Virtual Library
Start Your Search
L. Paz-Arez
Author of
-
+
ISS04 - Industry Supported Symposium: Treatment Selection Strategies in Advanced NSCLC - A Symphony of Views - Eli Lilly and Company (ID 438)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Industry Supported Symposium
- Track:
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:G.V. Scagliotti, T. Mok
- Coordinates: 12/04/2016, 17:15 - 18:45, Hall C1
-
+
ISS04.04 - Keys to Biomarker Driven Choices in 2nd Line (ID 6856)
18:05 - 18:25 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
Abstract not provided
-
+
MA07 - ALK-ROS1 in Advanced NSCLC (ID 385)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
-
+
MA07.05 - EUCROSS: A European Phase II Trial of Crizotinib in Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Lung Harboring ROS1 Rearrangements - Preliminary Results (ID 4451)
11:30 - 11:36 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
ROS1 rearrangements are present in the tumors of 1-2% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LAD). This patient subgroup is characterized by non-smoking history and younger than average age compared to the overall NSCLC population. In a phase I trial the ALK/ROS1/MET inhibitor crizotinib has shown to be highly effective in these patients (NCT00585195). EUCROSS is a prospective phase II trial of the Lung Cancer Group Cologne in collaboration with the Spanish Lung Cancer Group to evaluate crizotinib in ROS1-positive LAD. Here, we present preliminary data on efficacy and safety.
Methods:
Patients with advanced LAD harboring ROS1 rearrangements as confirmed by central FISH were eligible for the trial irrespectively of the number of prior treatment lines. Patients received treatment with crizotinib 250 mg BID - doses were adapted for management of AEs. Trial design: Fleming’s single stage phase II design. Primary endpoint: ORR (95% CI, H~0~: ORR≤20% vs. H~1~: ORR>20%). Secondary endpoints: a.o. PFS, OS and safety. All efficacy endpoints were assessed by investigator’s RECIST v1.1 and will be analyzed by IRB at a later stage. Baseline tumor tissue was analyzed by DNA-sequencing to identify the translocation Partners of ROS1, to validate FISH results and to identify additional biomarkers for prediction of response. Data-cut off for this report was March 2016.
Results:
In total, 34 patients were enrolled in EUCROSS at the time of data cut-off. Twenty-nine patients were eligible for efficacy assessment. Tumor tissue of 20 of these patients was suitable for further sequencing - 18 were sequenced positive for ROS1 fusion. The fusion partners involved were CD74 (N=9;50%), EZR (N=4;22%), SCL34A2 (N=3;17%), TPM3 and SDC4(N=1;6% each). The investigator assessed ORR was 69% (95% CI, 49.1-84.3) in the overall trial population and 83% (95% CI, 67.7-94.2) in the ROS1-positive by sequencing population (N=18;P=0.324 for difference of ORR). Three patients (10.3%;95% CI, 3.6-26.4) exhibited primary progression, two of them were sequenced ROS1-negative. All patients were included in the safety population (N=34). Most common AEs irrespectively of relatedness or grade were visual disorders (N=16;48%), edema (N=14;41%), diarrhea (N=13;38%) and bradycardia (N=11;32%).
Conclusion:
Crizotinib is a highly effective and safe treatment in the subset of ROS1 rearranged NSCLC patients as determined by FISH and DNA-sequencing. Although, the number of patients with tissue available for sequencing was low at the time of data cut-off, sensitivity and specificity support sequencing as the potential new gold-standard for the identification of clinically relevant ROS1 gene-rearrangements.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA03 - Immunotherapy Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced NSCLC (ID 367)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy/Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
-
+
OA03.05 - Analysis of Early Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-Squamous NSCLC Treated with Nivolumab vs Docetaxel in CheckMate 057 (Abstract under Embargo until December 5, 7:00 CET) (ID 4392)
11:45 - 11:55 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Nivolumab significantly improved OS versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous NSCLC (CheckMate 057; NCT01673867). Kaplan−Meier OS curves for nivolumab and docetaxel crossed at ~7 months, suggesting non-proportional hazards between arms.
Methods:
Post-hoc analyses were conducted to explore relationships between baseline patient/disease characteristics, including PD-L1 expression, and death within the first 3 months of treatment (3motx). Additionally, the association between PD-L1 expression level and magnitude of clinical benefit was explored.
