Virtual Library
Start Your Search
M. Tsuboi
Moderator of
-
+
ED08 - Early-Stage NSCLC: State-of-the-Art Treatment and Perspectives (ID 276)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Education Session
- Track: Early Stage NSCLC
- Presentations: 4
- Moderators:T. Le Chevalier, M. Tsuboi
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall C2
-
+
ED08.01 - Surgery of Early-Stage NSCLC (ID 6469)
14:30 - 14:50 | Author(s): M.R. Mueller
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
General considerations Early stage lung cancer - a term in transition Generally early stage lung cancer is understood as stage I and stage II non-small lung cancer. An alternative understanding of early stage lung cancer is resectable disease. However, both definitions are imprecise and subject to development and Expertise. 1. Defining early stage lung cancer as resectable disease depends on regional philosophies and local expertise and therefore is the most unreliable and variable definition. The term resectability focuses on the T factor of the tumour and describes the ability of the surgeon to achieve radical resection. In contrast operability includes any potential regional and systemic spread and focuses more on the N and M descriptors. 2. Defining early stage lung cancer based on mediastinal nodal involvement neglects the fact, that single station N2 (N2a) is associated with the same five-year survival as multistation N1 (N1b). This touches on the term locally advanced disease, which in fact also means different things for different people. For the oncologist locally advanced disease usually means N2 involvement with the consequent call for chemotherapy. For the surgeon locally advanced disease primarily addresses the T factor and is used for T3 or T4 tumours, indicating more extended resections in the absence of N2 disease. In summary, terms like early stage, locally advanced stage or advanced stage should be avoided since they do not properly describe a clinical situation nor are they guiding therapy. If the term early stage lung cancer should be maintained for any reason, there is need for revisions. The five-year survival of stage I and stage II non-small lung cancer is a range of less than 30 to more than 90% and the survival expectedly mainly depends on nodal involvement. The estimated median five-year survival of patients with Screening detected T1N0 NSCLC is a reported 92%. Even nodal negativeT3 tumours are associated with almost 60% five year survival following radical resection. On the other hand involvement of multiple N1 lymph nodes results in a much worse prognosis of about 35%. However, for this presentation the current definition of stage I and stage II non-small lung cancer was used. Preoperative staging Resectability of lung cancer for technical reasons in general, and in early stage lung cancer in particular, very rarely is an issue. Oncological operability has to be defined preoperatively along international guidelines. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) recently has ublished revised guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph nodes staging for non-small cell lung cancer. Only one selected group of patients with tumours of less than 3 cm in diameter (cT1) in the outer third of the lung without signs of nodal involvement at CT scan, PET scan or PET CT (cN0) may directly undergo surgical resection. All other clinical situations require invasive preoperative staging by bronchoscopy plus EBUS/EUS. If the absence of nodal involvement is verified by EBUS/EUS this patient may also directly undergo surgery. In the presence of radiologically suspect mediastinal lymph nodes and negative EBUS/EUS further confirmation is recommended using mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy. If mediastinal nodal involvement is histologically verified by any means the patient has to undergo multimodality treatment. All clinical findings are to be discussed in an interdisciplinary tumour board for proper therapy planning. [1] Surgical therapy of early stage NSCLC Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment of early stage non-small lung cancer for patients willing to accept the procedure-related risks. Goal of any surgical intervention for early stage lung cancer is the complete resection of the primary tumour together with regional lymphatic nodes. The standard for any resection with curative intent is defined by anatomical lung resection. In early stage lung cancer the predominant type of resection is lobectomy or bilobectomy, sometimes along with bronchoplastic or angioplastic procedures or extended resections for locally invading T3 tumours. Pneumonectomy particularly in the treatment of early stage lung cancer is rarely used. Gold standard of surgical resection for lung cancer is lobectomy. This standard is based on a prospective multi-institutional randomized trial comparing limited resection with lobectomy for peripheral T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer published in 1995. [2 ]In the absence of more recent prospective randomised trials lobectomy still must be considered the surgical procedure of choice for patients with peripheral T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer. An extensive body of literature mainly composed of retrospective studies supports the use of radical anatomical segmentectomy for peripheral cT1N0M0 non-small lung cancer with less than 2 cm in diameter, certainly for older patients with limited cardiopulmonary function. However, caution should be taken to promote a widespread indication for intentional segmentectomy in young good surgical candidates until the results of the ongoing randomised controlled trials become available.[ 3,4] The role of minimally invasive surgery Minimally invasive anatomical resection for lung cancer carried out by means of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been increasingly carried out during the past years. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials published in 2009 reported an improved five-year survival and reduced systemic recurrences in patients who received VATS lobectomy. [5 ]A multicentric propensity-matched analysis of more than 1000 patients, of which 700 had undergone VATS lobectomy confirms, that thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity as compared with thoracotomy. The positive impact of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of lung cancer particularly applies to the elderly. [6] Regarding long-term survival after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy a meta- showed a survival benefit in the favour of VATS with a difference in survival of 5% at five years. The reason for this observed survival benefit may be attributed to a less pronounced compromise of the immunocompetence after the surgical trauma. [7] The role of mediastinal lymph node dissection The rationale for a formal mediastinal lymph node dissection is multifold. The distribution pattern of mediastinal lymph node metastasis is not predictable and skip metastasis are seen in up to 30% of patients. Even small tumours may present with unexpected N2 disease with an incidence of 6-10%. The operative morbidity is not significantly influenced by a systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection. Recommended standard of mediastinal lymph node dissection is the removal of all mediastinal tissue containing lymph nodes in a systematic Approach within anatomical landmarks. The most recent randomized controlled trial published in 2011 did not find a survival benefit by complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy in patients with early stage lung cancer, but the results should not be generalized to patients staged only radiographically or those with higher stage tumours. The recommendation from this study is that a formal mediastinal en-bloc dissection may still affect survival and certainly optimally stages patients. In the subgroup analysis no difference between VATS and open lobectomy was observed for number of lymph nodes harvested and regarding long-term survival.