Virtual Library

Start Your Search

M. Tanahashi



Author of

  • +

    P1.05 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 457)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Early Stage NSCLC
    • Presentations: 2
    • +

      P1.05-011 - Comparative Analysis of TTF-1 Copy Number Alterations and Protein Expression in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 5133)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): M. Tanahashi

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      TTF-1 (also known as NKX2-1) is located at chromosome 14q13.3. TTF-1 is a master regulator for the development of normal lung, and is also both a lineage oncogene and a suppressor gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TTF-1 expression is associated with a favorable prognosis. In contrast, the clinical significance of increased TTF-1 gene dosage has yet to be fully elucidated. We explored the relationship of TTF-1 copy number alterations with TTF-1 protein expression as well as patients’ prognoses in a relatively large cohort.

      Methods:
      We assessed TTF-1 gene copy number and protein expression in microarrayed 636 NSCLC, including 421 adenocarcinomas and 173 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and 42 other histologies, using fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. TTF-1 copy number alterations were divided into three categories; amplification (TTF-1/CEP14 ≥2), polysomy (TTF-1/CEP14 <2 and TTF-1 signals ≥4 copies per nucleus), and disomy (the others). Their associations with clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.

      Results:
      Among the entire cohort, TTF-1 amplification and polysomy were observed in 5.6% (36/636) and 8.3% (53/636), respectively. Tumors with copy number alterations (amplification and polysomy) were detected in 14.5% (61/421) among adenocarcinomas, 9.3% (17/173) among squamous cell carcinomas, and 26.2% (11/42) among other histologies (P = 0.012). TTF-1 expression was almost exclusively observed in adenocarcinomas (P < 0.001). In the adenocarcinoma cohort, the frequency was 6.7% (28/421) for TTF-1 amplification and 7.8% (33/421) for polysomy. TTF-1 positivity was 84.8% (357/421). A multivariate Cox hazards model analysis demonstrated that TTF-1 amplification was an independent worse prognostic factor (hazard ratio (HR), 3.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.18-6.71) for overall survival, but TTF-1 expression was adversely an independent better prognostic factor (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.85). In the SCC cohort, there were few cases of TTF-1 amplification (1.7%, 3/173), polysomy (8.1%, 14/173), and TTF-1 expression (3.7%, 10/273). Interestingly, any case of adenocarcinoma and SCC with TTF-1 amplification harbored positive TTF-1 expression.

      Conclusion:
      Both TTF-1 amplification and TTF-1 expression were more common in adenocarcinoma. However, they had distinct prognostic roles: TTF-1 amplification was an independent poor prognostic factor in adenocarcinoma, whereas TTF-1 expression was a favorable prognostic factor.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      P1.05-020 - Opposing Prognostic Roles of CD73 and A2A Adenosine Receptor in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ID 5139)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): M. Tanahashi

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      CD73 (otherwise known as ecto-5’-nucleotidase) is an important molecule in the adenosine pathway because it generates adenosine by enzymatically dephosphorylating extracellular AMP, which results in immunosuppressed niche within the tumor microenvironment. A2A adenosine receptor (A2AR) acts as a predominant receptor for adenosine in immune cells and can also be expressed in lung tumor cells. However, the clinical impact of the adenosine pathway in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has yet to be uncovered, although the pathway has been shown to have a pivotal role in the regulation of anti-tumor immunity and is considered as one of the promising future treatment targets.

      Methods:
      We investigated CD73 and A2AR protein expression profiles using immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays containing 642 resected NSCLC specimens. The expression levels were assessed using the H-score method that ranged from 0 to 300, and cutoffs were determined using the minimum P-value method for overall survival (OS). The associations between their expression levels and clinicopathological and molecular characteristics as well as patients’ prognoses were retrospectively analyzed.

      Results:
      The median age of patients was 68 years old (range, 23–88) and 440 (68.5%) patients were male. 438 (68.2%) patients had smoking history and 420 (65.4%) patients had adenocarcinoma histology. Significantly higher expression of both CD73 and A2AR was observed in female than male, in never smokers than ever smokers, and in adenocarcinomas than squamous cell carcinomas. Among adenocarcinomas, both high CD73 and A2AR expression were significantly associated with TTF-1 positivity and EGFR mutations. ALK-positive adenocarcinomas showed significantly higher expression levels of CD73 than ALK-negative tumors. High CD73 expression was an independent indicator of a poor prognosis for NSCLC patients in multivariate Cox regression analyses for OS (hazard ratio (HR), 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38–3.47) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.78–4.95). Contrary, high A2AR expression was an independent favorable predictor of prognosis for OS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49–0.97) and DSS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33–0.79). Among adenocarcinomas, high CD73 expression was an independent poor prognostic marker for OS (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.61–4.63) and DSS (HR, 4.57; 95% CI, 2.54–8.23), whereas high A2AR expression was an independent favorable prognostic marker for DSS (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32–0.98).

      Conclusion:
      Both CD73 and A2AR expression was associated with TTF-1-positive and EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma. Nonetheless, they had opposing prognostic significance in resected NSCLC.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.08 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 460)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Surgery
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.08-069 - One Surgeon's 30-Year Experience of Surgical Treatment for Pancoast Tumor (ID 5406)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): M. Tanahashi

      • Abstract

      Background:
      Surgical treatment for Pancoast tumor has made marked progress, and the patient outcome has improved significantly over the last three decades. Developments of some new surgical approaches and the application of preoperative chemo-radiotherapy markedly contributed.

      Methods:
      We retrospectively analyzed the patients who received surgical treatment in two institutes between 1984 and 2013. One surgeon planned the surgical treatment and performed the operation in all patients.

      Results:
      Seventy-two patients received surgical treatment. There were 61 males and 11 females, with median age of 61 years old (33-83 years). There were 26 adenocarcinomas, 26 squamous cell carcinomas, 10 large cell carcinomas, and 10 other pathologies. Forty patients received preoperative induction therapy. Twenty-five patients were treated by induction chemo-radiotherapy with a platinum doublet and 40-50 Gy of concurrent radiotherapy. Fourteen patients received radiotherapy alone, and another one patient received chemotherapy alone. The surgical approach was selected based on the tumor location. An anterior approach including Masaoka’s approach, Dartevele’s approach, and Grunennwald’s approach were adopted for 19 patients. Posterior approach, all involving a hook approach was employed in 52 patients. One patient was operated on using both anterior and posterior approaches. Combined resection excluding the chest wall was performed in 59 patients. The brachial plexus (Th1) in 48 patients, thoracic vertebrae in 17, subclavian artery in eleven, and subclavian vein in 5 were removed with the tumor. In 52 patients (72.2%), the tumors were completely removed. The morbidity rate was 37.5% and mortality rate was 2.8%. One patient died of bleeding from rapture of an aortic anastomosis, and another patient died of esophago-pleural fistula. The 5-year survival rate for all patients was 44%, with a median survival time of 19.5 months. The 5-year survival rate based on the operation date was 31.7% for the first half (1984-1999) and 59.1% for the second half (2000-2013) (p=0.035). The 5-year survival rates of patients who received and did not receive induction chemo-radiotherapy were 63.0 and 34.8%, respectively.

      Conclusion:
      The survival rate after surgical therapy for Pancoast tumor significantly improved over the three decades. Preoperative chemo-radiotherapy and the selection of an approach based on the tumor location contributed to the improvement.