Results:
During the first 3motx, risk of death (rDt) was numerically higher with nivolumab versus docetaxel (59 versus 44 deaths among 292 and 290 patients, respectively). Early deaths were most commonly attributed to disease progression (no treatment-related deaths occurred). At 3motx, 80% of nivolumab-treated patients (233/292) and 85% of docetaxel-treated patients (246/290) were alive. After 3motx, the rDt was consistently higher in the docetaxel arm. In univariate analyses, no single baseline factor, including PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation, ECOG PS, or smoking status, reliably characterized the rDt within the first 3motx with nivolumab. Among patients alive >3 months, the OS HR (95% CI) favored nivolumab in the overall population (0.59 [0.47−0.74]) and PD-L1 non-expressors (PD-L1 expression <1%; 0.66 [0.45−0.97]). In a multivariate analysis, factors associated with higher rDt within the first 3motx on nivolumab versus docetaxel were ECOG PS=1, time since last treatment <3 months, and/or progressive disease as best response to prior treatment combined with lower or no PD-L1 expression. However, the majority of nivolumab-treated patients with these attributes (including PD-L1 non-expressors), did not die within the first 3motx and experienced subsequent benefit. PD-L1 expression was a continuum, ranging from 1 to 100%, with increasing expression associated with enhanced ORR/OS benefit from nivolumab.
Conclusion:
In CheckMate 057, the benefit−risk profile of nivolumab versus docetaxel was favorable across the overall patient population. During the first 3motx, a small difference in the number of deaths (n=15) was observed; thereafter the OS rate consistently favored nivolumab (2-year OS was >2-fold higher with nivolumab versus docetaxel). Patients with poorer prognostic factors and/or more aggressive disease combined with lower or no PD-L1 expression appeared to be at higher rDt within the first 3motx on nivolumab versus docetaxel. With the exception of PD-L1 status, these are recognized prognostic factors. While PD-L1 expression may help inform individual treatment decisions, PD-L1 status alone is not considered an appropriate biomarker for nivolumab treatment selection in pre-treated advanced NSCLC, but rather should be considered in the context of other patient/disease characteristics.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA11 - Angiogenesis in Advanced Lung Cancer (ID 387)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:L.M. Montuenga, J. Heymach
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 11:00 - 12:30, Stolz 2
-
+
OA11.02 - Randomized Phase 1b/3 Study of Erlotinib plus Ramucirumab in First-Line EGFR Mut + Stage IV NSCLC: Phase 1b Safety Results (ID 3827)
12:10 - 12:20 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Ramucirumab, an antiangiogenic IgG1 VEGFR2-targeted monoclonal antibody, and erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, are both active in advanced NSCLC. This global phase 1b/3 study (NCT02411448) will assess safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination of ramucirumab with erlotinib in previously untreated patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage IV NSCLC. Here we report phase 1b safety results.
Methods:
Eligible patients with ECOG PS 0-1, an activating EGFR mutation, and previously untreated stage IV NSCLC received ramucirumab 10 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of repeating 14-day (± 3 days) cycle and erlotinib 150 mg orally daily. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of part A was to assess the safety and tolerability, in terms of dose limiting toxicities (DLT), of adding the recommended dose of ramucirumab for phase 3 (part B) to standard dose erlotinib. Data were analyzed separately for Japan (JP) (cohort 1) and US/EU (cohort 2). The DLT assessment occurred during the first 2 cycles (approximately 28 days).
Results:
As of Dec 16th, 2015, 14 patients were treated in the phase 1b part of this trial and 12 were DLT evaluable (6 JP; 6 US/EU). Overall, 6 grade (Gr) 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were noted, with at least one TEAE in 5 patients; no serious adverse events or Gr 4-5 TEAEs occurred. In the JP cohort the median age was 73 (64-79), 57% had ECOG PS 1 and 29% had a history of smoking. Four patients (57%) experienced a Gr 3 TEAE, of which one was a DLT (elevation of alanine aminotransferase) while the others (hypertension [n=2], dermatitis acneiform, and diarrhea) were not DLTs. In the US/EU cohort the median age was 71 (31-83), 86% had ECOG PS 1, and no patients had a history of smoking. One patient experienced Gr 3 TEAE of rash; no DLTs were observed in this cohort.
