Virtual Library
Start Your Search
M. Cobo
Author of
-
+
P2.06 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 467)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Scientific Co-Operation/Research Groups (Clinical Trials in Progress should be submitted in this category)
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.06-010 - AZD9291 as 1st-Line Therapy for EGFR Mutant NSCLC Patients with Concomitant Pretreatment EGFR T790M Mutation. The AZENT Study (ID 4267)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Cobo
- Abstract
Background:
Osimertinib (AZD9291) is a selective and irreversible pyrimidine-based inhibitor of the primary activating and the secondary EGFR mutation, T790M, which is the most common mechanism of acquired resistance to 1st and 2nd-generation EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Progression-free survival (PFS) with osimertinib was 9.6 and 2.8 months (m) for EGFR mutated (EGFR+) NSCLC patients progressing to prior EGFR TKI therapy with and without EGFR T790M mutation, respectively, indicating that the T790M is a predictive biomarker for osimertinib efficacy. Sixty patients from two expansion cohorts of the same study, received 1st-line osimertinib and obtained a PFS of 19.3m. T790M, arising in cis with the primary activating mutation, confers resistance to EGFR TKIs, even in the absence of drug selection. The coexistence of the pretreatment T790M mutation has been under appreciated, in spite of accumulative evidence that is present in a frequency of 35-60% using different detection methods. In our experience, pretreatment T790M mutation is frequently detected by three specific aspects of the method: tumor microdissection, examination of two separate tumor areas, and the use of a peptic nucleid acid clamp that inhibits wild-type allele amplification. Thus, we designed the first phase IIa study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of osimertinib as 1st-line therapy for patients with metastatic EGFR+ NSCLC and concomitant pretreatment T790M mutation.
Methods:
This is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, non-controlled phase IIa clinical study in Spain. Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with metastatic EGFR+ NSCLC and by central testing documented presence of pretreatment T790M mutation. Seventy-three patients will receive continuous treatment with osimertinib 80 mg daily until disease progression, intolerable adverse events, consent withdrawal or noncompliance with the study protocol. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. The trial is designed to detect a ≥70% ORR in this patient population. Secondary objectives include PFS, overall survival, time to treatment failure, duration of response and disease control rate. Additional pre-specified secondary objectives of the study are the longitudinal analysis of EGFR mutations (including the T790M and the C797S mutations) in plasma and serum and the expression analysis of a panel of biomarkers with possible predictive value for osimertinib treatment.
Results:
Not applicable
Conclusion:
Not applicable
-
+
P2.06-011 - Phase 2 Study of MM-121 plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone in Heregulin-Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC (ID 4158)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Cobo
- Abstract
Background:
The role of the HER3 receptor and its ligand heregulin (HRG) in the progression of multiple cancers has been well established. Seribantumab (MM-121) is a fully human, monoclonal IgG2 antibody that binds to the HRG domain of HER3, blocking HER3 activity. The correlation between the level of HRG mRNA in tumor tissue and progression free survival (PFS) were retrospectively analyzed in three completed randomized Phase 2 studies of seribantumab plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone (NSCLC, breast cancer and ovarian cancer). In each of these studies, high levels of HRG mRNA predicted shortened PFS for patients who received SOC treatment, while the addition of seribantumab to SOC improved PFS for patients with HRG-positive (HRG+) tumors. This is consistent with the hypothesis that HRG expression defines a drug tolerant cancer cell phenotype shielded from the effects of cytotoxic or targeted therapies and that blockade of HRG-induced HER3 signaling by seribantumab counters the effects of HRG on cancer cells, with the potential to improve outcomes for HRG+ patients. It is estimated that up to approximately 50% of cases of all solid tumor indications are HRG+. This HRG expression may contribute to rapid clinical progression in a subset of patients with poor prognosis.
