Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Edward Brian Garon
Moderator of
-
+
GR 02 - Management of Immunotherapy-Related Adverse Events (ID 521)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Grand Rounds
- Track: Immunology and Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 8
- Moderators:Edward Brian Garon, Makoto Nishio
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, Main Hall
-
+
GR 02.00 - Intro (ID 11065)
11:00 - 11:02 | Presenting Author(s): Makoto Nishio
- Abstract
Abstract not provided
-
+
GR 02.01 - Case Study (ID 10951)
11:02 - 11:07 | Presenting Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
GR 02.02 - Case Study (ID 10952)
11:07 - 11:12 | Presenting Author(s): Makoto Nishio
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
GR 02.03 - Pathophysiology of Immunotherapy-related Toxicity (ID 7631)
11:12 - 11:27 | Presenting Author(s): Ji-Youn Han
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Clinical development and approval of immune-checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment of many types of tumors. In recent years, three anti-PD-1 or –PD-L1 antibodies have been approved for advanced NSCLC, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab. These antibodies have entered into the routine practice of treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. In addition, all clinical trials, which compared the efficacy of anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibodies with chemotherapy, demonstrated that these antibodies are less toxic than chemotherapy (1-4). However, these immunomodulatory antibodies have led to the emergence of unusual autoimmune toxicities, also called immune-related adverse events (IrAEs). IrAEs management is challenging because they may concern many organ systems, including the skin, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and pulmonary systems. Furthermore, given the recent success of immunotherapy, the incidence of immunotoxicity will likely continue to rise as these therapies become more widely used not only in advanced diseases but also in early stage diseases (5). Treatment-related toxicities have correlated with better response in some cases, and it is probable that serious adverse events from immune-mediated reaction will increase as immunotherapeutic approaches become more effective (6). Adding more complexity, the natural history of certain irAEs is unpredictable. The onset of clinical disease manifestation can vary from weeks to decades after the appearance of autoantibodies (7). Thus understanding irAEs is critical for early detection and appropriate management of patients. We will discuss the mechanisms that might be related with the induction of anutoimmunity from immunotherapy. References: Lancet. 2016; 387(10027):1540-50. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):123-35. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(17):1627-39. Lancet. 2016;387(10030):1837-46. Eur J Cancer. 2016 ;54:139-48. Blood. 2011;118(3):499-509. Nat Med. 2017 ;23(5):540-547.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
GR 02.04 - Current Standard in Monitoring of Immunotherapy-related Toxicity (ID 7632)
11:27 - 11:42 | Presenting Author(s): Clarissa Mathias
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Checkpoint protein inhibition is associated with on- and off-target, cell and metabolic toxic effects that need to be carefully monitored and managed during and after treatment[1]. Despite important clinical benefits, immunotherapy is associated with a unique spectrum of side effects termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or, occasionally, adverse events of special interest. IrAEs include dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, and other less common inflammatory events. Most irAEs remain mild in intensity but approximately 10% of patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade agents will develop severe, sometimes life-threatening, grade 3–4 dysimmune toxicities. Before prescribing immune checkpoint blockade agents to patients, oncologists need to be aware of the toxicity spectrum and must identify potential risk factors that could favor the emergence of irAEs[2]. Patients should be informed that most of these irAEs are mild and reversible if detected early and specifically addressed. Therefore, patients should be educated about signs of organ inflammation that would require prompt referral such as diarrhea, blood or mucus in the stool, severe abdominal pain, fatigue, weight loss, nausea, vomiting, thirst or appetite increase, polyuria, extensive rash, severe pruritus, shortness of breath, coughing, headache, confusion, muscle weakness, numb-ness, arthralgia or swelling joints, myalgia, unexplained fever, hemorrhagic syndrome and severe loss of vision in one or both eyes. Any new symptom or deterioration of pre-existing symptoms must at least be monitored attentively and if necessary be explored to determine its etiology and rule out any dysimmune cause that could be worsened by immunotherapy continuation. Although early recognition and treatment improves symptoms and severity, a broad differential diagnosis should be entertained. It is recommended that all patients receiving these agents routinely have thyroid function studies, complete blood counts, and liver function and metabolic panels at each treatment and at intervals of 6 to 12 weeks for the first 6 months after finishing treatment. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, and in men, testosterone should also be checked in patients who develop fatigue and nonspecific symptoms. Follow-up testing may need to increase in frequency based on individual response and adverse events that occur[3]. It is challenging to differentiate between infection, early pulmonary edema, alveolar hemorrhage, immune-mediated pneumonitis, immune-related tumor inflammation, and tumor progression (figure 1). Infections, thromboembolism, congestive heart failure, and COPD are among the many diagnoses to consider before committing patients to a long course of steroid therapy with additional consideration of prophylaxis for opportunistic (i.e., pneumocystis with or without fungal) infections. Pulmonary specialty consultation and consideration of bronchoscopic evaluation with lavage to assess for infections alongside biopsies of lung tissue can help narrow the diagnosis. IrAEs can develop at any time: at the beginning, under treatment and after immunotherapy termination. As shown with nivolumab, the majority of irAEs occur within the first 4 months[4]. On the basis of this median time to onset, irAEs could be classified as early (median time to onset <2 months) and late toxicities (median time to onset >2 months). Early toxicities include skin (5 weeks), gastrointestinal (7.3 weeks) and hepatic (7.7 weeks), whereas late toxicities include pulmonary (8.9 weeks), endocrine (10.4 weeks) and renal (15.1 weeks). However, clinicians should keep in mind that all toxicities can develop at any time since confidence interval may vary widely among organs: 0.1–57 weeks for skin; 0.1–37.6 weeks for gastrointestinal. Rarely, other irAEs may occur after week 24 with any checkpoint-blocking antibodies. In trials including maintenance ipilimumab, colitis has been seen 47 months from initiation of treatment[5]. Patients with prior autoimmune diseases or a history of viral hepatitis have been excluded from receiving ipilimumab on trials, but recent data suggest that the drug can be given safely to those patients. Nonetheless, extreme caution should be taken in treating patients with recent or ongoing autoimmune conditions, particularly any type of inflammatory bowel disease[6]. Management algorithms have been established for patients treated with immunotherapy, which may be useful in helping to manage irAEs but they are based upon clinical experience, since no prospective trials have been conducted to guide the treatment of irAEs. Resolution of irAEs usually follows a temporal pattern: 2 weeks for gastrointestinal, 4 weeks for hepatic, 6 weeks for skin, and 20 weeks for endocrine irAEs[7]. The key to successful management of checkpoint protein antibody toxicities is early diagnosis, high suspicion, excellent patient-provider communication, and rapid and aggressive use of corticosteroids and other immune suppressants for irAEs. Effective biomarkers to predict toxicity could be valuable in the development of these agents. Figure 1 FIGURE 1: CT scan of a patient with non-small cell lung cancer presenting with cough, dyspnea, and hypoxia on an immunotherapy drug. References: Fecher LA, et al: Ipilimumab and its toxicities: A multidisciplinary approach. Oncologist 18:733-743, 2013 Champiat S. et al., Management of immune checkpoint blockade dysimmune toxicities: a collaborative position paper Annals of Oncology Volume 27, No. 4, 559-74, 2016 Weber JS et. al. Toxicities of Immunotherapy for the Practitioner, J of Clin Oncol., volume 33, No 18, 2092-2099, 2015 Weber JS et al. Safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL): a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33 (suppl): abstr 9018 Sarnaik AA et al: Extended dose ipilimumab with a peptide vaccine: Immune corre- lates associated with clinical benefit in patients with resected high-risk stage IIIc/IV melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 17:896-906, 2011 Hodi FS, et al: Ipilimumab plus sargramostim vs ipilimumab alone for treatment of metastatic melanoma: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 312:1744-1753, 2014 Weber JS, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events and kinetics of response with ipilimumab. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2691-2697
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
GR 02.05 - Practical Management of Immunotherapy-related Toxicity (ID 7633)
11:42 - 11:57 | Presenting Author(s): Scott N. Gettinger
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
GR 02.06 - Who Should Not Receive Immunotherapy? (ID 7634)
11:57 - 12:12 | Presenting Author(s): Terufumi Kato
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
GR 02.07 - Toxicity of Induction Immunotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy: How to Minimize It? (ID 7635)
12:12 - 12:27 | Presenting Author(s): Dirk K De Ruysscher
