided P value 0.551 (0.408–0.745) <0.0001 0.626 (0.444–0.883) 0.0034 ORR per IRC CR, n (%) 7 (5.2) 3 (2.3) 5 (5.4) 1 (1.1) PR, n (%) 95 (70.9) 90 (67.7) 63 (67.7) 67 (72.8) ORR (CR + PR), n (%) (95% CI) 102 (76.1) (68.0–83.1) 93 (69.9) (61.4–77.6) 68 (73.1) (62.9–81.8) 68 (73.9) (63.7–82.5) 1-sided P value 0.1143 0.5395 DoR in responders per IRC Median, months (95% CI) 15.6 (13.1–19.6) 8.3 (7.9–10.1) 13.7 (9.2–17.4) 7.5 (6.5–10.2) Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1-sided P value 0.454 (0.319–0.645) <0.0001 0.403 (0.267–0.607) <0.0001 CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DoR, duration of response; PR, partial response.
Conclusion:
By IRC and investigators’ assessments, PFS with dacomitinib was superior to that with gefitinib in patients with either EGFR mutation. Despite a similar ORR among the treatment and EGFR mutation subgroups, duration of response was longer with dacomitinib for both mutations.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.02 - Biology/Pathology (ID 614)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P1.02-055 - Genotyping Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma Among Hispanics (Geno1.1-CLICaP) (ID 10166)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
Background:
Lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most prevalent type of lung cancer. Currently, no targeted therapeutics are approved for treatment of this cancer subgroup, largely because of a lack understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of the disease. To characterize SCC genomic profile among Hispanics we tested diverse alterations using a validated next generation sequencing (NGS) platform.
Method:
We performed sequencing using a comprehensive NGS assay (TruSight Tumor 170) targeting the full coding regions of 170 cancer-related genes on 26 squamous cell lung cancer samples from Hispanic patients. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TCs) was assessed using clone 22C3 (Dako) and main clinical outcomes like progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) were recorded.
Result:
Median age was 67 years (range, 33-83), 53.8% were men and all patients had previous exposure to tobacco (former 69.2%/current 30.8%) with a mean consumption rate of 34-year package. Almost all patients (80.8%) received cisplatin or carboplatin plus gemcitabine as first line with an ORR of 61.5%, a median PFS of 12.0 months (95% CI 10.9-13.2) and OS of 24.8 months (95% CI 20.8-28.7). We found a relatively high prevalence of inactivating mutations in TP53 (61.5%), PIK3CA (34.6%), MLL2 (34.6%), KEAP1 (30.8%) and NOTCH1 (26.9%). In addition, genetic alterations in the NF1 (19.2%), RB1 (15.4%), STK11 (15.4%), SOX2 (11.5%), PTEN (7.7%), KRAS (3.8%) and HRAS (3.8%). Distribution of PD-L1 expression were: negative, 1%, 2-49% and ≥50% in 23.1%, 38.5%, 26.9% and 11.5%, respectively. None of the genetic alterations affected PFS, OS or ORR and PDL1 expression was lower among those who had mutations in TP53 (p=0.037) and PIK3CA (p=0.05).
Conclusion:
We identified previously described mutations among Hispanic patients with SCC. Lower PDL1 expression was also found among those who had alterations in TP53 and PIK3CA.Figure 1
-
+
P1.07 - Immunology and Immunotherapy (ID 693)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Immunology and Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P1.07-015 - Interferon-Gamma (INFG) as a Biomarker to Guide Immune Checkpoint Blockade (ICB) in Cancer Therapy (ID 8939)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
Background:
PD-L1 is induced by oncogenic signals or via INFG. STAT3, through DNMT1, epigenetically silences STAT1 and RIG-I and opposes INFG signaling. TET1 is a DNA demethylase. I kappa B kinase epsilon (IKBKE), a noncanonical I-kappa-B kinase, is essential for INFG induction, but can also promote NFATc1 phosphorylation and T cell response inhibition. Eomesodermin (Eomes) regulates T cell exhaustion. CCL5 (or Rantes), dependent on STAT3, causes myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) recruitment. YAP1 can also drive MDSC recruitment via CXCL5 signaling. We have explored whether the expression of genes related to INFG signaling, T cell exhaustion and MDSC recruitment is associated with response to ICB.
