Virtual Library
Start Your Search
J. Lim
Author of
-
+
P3.02b - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 494)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.02b-018 - Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA versus Tumor Biopsy (ID 5550)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): J. Lim
- Abstract
Background:
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are predictive marker of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. We compared the sensitivity of EGFR mutation detection techniques between matched tumor tissue and peripheral blood sample in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Methods:
We collected the paired samples from plasma and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue in 202 patients before EGFR-TKIs. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp MinElute virus spin kit and EGFR mutation analysis was done by two detection methods. One is the PNAClamp[TM] which is the PNA-based PCR clamping that selectively amplifies only the mutated target DNA sequence as minor portion in mixture with the major wild type DNA sequences. The other is the PANAMutyper[TM] EGFR kit, which use PNA clamping-assisted fluorescence melting curve analysis to perform mutation detection and genotyping. The degree of agreement was evaluated by Cohen's kappa value.
Results:
The EGFR mutation rates by PANAMutyper[TM]R and PNAClamp[TM] were 51.0% vs. 47.0% in tissue, and 22.2% vs. 11.4% in plasma sample, respectively. Overall concordance rates and the degree of agreement between tissue and plasma samples was better in PANAMutyper[TM]R (69.3%, k=0.393, p<0.001) than PNAClamp[TM] (62.3%, k=0.211, p<0.001). Sensitivity of plasma EGFR mutations was higher (41.7% vs. 22.1%, p<0.001) and false negative rate was lower in PANAMutyper[TM]R test (58.3% vs. 77.9%, p<0.001). Response to EGFR-TKI was correlated with plasma EGFR mutation by PANAMutyper[TM]R (p=0.025) unlike PNAClamp[TM ](p=0.829).
Conclusion:
The sensitivity and concordance rate of PANAMutyper[TM]R test were better than standard PNAClamp[TM] test. So this technique can be useful to detect EGFR mutation in circulating cell-free DNA sample.