[8] As minimally invasive surgery along with unilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy generally prolongs operation times and the requirement of single lung ventilation the advantages for the elderly population has to be questioned and discussed individually. An alternative to thoracoscopic unilateral lymphadenectomy is offered by video-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy through the neck (VAMLA). The approach is similar to transcervical mediastinoscopy and allows for a radical bloc dissection of all mediastinal lymph node stations. Besides the benefit of bilateral lung ventilation during this phase of the operation a bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy offers improved surgical radicality. Alternatives to surgical resection and the role of primary radiotherapy In patients unfit for surgery SABR is the treatment of choice for peripherally located stage I non-small cell lung cancer. If SABR is not available a hypofractionated radiotherapy is advocated. A systematic Review comparing outcomes of SABR and surgery in patients with severe COPD revealed a higher 30 day mortality following surgery but similar overall survival at one and three years. [9] In a meta-analysis of 19 out of 318 papers with the best evidence addressing a comparison of SABR and surgical wedge resection both methods proved as reasonable alternatives to lobectomy in high risk surgical patients. In this analysis SABR was associated with reduced local recurrence compared to wedge resection and should be considered when wedge resection is planned due to anatomical location and size of the primary tumour in a patient who is high risk for surgery. [10] Although local tumour control may be comparable or even superior to extra-anatomic surgical resection a quite high rate of late radiological changes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage lung cancer has to be considered. At one year follow-up the predicted probability of having expected or pronounced radiological changes after SABR were 65 and 22%. These changes included phenomena like mass-like appearance, radiation fibrosis, and rib fractures, which sometimes are difficult to differentiate from tumour recurrence. Summary The ACCP guidelines address the question, who had to be considered a high risk candidate for surgery. With the advent of minimally invasive resection, the criteria to classify a patient as too ill to undergo an anatomic lung resection are being redefined. Surgical resection remains the primary and preferred approach to the treatment of stage I and II NSCLC in patients with good or low surgical risk. Primary radiation therapy remains the primary curative intent approach for patients who refuse surgical resection or are determined by a multidisciplinary team to be inoperable. [11] References 1. Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. De Leyn P, Dooms C, Kuzdzal J, Lardinois D, Passlick B, Rami-Porta R, Turna A, Van Schil P, Venuta F, Waller D, Weder W, Zielinski M. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 May;45(5):787-98 2. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ginsberg RJ; Rubinstein LV. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 60(3):615-22; discussion 622-3 3. Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H, et al. Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy compared with lobectomy for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: propensity score-matched analysis in a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:358-64. 4. Zhao X, Qian L, Luo Q, et al. Segmentectomy as a safe and equally effective surgical option under complete video-assisted thoracic surgery for patients of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;8:116, 5. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized and non-randomized Trials on safety and efficacy of videoassisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2553–2562 6. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomy.Villamizar NR, Darrabie MD, Burfeind WR, Petersen RP, Onaitis MW, Toloza E, Harpole DH, D'Amico TA. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Aug;138(2):419-25. 7. Long-term survival in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs open lobectomy in lung-cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Taioli E, Lee DS, Lesser M, Flores R. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Feb 14. 8. Darling GE, et al. Randomized trial of m diastinal lymph node sampling versus complete lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection in the patient with N0 or N1 less than hilar) non-small cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 011;141:662-70 9. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, Treatment and follow-up. J. Vansteenkiste, D. De Ruysscher, W. E. E. Eberhardt, E. Lim, S. Senan, E. Felip & S. Peters, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group 10. Mahmood S, Bilal H, Faivre-Finn C, Shah R. Is stereotactic ablative radiotherapy equivalent to sublobar resection in high-risk surgical patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Nov;17(5):845-53. 11. Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.Howington JA, Blum MG, Chang AC, Balekian AA, Murthy SC. Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl)
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ED08.02 - The Role of Radiotherapy in Early-Stage NSCLC (ID 6470)
14:50 - 15:10 | Author(s): S. Senan