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Checkpoint inhibitors have changed the outcome of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiotherapy has consistently been shown to activate key elements of the immune system that are responsible for resistance for immune therapy. Radiation upregulates MHC-class I molecules that many cancer cells lack or only poorly express, tumor-associated antigens, provokes immunogenic cell death, activates dendritic cells, decreases regulatory T-cells (Tregs) in the tumor, broadens the T-cell repertoire and increases T-cell trafficking, amongst many other effects. Radiation may convert a completely or partly poorly or non-immunogenic tumor immunogenic. Radiotherapy in combination with different forms of immune therapy such as anti-PD-(L)1, anti-CTLA4,immunocytokines, dendritic cell vaccination and Toll-like receptor agonists improved consistently local tumor control and very interestingly, lead to better systemic tumor control (the “abscopal” effect) and the induction of specific anti-cancer immunity with a memory effect. At the time of writing, the most compelling data in human studies come from Shaverdian et al. (Lancet Oncol 2017). In 97 patients with advanced NSCLC treated on the phase 1 KEYNOTE-001 trial it was shown that patients having received prior radiotherapy, the six-month PFS rate was 54.3% vs. 21.4% among never irradiated patients. The median OS was 11.6 months and the six-month OS estimate was 75.3% among patients who previously received extra-cranial radiation therapy vs. a median OS of 5.3 months and a six-month OS estimate of 45.3% among patients who did not receive extra-cranial radiation therapy. Patients with prior thoracic radiotherapy had more overall pulmonary toxicity compared to never irradiated patients: 12.5% vs. 1.4%. Unfortunately, no dose-volume parameters such as the mean lung dose are available of these patients. The biggest concern of combining radiotherapy and immune treatment is indeed a higher incidence of pneumonitis. Many studies are investigating the combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immune therapy in lung cancer, including the PACIFIC, the STIMULI and the NICOLAS studies. The results of these studies have not been reported at the time of writing, but none of the trials have been closed prematurely. Moreover, as radiotherapy is used to stimulate the immune system, classical concept in dose and volume will have to be investigated again. Less dose in a few fractions may suffice, and margins may be reduced, which in turn will lead to less side effects. When studied meticulously, radiotherapy and immune therapy may well turn out to be efficacious and with few side effects and additional costs.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
GR 02 - Management of Immunotherapy-Related Adverse Events (ID 521)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Grand Rounds
- Track: Immunology and Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Edward Brian Garon, Makoto Nishio
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, Main Hall
-
+
GR 02.01 - Case Study (ID 10951)
11:02 - 11:07 | Presenting Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MA 02 - Emerging Targets (ID 656)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Clinical Design, Statistics and Clinical Trials
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Ravi Salgia, Shun Lu
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, Room 511 + 512
-
+
MA 02.07 - A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in EGFR Mutant, PD-L1+, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Naïve Patients with Advanced NSCLC (ID 9525)
11:40 - 11:45 | Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Pembrolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the interaction between programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity and produced durable responses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data to date suggests that responses are less frequent in patients whose tumors harbor mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. Our single center experience with the KEYNOTE-001 trial suggested that EGFR mutation positive NSCLC patients with a history of prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy had worse clinical outcomes than those who were TKI naïve. However, that analysis was limited by small sample size. As a result of this observation, we are currently enrolling an open-label, phase II trial, of front-line pembrolizumab in EGFR mutation positive NSCLC patients that are PD-L1+.
Method:
This is an open-label, phase II trial of pembrolizumab in patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC whose tumors are PD-L1 positive [>1% tumor membranous staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC), 22C3 pharmDx test in a CLIA certified laboratory]. Patients receive pembrolizumab 200mg by IV infusion every three weeks and are evaluated every 9 weeks +/- 1 week with radiographic imaging to assess response to treatment for a maximum of 35 trial treatments of pembrolizumab. After progression on pembrolizumab, patients are followed for evaluation of EGFR TKI efficacy. The primary end point of the study is objective response rate (ORR) to pembrolizumab, per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include safety and efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)] of front-line pembrolizumab in this population, as well as efficacy [PFS, OS, ORR] of subsequent EGFR TKI after progression on pembrolizumab. Correlative analyses include whole exome sequencing and IHC of patient specimens. To date, 8 out of the 25 planned patients have been enrolled.
