Virtual Library
Start Your Search
A. Vennettilli
Author of
-
+
P3.04 - Poster Session/ Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing (ID 235)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P3.04-044 - EGFR and ALK Status Influence Health Utility and Global Quality of Life Scores in Patients with Metastatic Lung Cancer (ID 1613)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): A. Vennettilli
- Abstract
Background:
EGFR mutations and EML4-ALK rearrangements play important roles in prognosis and response to treatment. While extending survival is a main goal of treatment, improving symptoms, well-being, and quality of life is an equally important priority.
Methods:
At Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, a cross-sectional study evaluated 224 outpatients with metastatic lung cancer who completed demographic and EQ5D-3L questionnaires generating health utility scores (HUS, 0-1) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) slider (0-100). Patients rated their ECOG performance status (0-4), and described their health over the last month from 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor). Results were correlated with clinical and demographic data. Our objective was to compare HUS and global quality of life by mutational status. Patients with EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements were enriched through targeted enrolment, while patients with neither alteration were selected randomly from the same outpatient clinics.
Results:
94 patients (42%) had an EGFR mutation, 23 (10%) an ALK rearrangement and 107 (48%) had neither (“wildtype”) in their tumor. Participation rate was 87%. Characteristics of the populations were as expected, with higher rates of never smokers in patients with EGFR or ALK alterations (p<0.0001), greater proportion of Asians (p=0.0004), and higher proportion of adenocarcinoma (p<0.0001). Current systemic treatment differed among groups, as the majority of patients with driver mutations were receiving targeted agents at the time of assessment (77% EGFR and 65% ALK vs 7% wildtype). Conversely, wildtype patients were more likely on chemotherapy (6% vs 17% vs 38%) or not on treatment (17% vs 17% vs 47%, p<0.0001). Patients filled questionnaires on average 25 months after initial diagnosis of lung cancer. Patients with EGFR mutations (97%) or ALK rearrangements (100%) were more often ECOG performance status 0-1 at the time of diagnosis of stage IV disease than wildtype individuals (86%, p=0.02). For quality of life analysis, we regrouped the patients with EGFR/ALK alterations (n=117). Their mean HUS was better than for wildtype patients (0.80 vs 0.71, p=0.0003), their mean VAS slider was higher (66.9 vs 60.8, p=0.0381) and their mean self-rated ECOG scores was better (0.90 vs 1.26, p=0.022).
Conclusion:
In a clinical population, patients with metastatic lung cancer harboring EGFR and ALK alterations report superior HUS and global quality of life scores when compared with patients without these molecular changes, during the course of their therapy. This is reflected in higher proportion of patients on active therapy, particularly with molecularly targeted agents, and with improved self-reported performance scores. Health utility values used in economic analyses of metastatic lung cancer patients in clinical practice should be specific for different mutations.