Method:
Total RNA from pre-treatment tissue samples of 17 NSCLC and 21 melanoma patients treated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab respectively, was analyzed by qRT-PCR. INFG, STAT3, IKBKE, STAT1, RIG-I and PD-L1 mRNA were examined. CCL5, YAP1, CXCL5, NFATC1, EOMES and TET1 expression was additionally assessed. Gene expression was categorized with respect to tertiles and patients were divided into two risk groups (low and intermediate/high). CD8[+ ]tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-L1 protein expression in tumor and CD8[+ ]TILs were examined by immunohistochemistry (SP57 and SP142 assay, respectively). Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were estimated.
Result:
Seventeen NSCLC patients, previously treated with one or more prior systemic therapies, received nivolumab. IKBKE was positively correlated with INFG (r=0.65, p=0.0124) and PD-L1 (r=0.58, p=0.0225) expression. RIG-I was loosely anticorrelated with NFATc1 (r=-0.55, p=0.0518). Among all biomarkers explored, only INFG was associated with PFS, OS and DCR. Specifically, PFS was significantly longer for nivolumab-treated patients with intermediate/high versus low INFG expression (5.1 versus 2.0 months, p=0.0124). OS was longer (though not statistically significant) for patients with intermediate/high versus low INFG expression (10.2 versus 4.9 months, p=0.0687). DCR to nivolumab was 71.43% for patients with intermediate/high INFG versus 0% for patients with low INFG expression. Neither PD-L1 immunohistochemistry expression nor CD8[+ ]TILs were related to nivolumab outcome. The same results were observed for 21 melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab.
Conclusion:
IFNG production by T-cells plays critical roles in anti-cancer immune responses by augmentation of MHC Class I expression, growth arrest, post-proteasomal trimming of antigen epitopes, recruitment of effector cells, induction of T-regs fragility and PD-L1 expression. Further research is warranted in order to validate whether INFG is more accurate than PD-L1.
-
+
P1.09 - Mesothelioma (ID 695)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Mesothelioma
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P1.09-013 - Profiling Response to Chemotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Among Hispanics (MeSO-CLICaP) (ID 10430)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignant disease, and the understanding of molecular pathogenesis has lagged behind other malignancies.
Method:
A series of 53 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples with clinical annotations were retrospectively tested for BAP1 and PI3K mutations and for mRNA expression of TS and EGFR. Immunohistochemistry staining for CD26 (dipeptidyl-peptidase IV, DPP-IV) and Fibulin3 (Fib3) proteins were also performed. Outcomes like progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rate (ORR) were recorded and evaluated according to biomarkers. Cox model was applied to determine variables associated with survival.
Result:
Median age was 58 years (range 36-76), 27 (51%) were men, 89% were current or former smokers, and six patients had previous contact with asbestos. 77% had a baseline ECOG 0-1 and almost all patients (n=52/98%) received cisplatin or carboplatin plus pemetrexed (Pem) as first line; 58% of them were treated with Pem as maintenance for a mean of 4.7 +/-2.8 cycles. 53.5% and 41.5% of patients were positive for CD26 and fibulin-3, while 49% and 43.4% had low levels of EGFR and TS mRNA, respectively. The majority of epithelioid and biphasic types expressed CD26 (p=0.008), Fibulin3 (0.013) and had lower levels of TS mRNA (p=0.008). Mutations in PI3K (c.1173A> G, c.32G> C and c.32G> T) were found in 5 patients and only one patient had a mutation in BAP1 (c.241T> G). First line PFS were significantly longer in CD26+ (p=0.0001), in those with low EGFR mRNA expression (p=0.001), in patients with positive Fib3 (p=0.006) and lower TS mRNA expression (p=0.0001). OS were significantly higher in patients with CD26+ (p=0.0001), EGFR- (p=0.001), Fib3 + (p=0.0002) and low TS mRNA expression level (p=0.0001). Multivariate analysis found that CD26+ (p=0.012), Fib3 (p=0.020) and TS mRNA levels (p=0.05) were independent prognostic factors.