Conclusion:
Enrollment on the phase 1b portion of this trial is complete and the safety results were consistent with previous combinations of antiangiogenic/erlotinib in this patient population. No unexpected toxicities were identified. Phase 3 enrollment has been initiated maintaining the dose of ramucirumab at 10 mg/kg Q2W.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA23 - EGFR Targeted Therapies in Advanced NSCLC (ID 410)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:O.T. Brustugun, S. Lu
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:20 - 15:50, Stolz 2
-
+
OA23.02 - Efficacy and Safety of Necitumumab Continuation Monotherapy in Patients with EGFR-Expressing Tumors in SQUIRE, a Phase 3 Study (ID 4283)
14:30 - 14:40 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
SQUIRE (NCT00981058) demonstrated adding necitumumab (N) to gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) improved survival in patients with Stage IV squamous NSCLC (SQ-NSCLC). Retrospective analysis revealed consistent treatment effect in favor of patients receiving N monotherapy as continuation after chemotherapy (CT) (GC+N continuation patients) versus continuation therapy-eligible GC arm patients (GC non-progressors). In the EU, N is approved for patients with EGFR-expressing tumors. We repeated the analysis in this patient population.
Methods:
Patients with Stage IV SQ-NSCLC were randomized 1:1 for ≤6 cycles of G (1250 mg/m[2] iv, Days [d] 1,8) and C (75 mg/m[2] iv, d1) either with or without N (800 mg iv, d1,8). Patients in GC+N without progression continued N until progressive disease (PD). SQUIRE included mandatory tissue collection. EGFR protein expression was assessed by IHC in a central lab (Dako EGFR PharmDx kit). Analyses were done in EGFR-expressing patients (EGFR >0). Patients who received ≥4 cycles of CT without PD were included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CIs and hazard ratios estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards model.
Results:
Of 1093 patients (ITT population), 982 patients (89.8%) had evaluable IHC assay results; 935/982 (95.2%) had EGFR>0. GC+N arm continuation therapy patients included 228 patients with EGFR>0 and 194 patients (EGFR>0) were GC arm non-progressors. Baseline characteristics were similar except gender (Males: 81% in GC+N vs 91% in GC arm). CT exposure was balanced. Median OS from randomization in GC+N vs GC was 16.1 vs 14.9 months; HR 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61, 0.95). Median PFS in GC+N vs GC was 7.4 vs 6.9 months; HR 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66, 1.00). Figure 1
Conclusion:
In patients with EGFR-expressing tumors, a consistent treatment effect in favor of GC+N continuation maintenance compared to GC non-progressors was observed, similar to ITT population with no unexpected increases in AEs.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA23.05 - First-Line Afatinib versus Gefitinib in EGFRm+ Advanced NSCLC: Updated Overall Survival Analysis of LUX-Lung 7 (ID 5347)
15:05 - 15:15 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
The irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib and the reversible EGFR TKI gefitinib are approved for first-line treatment of advanced EGFRm+ NSCLC. This Phase IIb trial prospectively compared afatinib versus gefitinib in this setting.
Methods:
LUX-Lung 7 assessed afatinib (40 mg/day) versus gefitinib (250 mg/day) in treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC harbouring a common EGFR mutation (Del19/L858R). Co-primary endpoints were PFS (independent review), time to treatment failure (TTF) and OS. Other endpoints included ORR and AEs. In case of grade ≥3/selected grade 2 drug-related AEs the afatinib dose could be reduced to 30 mg or 20 mg (minimum). The primary analysis of PFS/TTF was undertaken after ~250 PFS events. The primary OS analysis was planned after ~213 OS events and a follow-up period of ≥32 months.
Results:
319 patients were randomised (afatinib: 160; gefitinib: 159). At the time of primary analysis, PFS (HR [95% CI] 0.73 [0.57‒0.95], p=0.017), TTF (0.73 [0.58‒0.92], p=0.007) and ORR (70 vs 56%, p=0.008) were significantly improved with afatinib versus gefitinib. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were diarrhoea (13%) and rash/acne (9%) with afatinib and elevated ALT/AST (9%) with gefitinib. 42% of patients treated with afatinib had ≥1 dose reduction due to AEs; dose reductions were more common in females than males (77%/23%) and non-Asians than Asians (64%/36%). Dose reduction of afatinib did not negatively impact PFS (<40mg vs ≥40mg; HR [95% CI]: 1.34 [0.90‒2.00]) but reduced incidence and severity of drug-related grade ≥3 AEs. Treatment discontinuation due to drug-related AEs was the same in each arm (6%). The data cut-off for primary OS analysis occurred on 8 April 2016. At this time, median treatment duration (range) was 13.7 (0‒46.4) versus 11.5 (0.5‒48.7) months with afatinib and gefitinib. 25% (afatinib) and 13% (gefitinib) of patients received treatment for >24 months. 73% and 77% of patients in the afatinib and gefitinib arms had ≥1 subsequent systemic anti-cancer treatment, with 46% and 56% receiving a subsequent EGFR-TKI including osimertinib (14%)/olmutinib (14%). OS data, including subgroup analysis with respect to subsequent therapy will be presented at the meeting.