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Radiotherapy is a curative treatment for early-stage NSCLC. Following hypofractionated radiotherapy in 15 once-daily fractions of 4 Gy to biopsy-proven tumors, a prospective multicenter study reported a 3-year local control rate of 82.7% (95% CI = 69.7% to 90.5%) [Cheung PC, 2014]. In the past decade, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR or SBRT) has become established as the guideline-recommended standard of care for medically inoperable patients with a peripheral early-stage NSCLC, as 5-year local control rates of 90% have been reported [Louie AV, 2015]. SABR is usually delivered in 3-8 fractions, utilizes small margins for positional uncertainty, 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) for treatment planning, multiple conformal beams or arcs for delivery, and cone-bean CT scans for daily setup. Where facilities for SABR are unavailable, hypofractionated radiotherapy delivered using 4DCT planning remains an acceptable curative treatment. Diagnosis Population studies reveal that a significant proportion of elderly patients, as well as those with severe co-morbidities, do not receive any treatment. Guidelines recommend that a tissue diagnosis be obtained before initiating treatment for early-stage NSCLC, but also permit the use of SABR following review by an expert tumor board, in tumors where the calculated probability of malignancy is high [Vansteenkiste J, 2014; Callister ME, 2015]. However, any decision to proceed to a FDG-PET directed SABR approach in less fit patients must take into account the likelihood of benign disease. Given a high incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis, guidelines for Asia have recommended performing early non-surgical biopsies in Asian patients [Bai C, 2016]. Toxicity Treatment-related grades 3-4 toxicity are uncommon following SABR to peripheral lung tumors, while local control rates are approximately 90% [Louie AV 2015]. Commonly reported toxicities are chest wall pain, rib fractures, and except in patients who have pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD), the incidence of high-grade radiation pneumonitis is low. A systematic literature review of SABR in patients with ILD reported a treatment-related mortality in 15% [Chen H, Proc ASTRO 2016]. Follow-up Guidelines recommend 6-monthly CT scans for up to 3 years following SABR, followed by annual scans thereafter. The assessment of radiological changes can be challenging in a sub-group of patients during long-term follow-op, and the so-called high-risk radiological features [HRF] can identify patients in whom a biopsy is warranted [Figure 1, Huang K, 2014]. The HRF’s identified in the literature are an enlarging opacity at primary site, a sequential enlarging opacity, enlarging opacity after 12-months, a bulging margin, loss of linear margin, loss of air bronchogram and cranio-caudal growth [Huang K, 2014]. Initial reports on surgery for local failures following SABR indicate that this salvage procedure can be performed safely [Allibhai Z, 2012; Hamaji M, 2015; Verstegen N, Proc ELCC 2015]. Figure 1 The observed rates for a second primary lung cancer following SABR appear similar to those following surgery [Verstegen N, 2015]. In this situation, a subsequent course of SABR can generally be performed safely. Operable patients The role of SABR in fit patients remains a topic of active debate. Indirect comparisons of outcomes following the two modalities have revealed conflicting results. The role of SABR in surgical patients is currrently being investigted in 3 prospective randomized studies (NCT02468024, NCT02629458, NCT01753414), with a fourth study (VALOR) scheduled to open shortly.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ED08.03 - Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Completely Resected (ID 6471)
15:10 - 15:30 | Author(s): G. Goss
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Completely Resected NSCLC Glenwood D. Goss Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death world-wide and accounts for approximately 28% of all cancer deaths(1,2). Surgical resection is the cornerstone of therapy for early stage disease, but relapse is high with 30-60% of patients with resected NSCLC still dying of their disease. Despite the results of a 1995 meta-analysis demonstrating a non-significant 5% survival advantage at five years with the addition of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, no large randomized studies conclusively demonstrated a benefit following resection until 2003(3). Five large randomized trials were undertaken to determine if adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy after curative surgery for NSCLC conferred a survival advantage: ALPI; IALT; JBR10; CALGB 9633; and ANITA (4,5,6,7,8). Three of these five trials showed statistically significant improvements in overall survival, ranging from 4% [IALT] to 15% [JBR10] at 5 years, corresponding to an absolute improvement in relapse-free survival from 49% to 61%. Of the two trials that did not demonstrate improved survival, one [ALPI] suffered from poor compliance to the treatment regimen (69%), and the second was a smaller trial (n=344) limited to patients with stage IB disease [CALGB 9633], which was likely underpowered to detect a statistically significant improvement in overall survival. Interestingly, despite being limited to patients with stage IB disease, CALGB 9633 did demonstrate an overall survival hazard ratio comparable to the other adjuvant trials (HR=0.8) that included patients with more advanced disease, despite not achieving statistical significance. Since the publication of original adjuvant chemotherapy trials, a number of meta-analyses have confirmed the benefit of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy after surgical resection for NSCLC(9,10). In these meta-analyses, all-stage (IB-IIIA) hazard ratios were in the range of HR=0.86, corresponding to an absolute benefit for chemotherapy on overall survival of 4-5% at 5 years. The benefit, however, was demonstrated to be stage dependent (albeit using older staging criteria versions), with the benefit only reaching statistical significance for stages II and III. While the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I disease is controversial (11), subgroup analyses in a number of trials in high-risk patients with stage IB disease (tumours≥4cm) suggests that there may be an overall survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy in this subgroup of patients, comparable to those observed in stage II and III disease [Strauss 2008]. In 2009 the long term follow up of the IALT study (with a median follow up of 7.5 years) was reported. Results showed a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.02; P = .10) and on disease-free survival (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; P = .02). However, there was a significant difference between the results of overall survival before and after 5 years of follow-up (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.97; P = .01 v HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.07; P = .04) with P = .006 for interaction. Similar results were observed for disease-free survival. The analysis of non-lung cancer deaths for the whole period showed an HR of 1.34 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.81; P = .06) suggesting that those patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had a higher death rate from non- lung causes after 5 years(12). However these conclusions were not support by the findings of Butts and colleagues reporting on JBR10 with a median follow-up was 9.3 years (range, 5.8 to 13.8). Adjuvant chemotherapy continued to show a benefit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99; P = .04). There was a trend for interaction with disease stage (P = .09; HR for stage II, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.92; P = .01; stage IB, HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.52; P = .87). Adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in significantly prolonged disease specific survival (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.97;P = .03). Observation was associated