Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

L. Hendriks



Author of

  • +

    MA06 - Locally Advanced NSCLC: Risk Groups, Biological Factors and Treatment Choices (ID 379)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Mini Oral Session
    • Track: Locally Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MA06.05 - Screening for Brain Metastases in Patients with Stage III NSCLC, MRI or CT? A Prospective Study (ID 5664)

      16:30 - 16:36  |  Author(s): L. Hendriks

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      In all current non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) guidelines it is advised to screen all stage III patients for brain metastases, preferably by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or otherwise a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). Access to MRI can be problematic and a dedicated brain CE-CT can be incorporated in the staging [18]Fluodeoxoglucose-positron-emission-tomography ([18]FDG-PET)-CT scan. The additive value of a brain MRI after a dedicated brain CE-CT scan is unknown.

      Methods:
      In this observational prospective multicentre study all consecutive stage III NSCLC patients scheduled for treatment with curative intent from three Dutch hospitals who underwent a dedicated brain CE-CT incorporated in the staging [18]FDG-PET and an additional brain MRI were included. Patients with another primary tumour within 2 years of NSCLC diagnosis were excluded. Data regarding patient characteristics and imaging results were collected. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients diagnosed with brain metastases on MRI without suspect lesions on CE-CT. 118 patients were needed to show a clinically relevant considered difference of 2%.

      Results:
      Between December 14[th] 2012 and July 15[th] 2016, 264 consecutive patients had an extracranial stage III NSCLC based on [18]FDG-PET. 111 out of these 264 patients (42.0%) were excluded because of no dedicated brain CE-CT 57 (51.4%) had only a low dose CT for attenuation correction, 54 (48.6%) had a CE-CT but without dedicated brain imaging protocol). Fourty (26.1%) of the remaining 153 patients were excluded because of asymptomatic brain metastases on dedicated CE-CT brain (N=8), second primary (N=6) or no brain MRI (N=26). 113 stage III patients were included (updated results of 118 patients will be presented). 57.5% of the included patients were male; mean age was 67.0 years, 84.1% had WHO PS 0-1, 60.2% had stage IIIA (before MRI brain) and 42.5% had an adenocarcinoma. Median time (range) between [18]FDG-PET-CE-CT and MRI was 2.0 (0.0 -8.1) weeks. 5/113 (4.4%) patients had a solitary brain metastasis on MRI despite no suspect brain lesions on CE-CT. In retrospect, in one of these five patients a solitary brain metastasis could be identified on the [18]FDG-PET–CE-CT.

      Conclusion:
      Although asymptomatic brain metastasis were detected in staging CE-CT, MRI brain is in daily practice clinically relevant superior to a CE-CT in screening for brain metastases in stage III NSCLC

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.02 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 462)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Locally Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.02-021 - Extracranial Progression (ePD) after Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for Stage III NSCLC: Does the Chemotherapy Regimen Matter? (ID 4887)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): L. Hendriks

      • Abstract

      Background:
      In stage III NSCLC concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) compares favourably to sequential CRT (sCRT). No superior chemotherapy regimen has been identified regarding (extracranial)PD. Previously we reported that the specific chemotherapy did not influence symptomatic brain metastases incidence. Here we analyse whether the specific chemotherapy influences occurrence of extracranialPD as first PD site (ePD~first~) after CRT.

      Methods:
      This retrospective multicenter study included all consecutive stage III NSCLC patients that completed CRT between 01-2006 and 06-2014. Primary endpoint was ePD~first ~(with/without cranial PD). Differences between regimens were assessed using logistic regression modelling including known relapse risk factors (age, gender, stage, histology) and the specific chemotherapy: cCRT versus sCRT. Within cCRT: daily low dose cisplatin (LDC) versus cyclic dose polychemotherapy (CDC); LDC versus (non-)taxane CDC; LDC versus subgroups of ≥50 CDC patients).

      Results:
      838 patients (737 cCRT, 101 sCRT) from 5 institutions were eligible. Median follow-up [95% CI] was 45.1 [42.3-47.8] months. 530 (63.2%) had PD, of which 463 (87.4%) had ePD~first. ~Median time to ePD~first~ was 16.6 [14.5-18.7] months. Patients with ePD~first~ had more often squamous histology (p=0.04). ePD~first~% or median time to ePD~first~ was not different for sCRT versus cCRT (table 1). 461 (62.6%) patients had PD after cCRT, of whom 401 (87.0%) had ePD~first~. ePD~first~% or median time to ePD~first~ did not differ between LDC and CDC. The chemotherapy regimen (cCRT versus sCRT) did not influence ePD~first~ on multivariate analysis: OR 0.81 [0.52-1.24] (p=0.33). LDC versus CDC cCRT did not differ: OR 0.96 [0.72-1.29] (p=0.80). Comparable results were found for LDC versus CDC non-taxane (N=277) and CDC taxane regimens (N=69) and for cCRT regimens with ≥50 patients (LDC versus cisplatin/etoposide (N=188), cisplatin/vinorelbin (N=65), weekly cisplatin/docetaxel (N=60)).

      Table1
      concurrent N=737 sequential N=101 p-value
      PD N(%) 461 (62.6) 68 (68.3) 0.18
      ePDfirst N(%) -patients with concomitant brain metastases 401 (87.0) -38 (9.5) 62 (89.9) -8 (12.9) 0.19
      median time to ePD [95%CI] months 17.5 [15.0-20.0] 14.3 [11.9-16.7] 0.16
      LDC N=391 cyclic dose N=346 p-value
      PD N(%) 245 (62.7) 216 (62.4) 0.33
      ePDfirst N(%) -patients with concomitant brain metastases 211 (86.1) -17 (8.1) 190 (88.0) -21 (11.1) 0.80
      median time to ePD [95%CI] months 17.4 [14.3-20.5] 18.3 [14.2-22.5] 0.59


      Conclusion:
      Sixty-three percent of stage III NSCLC patients developed PD, of whom 87% had ePD~first~. Incidence of ePD~first~ is independent of the specific chemotherapy regimen.