Conclusion:
CD26, Fib3 and TS were prognostic factors significantly associated with improved survival in patients with advanced MPM.
-
+
P2.02 - Biology/Pathology (ID 616)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.02-034 - PD-L1 Expression Can Be a Prognostic Marker in EGFR Mutant NSCLC Patients Treated with Erlotinib (ID 8933)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
Background:
INF-gamma secreted by CD8+ lymphocytes upregulates PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. We recently identified STAT3 and YAP1 as compensatory mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in EGFR mutant cells. STAT3 and YAP1 up-regulate CCL5 (Rantes) and CXCL5, respectively, with both chemokines attracting the myeloid-derived suppressor cell. STAT3 stimulates DNMT1 by repressing STAT1 and retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I) expression. STAT1 and RIG-I are key mediators in INF-gamma signaling. We assume that alterations in the INF-gamma signaling pathway could be present in EGFR mutant NSCLC.
Method:
Total RNA from 53 EGFR mutant NSCLC patients was reversed transcribed and analyzed by qRT-PCR. STAT3, YAP1, RIG-I, STAT1, PD-L1, DNMT1 and CXCL5 mRNA were examined with specific primers/probes in triplicates. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated.
Result:
Fifty-three EGFR mutant NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib were analyzed, 72% were female, 62% never-smoked, 70% had exon 19 deletion and 36% brain metastases. A positive correlation was found between RIG-1 and STAT1 (r=0.42, p=0.003). An anti-correlation trend was noted between STAT3 and PD-L1, YAP1 and PD-L1 and DNMT1 and STAT1. Median PFS was 22, 12.9 and 8.6 months for patients with high, intermediate and low PD-L1 mRNA, respectively (P=0.04). Median PFS was numerically longer for patients with low levels of DNMT1, RIG1 STAT1 and CXCL5, although the differences were not statistically significant. A similar trend was observed for OS.
Conclusion:
PD-L1 mRNA could be a prognostic marker in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. Down-modulation of PD-L1 indicates alterations in pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), like RIG-1 or downstream interferon signaling factors. The dysregualtion of the pathway is multifactorial, and the role of STAT3 and YAP1 hyperactivation merits further research. DNMT1 overexpression ablates STAT1. Since the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) interacts with DNMT1, therapies with CDK4 inhibitors can directly neutralize the main defects in the INF-gamma signaling pathway.
-
+
P3.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 621)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.01-012 - Symptom Impact of First-Line Dacomitinib versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Positive NSCLC: Results from a Randomized Phase 3 Study (ID 8569)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
Background:
Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience high disease burden due to many cancer-related symptoms (eg, cough, dyspnea, pain, and fatigue). Decreasing tumor burden may reduce/delay symptoms and favorably impact global health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Dacomitinib is an irreversible, small-molecule inhibitor of EGFR/HER-1, HER-2, and HER-4 tyrosine kinases. In a global, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 study (NCT01774721) for first-line treatment of NSCLC, dacomitinib improved the primary objective of progression-free survival per independent radiologic review (median, 14.7 vs 9.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47–0.74; P<0.0001) over gefitinib. Median duration of treatment was longer with dacomitinib than with gefitinib (67 vs 52 weeks, respectively).[1] A secondary objective was to explore HRQoL. Here, we report the impact of dacomitinib and gefitinib treatment on core lung cancer symptoms.