Result:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MA 03 - Chemotherapy (ID 651)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Jin-Hyoung Kang, W. Su
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, Room 502
-
+
MA 03.06 - Effect of 2L Ramucirumab after Rapid Time to Progression on 1L Therapy: Subgroup Analysis of REVEL in Advanced NSCLC (ID 7947)
11:35 - 11:40 | Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
In REVEL, ramucirumab+docetaxel in the second-line (2L) treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC led to improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), independent of histology. This exploratory, post-hoc analysis focuses on patients who progressed rapidly on first-line (1L), and who traditionally have a poor prognosis in the 2L setting. In REVEL, treatment benefit was observed in patients with progressive disease as their best overall response to 1L and in patients who were on 1L for only a short time (Reck M, ASCO 2017, Abstr 9079). Here, we report outcomes from patients who participated in REVEL according to their time to tumor progression (TTP) on 1L (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01168973).
Method:
Patients with advanced NSCLC of squamous or nonsquamous histology with disease progression during or after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m[2] and either ramucirumab 10 mg/kg or placebo on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. OS was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included PFS, ORR, safety, and patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL). Response was assessed according to RECIST v1.1. QoL was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. TTP on 1L, defined as the time from start of 1L until progressive disease, was assessed for the REVEL intent-to-treat population.
Result:
Of 1253 patients in REVEL, 11% had TTP ≤9 weeks, 17% had TTP ≤12 weeks, and 28% had TTP ≤18 weeks on 1L therapy. Baseline characteristics of each subgroup generally were balanced between treatment arms. Efficacy, safety, and QoL outcomes by TTP are shown in the table.Outcomes in Patients From the REVEL Study by Time to Tumor Progression on First-Line Therapy
≤9 Weeks ≤12 Weeks ≤18 Weeks INTENT-TO-TREAT POPULATION Ramucirumab+Docetaxel N = 71 Placebo+Docetaxel N = 62 Ramucirumab+Docetaxel N = 111 Placebo+Docetaxel N = 98 Ramucirumab+Docetaxel N = 182 Placebo+Docetaxel N = 172 Median OS, months (95% Confidence Interval [CI]) 8.28 (5.19, 10.84) 4.83 (3.09, 6.90) 9.10 (6.70, 10.84) 5.78 (4.30, 7.49) 8.51 (6.97, 9.95) 5.95 (4.44, 6.97) Unstratified Hazard Ratio (HR) (95% CI) 0.69 (0.47, 1.01) 0.74 (0.54, 1.00) 0.80 (0.63, 1.01) 12-month survival rate, % (95% CI) 47 (35, 58) 32 (20, 44) 34 (25, 43) 23 (15, 32) 30 (23, 37) 24 (18, 31) 18-month survival rate, % (95% CI) 20 (11, 31) 12 (5, 24) 17 (10, 26) 13 (6, 22) 17 (11, 23) 13 (8, 20) Median PFS, months (95% CI) 3.01 (2.66, 4.07) 1.48 (1.41, 1.87) 3.61 (2.76, 4.21) 1.61 (1.45, 2.60) 3.22 (2.79, 4.14) 1.61 (1.48, 2.60) Unstratified HR (95% CI) 0.69 (0.48, 0.98) 0.73 (0.55, 0.97) 0.72 (0.58, 0.89) ORR (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]), %, (95% CI) 18.3 (10.1,29.3) 3.2 (0.4, 11.2) 18.9 (12.1, 27.5) 9.2 (4.3, 16.7) 19.2 (13.8, 25.7) 10.5 (6.3, 16.0) Disease Control Rate (CR+PR+stable disease), % (95% CI) 50.7 (38.6, 62.8) 30.6 (19.6, 43.7) 49.5 (39.9, 59.2) 37.8 (28.2, 48.1) 50.5 (43.1, 58.0) 36.0 (28.9, 43.7) Average Symptom Burden Index, time to deterioration HR (95% CI) 0.60 (0.30, 1.22) 0.49 (0.27, 0.88) 0.74 (0.49, 1.12) Total Score Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, time to deterioration HR (95% CI) 0.89 (0.45, 1.78) 0.71 (0.41, 1.23) 0.90 (0.60, 1.36) SAFETY POPULATION Ramucirumab+Docetaxel N = 70 Placebo+Docetaxel N = 61 Ramucirumab+Docetaxel N = 109 Placebo+Docetaxel N = 97 Ramucirumab+Docetaxel N = 179 Placebo+Docetaxel N = 171 Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), n (%) 67 (95.7) 58 (95.1) 105 (96.3) 92 (94.8) 173 (96.6) 159 (93.0) Grade ≥3 50 (71.4) 46 (75.4) 80 (73.4) 69 (71.1) 134 (74.9) 113 (66.1) TEAE leading to discontinuation 4 (5.7) 2 (3.3) 5 (4.6) 3 (3.1) 13 (7.3) 6 (3.5) TEAE leading to dose adjustment 24 (34.3) 19 (31.1) 39 (35.8) 28 (28.9) 70 (39.1) 47 (27.5) TEAE leading to death 5 (7.1) 4 (6.6) 7 (6.4) 6 (6.2) 9 (5.0) 8 (4.7) TESAE 25 (35.7) 30 (49.2) 46 (42.2) 46 (47.4) 80 (44.7) 71 (41.5)
