Author of

• 17328

  +

  MA10 - Facing the Real World: New Staging System and Response Evaluation in Immunotherapy (ID 393)

  • Event: WCLC 2016
  • Type: Mini Oral Session
  • Track: Radiology/Staging/Screening
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:P. Kosmidis
  • Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:20 - 15:50, Stolz 2

  • 17335

    +

    MA10.07 - 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Solid-Type Stage-I Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas: What Cause False-Negative Cases? (ID 4018)

    15:02 - 15:08  |  Author(s): F. Fioroni
    • Abstract
    • Presentation
    • Slides

    Background:
    False-negative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake can be divided into those cases related to technological limitations of positron-emission tomography (PET) and others related to inherent properties of neoplasms. We aim to clarify possible factors causing false-negative (FN) PET results in solid-type pulmonary adenocarcinomas (PAs).
    
    Methods:
    From 01/2007 to 12/2014, among 255 Stage-I NSCLCs we retrospectively review PET/CT-records, clinical information, preoperative thin-section CT-images, and pathological features (classified by the IASLC/ATS/ERS subtyping criteria) of 94 consecutive solid-type Stage-I PA undergone surgical resection at Our Institution. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis were used to identify and weigh the independent predictors of PET-findings: body weight, blood glucose level, tumor-size, and histological classification.
    
    Results:
    There were 58 males and 36 females (mean age= 68.7 yrs, range 42-85). Seventeen lesions (18.1%) were judged as PET-negative and 77 lesions (81.9%) as PET-positive. Overall, mean SUVmax was 8.0 (range 0-35) with higher SUVmax-values (p<0.001) in PA>2cm (mean SUVmax=10.6) than PA<2cm (mean SUVmax=4.8). PET false-negative (FN) results were also differently distributed (27.9% in PA <2cm vs 9.8% in PA>2 cm, p=0.023). When clustering the PA in 2 histological classes (Class-A [“colloid/mucinous/lepidic”] vs Class-B [“micropapillary/solid/acinar/papillary”]), the radiometabolic patterns were significantly different [mean SUVmax 3.8 in Class-A vs 9.9 in Class-B, p<0.001], as reported in Figure 1. Similarly, a different distribution of PET FN-cases was observed (38.7% FN in Class-A vs 7.9% FN in Class-B, p=0.001). Table 1 shows the results of multivariate logistic analysis. Both the tumor-size (cut-off=2cm) and IASLC/ATS/ERS aggregated clusters were clinically relevant factors for determining whether PET results were negative or positive, but only histology was statistically significant (OR:6.1, 95%CI: 1.85-20.15, p=0.003). Figure 1
    
    
    
    Conclusion:
    Among solid-type lung adenocarcinoma, tumor-size and histopathological findings were significantly associated with FDG-uptake. In particular, it warrants attention that lesions ≤2cm and “colloid/mucinous/lepidic” adenocarcinomas have a tendency for negative PET-findings.
    
    

    Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

    Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.