Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

S.L. Able



Author of

  • +

    MINI 29 - Meta Analyses and Trial Conduct (ID 156)

    • Event: WCLC 2015
    • Type: Mini Oral
    • Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MINI29.08 - Innovation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Where Are the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes? (ID 1280)

      19:10 - 19:15  |  Author(s): S.L. Able

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recently developed a set of recommended targets for clinically meaningful outcomes to encourage patients, advocates and investigators to expect more of clinical trials in the future and to encourage investigators to design trials and select agents that have the most promise. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify where and how research has successfully met the bar for meaningful improvements in NSCLC patient survival.

      Methods:
      A systematic search strategy was implemented in MedLine and EMBASE to identify randomized phase III trials reporting overall survival (OS) outcomes from 1974-present. Eligible studies were those that reported OS data in terms of a hazard ratio (HR) or median OS. Patients in the eligible randomized trials were NSCLC patients treated in the first (1L) or post-first line (2L+) setting. Data were extracted related to study population, histology, interventions, and survival from trials of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. All eligibility determinations and extracted data were reviewed by two researchers for accuracy.

      Results:
      The search strategy identified 2051 articles that were reviewed for eligibility. Of these, 245 were eligible for inclusion. 198 (80.8%) studied 1L, 45 (18.4%) 2L+, and 2 investigated both lines. Of all articles, 51 (20.8%) found significant improvement in survival (Figure 1). Of these, 45 (88.2%) were 1L (41 studies). 14/41 (34.1%) were terminated early or had major protocol changes during study enrollment, and 5/41 (12.2%) reported inconsistent outcomes. In significant 1L studies, the median OS improvement ranged from 0.3-7.0m and HRs ranged from 0.35 to 0.87. The 4 2L+ positive studies, OS improvement ranged from 1.4-2.8m and HRs from 0.70-0.86. Of all 198 1L publications, 12 studies met the significant HR <0.80 bar and an additional 12 studies reported statistically significant gains of ≥2.5m OS. Figure 1. Publications reporting significant improvement in survival Figure 1



      Conclusion:
      There is a need to improve survival outcomes for patients in NSCLC. In 1L, few studies would have met the ASCO target. Only four 2L+ trials were identified with significant improvements in NSCLC. The results of this systematic literature review inform the interpretation of research and the new bar recommended for meaningful outcomes.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.