Conclusion:
Efficacy, toxicity, and QoL outcomes among ramucirumab+docetaxel patients who have aggressive disease with rapid TTP on 1L therapy appear consistent with the intent-to-treat population. The benefit/risk profile for these rapid progressors suggests that such patients may derive meaningful benefit from ramucirumab+docetaxel in the 2L setting.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MTE 28 - Immunotherapy for Earlier Stage NSCLC (Sign Up Required) (ID 577)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Meet the Expert
- Track: Immunology and Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 07:00 - 08:00, Room 301 + 302
-
+
MTE 28.02 - Pros and Cons of IO in Early Stage NSCLC (ID 7817)
07:30 - 08:00 | Presenting Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 757)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P1.01-051 - Nivolumab Versus Chemotherapy as Post-Platinum Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Real-world Setting (ID 8483)
09:30 - 09:30 | Presenting Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
Background:
Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is approved for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy, based on results of 2 pivotal studies (CheckMate 017 and 057). This prospective observational study (CA209-118) compared outcomes with nivolumab versus chemotherapy as post-platinum therapy for NSCLC in a real-world community setting.
Method:
This analysis, as of May 16, 2017, included patients with advanced NSCLC who completed an initial course of platinum-based chemotherapy and started subsequent treatment prior to November 16, 2016, with a minimum of 6 months of potential follow-up. Patients receiving experimental therapy, immunotherapy other than nivolumab, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR/ALK-mutated NSCLC were excluded. Patients in this non-randomized study were grouped by receipt of nivolumab or chemotherapy as first post-platinum therapy and followed until death, study discontinuation, or initiation of subsequent immunotherapy. Unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses were conducted. For adjusted analysis, multivariate regression was performed that included age, ECOG performance status score, time since stage IV diagnosis, smoking status, and squamous histology as covariates.
Result:
Of 383 eligible patients, 161 received post-platinum nivolumab and 222 received post-platinum chemotherapy, including 158 who received a regimen recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (docetaxel, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, ramucirumab + docetaxel, or erlotinib) and 40 who received a second platinum-based regimen. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups, except that the percentage of men was higher in the nivolumab versus chemotherapy group (59% vs 49%). Mean age was 66 years, and 79% of patients had non-squamous histology. In all, 65% of patients in the nivolumab group and 69% in the chemotherapy group started post-initial platinum therapy ≤1 year after stage IV diagnosis. Median survival from the start of post-initial platinum therapy was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9, not reached) in the nivolumab group and 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.1, 11.0) in the chemotherapy group. Unadjusted survival analyses showed a reduction in mortality risk of 20% with nivolumab versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.08); adjusted survival analyses yielded comparable results. In the nivolumab and chemotherapy groups, respectively, 9% and 18% of patients discontinued due to adverse effects; 41% and 49% discontinued due to death or disease progression.
