Virtual Library
Start Your Search
R. Heist
Author of
-
+
MA09 - Immunotherapy Combinations (ID 390)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy/Immunotherapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:M. Sebastian, E.B. Garon
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:20 - 15:50, Strauss 2
-
+
MA09.09 - First-In-Human Phase 1 Study of ABBV-399, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Targeting C-Met, in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (ID 5008)
15:20 - 15:26 | Author(s): R. Heist
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
The c-Met receptor is overexpressed in ~50% of patients with NSCLC. ABBV-399 is a first-in-class ADC composed of ABT-700, an anti–c-Met antibody, conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (a microtubule inhibitor). Preclinical data support ABBV-399 as a unique strategy to deliver a potent cytotoxin directly to c-Met+ tumor cells.
Methods:
In a 3+3 dose-escalation design, ABBV-399 was administered at doses ranging from 0.15 to 3.3 mg/kg once every 21 days to patients with advanced metastatic solid tumors (NCT02099058). ABBV-399 was then studied in a dose-expansion cohort in 16 patients with advanced c-Met+ (immunohistochemistry [IHC] H-score ≥150) NSCLC that had progressed on ≥2 prior lines of therapy. ABBV-399 was also studied in combination with erlotinib in 10 patients with NSCLC, 8 of whom were c-Met+. Overexpression of c-Met was assessed by an IHC assay utilizing the SP44 antibody (Ventana; Tucson, AZ, USA).
Results:
As of June 27, 2016, 48 patients with solid tumors received ≥1 dose of ABBV-399. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for ABBV-399 was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 2 patients (1 each at 3 and 3.3 mg/kg). There were no treatment-related deaths. Monotherapy treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥10% of patients (including all dose levels and all grades) were fatigue (25.0%), nausea (22.9%), neuropathy (14.6%), decreased appetite (12.5%), vomiting (12.5%), and hypoalbuminemia (10.4%). Based primarily on safety and tolerability, a 2.7-mg/kg dose was chosen for dose expansion in patients with c-Met+ advanced NSCLC. Three of 16 (19%) ABBV-399–treated c-Met+ NSCLC patients had a confirmed partial response (PR) with duration of response (DOR) 3+, 3, and 4.5 months. At week 12, 6 of 16 patients treated (37.5%) had disease control. Ten patients received ABBV-399 in combination with erlotinib. No DLTs were observed and AEs related to ABBV-399 occurring in ≥2 patients were acneiform rash (40.0%), fatigue (30.0%), and dry skin (20.0%). Three of 8 (37.5%) evaluable ABBV-399 + erlotinib-treated c-Met+ patients had a confirmed PR with DOR 2+, 4+, and 5+ months. Two of the 3 patients with PR had EGFR-mutated tumor, and previous TKI- and platinum-based chemotherapy had failed.
Conclusion:
ABBV-399 is well tolerated at a dose of 2.7 mg/kg every 21 days and has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with c-Met+ NSCLC both as monotherapy and in combination with erlotinib. Updated data of antitumor activity and safety of ABBV-399 as monotherapy and in combination with erlotinib in c-Met+ NSCLC patients will be presented.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.06 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 467)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Scientific Co-Operation/Research Groups (Clinical Trials in Progress should be submitted in this category)
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.06-001 - A Study of MGCD516, a Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (RTK) Inhibitor, in Molecularly Selected Patients with NSCLC or Other Advanced Solid Tumors (ID 4109)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): R. Heist
- Abstract
Background:
MGCD516 (Sitravatinib), is an oral, potent small molecule inhibitor of a closely related spectrum of RTKs including RET, the split RTKs (VEGFR, PDGFR and KIT), TRK family, DDR2, MET and AXL. RTKs inhibited by sitravatinib are genetically altered in NSCLC and other cancers, where they function as oncogenic drivers, promoting cancer development and progression. Alterations in these RTKs have also been implicated in tumor resistance mechanisms. Sitravatinib has demonstrated antitumor activity in nonclinical cancer models harboring genetic alterations of sitravatinib targets, including rearrangement of RET, NTRK, or CHR4q12 amplification. Phase 1 dose escalation has been completed, showing dose proportional increases in exposure. PK and preliminary PD data indicate inhibition of the targets at the 150 mg dose administered orally once per day.
