Virtual Library
Start Your Search
G. Simontacchi
Author of
-
+
P2.02 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 462)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Locally Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.02-020 - Pattern of Care of Inoperable Locally Advanced (LA) NSCLC in Elderly Patients: Analysis of the Experience of Two Academic Italian Hospitals (ID 6038)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): G. Simontacchi
- Abstract
Background:
Optimal treatment in LA NSCLC patients is still debated. In fit patients concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RCT) seems to be the best treatment in terms of local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) while sequential RCT is a good alternative in unfit patients. Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy improve OS in recent studies. Elderly patients often cannot be offered multimodality treatments. We report our experience with over 70 years old LA NSCLC patients deemed unfit for surgery.
Methods:
Characteristics of patients and treatments are summarized in table 1. All patients were treated with a platinum based doublet of chemotherapy (CT). RT target volumes included the primary lung tumor and involved mediastinal lymphnodes as defined on pre-treatment contrast enhanced CT scan. Elective nodal irradiation was not performed. Acute/late toxicities were reported in accordance to 4.0 CTCAE scale. Clinical response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria.Patients' Characteristics Age Median 75 Range 70-83 Gender Male 50 (70%) Female 21 (30%) Performance Status (ECOG) 0 29 (41%) 1 36 (51%) 2 6 (8%) Histology Adenocarcinoma 31 (44%) Squamous Cell Carcinoma 39 (55%) Large Cell Carcinoma 1 (1%) Stage IIa/IIb 12 (17%) IIIa 39 (55%) IIIb 20 (28%) Chemotherapy Concomitant 9 (13%) Sequential 62 (87%) Cycles: median 4 Cycles: range 1-8 Radiotherapy Median Dose 62,3 Gy Moderate hypofractionation 26 (37%) Conventional fractionation 45 (63%)
Results:
At a median follow up of 10 months clinical response was evaluable in 69/71 patients obtaining a partial response in 35 of them, stable disease in 17, progressive disease in 17 patients. Twenty six patients experienced a local relapse within RT primary tumor volume, while 13 on nodal volume (5 patients both tumor and nodal relapse). 22 patients developed metastatic disease. One and 3-year OS was 62.3%(SE±6.2%) and 24,5%(SE±7.8%) respectively, while 1- and 3 year PFS was 45.1%(SE±6.9%) and 9,7%(SE±5.7%) respectively. At univariate analysis, tumor dimension (p<0,002) was the only prognostic factor statistically significant for OS. G1-G2 acute toxicity was observed in 45 patients: 36/62 in sequential CRT (3/36 developed also chronic toxicities) and 9/9 in concomitant CRT; most events were G1 oesophagitis (27 patients) and G1 cough (17 patients). No G3-4 event was reported.
Conclusion:
CRT is feasible in elderly patients; multidisciplinary evaluation is needed in order to reserve CRT to very fit patients.
-
+
P2.05 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 463)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Radiotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.05-019 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Central Lung Tumors: The Experience of Florence University-Careggi Hospital Radiotherapy (ID 6047)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): G. Simontacchi
- Abstract
Background:
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for central lung tumors, defined as tumor within 2 cm or touching the zone of the proximal bronchial tree or tumors immediately adjacent to the mediastinal or pericardial pleura (Adebahr S. et al. BJR 2015) is debated because of toxicities to organs at risk. No evidences from phase III trial are available.
Methods:
From 2010 to 2015, 45 central lesions in 40 pts were treated with SBRT. 14 lesions were primary lung cancer (PLC), 31 were lymphoadenopathies (LAP). PLC were treated with volumetric arc Therapy (VMAT) in 9 cases and 5 with Cyberknife®. LAP were treated with VMAT in 12 cases, with IMRT (step and shoot) in 10 and with Cyberknife® in 9 cases. Prescribed doses varied between 18 and 60 Gy (1-8 fractions) with median BED of 65 Gy (37,5-105 Gy). We evaluated Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Disease Specific Survival (DSS) using Kaplan-Meier method and treatment related toxicities using CTCAE version 4.0.
Results:
Median age was 62 years (48-86), 26 male and 14 female. PS was 0 in 9 pts, 1 in 21, 2 in 10 pts. Histology was available in all series and consisted of primary NSCLC (32 adenocarcinoma, 12 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 neuroendocrine tumour). 41 PLC were less than 2 cm from proximal bronchial tree, 4 PLC were immediately adjacent to the mediastinal or pericardial pleura. Tumor diameter was 10 to 60 mm with a median of 31 mm. Median follow up was 14,5 months. OS and DSS were 86.5% at 1 year, 55.6% at 2 years, and 49,4% at 3 years. PFS was 48,6% at 1 year, 24,1% at 2 years, and 12% at 3 years. 35 pts showed no acute toxicity; in 5 pts we recorded grade 1-2 esophagitis, in 2 pts grade 2 cough, in 2 pts, grade 1 asthenia. Chronic toxicity was present in 2 pts as grade 2 esophagitis.
Conclusion:
SBRT is confirmed to be a safe and effective strategy for central lung tumors. The majority of patients in the first part of our series was treated with low doses compared to current doses. Nevertheless 23 patients had clinical benefit from the treatment without life-threatening toxicities. Further studies are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of SBRT in central lung lesions.