Conclusion:
The results of this early survival analysis from a prospective study in a real-world community setting were similar to those seen in randomized trials, further supporting the benefit of nivolumab over chemotherapy in previously treated advanced NSCLC.
-
+
P1.04 - Clinical Design, Statistics and Clinical Trials (ID 690)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Clinical Design, Statistics and Clinical Trials
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P1.04-008 - POSEIDON: A Phase 3 Study of First-Line Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab + Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone in Metastatic NSCLC (ID 8666)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
Background:
Immunotherapy is an important new treatment modality for NSCLC. Dual blockade of the non-redundant PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways may provide additive or synergistic effects. Durvalumab is a selective, high-affinity, engineered human IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80. Tremelimumab is a selective human IgG2 mAb against CTLA-4. A combination regimen of immunotherapy with chemotherapy may further enhance clinical benefit. In a Phase 1b study (NCT02537418), durvalumab ± tremelimumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated manageable tolerability and preliminary signs of clinical activity in patients with solid tumors, including NSCLC.
Method:
POSEIDON (NCT03164616) is a Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label, global study to investigate durvalumab ± tremelimumab + platinum-based chemotherapy vs platinum-based chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC. Patients must be immunotherapy- and chemotherapy-naïve with EGFR/ALK wild-type metastatic NSCLC, and have confirmed tumor PD-L1 expression status, and a WHO/ECOG performance status of 0/1. Approximately 801 patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy (Arm 1); durvalumab + chemotherapy (Arm 2); or chemotherapy alone (Arm 3). After induction, patients in the immunotherapy arms will receive durvalumab monotherapy, and non-squamous patients who initially received pemetrexed during induction will receive it as maintenance therapy if eligible. Treatment will continue until disease progression or another discontinuation criterion has been met. The primary endpoint is PFS according to blinded independent central review (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints include OS; ORR; duration of response; best overall response; proportion of patients alive and progression-free at 12 months; disease-related symptoms and HRQoL; and safety and tolerability. Recruitment is ongoing.Figure 1
Result:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
-
+
P2.04 - Clinical Design, Statistics and Clinical Trials (ID 705)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Clinical Design, Statistics and Clinical Trials
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.04-005 - GEOMETRY Mono-1: Phase II, Multicenter Study of MET Inhibitor Capmatinib (INC280) in EGFR Wt, MET-Dysregulated Advanced NSCLC (ID 8961)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
Background:
Amplification of MET leading to oncogenic signaling occurs in 3‒5% of newly diagnosed EGFR wild type (wt) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases with decreasing incidence at higher levels of amplification. Mutations in MET leading to exon 14 deletion (METΔ[ex14]) also occur in 2–4% of adenocarcinoma and 1–2% of other NSCLC subsets. Capmatinib (INC280) is a potent and selective MET inhibitor that has shown strong evidence of antitumor activity in a phase I study in patients with EGFR wt advanced NSCLC harboring MET amplification and METΔ[ex14].
Method:
This phase II, multicenter study (NCT02414139) was designed to confirm the clinical activity of capmatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC by MET amplification and METΔ[ex14] status. Eligible patients (≥18 years of age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0–1) must have ALK-negative, EGFR wt, stage IIIB/IV NSCLC (any histology). Centrally assessed MET amplification (gene copy number [GCN]) and mutation status is used to assign patients to one of the below cohorts: Pretreated with 1–2 prior systemic lines of therapy for advanced setting (cohorts 1–4): 1a: MET amplification GCN ≥10 (n=69) 1b: MET amplification GCN ≥6 and <10 (n=69) 2: MET amplification GCN ≥4 and <6 (n=69) 3: MET amplification GCN <4 (n=69) 4: METΔ[ex14] mutation regardless of MET GCN (n=69) Treatment naïve (cohorts 5a and 5b): 5a: MET amplification GCN ≥10 and no METΔ[ex14] mutation (n=27) 5b: METΔ[ex14] mutation regardless of MET GCN (n=27) Capmatinib 400 mg tablets are orally administered twice daily on a continuous dosing schedule 12 hours apart. Primary and key secondary endpoints are overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR), respectively (blinded independent review assessment). Other secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed ORR, DOR, time to response, disease control rate, progression-free survival (independent and investigator assessment), safety, and pharmacokinetics. Enrollment is ongoing in 25 countries. Cohorts 1b, 2, and 3 are now closed to enrollment; cohorts 1a and 4 continue to enroll patients who have received 1–2 prior lines of therapy in the advanced setting, and cohorts 5a and 5b are open for enrollment of treatment-naïve patients. Responses have been seen in both MET-amplified and MET-mutated patients irrespective of the line of therapy.
