Virtual Library

Start Your Search

M. Marin Alcala



Author of

  • +

    P3.03 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 473)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.03-056 - Retrospective Study Comparing Two Frontline Chemotherapy Schemes in Unresectable Malignant Mesothelioma (ID 5724)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): M. Marin Alcala

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Standard treatment for mesothelioma is platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Selected patients can benefit from surgical procedures and / or radiotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed the results of different platinum doublets administered in clinical practice in our centre.

      Methods:
      This is a single-centre study of 64 patients with mesothelioma treated with first-line palliative chemotherapy between September 1999 and December 2015. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the treatment received: (A) 55 patients who received platinum + pemetrexed and (B) 9 patients treated with platinum + gemcitabine. The characteristics of the groups are compared and the results obtained presented.

      Results:
      Group A characteristics: 75.4% male, mean age 66.7 years. Origin: 91.2% pleural and peritoneal 5.3%. Histology: epithelioid 61.1%, 5.6% biphasic and 33% unknown. Clinical staging III and IV (50.9%) I and II (24.6%). They had PS0 = 31.6%, PS1= 57.9%, PS2 = 5.3%. Group 'B': 77.8% male, mean age 69.9 years. Origin: pleural 77.8% and 22.2% peritoneal. Epithelioid histology 44.4%, 22.2% sarcomatoid and 22.2% unknown. They had PS0 =11.1%, PS1 = 55.6%, PS2= 22.2%, PS3 = 11.1%. There were no significant differences between groups in either prognostic factors or in the indication of palliative pleurodesis. Progression-free survival (A) was 6.7 vs. (B) 2.53 months (p = 0.013). Overall survival (A) was 19.1 months vs. (B) 7.7 months (p = 0.046). The response rate was (A) 50% and (B) 11% (p = 0.19). They received second line: (A) 52.6% vs. (B) 1p (11.1%). G3-4 toxicities: (A) neutropaenia and asthenia (14.1%), anemia (7%), diarrhoea (3.5%), thrombocytopenia, nausea / vomiting, neuropathy, vascular, hearing and dysgeusia (1.8%). In (B) 2p anaemia (22.2%), diarrhoea 1p (11.1%). Median number of cycles (A) 6 vs. (B) 3 (p = 0.084). No significant differences in the number of delays and dose reductions between treatments were observed.

      Conclusion:
      A significant increase in PFS and OS was achieved with the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed in our series. The toxicity profile is the expected one with a clinical benefit with cisplatin compared to gemcitabine.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.