Virtual Library

Start Your Search

G. Metro



Author of

  • +

    MA04 - HER2, P53, KRAS and Other Targets in Advanced NSCLC (ID 380)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Mini Oral Session
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MA04.06 - Signaling Networks in KRAS-Mutant Advanced NSCLC: A Complex Landscape Involving Immunoresponse, Inflammation and DNA Repair (ID 5768)

      16:36 - 16:42  |  Author(s): G. Metro

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and its role as prognostic and predictive biomarker remains widely debated. Unfortunately, KRAS direct targeting strategies have been unsuccessful and no approved target therapy exists for KRAS-mutant-NSCLC. This pilot study evaluated the activated signaling architecture of advanced NSCLC harbouring a KRAS mutation to better characterize the signaling network driving this subgroup of pulmonary malignancies.

      Methods:
      Twenty Stage IV Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) NSCLCs were collected from chemo-naïve patients at S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital (Perugia, Italy). Ten tumors were KRAS-wild-type (KRAS-WT) and ten were KRAS-Mutant (KRAS-MUT). Whole-tissue lysates were obtained for all samples. Signaling network analysis was performed using the Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) platform to quantitatively evaluate the expression/activation of 148 key proteins and phosphoproteins involved in cellular growth, survival, proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, inflammation, invasion and cell motility. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test was used to compare the signaling architecture of KRAS-MUT and KRAS-WT tumours. All p-values <0.05 were considered significant. Non-parametric correlation analysis was performed to explore the signaling interconnection within each group of patients. Only correlations with p<0.0001 were considered significant.

      Results:
      This preliminary analysis revealed a statistically significant different activation level of 20 proteins between the KRAS-MUT and KRAS-WT samples. Five of the proteins that were statistically different in the KRAS-MUT group are involved in the inflammatory immunoresponse (ASK1 S83 p<0.01, Axl Y702 p=0.01, Stat2 Y690 p<0.01, Tyk2 Y1054/Y1055 p=0.01 and Twist p<0.01) and six in cell cycle control and DNA repair (ATM S1981 p=0.01; Bcl-xL p=0.03; Cleaved Caspase 3 D175 p=0.02; Histone H3 S10 p<0.01; p53 S15 p<0.01; p27 T187 p=0.04). The analytes that were statistically significant were all lower in the KRAS-MUT group compared to the WT (except for p27 T187 which decreased in the KRAS-MUT group compared to KRAS-WT). Pair-wise correlation analysis of the signaling proteins showed an overall more complex protein-protein interaction network and pathway activation (included AKT/mTOR signaling pathway) in the KRAS-MUT population with high number of statistically significant correlations compared to the KRAS-WT group.

      Conclusion:
      This pilot study indicated that the effect of KRAS mutation status on protein signaling in NSCLC was an alteration of the immunoresponse axis and DNA repair network. If validated in a larger cohort of patients, these results could have important clinical implications for stratification KRAS-MUT advanced NSCLC patients towards more efficacious targeted treatment and to identify new therapeutic targets based on multi-targets/multi-pathways KRAS inhibitory approach. (AIRC-supported study).

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.07 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 459)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: SCLC/Neuroendocrine Tumors
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.07-018 - Incidence of Brain Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Lung: Implications for Clinical Practice (ID 3879)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): G. Metro

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Among patients with advanced high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung, the optimal therapeutic management is much less established for large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) than for small cell lung cancers (SCLCs). We evaluated the survival outcomes and incidence of brain recurrence of advanced LCNECs, and compared them with those of a population of SCLCs matched by stage.

      Methods:
      Forty-eight unresected stage III HGNECs (16 LCNECs and 32 SCLCs) and 113 stage IV HGNECs (37 LCNECs and 76 SCLCs) were eligible for the analysis. The efficacy of platinum-etoposide chemotherapy with or without thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and/or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was investigated.

      Results:
      Overall response was significantly lower for LCNECs compared with SCLCs for both stage III (43.8% vs 90.6% respectively, P=0.004) and stage IV (43.3% vs 64.5%, respectively, P=0.04). Similarly, an inferior outcome was observed in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for LCNECs compared with SCLCs, which, however, reached significance only for stage III disease (median: 5.6 vs 8.9 months, P=0.06 and 10.4 vs 17.6 months, P=0.03 for PFS and OS, respectively), (Figure 1). Histologic subtype (LCNEC vs SCLC) was an independent prognosticator in multivariate analysis. In the lack of PCI, LCNECs showed a high cumulative incidence of brain metastases, as 58% and 48% of still living stage III and IV patients, respectively, developed brain metastases at 18 moFigure 1



      Conclusion:
      Patients with advanced LCNECs are at high risk for brain recurrence. Unresected stage III LCNECs treated with platinum-etoposide with or without TRT bear a dismal prognosis, when compared indirectly with SCLC counterparts. Randomized trials should evaluate whether PCI could improve survival of advanced LCNECs.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P3.02b - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 494)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.02b-008 - Quantification and Monitoring of Treatment Response in EGFR Mutant NSCLC Patients by Digital-PCR in Plasma cftDNA (ID 5351)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): G. Metro