Methods:
This phase 1b study includes enrollment of molecularly selected patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic NSCLC or other advanced solid tumor malignancies in patient cohorts characterized by activating alterations in sitravatinib RTK targets (RET, KDR, PDGFRA, KIT, TRK, DDR2, MET, AXL) or by loss of function mutations in CBL, a negative regulator for MET, AXL and PDGFR/KIT signaling. Pts receive sitravatinib at 150 mg once daily in 21-day cycles. Study endpoints include safety and tolerability, PK/PD, and clinical activity assessed by objective disease response per RECIST 1.1, duration of response and survival. A two stage optimal Simon design of up to 24 pts (8 pts in first stage and 16 pts in second stage) will be applied to those cohorts defined by a specific tumor gene alteration assuming p~0~=0.15 and p~1~=0.35, with an additional expansion of a cohort up to a total of 70 pts in order to provide a more precise estimate of ORR. PD biomarkers, including sMET, sVEGFR2, VEGFA and sAXL, are being explored in plasma samples for prognostic potential and possible relationship with clinical outcome. The study is open for enrollment, and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02219711
Results:
Section not applicable
Conclusion:
Section not applicable
-
+
P3.02c - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 472)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.02c-046 - Safety, Clinical Activity and Biomarker Results from a Phase Ib Study of Erlotinib plus Atezolizumab in Advanced NSCLC (ID 5215)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): R. Heist
- Abstract
Background:
Targeted therapy with erlotinib is effective in reducing tumor burden in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance to therapy develops almost universally. Atezolizumab, an engineered mAb that inhibits binding of PD-L1 to its receptors, PD-1 and B7.1, has demonstrated promising monotherapy activity in NSCLC. Given that atezolizumab may enhance and perpetuate anti-tumor immunity, we hypothesized that combining atezolizumab with erlotinib may improve both clinical response and durability in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Methods:
This Phase Ib study consisted of a safety-evaluation stage in patients with NSCLC regardless of EGFR status followed by an expansion stage in TKI-naïve patients with tumors harboring activating EGFR mutations. Patients were enrolled regardless of PD-L1 status. After a 7-day run-in with 150mg erlotinib PO QD alone, patients received 150mg erlotinib PO QD and 1200mg atezolizumab IV q3w. To evaluate immune biology, biopsies were obtained in expansion-stage patients pre-treatment, after erlotinib run-in, at weeks 4-6, and at progression. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the clinical activity per RECIST v1.1. Data cutoff, 11 April 2016.
Results:
Twenty-eight patients (safety stage, n = 8; expansion stage, n = 20) who received ≥ 1 dose of erlotinib or atezolizumab were considered safety evaluable. Median age was 61y (range, 47-84); median survival follow-up was 11.2mo (range, 0.8-24.2). The incidence of either treatment-related G3-4 AEs was 39% and for serious AEs, 50%. The most common atezolizumab-related G3-4 AEs were pyrexia and increased ALT. No pneumonitis was reported. No treatment-related G5 AEs occurred. Five patients discontinued atezolizumab due to treatment-emergent AEs. No DLTs were observed. In the expansion-stage population, ORR was 75% (95% CI, 51-91). Disease control rate (CR + PR + SD ≥ 24 weeks) was 90% (95% CI, 68-99), median PFS was 11.3mo (95% CI, 8.4-NE) and median DOR was 9.7mo (range, 4.2-11.7). Increases in intratumoral CD8+ T cells post-erlotinib run-in were observed in 8/13 evaluable paired biopsies. Higher intratumoral CD8+ T-cell prevalence and immune gene expression signatures at baseline were associated with improved PFS.
Conclusion:
The combination of full dose erlotinib plus atezolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile. While response rates and median PFS for combination treatment appear similar to those observed with erlotinib monotherapy, the addition of atezolizumab to erlotinib may lead to more durable clinical responses in some patients. Additional follow-up is required to evaluate the full potential of this combination treatment. NCT02013219