Methods:
In the ongoing randomized, open-label, international, Phase 2 study, NSCLC patients with HRG+ tumors are being prospectively selected using a HRG RNA in situ hybridization assay performed on a recent tumor tissue sample collected via fine needle aspiration, core needle biopsy or excision. Approximately 560 patients will be screened to support enrollment of 280 HRG+ patients, who will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive seribantumab plus investigator’s choice of docetaxel or pemetrexed, or docetaxel or pemetrexed alone. Patients will be wild-type for EGFR and ALK and will have progressed following one to three systemic therapies, one of which must be an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy, for locally advanced and/or metastatic disease. Overall survival (OS) is the primary endpoint of the study and secondary endpoints include PFS, objective response rate and time to progression. Safety and health-related quality of life will also be assessed. An interim analysis is planned when 50% of final OS events have been reported. Enrollment has been initiated with approximately 80 sites expected to participate worldwide. Clinical Trials Registry number: NCT02387216
Results:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
-
+
P3.02b - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 494)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.02b-003 - Second-Line Afatinib versus Erlotinib for Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung (LUX-Lung 8): Analysis of Tumour and Serum Biomarkers (ID 5627)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Cobo
- Abstract
Background:
LUX-Lung 8 compared second-line afatinib (40 mg/day; n=398) and erlotinib (150 mg/day; n=397) in patients with stage IIIB/IV squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung. PFS (median 2.6 vs 1.9 months, HR=0.81 [95% CI, 0.69–0.96], p=0.010) and OS (median 7.9 vs 6.8 months, HR=0.81 [0.69–0.95], p=0.008) were both significantly improved with afatinib versus erlotinib. Here we report exploratory molecular (n=245) and immunohistochemical (n=288) analyses of tumour samples to assess the frequency of short variants (SVs) and copy number alterations (CNAs) in cancer-related genes and whether these tumour genomic alterations, or EGFR expression levels, have clinical utility as prognostic/predictive biomarkers in patients with SCC of the lung. We also assessed the predictive utility of the prospectively validated VeriStrat®, a serum protein test (n=675).
Methods:
Archived tumour samples were retrospectively analysed using next-generation sequencing (FoundationOne™). Tumour EGFR expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry; EGFR positivity was defined as staining in ≥10% of cells. Pretreatment serum samples were assigned as VeriStrat-Good or VeriStrat-Poor according to a mass spectrometry signature. Cox regression analysis was used to correlate OS/PFS with genomic alterations (individual or grouped into gene families e.g. ErbB family), EGFR expression levels and VeriStrat status.
Results:
The frequency of ErbB family alterations was low (SVs: EGFR 6.5%, HER2 4.9%, HER3 6.1%, HER4 5.7%; CNAs: EGFR 6.9%, HER2 3.7%). No individual genetic alterations, or grouped ErbB family aberrations, were prognostic of OS/PFS. Treatment benefit from afatinib versus erlotinib was consistent in all molecular subgroups. Most tumours were EGFR-positive by immunohistochemistry (afatinib: 82%; erlotinib: 86%). EGFR expression was not predictive of OS or PFS benefit (EGFR-positive PFS: HR=0.76 [0.57‒1.02]; OS: HR=0.84 [0.63‒1.12]; EGFR-negative PFS: HR=0.87 [0.45‒1.68]; OS: HR=0.77 [0.40‒1.51]). In afatinib-treated patients, both PFS (HR=0.56 [0.43‒0.72], p<0.0001) and OS (HR=0.40 [0.31‒0.51], p<0.0001) were improved in the VeriStrat-Good versus the VeriStrat-Poor group. VeriStrat-Good patients had significantly longer OS and PFS when treated with afatinib versus erlotinib (median OS: 11.5 vs 8.9 months, HR=0.79 [0.63‒0.98]; PFS: HR=0.73 [0.59‒0.92]). In VeriStrat-Poor patients there was no significant difference in OS between afatinib and erlotinib (HR=0.90 [0.70‒1.16]). However, there was no significant interaction between treatment arms and VeriStrat classification.
Conclusion:
Despite comprehensive, multifaceted analysis, no biomarkers were identified that predicted the benefit with afatinib over erlotinib in patients with SCC of the lung. Afatinib is a treatment option in this setting irrespective of patients’ tumour genetics or EGFR expression levels. However, patient outcome strongly depends on VeriStrat status.