Result:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
-
+
P2.07 - Immunology and Immunotherapy (ID 708)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Immunology and Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.07-038 - Thyroid Dysfunction Arising During KEYNOTE-001 Associated with Improved Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in NSCLC Patients at UCLA (ID 9531)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
Background:
PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has rapidly been adopted for treatment of NSCLC. However, much remains to be learned about the implications of the side-effect profile of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. We previously showed that the 38 patients who experienced a treatment related AE (trAE) on the KEYNOTE-001 trial at UCLA had superior clinical outcomes compared to the 59 that did not. Treatment related hypothyroidism was the most predictive trAE for response to therapy [objective response rate (ORR): 83.3% (5/6 patients with response)]. The highly predictive nature of treatment related hypothyroidism led us to further evaluate the implications of thyroid dysfunction in our patient cohort by analyzing the association between therapeutic efficacy and thyroid specific laboratory values obtained on trial.
Method:
We performed a retrospective analysis of the 97 NSCLC patients treated on KEYNOTE-001 at UCLA with either 2 mg/kg Q3W or 10 mg/kg Q2/3W of pembrolizumab (data cut-off 12/2016). Patients had Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), free Thyroxine 4 (fT4), and Triiodothyronine (T3) assessed at baseline (prior to therapy), cycle 2, and every other cycle thereafter. In some instances, labs were obtained at safety follow-up and unscheduled visits. Tumor response was evaluated using investigator assessed immune related response criteria (irRC), with imaging q9wks.
Result:
97.9% (95/97) of the patients treated at UCLA on KEYNOTE-001 had a baseline set of thyroid indices, while 74.7% (68/97) had >3 sets of values. Patients with an abnormal TSH during study participation had a higher ORR, 35.5% (11/31), than those that did not, 14.1% (9/64) (p=0.0296), with an acquired TSH abnormality (first observed after C1D1) more predictive of response than a baseline abnormality [acquired TSH abnormality: ORR 42.9% (9/21) vs baseline abnormality: ORR 20% (2/10)]. An abnormal fT4 or abnormal T3 on trial were also both independently associated with improved response to therapy [fT4 abnormality+: ORR: 50% (5/10) vs fT4 abnormality-: 17.7% (15/85) (p=0.0317) and T3 abnormality+: ORR 47.4% (9/19) vs T3 abnormality-: ORR 14.5% (11/76) (p=0.0037)]. As with TSH, acquired fT4 and T3 abnormalities were associated with higher ORR than baseline abnormalities.
Conclusion:
Thyroid dysfunction, assessed by abnormalities in TSH, fT4, or T3, was associated with improved efficacy of pembrolizumab on the KEYNOTE-001 trial at UCLA and an acquired thyroid abnormality, defined as first occurrence after C1D1, was more predictive of improved efficacy than a baseline abnormality. Future work is ongoing to evaluate this association in a larger patient population and molecular mechanisms that may be underlying this observation.
-
+
P3.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 621)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.01-071 - Randomized Phase 1b/3 Study of Erlotinib + Ramucirumab in Untreated EGFR Mutation-Positive Stage IV NSCLC: Phase 1b Outcomes (ID 8468)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
Background:
Despite the likelihood of an initial response to an EGFR TKI, NSCLC patients with an activating EGFR mutation eventually develop disease progression. Anti-angiogenic agents in combination with an EGFR TKI may provide additional benefit in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but additional studies are needed to confirm the benefit.
Method:
This ongoing phase 1b/3 study (NCT02411448; RELAY) enrolled patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC, ECOG PS 0-1, and an activating EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R substitution). In part A (phase 1b), patients received ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR2 antibody) 10 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of a 14-day cycle and oral erlotinib at 150 mg/day. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of part A was to assess safety and tolerability, in terms of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first two cycles of therapy, and to determine the recommended dose for Part B (phase 3). Data cutoff was 31-May-2017.