with significantly higher risk of death from lung cancer (P = .02), with no difference in rates of death from other causes or second primary malignancies between the arms. They concluded that prolonged follow-up of patients from the JBR.10 trial continues to show a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy(13). Recently in a post hoc analysis of ECOG 1505, a trial of adjuvant chemotherapy +/- bevacizumab for early stage NSCLC, Wakelee and colleagues had the opportunity to compare four different cisplatin doublet regimens namely, cisplatin with one of vinorelbine, docetaxel, gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Median follow-up time for each chemotherapy doublet was: vinorelbine 54.3 months; docetaxel 60.3 months; gemcitabine 57.0 months; and pemetrexed 40.6 months respectively. The arms were well balanced for the major prognostic factors apart from smoking where the rate was slightly lower in the pemetrexed arm. There was no difference in the median number of cycles between arms. Both in the nonsquamous and squamous subgroups there was no difference in overall survival (nonsquamous logrank p=0.18 and squamous p=0.99) and disease free survival (nonsquamous p=0.54 and p=0.83). The authors concluded that there did not appear to be a difference in outcome between cisplatin doublet regimens(14). Despite the established benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery for NSCLC there is still much to be done with approximately 50 % of patients still dying from disease. Furthermore, not all patients with early stage disease are eligible or willing to undergo chemotherapy following complete surgical resection [Booth 2010]. As such, the long-term prognosis of patients with NSCLC, even among those with early stage disease, remains poor. Therefore it is imperative that we find new and better therapies to improve upon the results of surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. . References: 1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2012. 2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer Statistics 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 43-66. 3. L. A. Stewart, S. Burdett, J. F. Tierney, J. Pignon on behalf of the NSCLC Collaborative GroupSurgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) compared to surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A meta-analysis using individual patient data (IPD) from randomized clinical trials (RCT). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 7552 4. Scagliotti GV, Fossati R, Torri V et al. Randomized study of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected stage I, II, or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1453–61. 5. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A et al. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Eng J Med 2004; 350: 351-60. 6. Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D et al. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Eng J Med 2005; 352: 2589-97. 7. Strauss GM, Herdone JE, Maddaus et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 5043-51. 8. Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomized controlled trial [published erratum appears in Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 797]. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 719-27. 9. Pignon JP, Tribodet GV, Scagliotti G et al. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3552-9. 10. NSCLC Meta-analyses Collaborative Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data. Lancet 2010; 375: 1267-77. 11. Wakelee H, Dubey S, Gandara D et al. Optimal adjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer – how to handle stage I disease. Oncologist 2007; 12: 331-7. 12. Arriagada R, Dunant A, Pignon JP, et al. Long-Term Results of the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Evaluating Adjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Resected Lung Cancer JCO January 1, 2010 vol. 28no. 1 35-42 13. Butts C, Ding K, Seymour L,et al. Randomized Phase III Trial of Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Observation in Completely Resected Stage IB and II Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Survival Analysis of JBR-10. Journal of Clinical Oncology, January 1, 2010 vol. (28) 1 29-34. 14. H.A. Wakelee[1], S.E. Dahlberg[2], S.M. Keller te al. E1505: Adjuvant chemotherapy +/bevacizumab for early stage NSCLC: Outcomes based on chemotherapy subsets. ASCO Annual Meeting, 2016 Abstr 8507: E1505 Chemotherapy subsets. 15. Booth CM, Shepherd FA, Peng Y et al. Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC: a population-based outcome study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3472-8.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ED08.04 - Perspectives of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Completely Resected NSCLC (ID 6472)
15:30 - 15:45 | Author(s): H. Wakelee
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Perspectives of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Completely Resected NSCLC - Heather Wakelee, USA The use of four cycles of cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy is now the standard of care for patients with resected stage II and IIIA NSCLC and is commonly used for patients with larger (at least 4 cm in size) stage IB tumors. The survival benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy though is limited with meta-analyses revealing a 4-5% absolute survival benefit at 5 years for patients receiving adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy.[1,2]Some recent attempts to improve outcomes with the addition of other agents to cisplatin doublets (or as longer term therapy) have been disappointing. The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in the ECOG-ACRIN E1505 adjuvant trial failed to show a benefit in disease free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS).[3] The use of the MAGE-A3 vaccine in the MAGRIT trial was similarly negative.[4] With knowledge about molecular drivers of NSCLC and targeted treatment options in advanced disease, multiple studies are either completed or underway to study molecularly targeted agents in earlier stages of lung cancer, particularly with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In metastatic NSCLC the EGFR TKIs produce superior response and progression free survival (PFS) compared with platinum doublet chemotherapy in treatment naïve patients with tumors with activating EGFR mutations (EGFRmut).[5,6]Similar outcomes with significant response and PFS improvements with the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor crizotinib compared to chemotherapy have been reported in patients with tumors harboring translocations of ALK.