Conclusion:
Afatinib significantly improved PFS, TTF and ORR versus gefitinib in EGFRm+ NSCLC patients, with a manageable AE profile and few drug-related discontinuations. Dose adjustment of afatinib reduced drug-related AEs without compromising efficacy. Primary OS analysis will be reported.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.03b - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 465)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.03b-035 - EGFR FISH as Potential Predictor of Necitumumab Benefit with Chemotherapy in Squamous NSCLC: Subgroup Analyses from SQUIRE (ID 5708)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
Background:
Necitumumab (Neci) is a monoclonal antibody directed against the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In the SQUIRE trial (NCT00981058), the addition of Neci to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (Gem-Cis) in squamous cell lung cancer resulted in a significant advantage in terms of overall survival (OS), but the expression of EGFR assessed by immunohistochemistry was not able to robustly predict the benefit from Neci. In a post-hoc analysis of SQUIRE, EGFR gene copy number gain determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed a trend towards improved OS (HR=0.70) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.71) with the addition of Neci. We present the analysis of granular EGFR-FISH data from SQUIRE to examine the potential predictive role of high polysomy (HP) vs gene amplification (GA) as both were included in the “FISH-positive” category.
Methods:
Suitable specimens from SQUIRE patients underwent FISH analysis. Probe hybridization was performed in a central laboratory and each sample was analyzed using the Colorado EGFR scoring criteria. FISH was considered positive in cases of HP (≥40% cells with ≥4 EGFR copies) or GA (EGFR/CEP7 ≥2 or ≥10% cells with ≥15 EGFR copies). The correlation of granular FISH parameters with clinical outcomes was assessed.
Results:
FISH analysis was available for 557 patients (out of 1093); 208 patients (37.3%) were FISH+, including 167 (30.0%) with HP and 41 (7.4%) with GA. The outcome data for HP and GA are reported below:HIGH POLYSOMY GENE AMPLIFICATION Neci+Gem-Cis (N=89) Gem-Cis (N=78) Neci+Gem-Cis (N=22) Gem-Cis (N=19) Median OS in months (95% CI) 12.58 (11.04-16.00) 9.53 (7.16-12.48) 14.78 (10.02-31.51) 7.62 (4.99-16.10) Hazard ratio within subgroup (interaction model) 0.77 (0.55-1.08) p = 0.133 0.45 (0.21-0.93) p = 0.033 Interaction p value 0.189 Median PFS in months(95% CI) 6.08 (5.59-7.59) 5.13 (4.24-5.72) 7.36 (4.27-11.40) 5.55 (2.79-8.34) Hazard ratio within subgroup (interaction model) 0.70 (0.50-0.99) p = 0.044 0.69 (0.33-1.45) p = 0.334 Interaction p value 0.980
Conclusion:
The OS benefit from the addition of Neci to Gem-Cis appeared to be more pronounced in the small subset of patients with GA when compared to HP, but the same trend was not observed for PFS. The potential predictive value of different EGFR FISH parameters should be evaluated in future studies.
-
+
P2.06 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 467)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Scientific Co-Operation/Research Groups (Clinical Trials in Progress should be submitted in this category)
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.06-012 - Phase 2 Study of Abemaciclib + Pembrolizumab in KRAS Mutation, PD-L1+, Stage IV Non-Small Cell or Squamous Cell Lung Cancer (ID 3762)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
Background:
Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring KRAS mutations remains a treatment challenge. Abemaciclib, a small molecular inhibitor of both cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and CDK6, demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and single-agent activity for patients with different tumors, including NSCLC. Preclinical evidence suggests a lethal interaction between CDK4 inhibition in lung cells and KRAS oncogenes. Pembrolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against PD-1 protein, is approved in the US for patients with metastatic PD-L1+ NSCLC. Both compounds demonstrated manageable toxicities. We thus aim to study the combination of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab in pretreated patients with NSCLC.