Result:
Fourteen patients were enrolled and treated in part A. Two patients discontinued prior to completion of cycle 2, due to non-DLT adverse events of grade 2 interstitial pneumonia and grade 1 hemoptysis and were therefore not eligible for DLT assessment. Of the 12 DLT-evaluable patients (Japan, n=6; US/Europe, n=6), median age was 72 years (range 51-83), 83% were female, and 75% had ECOG PS of 1. Median duration of therapy was 64.3 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 19.5-89.0) with ramucirumab and 68 weeks (IQR 44-95) with erlotinib. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in all patients, most commonly rash (100%), diarrhea (92%), paronychia (67%), hypertension (58%), and dry skin (58%). Ten (83%) patients experienced grade 3 TEAEs (hypertension [n=4], rash [n=3], diarrhea [n=2], neutropenia, conjunctivitis, elevation of alanine aminotransferase [DLT; resolved within 4 days], and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase). No serious or grade 4-5 adverse events occurred. Median PFS was 17.1 months (95% CI 8.8-NR; 50% censored) and the PFS survival rate at 21-months was 46.9%. Five patients remain on study treatment.
Conclusion:
Ramucirumab plus erlotinib demonstrated encouraging clinical activity with no unexpected toxicities in Part A. Randomization into Part B began in January-2016, maintaining the dose of ramucirumab at 10 mg/kg Q2W with oral erlotinib at 150 mg/day.
-
+
P3.03 - Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy (ID 719)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P3.03-007 - LCMC2: Expanded Profiling of Lung Adenocarcinomas Identifies ROS1 and RET Rearrangements and TP53 Mutations as a Negative Prognostic Factor (ID 8338)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Edward Brian Garon
- Abstract
Background:
The Lung Cancers Mutation Consortium (LCMC) is a multi-institutional effort where 16 sites identify oncogenic drivers and pool data to assess the impact of targeted therapies in patients with lung adenocarcinomas. We now report the results of the second patient cohort (LCMC2) with an expanded multiplex molecular panel to include RET and ROS1 and tumor suppressors.
Method:
904 patients with centrally confirmed stage IV lung adenocarcinomas who were candidates for therapy had at least one of 14 oncogenic drivers assessed in a CLIA-compliant laboratory using genotyping, FISH, massively parallel sequencing (NGS), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses.
Result:
Among 423 patients tested for all 14 targets, we found a driver in 65%. Mutated KRAS was found in 31%, sensitizing EGFR in 14%, MET amplification in 5%, ALK rearrangements in 4%, BRAF V600E in 3%, and HER2 in 3%. Rearrangements in RET and ROS1 were each found in 2% (CI 1 to 3%). Using IHC, PTEN loss was found in 8% (CI 6 to 11%) and MET expression in 58% (CI 55 to 61%). Use of targeted therapies in patients with EGFR, HER2, or BRAF mutations, ALK, ROS1, or RET rearrangements, and MET amplification was associated with a gain in overall survival of 1.5 years relative to those with the same drivers not receiving targeted therapy and a gain of 1 year relative to those without an actionable driver. Current and former cigarette smokers derived a survival benefit from targeted therapies similar to never smokers (p=0.975). Among 154 patients who had all drivers assessed and NGS testing in addition, any TP53 mutation was associated with poorer survival among those with EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 (p=0.014). STK11 was detected in 11%, all in patients with KRAS mutations.
Conclusion:
Using an expanded testing panel, LCMC2 demonstrates the survival benefit of matching targeted treatments to oncogenic drivers in patients with lung adenocarcinomas, identifies additional prognostic factors, and supports the performance of multiplex molecular testing on specimens from all individuals with lung adenocarcinomas irrespective of clinical characteristics. We detected either MET amplifications or HER2 mutations in 7%, together more than the 4% with ALK. A targeted drug is available in the United States for 35% of patients with lung adenocarcinomas. The routine use of massively parallel sequencing (NGS) detects both targetable drivers and tumor suppressor genes that have significance for therapy selection and prognosis. Supported by Free to Breathe
