Virtual Library
Start Your Search
L.A. Byers
Author of
-
+
MA11 - Novel Approaches in SCLC and Neuroendocrine Tumors (ID 391)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: SCLC/Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:P. Lara, A. Mohn-Staudner
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:20 - 15:50, Strauss 3
-
+
MA11.07 - Improved Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Response Rates with Veliparib and Temozolomide: Results from a Phase II Trial (ID 5517)
15:02 - 15:08 | Author(s): L.A. Byers
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
PARP1 is overexpressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and represents a novel therapeutic target for this disease. Preclinical data indicates that combining veliparib (an oral PARP-1/2 inhibitor) and temozolomide (TMZ) results in synergistic tumor growth delay or regression. In this study, we investigated whether adding veliparib to TMZ would improve outcomes in patients with relapsed sensitive and refractory SCLCs. Candidate predictive biomarkers, including SLFN11, were then explored.
Methods:
SCLC patients previously treated with 1 or 2 prior regimens were enrolled in the trial and randomized 1:1 to receive oral TMZ 150-200mg/m[2]/day (D1-5) with either veliparib or placebo 40mg twice daily, orally (D1-7) (NCT01638546). Primary endpoint was 4-month progression free survival (PFS). Data were analyzed in patients with platinum sensitive (progression >60 days after 1st line therapy) or refractory disease (progression ≤60 days after 1st line therapy, or in need of 3rd line treatment). Archived tissue was available for 53 patients for biomarker analysis.
Results:
104 patients were enrolled and 100 patients were treated. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms: 52% female; median age 62.5 (range, 31-84); 59% refractory disease; 33% needing 3rd-line therapy. Progression free survival at 4-months was similar between the two arms, 36% vs. 27% (p=0.39). However, in 93 evaluable pts, response rate was significantly higher in pts treated with veliparib/TMZ compared to TMZ alone (39% vs 14%, p =0.016). Median overall survival: 8.2 mos (95% CI: 6.4-12.2) in veliparib arm and 7 mos (95% CI: 5.3-9.5) in placebo arm, p = 0.50. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia more commonly occurred in the veliparib/TMZ arm: 50% vs 9% and 31% vs 7%, respectively. Levels of SLFN11, a marker of SCLC response to PARP inhibition in preclinical models, were assessed by immunohistochemistry. High SLFN11 in patient tumors (obtained at original diagnosis) was associated with a trend towards better overall survival in the veliparib/TMZ arm, but no difference in outcome in the TMZ alone arm. Additional correlative studies are ongoing, including assessment of MGMT promoter methylation, and will be available at the time of presentation.
Conclusion:
The combination of veliparib/TMZ increased response rates significantly, compared to TMZ alone. Hematologic toxicities of the combination may have impacted PFS (which was not significantly different between the arms) by limiting dosing. Biomarkers such as SLFN11, ATM, or MGMT promoter methylation could potentially help guide patient selection in the SCLC population.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA05 - Treatment Advances in SCLC (ID 373)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: SCLC/Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:A. Ardizzoni, J. Pujol
- Coordinates: 12/05/2016, 14:20 - 15:50, Strauss 2
-
+
OA05.03 - Single-Agent Rovalpituzumab Tesirine, a Delta-Like Protein 3 (DLL3)-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC), in Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) (ID 4648)
14:40 - 14:50 | Author(s): L.A. Byers
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
SCLC is one of the most deadly malignancies. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (SC16LD6.5, Rova-T) is a first-in-class ADC directed against DLL3, a novel target identified in tumor initiating cells and expressed in over 80% of SCLC cases.
Methods:
Seventy-four patients with progressive SCLC after at least one previous systemic therapy were enrolled in a first-in-human study (NCT01901653), irrespective of DLL3 expression, including 68 at active doses of 0.2-0.4 mg/kg administered intravenously every 3 or 6 weeks. Available archived tumor tissue (n=48) was assessed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry for DLL3.
Results:
Among 60 evaluable subjects, active dose levels resulted in a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 18% and a confirmed clinical benefit rate (CBR; stable disease or better) of 68%. Among 26 evaluable subjects with DLL3 expression in at least 50% of tumor cells (DLL3-high), confirmed ORR and CBR were 39% and 89%, respectively. Median duration of response was 5.6 months. One-year survival rates among all and DLL3-high subjects were 18% and 32%, respectively. Among primary sensitive relapse patients, confirmed ORR and CBR among all subjects were 24% (8/33) and 67% (22/33); and among DLL3-high subjects were 53% (8/15) and 100% (15/15), with one-year survival rates of 17% and 33%, respectively. Among primary resistant/refractory relapse patients, confirmed ORR and CBR among all subjects were 12% (3/25) and 72% (18/25); and among DLL3-high subjects were 18% (2/11) and 73% (8/11), with one-year survival rates of 21% and 29%, respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities included thrombocytopenia (12%), serosal effusions (11%), and skin reactions (8%). ADC pharmacokinetics were linear with a terminal half-life of 10 - 14 days and anti-therapeutic antibodies did not develop
Conclusion:
Rovalpituzumab tesirine demonstrates encouraging single-agent anti-tumor activity with a manageable safety profile, including among patients with disease resistant or refractory to primary chemotherapy. Further development of rovalpituzumab tesirine in SCLC is warranted.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.07 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 459)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: SCLC/Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/05/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P1.07-024 - EGFR Mutations in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): Genetic Heterogeneity and Prognostic Impact (ID 4154)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L.A. Byers
- Abstract
Background:
EGFR mutations in SCLC were first reported in cases of lung adenocarcinoma which transformed to SCLC after TKI treatment and such mutation was speculated to be a TKI resistance mechanism. Recently case reports and high throughput sequencing in a small number of samples suggested that EGFR mutations do exist in de novo SCLC. But the genetic and clinical characteristics have not been studied in large number of samples. This study aims to conduct a large scale survey of the EGFR mutations among Chinese SCLC patients, and to analyze the genetic and clinical characteristics of such mutations.