Methods:
This open-label phase 2 study will evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of abemaciclib 150 mg given orally every 12 hours on a continuous schedule on days 1-21 in combination with intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 of a 21-day cycle to patients in 1 of 3 disease cohorts: KRAS mutation, PD-L1+, stage IV NSCLC (Part A); stage IV NSCLC with squamous histology (Part B); or hormone receptor+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (Part C). Total target accrual is approximately 75 patients (25 per cohort). Only the 2 NSCLC cohorts will be presented here. Patients eligible for Part A have a confirmed KRAS mutation, PD-L1+ expression score of ≥1%, and are chemotherapy-naïve for metastatic NSCLC. Part B includes patients with predominately squamous NSCLC who have received 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. Patients must provide tumor tissue before and after treatment (cycle 3, day 1); have measurable disease, adequate organ function, an ECOG PS ≤1, and a life expectancy ≥12 weeks; and be ≥18 years of age and able to swallow oral medications. The primary objective is to characterize the safety profile of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab. Secondary objectives include objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), characterization of pharmacokinetics, and health outcomes. Patients who receive any study drug will be included in the analyses. Analyses of ORR, DCR, DoR, and PFS will be evaluated according to RECIST v.1.1 and irRECIST. Time-to-event variables will be estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. An interim analysis of safety and preliminary efficacy may occur after all patients have completed (or discontinued from) approximately 24 weeks of treatment. The final OS analysis will occur based on data collected for approximately 12 months after the last patient receives treatment.
Results:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
-
+
P3.02a - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 470)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.02a-013 - Brigatinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK+ NSCLC: Central Assessment and Updates from ALTA, a Pivotal Randomized Phase 2 Trial (ID 4046)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
Background:
Brigatinib, an investigational next-generation ALK inhibitor, has yielded promising activity in crizotinib-treated ALK+ NSCLC patients in a phase 1/2 trial (NCT01449461). As responses and adverse events (AEs) varied with starting dose, two brigatinib regimens are under evaluation in ALTA (NCT02094573).
Methods:
Patients with crizotinib-refractory advanced ALK+ NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive brigatinib at 90 mg qd (arm A) or 180 mg qd with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg (arm B) and stratified by presence of brain metastases at baseline and best response to prior crizotinib. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1.
Results:
222 patients were enrolled (arm A, n=112/arm B, n=110). Median age (A/B) was 51/57 years, 55%/58% were female, 74%/74% previously received chemotherapy, and 71%/67% had brain metastases. As of February 29, 2016, 64/112 (57%) patients in arm A and 76/110 (69%) patients in arm B were receiving brigatinib; median follow-up was 7.8/8.3 months. The Table shows investigator-assessed endpoints by arm and subgroup for select baseline characteristics. Independent review committee–assessed endpoints (A/B, n=112/n=110; as of May 16, 2016): confirmed ORR 48%/53%, median PFS 9.2/15.6 months. Any-grade treatment-emergent AEs (≥25% overall frequency; A/B, n=109/n=110 treated): nausea (33%/40%), diarrhea (19%/38%), headache (28%/27%), cough (18%/34%); grade ≥3 events (excluding neoplasm progression; ≥3% frequency): hypertension (6%/6%), increased blood CPK (3%/9%), pneumonia (3%/5%), increased lipase (4%/3%). A subset of pulmonary AEs with early onset (median onset: Day 2) occurred in 14/219 (6%) treated patients (3%, grade ≥3); 7/14 patients were successfully retreated. No such events occurred after escalation to 180 mg in arm B.