Method:
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral dacomitinib (45 mg) or gefitinib (250 mg) once daily. Disease-related symptoms were measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13). Scores were summarized by the mean and 95% CI for each group and plotted over 30 cycles and at the end of treatment; the number of cycles (n=30) chosen for this analysis was not prespecified. Mean changes from baseline (cycle 1, day 1 [C1D1]) were reported for each group.
Result:
Between 9-May-2013 and 20-March-2015, 452 patients were randomly assigned to dacomitinib (n=227) or gefitinib (n=225). Baseline scores were similar between treatment arms. On-study completion rates were high, with >90% of patients answering all questions for most treatment cycles. Statistically significant improvements from baseline (95% CI excludes 0; no adjustment for multiplicity) for most cycles were seen in fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and cough in both arms. Improvements were reported as early as C1D8. Clinically meaningful improvements (≥10 points score change) were recorded for pain in chest (23/30 cycles) and cough (28/30 cycles) with dacomitinib and for cough (22/30 cycles) with gefitinib; hence, improvements appear to be more frequent with dacomitinib. Symptom burden at end of treatment was generally higher than during treatment. As treatment duration was longer with dacomitinib, key lung cancer symptom improvements were seen for a longer time in patients treated with dacomitinib.
Conclusion:
Dacomitinib, along with gefitinib, demonstrated favorable clinical benefit and improvements in key NSCLC symptoms. These findings are important when considering choice of therapy. Reference 1. Mok T, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl):abstract LBA9007.
-
+
P3.01-073 - TPX-0005 with an EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Overcomes Innate Resistance in EGFR Mutant NSCLC (ID 8956)
09:30 - 09:30 | Presenting Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
Background:
Overexpression of several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) substitutes EGFR signaling in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The MET ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) provides an alternative signaling mechanism for EGFR by inducing inter-receptor cross talk with EphA2, CUB domain-containing protein-1 (CDCP1) or AXL. SHP2, a non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase is central in signal transduction downstream of RTK signaling and in Src activation. We previously demonstrated that STAT3 and Src-YAP1 signaling limits EGFR TKI efficacy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We are now exploring the possibility of multiple RTK activation through a Src-YAP1-mediated transcriptional program. We are evaluating whether combined EGFR inhibition with TPX-0005, a novel orally available multikinase inhibitor and potent Src/FAK and JAK2 inhibitor, can be more efficient than EGFR inhibition alone in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells.
Method:
We studied the mRNA expression levels of stromal HGF and tumor RTKs, AXL, CDCP1, MET, and EphA2, as well as SHP2, and clinical outcome in baseline samples of 64 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with first-line EGFR TKI. We combined in vitro approaches to explore whether gefitinib or osimertinib combined with TPX-0005 can abolish STAT3 and Src-YAP1 and downregulate the expression of RTKs.
Result:
High levels of AXL, CDCP1 and SHP2 mRNA expression were associated with worse outcome to EGFR TKI in 64 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.5 and 23.4 months for patients with high and low AXL mRNA, respectively (p=0.0359). Median PFS was 9.1 and 20.2 months for patients with high and low CDCP1 mRNA, respectively (p=0.0179). Tumoral EPHA2 and MET or stromal HGF levels did not affect PFS. Median PFS was 11.4 and 24.1 months for patients with high and low SHP2 mRNA, respectively (p=0.0094). The combination of gefitinib/osimertinib with TPX-0005 resulted in highly synergistic suppression of cell viability and reduced colony formation in two EGFR-mutant cell lines. The combination abolished the EGFR inhibition-induced STAT3 and YAP1 phosphorylation, as confirmed by western blotting and immunofluorescence. The results of TaqMan quantitative-PCR assay revealed that gefitinib/osimertinib plus TPX-0005 reduced the mRNA levels of AXL, CDCP1 and MET, an effect that could not be obtained with EGFR inhibition alone. In vivo experiments are ongoing.