[7] Encouraging data from retrospective and non-randomized trials looking at adjuvant EGFR TKI use led to randomized trials. Earlier trials that did not select based on EGFRmut status were negative, but more recent trials have been more encouraging. The phase III RADIANT trial selected patients with resected early stage NSCLC for EGFR expression by IHC/FISH, but not by EGFR mutation status, and randomized them to adjuvant erlotinib or placebo. [8] The primary end point was DFS in the full data set, with secondary analyses focused on patients with tumors harboring del19 or L858R EGFR mutations. No differences were found in DFS or OS based on treatment arm for the nearly 1000 patients who were enrolled. In the EGFRmut subset (N=161) DFS did favor erlotinib (HR 0.61, 95% CI = 0.384-0.981, p = 0.0391), but this was not considered statistically significant, as the primary endpoint of the trial was negative. The overall survival results, while still immature, were not in favor of the erlotinib arm, even in the EGFRmut subset. The conclusion from this study is that adjuvant EGFR TKI therapy requires further investigation and should not be considered a standard treatment option at this time. Multiple ongoing trials are exploring adjuvant EGFR TKI (and adjuvant ALK TKI) therapy for resected early stage NSCLC patients with tumors harboring the appropriate molecular marker.(Table 1) The ongoing trials are looking not only at whether or not an OS benefit can be obtained with adjuvant molecularly targeted therapy but also duration of therapy and the potential to use EGFR TKIs instead of chemotherapy in selected patients. The largest United States study is the NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) ALCHEMIST trial. The study is open to patients with resected early stage (IB-IIIA) NSCLC who are screened for EGFR activating mutations and ALK translocations. Patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations or ALK translocations enter the appropriate sub-study and, after completion of all planned adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy, are randomized to targeted TKI therapy or placebo for 2 years. Both sub-studies will enroll approximately 400 patients (410 EGFR; 378 ALK) and are powered for an OS endpoint. Patients without actionable mutations can enroll on the ANVIL sub-study looking at adjuvant nivolumab, a PD-1 targeted agent.(Table 1) Globally most targeted therapy adjuvant trials are being conducted in Asia, particularly China and Japan. ADJUVANT (C-TONG 1104) trial in China and IMPACT WJOG6410L in Japan are phase III trials for patients with resected stage II-IIIA EGFRmut NSCLC comparing gefitinib to cisplatin/vinorelbine using DFS as the primary endpoint.(Table 1) Other trials outlined in Table 1 are exploring variations on this theme using gefitinib or icotinib and either after or instead of adjuvant chemotherapy. The PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab are approved for the second line treatment of advanced stage NSCLC and will likely be utilized in first-line in the near future.[9-11] Based on their promise in advanced stage NSCLC, multiple trials with PD-1 and PD-L1 agents are ongoing. Most studies are for patients who have completed adjuvant chemotherapy (though some allow chemotherapy naïve patients) and they predominantly randomize patients to approximately 1 year of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. Most include testing for PD-L1 expression, but do not exclude patients with low tumor levels of PD-L1. Many are placebo controlled.(Table 1) Chemotherapy has helped improve outcomes but continued investigations with novel approaches will be necessary to continue to improve cure rates for patients with resected early stage NSCLC. The use of molecularly targeted agents for patients with tumors containing EGFRmut or ALK translocations are promising with validation studies ongoing and the hope of immunotherapy is being investigated as well in multiple global trials. Table 1. Ongoing Phase III Targeted and Immunotherapy Adjuvant Trials
All EGFR studies include stage II-IIIA All PD-1/PD-L1 studies open to IB (4cm) – IIIA after adjuvant chemotherapy N: Number of estimated enrollment DFS: disease-free survival; OS: overall survival *EGFR deletion 19 or exon 21 L858R mutation only ALK^ : Positive for ALK translocation by FISH &- regardless of PD-L1 status US NCI NCTN: United States National Cancer Institute, National Clinical Trials Network References: 1. Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV, et al: Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation: A Pooled Analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol, 2008 2. Group NM-aC, Arriagada R, Auperin A, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data. Lancet 375:1267-77, 2010 3. Wakelee HA, Dahlberg SE, Keller SM, et al: Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results of E1505. Journal of Thoracic Oncology Proceedings WCLC 2015:Abstr: Plen04.03, 2015 4. Vansteenkiste JF, Cho BC, Vanakesa T, et al: Efficacy of the MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected MAGE-A3-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (MAGRIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:822-835, 2016 5. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al: Gefitinib or Carboplatin-Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med, 2009 6. Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, et al: Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations. J Clin Oncol, 2013 7. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, et al: First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 371:2167-77, 2014 8. Kelly K, Altorki NK, Eberhardt WE, et al: Adjuvant Erlotinib Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage IB-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (RADIANT): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 33:4007-14, 2015 9. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al: Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 373:123-35, 2015 10. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al: Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 373:1627-39, 2015 11. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al: Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387:1540-50, 2016Trial Description Primary Endpoint(s) C-TONG 1104 NCT01405079 *gefitinib vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine 3-year DFS GASTO1002 NCT01996098 *Chemo then icotinib vs obs 5-year DFS BD-IC-IV-59 NCT02125240 *Chemo then icotinib vs. placebo 2-year DFS WJOG6401L IMPACT *Gefitinib vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine 5-year DFS ALCHEMIST A081105/E4512 *Erlotinib vs. placebo: ALK^ crizotinib vs placebo OS ALCHEMIST/ANVIL &EGFR/ALK wildtype; US NCI NCTN, Nivolumab vs obs OS/DFS Impower010 Restricted to PD-L1+ Global, Atezolizumab vs. placebo DFS MEDI4736 &Global, MEDI4736 vs placebo DFS Keynote-091 &ETOP/EORTC, Pembrolizumab vs placebo DFS
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
OA07 - Lymph Node Metastases and Other Prognostic Factors for Local Spread (ID 376)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Surgery
- Presentations: 1
-
+
OA07.05 - Prognostic Impact of Pleural Lavage Cytology (PLC): Significance of PLC after Lung Resection (ID 5801)
15:05 - 15:15 | Author(s): M. Tsuboi
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
We previously reported the prognostic significance of pleural lavage cytology (PLC) in patients undergoing surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Based on a larger cohort of more than 3500 NSCLC patients, which is the largest ever reported from a single institution in the literature, we evaluated the prognostic impact of PLC on survival and recurrence.
