Virtual Library
Start Your Search
B. Van Putte
Author of
-
+
P3.03 - Poster Session/ Treatment of Locoregional Disease – NSCLC (ID 214)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Treatment of Locoregional Disease – NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P3.03-029 - No Inferior Outcomes after Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Stage I and II NSCLC Compared with Surgery (ID 134)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): B. Van Putte
- Abstract
Background:
Surgical resection is the treatment of first choice for patients who are diagnosed with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, last years, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has shown to be a good alternative treatment, especially for the elderly or for patients with a poor pulmonary function. We compared the overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and locoregional and distant recurrence between patients with stage I and II NSCLC treated with SBRT or surgery.
Methods:
Patients who were diagnosed with stage I and II NSCLC between 2008 and 2011 and treated with SBRT or surgery were included. Crude survival and recurrence rates in both groups were evaluated and compared by Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses. Since the selection of treatment is influenced by patients characteristics, we used the propensity score method to account for this bias. Propensity scores were estimated by a logistic regression model that included treatment as dependent variable and age, gender, performance status, FEV~1~, DLCO, nodule diameter and clinical TNM classification as independent variable. The propensity score was added as covariate to Cox proportional hazard analyses to adjust the outcome for patient characteristics.
Results:
The cohort treated with SBRT and surgery consisted of 53 and 175 patients, respectively. Before adjustment for the propensity score, the OS at 1 and 3 years after SBRT was 87% and 43% and after surgery 89% and 70% (HR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.65 – 3.56; p = 0.0001). The PFS at 1 and 3 years was 72% and 39% after SBRT and 80% and 60% after surgery (HR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.43 – 2.99; p = 0.0001). The locoregional recurrence rates at 1 year after SBRT and surgery were 94% and 95% and at 3 years for both 85% (HR = 1.43 ; 95% CI = 0.60 – 3.43; p = 0.42). The distant recurrence rates at 1 and 3 years after SBRT were 73% and 62% and after surgery 88% and 74% (HR = 1.67; 95% CI = 0.96 – 3.92; p = 0.07). After adjustment for the propensity score, the OS and PFS after SBRT were not significantly different compared with surgery (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 0.87 – 3.35; p = 0.12 respectively HR = 1.56; 95% CI 0.83 – 2.93; p = 0.17). The locoregional and distant recurrence rates between SBRT and surgery were also not significantly different (HR = 2.11; 95% CI = 0.56 – 7.75; p = 0.26 respectively HR = 1.24; 95% CI = 0.48 – 3.20; p = 0.65).
Conclusion:
This study shows that, after adjustment for the propensity score, the OS, PFS and recurrence rates after SBRT are not inferior compared with surgery in patients with stage I and II NSCLC. Although, we used the propensity score to reduce the effects of confounding by indication, randomized clinical trials are desired. Due to the lack of these trials, a thorough discussion of the patient individual merits and drawbacks of surgery and SBRT should be the cornerstone of the treatment.