Conclusion:
AXL and CDCP1 are adverse predictive markers of PFS in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. STAT3 and Src-YAP1 signaling limits the efficacy EGFR TKI. Combined EGFR inhibition with TPX-0005 (currently in phase I clinical testing) is a particularly attractive strategy
-
+
P3.02 - Biology/Pathology (ID 620)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.02-063 - EGFR Exon 20 Insertions in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Molecular and Clinicopathologic Characteristics Among Hispanics (Geno1.2-CLICaP) (ID 10406)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
Background:
In contrast to other primary EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinomas, insertions in exon 20 of EGFR have been generally associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Their molecular spectrum, clinicopathologic characteristics and prevalence are not well established among Hispanics.
Method:
Tumors harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions were identified through a comprehensive screening of 4.500 lung adenocarcinomas from diverse Latin American Countries. Cases were tested for common and uncommon EGFR mutations and KRAS. Almost all cases (n=52) underwent extended genotyping for other driver mutations in BRAF, NRAS, PIK3CA, Her2 and MEK1 by NGS (TruSight tumor[TM]), EGFR amplification, ALK and PDL1 protein expression (D5F3CDx Assay and 22C3 Clone). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional models.
Result:
60 patients were included; median age was 66-yo (r, 24-79), 63.3% were females, most patients had a micropapillary (38.3%) or lepidic (20.0%) adenocarcinomas, 61.7% were never smokers and 36.7% had brain metastasis at diagnosis. 14 patients (23.4%) had common EGFR mutations (del19/L858R) in addition to the exon 20 insertion, 5 (10.0%) had non-common EGFR mutations (G719X /L861Q/S768I) plus the exon 20 insertion, and two cases had additional mutations in PIK3CA and MEK1. Insertion sequences were highly variable, with the most common variant (V769_D770insASV) making up only 21.7% of cases. 30% of patients had amplification of the EGFR and 75% had a PDL1 expression level of less than 50%. Overall response rate (ORR) to the first line was 30%, progression free survival (PFS) was 8.3 months (95%CI 6.9-9.6) and OS was 17.4 months (95%CI 16.4-19.5). Prognosis was positively influenced by concomitant presence of common EGFR mutations (p=0.016) and by response to first line therapy (p=0.06).
Conclusion:
Patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions have similar clinical characteristics to those with common EGFR mutations but a poorer prognosis. The mean PDL1 expression in this population appears to be higher than in patients with common EGFR mutations, finding that promote the potential use of immunotherapy alone or in combination for this population.
-
+
P3.09 - Mesothelioma (ID 725)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Mesothelioma
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.09-010b - Predicting Response to First Line Chemotherapy in Pleural Mesothelioma: A Random Forest Tree Model (Meso-CLICaP) (ID 10389)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. Multidisciplinary treatment including surgery, radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as the cornerstone of management prolonging progression free survival (PFS). Although beneficial, this treatment strategy has morbidity and mortality. Therefore, selection of patients who benefit from this treatment strategy is crucial for maximizing clinical benefit.
Method:
A random forest tree model was build for the prediction of response to first line chemotherapy among Hispanic patients with MPM. Variables evaluated included sex, age, ECOG performance status, smoking history, exposure to asbestos and histology. Based on these characteristics, patients were classified by responders (partial or complete response) and non-responders (stable disease or disease progression). In order to validate the results, a random subset of 70% of the sample was used to construct the model and the remaining 30% was utilized as an independent validation cohort. Predictions were compared to each patient’s treatment response and operational characteristics for the validation cohort model and receiver operational curves were computed.