Methods:
From January 1993 to July 2015, 3671 patients underwent R0 surgical resection for NSCLC at our institution and PLC results before (pre-) and after (post-) lung resection were both available. The cytological evaluation was classified into 3 categories: negative (-), suggestive (±), positive (+). We excluded 77 patients whose PLC results were suggestive, and 3594 patients were analyzed. The impact of PLC results on survival and recurrence was evaluated with conventional clinicopathological factors.
Results:
The overall survival (OS) of pre-PLC (+) patients was significantly inferior to that of pre-PLC (-) patients. However, the 5-year OS rate of pre-PLC (+) patients was 43%, which was significantly better than that of patients with pleural dissemination (11%). In the following analyses, we divided the patients into 3 groups according to pre/post- PLC results as follows: Pre (-)/ post (-), Group A (n=3461); pre (+)/ post (-), Group B (n=43); and post (+), Group C (n=87). Statistically significant difference was not observed between Groups A and B in OS or in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p=1.00, 0.28, respectively). However, there were significant differences in OS and RFS between Groups B and C (p=0.01 and p=0.02), and between Groups A and C (p<0.01 and p<0.01), respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathological factors including post-PLC results to identify prognosticators for OS, post-PLC(+) (hazard ratio (HR) =2.20, p<0.01), older age (≥65 years; HR=1.95, p<0.01), smoking history (+) (HR=1.48, p<0.01), elevated serum CEA level (>5.0 mg/dL; HR=1.28, p<0.01), pathological(p)T≥2 (HR=1.28, p<0.01), pN≥1 (HR=1.48, p<0.01), pStage≥II (HR=1.51, p<0.01), pl(+) (HR=1.43, p<0.01), ly(+) (HR=1.32, p<0.01), and v(+) (HR=1.53, p<0.01) were found to be significant independent unfavorable prognosticators.
Conclusion:
The prognostic impact of pre-PLC was moderate and not prohibiting lung resection. Post-PLC was shown to be a strong independent prognostic factor. Its impact on survival of NSCLC patients was very strong, and therefore should be incorporated in the future TNM classification.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA09 - Locally Advanced NSCLC: Innovative Treatment Strategies (ID 384)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Locally Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
-
+
OA09.04 - Discussant for OA09.01, OA09.02, OA09.03 (ID 6949)
11:30 - 11:45 | Author(s): M. Tsuboi
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA15 - Sublobar Resections for Early Stage NSCLC (ID 396)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Surgery
- Presentations: 1
-
+
OA15.01 - Limited Resection Trial for Pulmonary Sub-solid Nodules: Case Selection Based on High Resolution CT: Outcome at Median Follow-up of 105 Months (ID 4454)
16:00 - 16:10 | Author(s): M. Tsuboi
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
The objective of this study is to confirm limited resection efficacy as radical surgery in patients with minimally invasive lung cancer as indicated by high-resolution (HR) computed tomography (CT), and to confirm intraoperative cytology as a negative margin indicator and reliable margin non-recurrence predictor.
Methods:
Enrollment required patients with a tumor ≤ 2 cm in diameter, diagnosed or suspected as a clinical T1N0M0 carcinoma in the lung periphery based on a CT scan. They had to have a HRCT scan indicating a sub-solid nodule with tumor disappearance ratio; TDR ≥ 0.5. (TDR = 1- DM/DL; DM: maximum tumor diameter on mediastinal settings, DL: maximum tumor diameter on lung settings). Patients unfit for lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection were excluded. We performed a wedge or segmental resection. The used stapling cartridges were washed with saline, which was cytologically evaluated. If cytology was cancer positive, additional margin was resected, and cytologic examination repeated. If the second exam was positive, a routine lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection was performed. We aimed at enrolling 100 patients. The primary endpoint is 10-year local recurrence free survival rate.
Results:
This prospective study started in November 2003, and 101 patients were enrolled in 6 years. Of them, 99 were eligible for analysis. The mean age was 62 years (range: 30-75), and 60 were women. There were 11 Noguchi type A tumors, 54 type B tumors, 26 type C tumors, one type D tumor, one malignant lymphoma, 3 hyperplastic lesions, and 3 inflammatory fibroses. None of the 93 malignant nodules showed any vessel invasion. Although no positive cytology results were obtained, pathologically positive margin was reported after surgery in one type C patient. He later underwent a routine lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection. There was no clear correlation between tumor size, TDR, and Noguchi subtype. No mortality occurred, but one patient developed postoperative pneumothorax and pneumonia, and another hemorrhagic gastric ulcer. With a median follow-up period of 105 months (range: 72−129) as of June 2016, there have been no recurrences, but one patient died for unspecified cause.