Conclusion:
In each arm, brigatinib yielded substantial responses and prolonged PFS, with an acceptable safety profile. 180 mg with 90 mg lead-in was not associated with increased early pulmonary events and showed a consistent improvement in efficacy, compared with 90 mg, particularly with respect to PFS.Investigator-Assessed Endpoints by Arm and Subgroup
Confirmed ORR, n/N(%) Median PFS, months Arm A B A+B A B A+B All patients 50/112(45) 59/110(54) 109/222(49) 9.2 12.9 11.1 Prior chemotherapy Yes 35/83(42) 44/81(54) 79/164(48) 8.8 12.9 11.8 No 15/29(52) 15/29(52) 30/58(52) 9.2 8.1 9.2 Race Asian 18/39(46) 18/30(60) 36/69(52) 8.8 11.1 11.1 Non-Asian 32/73(44) 41/80(51) 73/153(48) 9.2 12.9 11.8 Brain metastases at baseline Yes 31/80(39) 43/74(58) 74/154(48) 9.2 11.8 11.1 No 19/32(59) 16/36(44) 35/68(51) 7.4 15.6 15.6 Best response to prior crizotinib Partial+complete 36/71(51) 47/73(64) 83/144(58) 11.1 15.6 15.6 Other 14/41(34) 12/37(32) 26/78(33) 7.4 12.9 9.2 ORR=objective response rate PFS=progression-free survival
-
+
P3.02a-025 - PROs With Ceritinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated ALK-rearranged Nonsquamous NSCLC (ASCEND-4) (ID 5128)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
Background:
Here, we present the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of ceritinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ALK+ NSCLC.
Methods:
Untreated, ALK+, advanced, nonsquamous NSCLC patients (N=376) were randomized (1:1) to ceritinib 750 mg/day (n=189) or chemotherapy (n=187; [pemetrexed 500 mg/m[2 ]plus cisplatin 75 mg/m[2] or carboplatin AUC 5-6] for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed). PROs were assessed using EORTC quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), the lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13), Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), and EQ-5D.
Results:
Median treatment exposure was 66.4 weeks for ceritinib and 26.9 weeks for chemotherapy. PRO compliance was high, ≥80% at most timepoints. Ceritinib significantly prolonged time to deterioration of lung cancer-specific symptoms (pain, dyspnea, and cough) versus chemotherapy in both LCSS and QLQ-LC13 instruments (composite endpoints for LCSS, HR=0.61 [0.41, 0.90]; and QLQ-LC13, HR=0.48 [0.34, 0.69]). Time to deterioration in LC13 questionnaire was significantly longer with ceritinib versus chemotherapy (23.6 [20.7, NE] vs 12.6 [8.9, 14.9] months) (Table). In the QLQ-C30 instrument, 4 of 5 functional domains and 6 of 9 symptom scales improved with ceritinib (P< 0.05); 2 scales related to gastrointestinal symptoms indicated deterioration for ceritinib. In agreement with most other scales showing symptom improvement, ceritinib demonstrated significant improvements in Global Health Status/QoL in the same instrument (QLQ-C30, P<0.001) as well as for EQ-5D-5L index (P<0.001) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (P<0.05 from cycle 13 until 49). Figure 1
Conclusion:
Untreated ALK+ NSCLC patients experienced significantly greater improvements in lung cancer-specific symptoms on treatment with ceritinib. General health status was significantly improved with ceritinib versus chemotherapy. Overall, PRO results from all 4 instruments independently showed improvements highlighting the consistency and robustness of these findings.
-
+
P3.02b - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 494)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.02b-044 - Afatinib versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC Patients Aged ≥75 Years: Subgroup Analysis of LUX-Lung 7 (ID 5327)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
Background:
The irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib and the reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib are approved for first-line treatment of advanced EGFRm+ NSCLC. In the Phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, afatinib significantly improved median progression-free survival (PFS; HR=0.73 [95% CI, 0.57–0.95], p=0.017), objective response rate (70% vs 56%, p=0.008) and time to treatment failure (TTF; HR=0.73 [95% CI, 0.58–0.92], p=0.007) versus gefitinib in this setting (Park et al. Lancet Oncol 2016). Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of afatinib versus gefitinib in patients aged ≥75 years in a subgroup analysis of LUX-Lung 7 (NCT01466660).
Methods:
Treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV EGFRm+ NSCLC were randomized (1:1) to oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or gefitinib (250 mg/day), stratified by EGFR mutation type (Del19/L858R) and presence of brain metastases (Yes/No). Co-primary endpoints were PFS, TTF, and overall survival. Subgroup analyses of PFS and adverse events (AEs) by age (≥75/<75 years) were exploratory.
