Virtual Library
Start Your Search
M. Mino-Kenudson
Author of
-
+
P2.06 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 467)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Scientific Co-Operation/Research Groups (Clinical Trials in Progress should be submitted in this category)
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.06-019 - A Phase II Study of Atezolizumab as Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Patients (pts) with Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (ID 4642)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Mino-Kenudson
- Abstract
Background:
There is no curative treatment for patients with NSCLC who develop metastatic disease after resection. Trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy have demonstrated an absolute survival benefit of 5% for patients with stages IB, II, and IIIA disease. Clearly, developing new treatment strategies to improve survival following resection is critical to improving outcomes for this patient population. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors such as antibodies to PD-1 and PD-L1 has demonstrated superior survival compared to chemotherapy in randomized clinical trials. PD-L1 expression is being investigated as a predictive biomarker for these therapies, but its ability to predict response has varied in published trials. Atezolizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal PD-L1 antibody that was recently evaluated in the POPLAR trial (NCT01903993), a phase II randomized trial of patients with NSCLC who progressed on platinum based chemotherapy. Atezolizumab therapy improved overall survival compared with docetaxel (12.6 months vs. 9.7 months, HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.53 – 0.99]) with a manageable safety profile. Improvement in survival correlated with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry expression of tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cells.
Methods:
Trial design: This phase II, open-label, single-arm study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab as a neoadjuvant therapy in patients with Stage IB, II, or IIIA NSCLC prior to curative-intent resection. Approximately 180 patients with NSCLC will be enrolled in this study at 15 academic medical centers in the United States. There are two parts to this study: the first/primary part will evaluate the ability of neoadjuvant atezolizumab to produce objective pathologic responses in patients with early stage NSCLC. Atezolizumab 1200 mg IV will be given every 3 weeks for two doses. Surgical resection of tumors following treatment will allow determination of pathologic response rates and potential predictive biomarkers. Part 2 is exploratory and will evaluate atezolizumab adjuvant therapy for up to 12 months in patients who demonstrate clinical benefit (evidence of pathologic response or absence of radiographic progression) in Part 1. After surgical resection, patients may receive SOC adjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiation) before starting atezolizumab adjuvant therapy in Part 2. The primary objectives are safety and major pathologic response based on surgical resection. Secondary objectives include overall response rate based on PD-L1 status, mutational load, antigen burden, and RNA-sequencing. This trial presents a unique opportunity to evaluate exploratory biomarkers, including pre- and post-treatment biopsy assessment of evolution of immune related markers associated with response.
Results:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
-
+
P3.01 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 469)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.01-018 - Reproducibility in Classification of Small Lung Adenocarcinomas: An International Interobserver Study (ID 5222)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Mino-Kenudson
- Abstract
Background:
The 2015 WHO classification for lung adenocarcinoma (ACA) provides criteria for diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in-situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (INV). Differentiating these entities can be difficult, and as understanding of prognostic significance increases, inconsistent classification is problematic.
Methods:
Sixty cases of lung ACAs (<2cm) were reviewed by an international panel of 6 lung pathologists. One slide reflecting overall morphology of each case was digitally scanned to an internet browser-based viewer. In round one, the panel independently reviewed each case to assess predominant pattern, invasive component size, and final diagnosis (AIS, MIA or INV). After a consensus conference among participants, a second round of independent review of the cases was performed. Additionally, a discussion on interpretation of elastic stain for evaluation of invasion will precede a third round of review with assessment of a concomitant elastic stain for each case. Statistical analysis was performed for each round.
