Virtual Library
Start Your Search
T. Curran
Author of
-
+
ORAL 36 - Translational Science/Radiation (ID 151)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Treatment of Locoregional Disease – NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:E. Vokes, B. Kavanagh
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, Mile High Ballroom 2c-3c
-
+
ORAL36.05 - Results of a National Database Review of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic versus Open Lobectomy after Induction Therapy (ID 1533)
17:28 - 17:39 | Author(s): T. Curran
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Minimally invasive lobectomy has become the standard of care approach for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however video assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy after induction therapy remains controversial. We sought to evaluate perioperative outcomes of VATS and open lobectomy after induction therapy using a national database.
Methods:
A cohort study of patients that underwent VATS and open lobectomy after induction chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2005 through 2012. Perioperative complications and mortality were compared between groups. Comparisons were made using two-sided student’s t-test or chi square test as appropriate.
Results:
A total of 6730 patients underwent lobectomy during the study period and 166 patients had prior induction therapy (open = 132, VATS = 34). There were no statistically significant differences in age, comorbidities or ASA class between groups. There were no significant differences in the surgeon specialty between groups (cardiac, thoracic, general, and vascular). Operative time was similar (VATS: 228 minutes, Open: 190 minutes; p = 0.07). Perioperative complications, return to OR, respiratory complication, mortality, and hospital length of stay were similar between groups. Table 1. Patient Demographics
VATS = video assisted thoracoscopic, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ASA= American Society of Anesthesia class Table 2. Post-Operative OutcomesN (%) All (N = 166) Open (N = 132) VATS (N = 34) P-value Age, yrs; Mean (SD) 62.9 (10.2) 62.4 (10.7) 65.2 (7.6) 0.077 Female 88 (53) 72 (55) 16 (49) 0.563 Diabetes 16 (10) 11 (8) 5 (15) 0.325 COPD 35 (21) 26 (20) 9 (27) 0.479 Creatinine > 1.2 17 (10) 13 (10) 4 (12) 0.757 ASA Class ≥4 18 (11) 14 (11) 4 (12)
VATS= video assisted thoracoscopic, LOS = length of stay, OR= operating roomN (%) All (N = 166) Open (N = 132) VATS (N = 34) P-value LOS, days; mean (SD) 7.3 (6.1) 7.4 (6.1) 6.6 (6.3) 0.471 Wound complication 5 (3) 5 (4) 0 0.584 Pneumonia 16 (10) 15 (11) 1 (3) 0.197 Reintubation 18 (11) 15 (11) 3 (9) 1.000 Respiratory complication 25 (15) 22 (17) 3 (9) 0.419 Return to OR 15 (9) 14 (11) 1 (3) 0.311 In hospital mortality 9 (5) 8 (6) 1 (3) 0.687 30 day mortality 13 (8) 12 (9) 1 (3) 0.471
Conclusion:
This is the first review of a prospective national database comparing outcomes for VATS and open lobectomy after induction therapy for NSCLC. VATS lobectomy appears to be safe with no increased morbidity or mortality compared to open in patients that had prior induction therapy. A larger series of matched VATS and open approaches after induction therapy is needed.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.