Conclusion:
We have repeatedly warned that delayed cut-end recurrence is possible following limited resection even for small sub-solid lung cancers. So far, however, HRCT scans appear to predict non- or minimally invasive sub-solid lung cancers with high reliability, warranting limited resection as curative surgery in this cohort. Intraoperative cytology reliably indicated negative margins and seems to predict freedom from local recurrence.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.05 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 457)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Early Stage NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/05/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P1.05-063 - Multicenter Observational Study of Patients with Resected Early-Staged NSCLC, Who Were Excluded from an Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial (ID 4713)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Tsuboi
- Abstract
Background:
From Nov. 2008 to Dec. 2013, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) conducted a randomized phase III trial (JCOG0707), which compared the survival benefit of UFT and S-1 for completely resected pathological (p-) stage I (T1>2 cm and T2 in the 6th TNM classification) NSCLC and a total of 963 patients were enrolled. Recently, there is a growing concern that those who participated in clinical trials are highly selected and do not represent the “real-world” population. Hereby, we conducted a multicenter observational study of patients excluded from JCOG0707 trial during the study period.
Methods:
We retrospectively collected and analyzed the patients’ backgrounds, tumor profiles, post-surgical treatment of the patients who underwent R0 resection of p-stage I (T1>2cm and T2 in TNM 6th) NSCLC by lobectomy or larger lung resection but were excluded from JCOG0707 from Japanese multi-centers.
Results:
Of the 48 institutions which took part in JCOG0707, 34 (enrolling 917 or 95.2% of all JCOG0707 patients) participated in this multicenter study, and 5006 patients were enrolled. Among them, 2617 (52.3%) patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria, but were not enrolled to JCOG0707 mainly due to patients’ decline (69.2%), or physicians’ discretion (20.5%). The accrual rate to JCOG0707 was various by institutions (4.1 to 46.1%), but was 25.9% (917 / [917+2617]) as a whole. Total number of p-stage I and eligible patients at each institution did not correlate the accrual rate (R2=0.003 and 0.046). In the remaining 2389 (47.7%) patients, main ineligible reasons included the existence of active multiple cancer (29.1%), physicians’ decision based on the patients’ comorbidities (19.4%), delayed recovery from surgery (14.1%), and high age ≥81 years (10.7%). Majority of patients received no adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 3338, 66.7%). This proportion differed according to p-T factor (T1: 75.3% vs. T2 : 57.8%, p<0.001) and the JCOG0707 eligibility (ineligible population: 77.6% vs. eligible population: 56.7%, p<0.001). Standard UFT and experimental S-1 were given in 1550 (31.0%) and 21 (0.4%) patients, respectively. Among those who received adjuvant UFT, 971 (62.6%) took UFT for one year or longer.
Conclusion:
Only selected population of candidate patients, even if they met the eligibility criteria, were enrolled to JCOG0707 adjuvant chemotherapy trial for early-stage NSCLC. The “excluded” patients were mainly treated with observation alone or standard UFT treatment. Further analysis of this “excluded” population, including long-term survival, should be necessary for external validation of the randomized trial results.
-
+
P1.08 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 460)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Surgery
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/05/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P1.08-062 - The Short and Long-Term Outcomes of Completion Pneumonectomy Compared with Primary Pneumonectomy (ID 5828)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Tsuboi
- Abstract
Background:
Completion pneumonectomy has been reported to be high morbidity and mortality procedure in lung cancer patients. However, we sometimes have no choice but to apply this procedure for the patients who developed secondary lung cancer in the remaining lung after lung resection, local recurrence, or postoperative complication. In this study, we investigated the short and long-term outcomes of completion pneumonectomy compared with primary pneumonectomy in our single institution.
Methods:
Between January 1997 and December 2014, 243 patients who underwent pneumonectomy in our institution were enrolled in this study. Retrospectively, we investigated the postoperative complication, short and long-term outcomes of the patients who underwent completion pneumonectomy (CP) and primary pneumonectomy (PP). CP was defined as pneumonectomy in patients with previous lung resection conducting a hilar manipulation.
Results:
Thirty-three patients (14%) of 243 patients underwent CP. CP was performed for 28 malignant tumors and 5 benign diseases. Postoperative severe complication (CTCAE Grade3 or more) occurred in 36% of CP group and 12% of PP group (p<0.01).Especially, bronchopleural fistula (BPF) was more likely to occur in patients undergoing CP (PP 5％ vs CP 15%, p=0.03). The incidence of BPF in PP group was related to the side of procedure (right 70% versus left 30%, p=0.01), but those in CP group was not related (right 60% versus left 40%, p=0.57). In the patient with BPF after CP, Bronchial stump coverage was performed in 2 of 5 patients undergoing the right-side procedure, not performed in other 3 of 5 patients (2 left-side and 1 right-side). The 30-day mortality for CP group (9%) was a significantly higher compared with PP group (2％, p=0.04). However, the 90-day mortality (PP 5％ vs CP 12％, p=0.14) and the overall survival (PP 47％ vs CP 52％, p=0.44 ) were not significant difference between the two groups.
Conclusion:
Postoperative morbidity and 30-days mortality rates in CP were higher than those in PP group, but the long-term survival of CP is acceptable compared with PP group. The incidence of left-side BPF is similar to right-side in CP group in this study. It will be also necessary to take preventive procedure against BPF (bronchial stump coverage) in left-side CP.