Results:
Of 319 patients randomised in LL7, 40 (13%) were aged ≥75 years (afatinib n=19, gefitinib n=21). Median PFS for both age groups was in line with the overall population and favoured afatinib versus gefitinib (patients ≥75 years: 14.7 vs 10.8 months, HR=0.69 [95% CI, 0.33–1.44]; patients <75 years: 11.0 vs 10.9 months, HR=0.76 [95% CI, 0.58–1.00]). The incidence of treatment-related AEs (grade 3/4) was slightly higher in the older subgroup (afatinib: 42%/0%; gefitinib: 24%/5%) than in the younger subgroup (afatinib: 28%/2%; gefitinib: 15%/<1%). There were no unexpected safety findings. The most common treatment-related AEs (all grade [grade 3]) with afatinib in the older patient subgroup were diarrhoea (89% [21%]), rash (63% [5%]), dry skin (37% [0%]), and decreased appetite (32% [0%]). Dose reduction/discontinuation of afatinib due to treatment-related AEs was required in 53%/16% and 40%/5% of the older and younger subgroup, respectively.
Conclusion:
A small subgroup of patients in the LUX-Lung 7 trial were ≥75 years old (13%). In exploratory subgroup analyses of patients aged ≥75 and <75 years old, advancing age did not adversely affect the PFS benefit and tolerability observed with afatinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve EGFRm+ NSCLC patients. These findings suggest that afatinib can provide an effective and tolerable treatment for older patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.
-
+
P3.02b-045 - Patritumab plus Erlotinib in EGFR Wild-Type Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Part a Results of HER3-Lung Study (ID 5473)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
Background:
Patritumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits human epidermal growth factor receptor 3. In a subgroup analysis of the phase 2 HERALD study, addition of patritumab to erlotinib increased progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced NSCLC patients with high tumor expression of heregulin mRNA (HRG-High); a similar safety profile was seen with patritumab+erlotinib versus erlotinib. This 2-part, phase 3 study (HER3-Lung) investigated erlotinib±patritumab in advanced, EGFR wild-type NSCLC patients previously treated with a platinum doublet. The primary objective of Part A was to confirm PFS improvement in HRG-High subjects.
Methods:
HER3-Lung was a 2-part, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Subjects aged ≥20 years with known HRG expression, advanced NSCLC previously treated with 1–2 systemic therapies including a platinum doublet, and EGFR wild-type (if adenocarcinoma histology) were eligible. Subjects were stratified by HRG expression, histology subtype (adenocarcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma/NOS), ECOG performance status (0–1), and best response to most recent therapy (CR/PR/SD, PD). Within each stratum, subjects were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib+patritumab or erlotinib+placebo.
Results:
One-hundred forty-five subjects were randomized, and 125 had discontinued study treatment prior to the data cutoff date. Most common reason for discontinuation was progressive disease (n=70). In the erlotinib+patritumab and erlotinib+placebo arms, respectively, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) grade ≥3 were reported in 40.5% and 46.5% and any grade serious TEAEs in 35.1% and 36.6% of subjects. Most common TEAEs (by subject) in the erlotinib+patritumab and erlotinib+placebo arms, respectively, were diarrhea (51.4%, 31%) and rash (37.8%, 36.6%). Patritumab did not increase erlotinib efficacy in the intent-to-treat group or HRG subgroups (Table). The study was stopped at the end of Part A because efficacy criteria to proceed into Part B were not reached.
Conclusion:
HER-3Lung did not confirm patritumab efficacy in the HRG-High subgroup. Safety of patritumab in combination with erlotinib was acceptable.Figure 1
-
+
P3.06 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 492)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Trial Design/Statistics
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.06-002 - ATLANTIS Trial: Phase III Study of PM01183/Doxorubicin vs. CAV or Topotecan in SCLC after One Platinum-Containing Line (ID 5877)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
Background:
PM01183 (lurbinectedin) is a new anticancer drug that blocks trans-activated transcription, induces DNA double-strand breaks and modulates the tumor microenvironment. Synergism in combination with doxorubicin with compelling overall response rates (~67%, including approximately 10% complete responses) was reported in a phase I expansion cohort in 21 second-line SCLC patients (pts) (ASCO 2015, abstract 7509). The most common toxicity observed was hematologic.