Result:
A total of 153 patients were included. Median age was 59 years old (r, 33-84), 60 (39%) were females, 127 (83%) had an ECOG performance score of 0-1 and 127 (83%) had an epithelioid histological subtype. In terms of expositional hazards, 107 (70%) were smokers (24% current/46% former), whereas 61 (40%) presented active exposure to asbestos. In terms of survival, median overall survival (OS) was 25 months (95%CI 23.4-29.4) and median PFS after first line chemotherapy was 6.97 months (95%CI 5.83-8.57). An objective response was observed in 74 patients (48%; complete response in 7/5%). In terms of operational characteristics, the validated model obtained a 0.992 AUC, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95% for detecting responders and non-responders to first line chemotherapy.
Conclusion:
Selection of responders to first line treatment based on clinical variables can accurately be achieved. These results could lead to better selection of Hispanic patients for aggressive and morbid treatments.
-
+
PL 02 - Presidential Symposium including Top 3 Abstracts and James Cox Lectureship Award Presentation (ID 585)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Plenary Session
- Track: Early Stage NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Hisao Asamura, Keunchil Park
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 08:15 - 09:45, Plenary Hall (Exhibit Hall D)
-
+
PL 02.04 - SCAT Ph III Trial: Adjuvant CT Based on BRCA1 Levels in NSCLC N+ Resected Patients. Final Survival Results a Spanish Lung Cancer Group Trial (ID 9523)
08:40 - 08:50 | Author(s): Rafael Rosell
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Postop platinum-based CT is considered standard of care in resected NSCLC with lymph node involvement. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are important DNA repair factors primarily involved in the repair of double strand DNA breaks. BRCA-1 functions may act as a differential regulator of response to cisplatin (Cis) and antimicrotubule agents. BRCA1 defficiency enhances Cis resistance and loss of BRCA1 function is associated to sensitivity to DNA-damaging CT and may also be associated with resistance to spindle poisons.
Method:
SCAT randomized phase III multicenter trial tests individualized optimal CT based on expression of BRCA1. After surgery patients (p) with St II and Iii NCSLC were random 1:3 to control arm (3 cycles Cis-Docetaxel) or to experimental arm with treatment assigned according BRCA1 expression levels (low levels: Cis-Gemcitabine; intermediate levels: Cis-Doc; high levels: Docetaxel alone). Stratification factors: N1 vs N2; age < or > 65 y; non-Squamous vs Squamous (Sq) histology; lobectomy vs pneumonectomy). Planned PORT in N2. Primary end-point OS. Secondary end-points DFS, toxicity profile (CTCAE v 3.0) /compliance, recurrence pattern. Statistical hypothesis: 5y survival rate control group (45%) could be increase 20% in experimental arm.
Result:
From June/2007 to May/2013, a total of 591 p were screened and 500 of them were randomized in the study, 108 in control arm, 392 in experimental arm. In experimental arm 110 p received Cis-Gem, 127 Cis-Doc and 110 Doc alone. There were no significant differences between arm for known prognostic factors: Median age 64 y; 79% males, 21% females; 43% Sq, 49% Adenoca, 8% others; 57% former smokers, 32% current smokers, 11% never smokers; pneumonectomy 26%; N1 58%, N2 48%. Median tumor size 4.4 cm (0.8-15.5 cm). Median mRNA BRCA1 levels 15.78 (0.73-132). Mean BRCA1 levels 6.95 in Adenoca vs 20.29 in Sq (p<0.001). Compliance of CT was better in experimental arm with less dose-reductions and without differences according extent of surgery. CT compliance was lower in patients older 70 y. Median PFS: 38.7 m (control), 32.2 m Cis-Gem, 34.3 m Cis-Doc and 41 m Doc. At 5 years, event-free rate is 54% in control arm and 56% in experimental arm and median OS 73.3 m (control) vs 77.5 m (exp) (p=0.75). In experimental arm: Docetaxel alone 80.2 m, Cis-Doc 80.5 m and Cis-Gem 74 m.
Conclusion:
Higher survival than expected in patients with lymph node involvement. No significant difference in survival achieved with the experimental arm. In case of high levels BRCA CT treatment without cisplatin is not detrimental. (Eudract:2007-000067-15; NCTgov: 00478699)
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
