Virtual Library

Start Your Search

M. Perna



Author of

  • +

    P2.04 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 466)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.04-021 - Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Prognostic Factor Analysis in Thymic Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis of 129 Consecutive Patients (ID 5004)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): M. Perna

      • Abstract

      Background:
      To evaluate the impact of histological subtypes, stage and therapeutic approaches on outcomes of a retrospective consecutive series of patients (pts) treated in 2 different Radiation Oncology Italian Centers

      Methods:
      One-hundred twenty nine pts were treated between 1982 and 2012.Sixty-six pts were male,63female;mean age was 58 years.The series was reclassified according to WHO 2004 staging:42 pts had epithelial/ mixed thymoma(type A/AB),72pts had cortical/medullary/atypical thymoma(B1/B2/B3) and 15 thymic carcinoma(type C).All pts were also staged using Masaoka classification(MKc) resulting in 43pts in stage I,30 stage IIA,13 stage IIB,24 stage III and 19 stage IVA.Radical surgery(thymectomy +/- mediastinal nodes sampling)was performed in all pts,30 of whom had positive margins,while 80 were also submitted to adjuvant thoracic RT(ART)due to their final pathological stage and/or surgical margins status. All pts were evaluated for clinical outcomes(overall survival-OS,progression free survival-PFS and local control-LC) and secondary malignancies incidence.

      Results:
      After a median follow up of 9.6 years,at time of analysis 103 pts were alive with a 5- and 10 year OS of 90.1%(SE±2,7)and 81.7(SE±3.7) respectively and a PFS of 84.8(SE±3.2) and 77.3(SE±4.0). Finally,5- and 10-year LC were respectively 94,1% (SE±2,2) and 89.2%(SE±3.2).In terms of OS, MKc advanced stage was found as a negative prognostic factors(p<0.0001) such as Performance Status (PS) with a p<0.0001, Tstage (p< 0,0001), aggressive histology (p=0.0001) and surgical positive margins (p< 0,0001) at univariate analysis. Regarding PFS,advanced MK stage,T stage, positive surgical margins and aggressive histology were confirmed as negative prognostic factor (p< 0,0001, p<0,0001, p<0,01, p<0,0001). Using Cox regression analysis ART seems to have a protective effect if stratified by MKc clinical stage (p< 0,03) just in terms of OS.Concerning local recurrence, a significant difference was found by T stage(p<0,001), surgical margins (p<0,03) and WHO classification(p=0.0001). At multivariate analysis PS, Surgical Margins and histology were statistically significant (p<0.0001, p<0.002 and p<0,001 respectively) with a negative impact on OS for PS>1, positive margins and thymic carcinoma differentiation. At the same analysis only thymic carcinoma differentiation influenced PFS when compared with PS, T and MKc stage, surgical margins and ART. During follow up secondary/methacronous neoplasms were diagnosed in 29 pts (22.5%)

      Conclusion:
      PS, surgical margins and WHO classification seems to be the most important indicators for long term survival. ART showed positive impact in terms of OS in advanced MKc clinical stage (Stage II-III) pts.

  • +

    P2.05 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 463)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Radiotherapy
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.05-019 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Central Lung Tumors: The Experience of Florence University-Careggi Hospital Radiotherapy (ID 6047)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): M. Perna

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for central lung tumors, defined as tumor within 2 cm or touching the zone of the proximal bronchial tree or tumors immediately adjacent to the mediastinal or pericardial pleura (Adebahr S. et al. BJR 2015) is debated because of toxicities to organs at risk. No evidences from phase III trial are available.

      Methods:
      From 2010 to 2015, 45 central lesions in 40 pts were treated with SBRT. 14 lesions were primary lung cancer (PLC), 31 were lymphoadenopathies (LAP). PLC were treated with volumetric arc Therapy (VMAT) in 9 cases and 5 with Cyberknife®. LAP were treated with VMAT in 12 cases, with IMRT (step and shoot) in 10 and with Cyberknife® in 9 cases. Prescribed doses varied between 18 and 60 Gy (1-8 fractions) with median BED of 65 Gy (37,5-105 Gy). We evaluated Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Disease Specific Survival (DSS) using Kaplan-Meier method and treatment related toxicities using CTCAE version 4.0.

      Results:
      Median age was 62 years (48-86), 26 male and 14 female. PS was 0 in 9 pts, 1 in 21, 2 in 10 pts. Histology was available in all series and consisted of primary NSCLC (32 adenocarcinoma, 12 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 neuroendocrine tumour). 41 PLC were less than 2 cm from proximal bronchial tree, 4 PLC were immediately adjacent to the mediastinal or pericardial pleura. Tumor diameter was 10 to 60 mm with a median of 31 mm. Median follow up was 14,5 months. OS and DSS were 86.5% at 1 year, 55.6% at 2 years, and 49,4% at 3 years. PFS was 48,6% at 1 year, 24,1% at 2 years, and 12% at 3 years. 35 pts showed no acute toxicity; in 5 pts we recorded grade 1-2 esophagitis, in 2 pts grade 2 cough, in 2 pts, grade 1 asthenia. Chronic toxicity was present in 2 pts as grade 2 esophagitis.

      Conclusion:
      SBRT is confirmed to be a safe and effective strategy for central lung tumors. The majority of patients in the first part of our series was treated with low doses compared to current doses. Nevertheless 23 patients had clinical benefit from the treatment without life-threatening toxicities. Further studies are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of SBRT in central lung lesions.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P3.03 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 473)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.03-029 - EPP Followed by Hemithoracic IMRT - A Multicenter Study on Behalf of the Italian Association for Radiation Oncology Lung Cancer Study Group (ID 4684)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): M. Perna

      • Abstract

      Background:
      The treatment of MPM is not well defined. Although it has been shown that extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) followed by hemithoracic RT may improve survival in early-stage disease, this therapeutic approach is declining. This might be due to the recent publication of a randomized trial (SAKK 17/04) which assessed the effect of high-dose hemithoracic RT after EPP. The study reported poor outcomes and the results did not support the use of hemithoracic RT. The major weakness of the SAKK study is the heterogeneity of the radiation techniques and schedules, and that only 12 patients received IMRT. On this background we conducted the present study to assess the outcome of MPM patients treated with EPP and adjuvant IMRT.

      Methods:
      This is a retrospective multicenter study, including 5 academic centers in Italy. Seventy patients treated with EPP and adjuvant IMRT were enrolled. The majority (95%) of patients had an epithelioid histology. Sixty patients were affected by stage III-IVA disease. Fifty-four (77%) patients received neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. The IMRT dose ranged between 50-60 Gy in 25-27 fractions. Radiation was interrupted in two patients due to systemic progression of disease.

      Results:
      Median follow-up was 14 months (range, 0-83 months). Rates of local control, loco-regional control, distant-metastases free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 73%, 63%, 39%, and 63%, respectively. Patients with stage I-II had a better 2-year OS and DMFS than those with advanced disease: 60% vs. 40% (p=0.09), and 78% vs. 32% (p=0.03), respectively. Three fatal pneumonitis were reported. Other major toxicities were: Grade 2-3 pneumonitis in 2 cases, 1 bronchial fistula, and 1 Grade 3 esophagitis.

      Conclusion:
      This multicenter study showed that EPP followed by hemithoracic IMRT is associated with high rate of local and loco-regional control, and showed that long-term survival can be achieved, even if some patients may experienced life-threatening lung toxicity. Distant metastasis represent the predominant pattern of failure.