Methods:
Multinational, multicenter (>150 sites), open-label, randomized, phase III study of PM01183/doxorubicin vs. a control arm with investigator choice of either standard CAV or topotecan (1.5 mg/m[2], D1-5 q3wk). A total of 600 pts will be randomized (1:1) and stratified according to ECOG performance status (PS), chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI), known CNS involvement, prior PD-1/PD-L1 based immunotherapy and potential investigator’s control preference. Patients with clinical benefit after 10 cycles of doxorubicin containing-combination will continue on single agent PM01183 or CV, until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Interim safety analysis will be performed after 150 pts by an independent data monitoring committee. The most relevant inclusion criteria are: pts ≥18 years old; confirmed diagnosis of SCLC (small-cell carcinomas from unknown site are eligible provided ≥50% Ki-67 expression). One prior platinum containing regimen is mandatory (additional immunotherapy is allowed provided that it was not given in combination with CT); PS: 0-2 and adequate major organ function, including normal LVEF ≥50% at baseline. Pts are excluded if pre-treated with PM01183, doxorubicin or topotecan; symptomatic or steroid requiring CNS involvement or any serious medical condition that might preclude safe compliance with study treatment. The primary objective is to determine a difference in progression-free survival by an independent review committee. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, survival rates at 12/18/24 months, antitumor response (RECIST v1.1), duration of response, QoL, safety, subgroup analyses and pharmacokinetics (PK) of PM01183/doxorubicin arm. First patient is planned in JUL2016. Enrollment is expected to be completed by 4Q17.
Results:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
-
+
PL03 - Presidential Symposium (ID 428)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Plenary
- Track:
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:D.P. Carbone, R. Pirker
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 08:35 - 10:25, Hall D (Plenary Hall)
-
+
PL03.07 - First-line Ceritinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With ALK-rearranged (ALK+) NSCLC: A Randomized, Phase 3 Study (ASCEND-4) (Abstract under Embargo until December 6, 7:00 CET) (ID 4987)
09:45 - 09:55 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Here, we report results of ceritinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ALK+ NSCLC.
Methods:
Untreated ALK+ (IHC confirmed), advanced, nonsquamous NSCLC patients (N=376; median age, 54 years) were randomized (1:1) to ceritinib 750 mg/day (n=189 [59 with brain metastases (BM)]) or chemotherapy (n=187 [62 with BM]; [pemetrexed 500 mg/m[2] plus cisplatin 75 mg/m[2] or carboplatin AUC 5-6] for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed), stratified by WHO PS (0 vs 1-2), BM at screening, and prior neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy. Crossover from chemotherapy to ceritinib was allowed at progression (n=80 crossed-over).
Results:
Median treatment exposure was 66.4 weeks for ceritinib and 26.9 weeks for chemotherapy. Median follow-up duration was 19.7 months (randomization to cut-off date). The study met its primary objective, with ceritinib demonstrating statistically significant improvement in BIRC PFS (RECIST 1.1; median, 16.6 [12.6, 27.2] vs 8.1 months [5.8, 11.1], HR=0.55, P<0.001) versus chemotherapy. OS was immature (HR, 0.73 [0.50, 1.08]; P=0.056) with 42.3% of required events at interim analysis. ORR (BIRC, 72.5% vs 26.7%) and DOR (BIRC, median, 23.9 vs 11.1 months) were also higher with ceritinib versus chemotherapy. Among patients with measurable baseline BM and ≥1 postbaseline assessment, intracranial ORR (BIRC neuroradiologist; modified RECIST v1.1) was higher with ceritinib (72.7% [49.8, 89.3] vs 27.3% [10.7, 50.2]) versus chemotherapy (Table). Most common AEs (>50%) with ceritinib were diarrhea (84.7%), nausea (68.8%), vomiting (66.1%), ALT increase (60.3%), and AST increase (52.9%). Overall, 5.3% ceritinib- and 11.4% chemotherapy-treated patients discontinued due to AEs suspected to be drug-related. Figure 1
Conclusion:
First-line ceritinib achieved statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in median PFS with an estimated 45% risk reduction in advanced ALK+ NSCLC versus chemotherapy including maintenance. Moreover, ceritinib achieved high and durable systemic responses and high OIRR in patients with measurable BM. Safety profile of ceritinib is consistent with previously reported.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
SC14 - Immunotherapy of NSCLC (ID 338)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Science Session
- Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy/Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:N. Rizvi, C. Zielinski
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 11:00 - 12:30, Hall C2
-
+
SC14.02 - Immunotherapy in the Second-Line Setting of Advanced NSCLC (ID 6654)
11:20 - 11:40 | Author(s): L. Paz-Arez
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