-
+
P3.01 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 469)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 3
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.01-001 - Cancer Cell Invasion Driven by Extracellular Matrix Remodeling is Dependent on the Properties of Cancer‑Associated Fibroblasts (ID 3891)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Tsuboi
- Abstract
Background:
As one form of tumor invasion, cancer cells can invade the extracellular matrix (ECM) through tracks that have been physically remodeled by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). However, CAFs are a heterogeneous population with diverse matrix-remodeling capacities. The purpose of this study is to investigate how CAFs with various matrix-remodeling capacities influence cancer cell invasion.
Methods:
We established single-cell derived clones from 3 primary cultures of CAFs from lung adenocarcinoma patients (Case 1, 5 clones; Case 2, 5 clones; Case 3, 7 clones). Using a co-culture model, we evaluated the correlations between the number of invaded cancer cells and the remodeling areas generated by CAF clones in each case.
Results:
When A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells and CAF clones were co-cultured, both the numbers of invaded cancer cells and the remodeling areas generated by the CAF clones varied greatly. The number of invaded cancer cells was moderately and strongly correlated with the remodeling areas generated by each CAF clone originating from Cases 1 and 2 (R[2] value = 0.53 and 0.68, respectively), suggesting that the remodeling areas in the ECM may determine the number of invaded cancer cells. In contrast, the number of invaded cancer cells was not correlated with the remodeling areas generated by CAF clones originating from Case 3, suggesting that factors other than the remodeling areas might determine the number of invading cancer cells.
Conclusion:
These findings showed two types of fibroblast-dependent cancer cell invasion that are dependent on and independent of the remodeling areas generated by CAFs.
-
+
P3.01-024 - Drastic Morphological and Molecular Differences between Lymph Node Micrometastatic Tumors and Macrometastatic Tumors of Lung Adenocarcinoma (ID 5894)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Tsuboi
- Abstract
Background:
The expansion of micrometastatic tumors to macrometastatic ones is thought to be tightly regulated by several microenvironmental factors. The aim of this study was to elucidate the morphological and phenotypical differences between micrometastatic and macrometastatic tumors.
Methods:
We first examined the morphological characteristics of 66 lymph node (LN) micrometastatic tumors (less than 2 mm in size) and 51 macrometastatic tumors (more than 10 mm in size) in 42 lung adenocarcinoma cases. Then, we evaluated the expression level of E-cadherin, S100A4, ALDH1, and Geminin in cancer cells and the number of smooth muscle actin (SMA), CD34, and CD204 (+) stromal cells in the primary tumors, matched micrometastatic tumors, and macrometastatic tumors (n = 34, each).
Results:
Tumor budding reflects the process of EMT, and stromal reactions were observed more frequently in macrometastatic tumors (P < 0.001). E-cadherin staining score for the micrometastatic tumors was significantly higher than that for the primary tumors (P < 0.001). In contrast, the E-cadherin staining score for the macrometastatic tumors was significantly lower than that for the micrometastatic tumors (P = 0.017). As for the stromal cells, the numbers of SMA (+) fibroblasts, CD34 (+) microvessels, and CD204 (+) macrophages were significantly higher for the macrometastatic tumors and primary tumors than for the micrometastatic tumors (P < 0.001, all).
Conclusion:
The present study clearly showed that dynamic microenvironmental changes (e.g., EMT-related changes incancer cells and structural changes in stromal cells) occur during the growth of micrometastases into macrometastases.
-
+
P3.01-033 - Changes in the Tumor Microenvironment during Lymphatic Metastasis of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ID 6341)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): M. Tsuboi
- Abstract
Background:
Metastasis and growth in neoplastic lesions requires the multi-step regulation of microenvironmental factors. We aimed to elucidate the microenvironmental changes in the process of lymphatic metastasis of lung squamous cell carcinoma.
Methods:
We examined the morphological characteristics of 102 cases of Primary Tumor (PT), 50 of intralymphatic tumor (ILT), 51 of lymph node (LN) micrometastasis (LN-Mic; less than 2 mm in size) and 82 of LN Macrometastasis (LN-Mac; greater than 10 mm in size). Afterwards we evaluated the expression of nine molecules (EGFR, FGFR2, CD44, ALDH1, Podoplanin, E-cadherin, S100A4, geminin and ezrin) in matched PT, ILT, LN-Mic and LN-Mac from 23 of these cases.
Results:
The number of smooth muscle actin α-positive fibroblasts, CD34-positive microvessels and CD204-positive macrophages were also examined. As a result, the mitotic index of cancer cells was significantly lower in ILT and LN-Mic than PT and LN-Mac (p<0.001). Moreover stromal reaction in ILT and LN-Mic was less prominent than in PT and LN-Mac (p<0.001). Immunohistochemical study revealed that EGFR expression level and frequency of geminin positive cells in ILT and LN-Mic were significantly lower than in PT and LN-Mac (p<0.05). The number of stromal cells indicated by staining of CD34, CD204 and smooth muscle actin α in ILT and LN-Mic also was significantly lower than in PT and LN-Mac (p<0.05).
Conclusion:
In lung squamous cell carcinoma, drastic microenvironmental changes (e.g., growth factor receptor expression and proliferative capacity of cancer cells and structural changes in stromal cells) occur during both the process of lymphatic permeation and the progression into macrometastases.
