Virtual Library

Start Your Search

K. Maneenil



Author of

  • +

    P1.07 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 459)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: SCLC/Neuroendocrine Tumors
    • Presentations: 2
    • +

      P1.07-036 - Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: The Mayo Clinic Experience (ID 4925)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): K. Maneenil

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a relatively uncommon, high-grade neuroendocrine tumor sharing several features with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). LCNEC is considered aggressive, and the optimal treatment strategy and chemotherapy regimen remain undefined.

      Methods:
      We retrospectively evaluated a LCNEC patient cohort established from 1997 to 2015 at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota). A diagnosis of LCNEC was made when all WHO classification criteria were present in the tumor section examined. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed. Available radiology assessment was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.

      Results:
      The study included 55 LCNEC patients. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range: 38-88); two thirds were men; and majority were smokers (94%). Clinical staging was I, II, III or IV in 52.8%, 9.1%, 14.5%, and 23.6% of cases, respectively. Forty-six percent of stage IV patients presented with brain metastases at time of diagnosis (n=6/13) and 18% (n=7/38) developed brain recurrence in the follow up period. Thirty-nine (71%) patients had surgery and 9 (16%) patients received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Sixty-five percent of patients with complete resection experienced disease recurrence with 80% recurring within 2 years of resection. Treatment data for first-line palliative chemotherapy were available on 23 patients: 10 received platinum/etoposide and 13 received other regimens. In 19 patients with available imaging; the overall response rate was 52.6% (95% CI, 31.7-72.7) and there was no difference in ORR between platinum/etoposide (ORR=55.6%) or platinum plus other agents (paclitaxel or pemetrexed; ORR=55.6%). The median survival time was 26.3 months (95%CI; 18.6-33.9); the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were 75%, 53%, 36%, and 30%, respectively. Patients who received platinum/etoposide demonstrated longer median time to progression (TTP), and median OS than those who received ‘other’ regimens (14.7 months vs. 7.1 months; p value 0.07, and 28.2 months vs. 21.1 months; p value 0.22, respectively); the differences did not reach conventional statistical significance, likely due to the small sample size. Rigorous pathologic confirmation and genomic analysis are ongoing.

      Conclusion:
      LCNEC is associated with a poor prognosis and high recurrence rates after surgery. Advanced LCNEC patients are at high risk for brain metastases, therefore, routine brain imaging surveillance during follow-up may be beneficial. The chemotherapeutic responsiveness of LCNEC patients was intermediate between that of NSCLC and SCLC patients. Future prospective, multicenter, clinical trials are needed to determine the best chemotherapy regimen for these rare tumors.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      P1.07-045 - Characteristics of Exceptional Long Term Survivors in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 5527)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): K. Maneenil

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a frustrating disease to all parties involved. Most patients present with extensive stage disease (ED), with a median survival of 8 to 13 months (Expected). The aim of this study is to present data on survivors who lived beyond 3 years after a diagnosis of ED-SCLC (Exceptional) in order to uncover favorable factors for better patient management and clinical outcomes.

      Methods:
      We retrospectively evaluated the SCLC patient cohort diagnosed and followed from 1997 to 2015 at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota), and searched for Exceptional survivors with matched Expected survivors who had passed away within 12 months of diagnosis on age and year of diagnosis. Patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were compared between the two groups.

      Results:
      To date, we identified 36 Exceptional and 144 Expected ED-SCLC patients. Women and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) 0-1 were higher in Exceptional than in Expected group (61.8% vs 36.1%, p<0.01; 97.2% vs 77.6%, p<0.01; respectively). Smoking history, comorbidities (COPD, prior cancers or paraneoplastic syndrome), and T or N stage did not differ significantly. The top two metastatic sites in Exceptional group were brain (26.7%) and distant lymph nodes (20.0%), and in Expected were liver (28.3%) and bone (22.5%). Use of chemotherapy and the mean cycle number were higher in the Exceptional than the Expected group (100.0% vs 80.0%, p<0.01; 5.0 vs 3.6, p<0.01; respectively), with the main regimen being platinum/etoposide. However, carboplatin was used more frequently than cisplatin in Expected group (all patients, p=0.02; ECOG 0-1 patients, p=0.05). The overall response rate of chemotherapy was significantly higher in exceptional group (91.4% vs 56.7%, p<0.01). Thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in Exceptional were also higher than in Expected group (58.3% vs 17.4%; p<0.01, 19.4% vs 6.9%; p=0.03). Multivariate analysis is underway. In Exceptional group, median overall survival was 5.4 years (95% CI 3.7-6.8); 9 (25%) patients were still alive. Twelve (33%) patients had disease recurrence or progression with the median progression free survival 1.2 (95% CI 0.7-2.0) years. The most common recurrent site was brain. Three patients had secondary malignancy, 2 being a non-small cell lung cancer.

      Conclusion:
      Although the chance of curing ED-SCLC is small, long-term survival can be achieved. This study supports the importance of good performance status and the achievement of a response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy on long-term survival. Addition of thoracic radiotherapy and PCI are beneficial in prolong life of ED-SCLC patients.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.