Results:
In round one, the overall kappa value for AIS versus MIA and INV was 0.34 (fair agreement), and that for AIS and MIA versus INV was 0.44 (moderate agreement). The raters had 100% agreement on final diagnosis in 10 cases (AIS, n=2; MIA, n=2; INV, n=6). In 28 cases with poor agreement on final diagnosis and invasive measurement, inconsistent measurement of multifocal invasion led to wide variance in 5 cases, and subjectivity in pattern recognition led to variance in 23 cases. Misinterpretation of the WHO criteria for MIA resulted in 18 instances of misclassification across all raters. A case with a predominant mucinous lepidic pattern had a range of diagnoses (AIS, n=1; MIA, n=1; INV, n=4). In round two, the overall kappa value for AIS versus MIA and INV is 0.40 (fair agreement), and that for AIS and MIA versus INV is 0.36 (moderate agreement). The raters had 100% agreement on final diagnosis in 12 cases (AIS, n=3; MIA n=4; INV, n=5). Misinterpretation of the WHO criteria for MIA was seen in 6 instances. The intraobserver kappa coefficient ranged widely from 0.259 to 0.859.
Conclusion:
Interobserver agreement on diagnosis of small lung ACAs between raters was fair to moderate, with minimal improvement after a consensus conference. Inconsistent measurement of multifocal invasion, subjectivity in pattern recognition, misinterpretation of the WHO criteria, and subjective interpretation of mucinous ACA have contributed to interobserver discordance. A third round of evaluation is currently ongoing to assess for improvement and the utility of elastic stains.
-
+
P3.01-021 - Reproducibility of Comprehensive Histologic Assessment and Refining Histologic Criteria in P Staging of Multiple Tumour Nodules (ID 5365)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Mino-Kenudson
- Abstract
Background:
Multiple tumor nodules (MTNs) are being encountered, with increasing frequency with the 8[th] TNM staging system recommending classification as separate primary lung cancers (SPLC) or intrapulmonary metastases (IM). Pathological staging requires assessment of morphological features, with criteria of Martini and Melamed supplanted by comprehensive histologic assessment of tumour type, predominant pattern, other histologic patterns and cytologic features. With publication of the 2015 WHO classification of lung tumours, we assessed the reproducibility of comprehensive histologic assessment and also sought to identify the most useful histological features.
Methods:
We conducted an online survey in which pathologists reviewed a sequential cohort of resected multifocal tumours to determine whether they were SPLC, IM, or a combination. Specific histological features for each nodule were entered into the database by the observing pathologist (tumour type, predominant adenocarcinoma pattern, and histological features including presence of lepidic growth, intra-alveolar cell clusters, cell size, mitotic rate, nuclear pleomorphism, nucleolar size and pleomorphism, nuclear inclusions, necrosis pattern, vascular invasion, mucin content, keratinization, clear cell change, cytoplasmic granules¸ lymphocytosis, macrophage response, acute inflammation and emperipolesis). Results were statistically analyzed for concordance with submitting diagnosis (gold standard) and among pathologists. Consistency of each feature was correlated with final determination of SPLC vs. IM status (p staging) by chi square analysis and Fisher exact test.
Results:
Seventeen pathologists evaluated 126 tumors from 48 patients. Kappa score on overall assessment of primary v. metastatic status was 0.60. There was good agreement as measured by Cohen’s Kappa (0.64, p<0.0001) between WHO histological patterns in individual cases with SPLC or IM status but proportions for histology and SPT or IM status were not identical (McNemar's test, p<0.0001) and additional histological features were assessed. There was marked variation in p values among the specific histological features. The strongest correlations (<0.05) between p staging status and histological features were with nuclear pleomorphism, cell size, acinus formation, nucleolar size, mitotic rate, nuclear inclusions, intra-alveolar clusters and necrosis pattern. Correlation between lymphocytosis, mucin content, lepidic growth, vascular invasion, macrophage response, clear cell change, acute inflammation keratinization and emperipolesis did not reach a p value of 0.05.
Conclusion:
Comprehensive histologic assessment shows good reproducibility between practicing lung pathologists. In addition to main tumour type and predominant patterns, nuclear pleomorphism, cell size, acinus formation, nucleolar size, and mitotic rate appear to be useful in distinguishing between SPLC and IM.