Methods:
Mutation status in exon 18-21 of EGFR was assessed by dideoxy-sequencing in 565 SCLC tumors treated in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China from 2009 to 2014 and correlated with clinical parameters. Chi-square test were used to show the correlation of clinic variables with EGFR mutation. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results:
40 instances of EGFR mutation are detected in 565 clinical samples. The mutation rate is 7.1%. Besides classic mutations E19 deletion（n=3）and E21 L858R(n=3), the rest of the mutations detected are atypical including E18 (G719D/S, G696R, S695N/D, N700D, I715F, L688F, P694L), E19(K757N, A755V, V742I, E736K, N756Y, E749K, P753L, A755T), E20 (T790M, H773R, S768R/N, R776H/C, G796D, D807N, R803W/Q, Y813C, G810S, A763T, G779D, Q791R, C781Y, N771S), E21(L858V, G874R, K867E). Among the EGFR mutation positive patients, 27.5% (11/40) are non-smokers, higher than the EGFR negative group (16.4%, 86/525). But it is not statistically significant (p=0.129). And EGFR mutation is not correlated with sex (female vs male), age (≥65y vs <65y) or clinical stages (limited stage vs extensive stage). After matching the treatment history of the EGFR mutation positive and negative patients (excluding patients who were not treated ,only treated by traditional Chinese medicine or one cycle chemotherapy or biological therapy , treatment unkown ), univariate analysis shows that the EGFR mutation positive patients have better overall survival than the EGFR negative group, with medium OS of 24.433m±4.864m vs 14.00m±0.838m respectively (p=0.018). COX regression analysis suggests that limited stage (HR=2.610), <65 years (HR=1.476) and EGFR mutation (HR=0.587, p=0. 0.039) were independently predictive of better OS.
Conclusion:
Among the de novo SCLC patients diagnosed, there exists a group harboring EGFR mutations, most of which are non-classic mutations. After matching the treatment history of patients, analysis reveals that EGFR mutations are predictive of better OS.
-
+
P2.06 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 467)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Scientific Co-Operation/Research Groups (Clinical Trials in Progress should be submitted in this category)
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/06/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P2.06-028 - A Phase 2 Study of Prexasertib in Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 4176)
14:30 - 14:30 | Author(s): L.A. Byers
- Abstract
Background:
Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1), plays a role in cell cycle regulation and DNA damage repair. Prexasertib monomesylate monohydrate (prexasertib, or LY2606368) inhibits CHK1 and induces replication catastrophe. As monotherapy, it demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and preliminary evidence of efficacy in Phase 1. Replication stress, together with defects in cell cycle checkpoints and/or DNA damage repair pathways may sensitize tumors to CHK1 inhibitors. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) tumors have high levels of replication stress through mechanisms such as MYC amplification and high rates of TP53 mutations, RB1 loss, and genomic rearrangements. Preclinical models of SCLC demonstrate sensitivity to prexasertib monotherapy. As a result, prexasertib is an attractive agent to evaluate in patients with SCLC.
Methods:
This is a parallel cohort, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase 2 study (NCT02735980) in patients with extensive disease (ED)-SCLC. Cohort 1 includes patients with platinum-sensitive disease (objective response to prior platinum-based therapy with subsequent progression ≥90 days after last platinum dose). Cohort 2 includes patients with platinum‑resistant/refractory disease (patients who either did not have an objective response to prior platinum-based therapy or had progression <90 days after last platinum dose). The primary objective is best overall response rate per cohort as determined per RECIST v1.1. Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety/toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy measures; which include overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, and disease control rate. Safety will be assessed by collecting and grading AEs as per CTCAE v4.0. Exploratory biomarkers associated with efficacy and safety of prexasertib may also be assessed. Key inclusion criteria include: patients ≥18 years having histologic or cytologic diagnosis of ED‑SCLC who received prior platinum therapy; ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1; ECOG performance status of 0 or 1; discontinued prior therapies ≥14 days before first dose of prexasertib. Key exclusion criteria include: received ≥2 prior therapies for ED-SCLC; symptomatic CNS metastases, prior treatment with CHK1 inhibitor; or serious cardiac conditions. Prexasertib will be administered as intravenous infusion every 14 days. Disease will be assessed by radiographic imaging every 6 weeks. Approximately 116 patients (58 per cohort) are planned for enrollment in 10 countries (>60 sites). An interim futility analysis will be conducted in each cohort after 29 patients have completed cycle 3 and, if required, the response is confirmed. Enrollment began in May 2016.
Results:
Section not applicable.
Conclusion:
Section not applicable.
