Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

E. Taioli



Author of

  • +

    P1.01 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 453)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Epidemiology/Tobacco Control and Cessation/Prevention
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.01-029 - Personal and Hospital Factors Associated with Limited Surgical Resection, In-Hospital Mortality and Complications in New York State (ID 5359)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): E. Taioli

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Lung cancer represents 13.4% of all newly diagnosed US cancers and 27.1% of all cancer deaths. Early stage lung cancer is generally treated with surgical resection. Many patient- and hospital-level factors influence the selection of appropriate surgical procedures and their outcome. We identified patient- and hospital-level characteristics influencing the type of lung cancer surgical approach utilized in New York State and assessed in-hospital complications and mortality.

      Methods:
      Patients were selected from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, SPARCS (1995-2012) based on ICD-9-CM codes of diagnosis (162 and 165) and procedures (32.0-32.9). Surgery was categorized into: limited resection (LR: 32.2-32.3), lobectomy (L: 32.4), and pneumonectomy (P: 32.5-32.6). Statistical analyses were performed in SAS v9.4 and ArcMap v10.3.1.

      Results:
      There were 36,460 patients (age 60-75 years); 56% underwent L, 37% LR, and 7% P. LR patients were more likely to be older (OR~adj~ 1.01, 95%CI [1.01-1.02]), female (OR~adj~ 1.10 [1.06-1.15]), Black (OR~adj~ 1.24 [1.15-1.34]), with comorbidities (OR~adj~ 1.10 [1.04-1.16]) than L patients. Opposite trends were observed among P patients, except for race. Over time, the odds of P decreased, while those of LR significantly increased (OR~adj~ 1.22 [1.16-1.29] for years 2007-2012 vs 1995-2000). Teaching hospitals were less likely to perform LR over L (OR~adj~ 0.82 [0.75-0.88]), while the opposite was true for hospitals with larger surgery volumes (OR~adj~ 1.07[1.03-1.11]). In-hospital complications were significantly less after LR than L (OR~adj~ 0.66 [0.62-0.69]), while in-hospital mortality was similar (OR~adj~ 0.93 [0.84-1.03]). In-hospital mortality was directly associated with age, length of stay, urgent/emergency admission, and inversely associated with female gender, private insurance, and surgery volumes. Figure 1



      Conclusion:
      There is a growing trend towards LR, which is still more likely to be performed in older patients with co-morbidities. In-hospital outcomes were affected by patients’ clinical and personal characteristics, and were better after LR than L or P.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.05 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 457)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Early Stage NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.05-071 - A Review of Quality of Life Measures Used in Lung Cancer Surgical Outcomes (ID 6175)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): E. Taioli

      • Abstract

      Background:
      With the increased life expectancy following surgery for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concern about the quality of life (QoL) of patients after surgery has gained attention. Previous QoL studies were limited by small sample size, inclusion of late-stage cancers and non-surgical treatments. This review summarized the existing literature on QoL in early stage lung cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment.

      Methods:
      PubMed and PsycINFO were searched for articles published between 1995 (year of the last published meta-analysis) and March 21, 2016. All English articles reported on quality of life for Stage I NSCLC were included. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers using pre-specified criteria.

      Results:
      Ten articles from nine studies were identified. Of the nine studies, four reported on the SF-36, one on the SF-12, one on the EORTC QLQ-C30, one on POMS-TMD, one on EQ-5D, and one on SGRQ. One study reported only on pre-surgical QoL, six only on post-surgical QoL and two studies reported on both pre- and post- surgical QoL. Timing for the administration of post-surgical QoL survey varied, from time at discharge to up to six years post-surgery. Two studies included only NSCLC patients with COPD. Due to the heterogeneity of these studies, comparison between studies and traditional meta-analysis were not possible.

      Conclusion:
      The literature on QoL in Stage I NSCLC patients is very sparse. As CT screening for lung cancer becomes more widespread with a consequent shift from late to early stage NSCLC, additional research is needed to explore the impact of different NSCLC surgical approaches on QoL.

  • +

    P3.03 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 473)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.03-031 - Definitive Radiation Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival in Non-Metastatic Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 4458)

      14:30 - 14:30  |  Author(s): E. Taioli

      • Abstract

      Background:
      To analyze rates of definitive radiation therapy (RT) utilization for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and evaluate the association between RT and overall survival (OS).

      Methods:
      The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried to identify patients with non-metastatic MPM diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. Definitive RT was defined as receipt of 40-65 Gy of external beam radiation therapy to the chest wall, lungs, or pleura. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of RT receipt. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of mortality. Propensity score matching was performed to verify the effect of definitive RT on OS.

      Results:
      Among 14,090 MPM patients, 3.6% received RT. Younger age, lower co-morbidity score, private insurance, surgical resection, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with increased RT utilization. Patients who received RT had higher crude 2 and 5-year OS rates (33.9% and 12.6%, respectively) compared to patients who did not (19.5% and 5.3%, respectively; p<0.001). On multivariable analysis and propensity matched analysis, definitive RT was associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio [adj HR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.87) and (adj HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.89), respectively. Compared to no therapy, surgery and RT (adj HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.54) and trimodality therapy (adj HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.40-0.55) were associated with the best survival.

      Comparison of Overall Survival According to Definitive RT
      2-yr rate 95% CI 5-yr rate 95% CI p Adjusted HR 95% CI
      No RT 19.5% 18.8-20.3 5.3% 4.9-5.8 <0.001 1.00 Ref
      RT 33.9% 29.4-38.4 12.6% 9.4-16.3 <0.001 0.78 0.70-0.87


      Conclusion:
      The rate of definitive RT utilization for non-metastatic MPM has remained low over the past decade. Patients who received RT had improved OS, suggesting a role for increased utilization, particularly with the advancement in RT techniques. Combined modality therapy was associated with a greater improvement in survival than any single modality treatment.