Author of

• 16637

  +

  P1.03 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 455)

  • Event: WCLC 2016
  • Type: Poster Presenters Present
  • Track: Radiology/Staging/Screening
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 12/05/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)

  • 16679

    +

    P1.03-042 - Nodule Size is Poorly Represented by Nodule Diameter in Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening (ID 6009)

    14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): P.M.A. Van Ooijen
    • Abstract

    Background:
    In lung cancer screening, at least one pulmonary nodule is found in over 50% of participants, of which 99% is benign. As lung cancer probability in low-dose computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening usually is based on nodule size and growth rate, accurate nodule size determination is of major importance to decrease false positive screen results. Previous studies showed that nodule size measurements based on semi-automated volume are preferred over diameter measurements. Aim of this study was to determine the correlation between nodule diameter and nodule size of nodules found in low-dose CT lung cancer screening, and to directly compare it with semi-automated volume measurements.
    
    Methods:
    We investigated baseline data of 2,240 solid nodules of intermediate size (volume 50-500mm[3]) in 1,500 lung cancer screening participants. Nodule volume, x, y, and z diameter and minimum / maximum diameter in any direction were generated by semi-automated software (LungCARE, Siemens). Range in maximum axial and mean nodule diameter per nodule volume category (50-100mm[3], 100-200mm[3], 200-300mm[3], 300-400mm[3], 400-500mm[3]) was determined. Semi-automated nodule volume represented nodule size. Intra-nodule diameter variation was defined as maximum minus minimum nodule diameter.
    
    Results:
    Median participant age was 59 years, 14.1% were women. Median nodule volume was 82.4 mm[3] (interquartile range [IQR], 62.9–125.4 mm[3]). Median nodule diameter was 6.1 mm (IQR, 5.4–7.2 mm) for mean diameter, and 6.6 mm (IQR, 5.9–7.7 mm) for maximum axial diameter. Range in mean nodule diameter per volume category varied from 8.55 mm (3.0 – 11.5 mm) for nodules with volume of 50-100 mm[3] to 6.1 mm (7.2 – 13.3 mm) for nodules with volume of 200-300 mm[3]; range in maximum axial diameter varied from 11.2 mm (7.3 – 18.5 mm) for nodules with volume of 200-300 mm[3], to 7.0 mm (9.1 – 16.1 mm) for nodules with volume of 400-500 mm[3]. Intra-nodule diameters varied by a median of 2.8 mm (IQR, 2.2-3.7 mm). Intra-nodule diameter variation for smaller intermediate-sized nodules (50-200 mm[3]) was 2.8 mm (IQR 2.2-3.5 mm), and was smaller than intra-nodule diameter variation for larger intermediate-sized nodules (200-500 mm[3]; median 3.6 mm [IQR 2.5-5.1 mm], P<0.01).
    
    Conclusion:
    Nodule size is poorly represented by diameter, as a nodule has an infinite number of diameters, but only one volume. Therefore, use of nodule diameter measurements may lead to misclassification of lung cancer probability. Median intra-nodule diameter variation was found to be higher as the 1.5mm LungRADS cutoff for nodule growth.