Author of

• 15144

  +

  ORAL 29 - MASCC-IASLC Joint Session: Palliative and Supportive Care (ID 136)

  • Event: WCLC 2015
  • Type: Oral Session
  • Track: Palliative and Supportive Care
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:A. Molasiotis, P. Van Houtte
  • Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, 708+710+712

  • 15147

    +

    ORAL29.03 - Efficacy of the Antiemetic Combination Agent, NEPA, in Patients with Lung Cancer Receiving Platinum Chemotherapy (ID 1275)

    17:07 - 17:18  |  Author(s): M. Palmas
    • Abstract
    • Presentation
    • Slides

    Background:
    Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with first-line chemotherapy treatments consisting predominantly of emetogenic platinum agents. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) can be prevented in most patients with appropriate combination antiemetic regimens. The antiemetic standard-of-care for patients receiving cisplatin consists of a combination of a NK~1~ receptor antagonist (NK~1~RA), a 5-HT~3~ RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). Adherence to antiemetic guidelines is unacceptably low with patients frequently not receiving recommended antiemetic combinations. NEPA has been developed as the first oral antiemetic combination; it delivers guideline-consistent prophylaxis with its combination of a highly selective NK~1~ RA (netupitant [NETU] 300 mg) and the pharmacologically/clinically distinct 5-HT~3~ RA, palonosetron (PALO 0.50 mg). NEPA has demonstrated superior prevention of CINV compared with oral PALO. The intent of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of NEPA in a subset of lung cancer patients from two of the pivotal trials.
    
    Methods:
    Patients in two randomized, double-blind trials received a single dose of NEPA on Day 1 prior to cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Three dose groups (NETU 100/200/300 mg + PALO 0.50 mg) showing similar efficacy were pooled in Study 1, while all patients in Study 2 received NETU 300mg/PALO 0.50 mg. All patients also received oral DEX on Day 1 (carboplatin) or Days 1-4 (cisplatin). Study 1 was single cycle, while Study 2 included evaluation over multiple chemotherapy cycles. The focus of this analysis was on the efficacy of NEPA only, as a PALO comparator group was included in only one of these studies. Endpoints were complete response (CR: no emesis, no rescue) and no significant nausea (max <25 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale) during the acute (0-24h), delayed (25-120h), and overall (0-120h) phases.
    
    Results:
    231 patients (78% males, 22% females) with lung cancer received NEPA; 152 patients received cisplatin and 79 received carboplatin as initial chemotherapy. CR rates in Cycle 1 exceeded 90% in Study 1 and 80% in Study 2 (Table). As expected, overall nausea rates were somewhat lower than CR rates (87% Study 1, 80% Study 2). Overall CR rates were maintained over subsequent cycles in Study 2 (87%, 95% and 94% in Cycles 2-4, respectively). Figure 1
    
    
    
    Conclusion:
    As a combination antiemetic agent targeting two critical pathways associated with emesis, NEPA offers a convenient and highly effective option for prevention of CINV in lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based emetogenic chemotherapy.
    
    

    Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

    Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.