Virtual Library
Start Your Search
D. Bonta
Author of
-
+
P1.07 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 459)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: SCLC/Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/05/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P1.07-032 - Most Common Genomic Alterations in SCLC (ID 5112)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): D. Bonta
- Abstract
Background:
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in US. The American Cancer Society’s estimates for lung cancer in the United States for 2016 are: approx 224,390 new cases of lung cancer and approx 158,080 deaths. Approximately 10-15% of lung cancers are classified as small cell (SCLC). These cancers portend a poor prognosis. Genomic sequencing of non-small cell lung cancer led to developing of new therapeutic modalities, i.e. targeted therapy with superior results to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. At this time, there is no approved targeted therapy for SCLC. In order to develop targeted therapies we need to identify and characterize molecular targets (alterations). This study aims to report our experience with genomic sequencing of SCLC
Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of a dataset of 54 cases of SCLC, who underwent genomic sequencing. Patients were treated at 5 tertiary referral centers, between October 2012 and June 2016. The recorded data included: age at diagnosis, date of the genomic sequencing, genomic alteration (affected genes and the type of molecular alteration identified). For genomic profiling we used a platform commercially available (FoundationOne).
Results:
We obtained 54 samples from 54 patients. Age range is 42 to 75 years, mean 60 and median 61 years old. All cases had a histologic diagnosis of SCLC. The genomic analysis found 88 affected genes with 230 alterations. The most common affected genes: Tp53 alteration, 45 cases (83%) and Rb1 33 cases (61%). There were an average of 4.3 mutations per patient; with a median of 4 mutations per patient, with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 13. Figure 1
Conclusion:
Sustained investigations and sequencing of larger numbers of SCLC are aiming to identify potential actionable mutations in these tumors. The ultimate goal is to determine new therapies and optimal treatment strategy based on the genomic profile.
-
+
P2.04 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 466)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.04-040 - Pleural Effusion Characteristics and Relationship with Outcomes in Cancer Patients (ID 3763)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): D. Bonta
- Abstract
Background:
Pleural effusion is a common occurrence in cancer patients, with an estimated annual incidence of 150,000 in the United States. It generally represents advanced malignant disease with median survival of 3-12 months. It can lead to debilitating symptoms such as dyspnea and pain, adversely affecting the quality of life.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of a dataset of 62 cancer patients with pleural effusion after first thoracentesis procedure. The recorded data included: age , gender, type of cancer, number of thoracentesis, pleural fluid volume characteristics and volume.
Results:
We studied 62 patients, with ages between 20-77 years, median 57 years; 64% were females and 36% were males. The number of patients deceased by the end of follow up was 43 (69.4%), alive at the end of follow up was 8 (12.9%), lost to follow up 11 (17.7%). Median overall survival was 3 months. The cancer type was divided into breast, 32.3%, non-small cell lung, 25.8% and 41.9% other cancers. Thirty-three (53.2%) patients had malignant pleural effusion with a median of 3 months of survival. Twenty-nine (46.8%) patients had non-malignant effusion with a similar median survival of 3 months. We analyzed the correlation of the radiologically estimated effusion volume, thoracentesis volume and presence of blood and malignant cells with outcomes (overall survival, OS). There is a negative correlation between the radiologically estimated effusion volume and OS (Pearson rank correlation of -0.43). This negative correlation is maintained in subgroup analysis (breast -0.56; lung -0.33). The thoracentesis volume was also negatively correlated with OS (Pearson rank correlation of -0.45), finding also maintained in subgroup analysis (breast -0.39, lung -0.66). We found no statistically significant difference in OS between malignant effusions (average OS 6.1 months, median 3 months) and non-malignant effusions (average OS 4.9 months, median 3 months). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between bloody effusions (average survival 3.5 months, median survival 1.25 months) and non-bloody effusions (average survival 6.2 months, median 3.5 months).
Conclusion:
We found an inverse correlation between the radiologically estimated pleural fluid volumes and OS as well as between thoracentesis volume and OS among cancer patients. This correlation is maintained in subset analysis of the two most common types of cancer in our sample, breast and NSCLC. Survival was not influenced by the presence of malignant cells or blood in the pleural fluid. A prospective study to better characterize the prognostic value of first thoracentesis may be warranted.