Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

C. O'Hear



Author of

  • +

    P2.03b - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 465)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.03b-014 - Atezolizumab in Advanced NSCLC Patients with Baseline Brain Metastases: A Pooled Cohort Safety Analysis (ID 5214)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): C. O'Hear

      • Abstract

      Background:
      Brain metastases, occurring in 20% to 40% of patients with advanced NSCLC, are associated with poor survival. Atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) inhibits PD-L1/PD-1 signaling and restores tumor-specific T-cell immunity. Clinical benefits have been observed in patients with NSCLC across PD-L1 expression levels following atezolizumab monotherapy, but the safety profile in NSCLC patients with brain metastases has not previously been explored.

      Methods:
      Pooled safety analyses were conducted in 843 patients who received atezolizumab as 2L+ treatment in 4 studies (PCD4989g: NCT01375842 [N = 76]; BIRCH: NCT02031458 [N = 520]; FIR: NCT01846416 [N = 105]; POPLAR: NCT01903993 [N = 142]). Patients had asymptomatic untreated brain metastases or stable previously treated brain metastases at baseline.

      Results:
      27 (3%) of 843 patients in the pooled cohort had baseline brain metastases; 23 of whom were previously treated with radiation to the brain. Among the 27 patients, mean age was 60 years, 41% were male, 85% had non-squamous NSCLC, and 70% had received 3L+ therapy. Median number of atezolizumab cycles (21d/cycle) was 4 (range, 1-39). Neurological AEs occurred in 12 (44%) patients with and 229 (28%) patients without baseline brain metastases (Table). The incidence of treatment-related neurological AEs was 4 (15%) in patients with and 77 (9%) in patients without baseline brain metastases, including the most common treatment-related AE of headache in 2 (7%) and 27 (3%) patients, respectively. The most common all-cause AEs in patients with baseline brain metastases were fatigue, nausea, and vomiting (7 [26%] each); 3 (11%) patients developed new brain lesions on study, none during treatment. No treatment discontinuations occurred due to AEs.

      Conclusion:
      The current analyses indicate that atezolizumab has an acceptable safety profile in patients with NSCLC who have asymptomatic or previously treated stable brain metastases. Further investigation is needed to fully assess the efficacy of atezolizumab in this patient population.

      Summary of safety data in patients with advanced NSCLC with and without baseline brain metastases following atezolizumab as 2L+ treatment
      Pooled Cohort (N = 843)
      Patients Without Baseline Brain Metastases (n = 816) n (%) Patients With Baseline Brain Metastases (n = 27) n (%)
      Any AE 779 (96%) 26 (96%)
      Any neurological AE 229 (28%) 12 (44%)
      Treatment-related AEs 548 (67%) 16 (59%)
      Treatment-related neurological AEs 77 (9%) 4 (15%)
      Serious AE 311 (38%) 9 (33%)
      Serious neurological AEs 21 (3%) 1 (4%)
      Treatment-related SAEs 78 (10%) 1 (4%)
      Discontinued treatment due to AE 47 (6%) 0 (0%)


  • +

    P3.02c - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 472)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.02c-046 - Safety, Clinical Activity and Biomarker Results from a Phase Ib Study of Erlotinib plus Atezolizumab in Advanced NSCLC (ID 5215)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): C. O'Hear

      • Abstract

      Background:
      Targeted therapy with erlotinib is effective in reducing tumor burden in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance to therapy develops almost universally. Atezolizumab, an engineered mAb that inhibits binding of PD-L1 to its receptors, PD-1 and B7.1, has demonstrated promising monotherapy activity in NSCLC. Given that atezolizumab may enhance and perpetuate anti-tumor immunity, we hypothesized that combining atezolizumab with erlotinib may improve both clinical response and durability in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

      Methods:
      This Phase Ib study consisted of a safety-evaluation stage in patients with NSCLC regardless of EGFR status followed by an expansion stage in TKI-naïve patients with tumors harboring activating EGFR mutations. Patients were enrolled regardless of PD-L1 status. After a 7-day run-in with 150mg erlotinib PO QD alone, patients received 150mg erlotinib PO QD and 1200mg atezolizumab IV q3w. To evaluate immune biology, biopsies were obtained in expansion-stage patients pre-treatment, after erlotinib run-in, at weeks 4-6, and at progression. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the clinical activity per RECIST v1.1. Data cutoff, 11 April 2016.

      Results:
      Twenty-eight patients (safety stage, n = 8; expansion stage, n = 20) who received ≥ 1 dose of erlotinib or atezolizumab were considered safety evaluable. Median age was 61y (range, 47-84); median survival follow-up was 11.2mo (range, 0.8-24.2). The incidence of either treatment-related G3-4 AEs was 39% and for serious AEs, 50%. The most common atezolizumab-related G3-4 AEs were pyrexia and increased ALT. No pneumonitis was reported. No treatment-related G5 AEs occurred. Five patients discontinued atezolizumab due to treatment-emergent AEs. No DLTs were observed. In the expansion-stage population, ORR was 75% (95% CI, 51-91). Disease control rate (CR + PR + SD ≥ 24 weeks) was 90% (95% CI, 68-99), median PFS was 11.3mo (95% CI, 8.4-NE) and median DOR was 9.7mo (range, 4.2-11.7). Increases in intratumoral CD8+ T cells post-erlotinib run-in were observed in 8/13 evaluable paired biopsies. Higher intratumoral CD8+ T-cell prevalence and immune gene expression signatures at baseline were associated with improved PFS.

      Conclusion:
      The combination of full dose erlotinib plus atezolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile. While response rates and median PFS for combination treatment appear similar to those observed with erlotinib monotherapy, the addition of atezolizumab to erlotinib may lead to more durable clinical responses in some patients. Additional follow-up is required to evaluate the full potential of this combination treatment. NCT02013219