Virtual Library
Start Your Search
K. Viktorsson
Author of
-
+
P1.07 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 459)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: SCLC/Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/05/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P1.07-044 - Educational Level and Management in Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Population-Based Study (ID 4568)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): K. Viktorsson
- Abstract
Background:
In a previous study we reported that educational level is a prognostic factor in SCLC, with females and LD patients with a higher education having a longer survival. In this study we examined possible associations between educational level, lead times and treatment strategies in the same cohort.
Methods:
The study was based on information in LcBaSe, a lung cancer research database generated by record linkages between the Swedish National Lung Cancer Register and several other population-based registers. Educational level was categorized according to number of years of schooling;low(≤ 9 years), middle (10-12 years), high (≥13 years). Stage was classified as limited disease (LD) and extensive disease (ED). Lead times were defined as A) from first radiological sign of a tumor to definite diagnosis and B) from date of referral from primary care to diagnosis. Treatment groups were divided as; chemotherapy (CT), CT+Radiation Therapy (CT+RT), Palliative RT or no oncological therapy.
Results:
The study population encompassed 4278 patients with a SCLC diagnosis between 2002-2011. Median age was 69 years. 988 (23.1 %) patients were diagnosed with LD (low E: 22.9 %, middle E: 23.6%, high E: 26.7 %) and 3187 (74.5 %) with ED (low E: 74.8, middle E: 74.0 %, high E: 73.3%) .One fifth of patients had a poor performance score (PS 3-4). The median lead time A was 14 days (IQR 5-32 days) and for lead time B 9 days (IQR 3-21 days). There were no differences in lead times between the educational groups. The proportion of patients receiving CT+RT was approximately 80 % in LD (Low E: 78.5% Middle E: 79.2% High E: 82.4 %) and 5 % in ED (Low E: 4.2%, Middle E: 5.3% High E: 6.8%). The percentage of patients receiving CT was 18 % in LD (Low E: 19.7% Middle E: 18.7 % High E: 15.3%) and 82 % in ED (Low E: 81.2 %, Middle E: 83.9 % High E: 81.4 %).
Conclusion:
There were no significant differences between educational groups in lead times or management. We conclude that the prognostic impact of educational status in Swedish SCLC patients does not appear to reflect inequalities in access to the healthcare.
-
+
P2.03b - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 465)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.03b-084 - Profiling of Eph Signaling in Malignant Pleural Effusions- Identification of Therapy Approaches and Associated Biomarkers (ID 4573)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): K. Viktorsson
- Abstract
Background:
For late stage lung cancer (LC) patients few treatment options are at hand and the survival time is very limited, hence novel therapies and associated biomarkers are urgently needed. Erythropoietin-Producing Hepatocellular carcinoma receptor (Eph) tyrosine kinase family and their ligands, Ephrins, drive multiple hallmarks of cancer e.g. proliferation/invasion. The Eph signaling pathways are attractive drug targets due to their dual role in oncogenesis and tumor progression. We analyzed Ephs/Ephrins signaling in LC cells from pleural effusions (PE) to reveal altered kinase pathways and putative BMs. We also assessed cytotoxicity and kinome alterations in PE tumor cells exposed to targeted agents and chemotherapy in vitro.
Methods:
Tumor cells purified from PE, assessed for histology, mutation and translocation status (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and Alk), were grown in vitro. Toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs (e.g. erlotinib, crizotinib, AG1024, AZD9291, dasatinib), EGFR blocker (cetuximab) and/or chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin, gemcitabine, etoposide) were analyzed after 72 h with the Tox8 assay. Ephs/Ephrins signaling components were studied using western blot, immunoprecipitation and by proximity ligation assay. Mutations and signaling heterogeneity were visualized using padlock probe method. For kinome profiling PathScan RTK signalling antibody array was used.
Results:
PE isolated tumor cells were identified as adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and SCLC and their EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and Alk mutational status determined. High levels of Ephrin B3 and phosphorylated EphA2 ser897, previously shown to be instrumental in driving NSCLC proliferation and invasion in vitro, were confirmed and also shown to directly interact, indicating the importance of this signaling event. The G391R mutation in EphA2, which is reported to cause a constitutive activation of EphA2 and to be linked to metastasis, but also mutations in EGFR (G719A, G719S, T790M and L858R) were detected. The PE derived tumor cells were hetereogenous in their survival response to TKIs and chemotherapy. However, cells with ALK translocation were sensitive to crizotinib and EGFR mutated cells showed response to erlotinib, cetuximab, AG1024, AZD9291 and dasatinib. Kinome analysis revealed selective signaling pathways that could also be targeted in combinational drug treatment.
Conclusion:
Screening of PE samples from LC patients for targeted agents alongside aberrant Ephs and kinome signaling, can be used to identify novel drug candidates. Together with frontline kinome profiling of NSCLC clinical specimens upon treatment it provides an opportunity to explore/identify new therapeutics for LC.