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      The identification of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is essential for deciding therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Circulating cell-free tumor DNA (cftDNA) holds promise as a non-invasive methodology for tumor monitoring in solid malignancies. Among advanced NSCLC patients with an acquired resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), about 50% carry T790M mutation, but its frequency in EGFR-TKI-naıve patients and dynamic change during therapy remains unclear. We hypothesized that EGFRmutation analysis detection in cftDNA for NSCLC may be feasible for monitoring treatment response to EGFR-TKIs and also predict drug resistance.

      Methods:
      EGFR sensitive mutations and T790M were analyzed using digital PCR (d-PCR) (Quant studio 3D, life technologies) in longitudinally (at baseline, at 4, 8, 20, 60, 120, 180, 270, 360 days) collected plasma samples (n=50) from 8 tissue-confirmed EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with an EGFR-TKI (Gefitinib N = 4; Erlotinib N = 1; Afatinib N = 3). DNA extracted from plasma of 8 healty blood donors were used to detect the specificity of EGFR mutant assay. Tumor assessment was performed according to RECIST criteria 1.1 every two months.

      Results:
      The sensitivity of d-PCR in plasma versus tissue was 71.4%. No EGFR mutation was present in the 8 control cases (specificity of 100%). Of four patients who developed progression disease (PD), in the samples of progression, T790M was detected in 75% of cases. The frequency of T790M in pre-TKI plasma samples was of 37.5%. EGFR sensitive mutations decreased at PD while T790M mutation increased in 75% of patients. Patients with concomitant pre-TKI EGFR 19 deletion and T790M showed a PD before of 12 months compared to those with L858R. T790M was frequently detected when new lesions were developed. Four patients had T790M level decreased to undetectable level with longer PFS than those with detectable T790M in blood.

      Conclusion:
      Our results indicated that d-PCR was a highly sensitive and useful method for detecting the T790M mutation. Moreover, dynamically monitoring T790M change might help determining EGFR-TKI resistance. We thank Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) for supporting the study.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P3.02c - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 472)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.02c-068 - Immunotherapy against Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Looking for Predictive Factors to Avoid an Untargeted Shooting (ID 5207)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): G. Metro

      • Abstract

      Background:
      The use of immunotherapy for the whole Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) population, is like an untargeted shooting. So trying to discover predicitve factors to response still represents the key to the problem. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients (pts) treated with Nivolumab, in the attempt to correlate clinical and molecular features with response.

      Methods:
      69 heavily pretreated advanced NSCLCs (16 squamous/ 53 adenocarcinomas) were retrospectively evaluated for response to Nivolumab. Pts’ samples from a subgroup of responders (14/17 pts, 82%), were further analyzed for PD-L1/PD-1 expression by immunoistochemistry (IHC), and for TILs density. We used rabbit monoclonal antibodies anti PD-L1 [clone E1L3N] for tumor cell expression (0-3, negative-intense) and mouse monoclonal antibody anti PD-1 [clone EH33] for TILs.

      Results:
      Clinico-pathologic characteristics: mostly smoker males (81%), PS 0-1 (85%), EGFR+ 7%, K-RAS+ 23%. Overall response rate was 25% (2% complete response and 23% partial response), stable disease 30%, progressive disease 41%. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort were 2.9 and 8.3 months (mo) respectively. 1 and 2-y OS rates were both 44% (95% CI, 29-58). Pts with EGFR + NSCLC showed a significantly lower median OS with respect to the wild type cohort (4.5 vs NR; p < 0.005) as well as pts with brain metastases (4.1 vs NR), while a trend toward improvement in PFS for K-RAS+ was seen. A subgroup analysis according to the time to progression to prior chemotherapy regimen (< 3 mo versus > 6 mo), confirmed a poorer survival for those with rapid spread of disease. Among laboratory tests, a better outcome for those who developed G2 leucopenia was demostrated (OS 8.3 vs 5.0 mo). Severe drug-related adverse events occurred in only 5.7% of pts. PD-L1, PD-1, TIL expression for 14/17 pts with OR, were as follows: PD-L1 > 5% 6/14 pts (43%); PD-1 2/14 (14%); focal TILs presence 7/14 (50%).

      Conclusion:
      Nivolumab confirms activity in NSCLC with durable responses and accettable safety profile. Of note, 44% of our patients were alive at 2 years. No predictive role emerged in our small cohort, according PD-L1, PD-1 and TILs expression, for those obtaining a tumor response. Interactions among alternative factors such as smoking habit, mutational status, time to progression, bone marrow toxicities (ie leucopenia), may have more powerful association with response and clinical outcome. Updated clinical activity and biomarker analysis will be presented.