Virtual Library
Start Your Search
M.D. Johnson
Author of
-
+
ORAL 19 - Radiation for Localized Lung Cancer (ID 126)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Treatment of Localized Disease - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:D. De Ruysscher, M. Hiraoka
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 10:45 - 12:15, 102+104+106
-
+
ORAL19.02 - Higher Risk of Failure and Death after Stereotactic Lung Radiotherapy for T2 Lung Cancer (ID 2945)
10:56 - 11:07 | Author(s): M.D. Johnson
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Limited data are available on the use of SBRT for tumors larger than 3cm. We analyzed results from a collaborative database to compare clinical outcomes for patients with tumors > 3cm to those with smaller tumors (<3cm).
Methods:
1192 patients with 1288 T1-T3N0M0 tumors underwent cone-beam CT image-guided lung SBRT between 10/2004-12/2014. The median prescription dose was 50 Gy in 3 fractions (range 24-64 Gy in 1-10) to the PTV. Patient, tumor and treatment factors and clinical outcomes were extracted from the database. Local recurrence (LR), regional recurrence (RR), distant metastasis (DM), overall (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were calculated from SBRT completion using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Student’s unpaired t-test and Pearson chi-square/Fisher’s Exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables between groups, respectively.
Results:
Mean follow-up time was 2.1y (0.02-10.12y) and similar for both groups. 295 tumors were > 3cm (T2) and 993 < 3cm (T1) (mean size 3.98 v 1.91cm (0.5-9.6cm), p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for gender, pulmonary function (median FEV1 1.7 L (56-60% predicted); DLCO 10 ml/min/mmHg (50-51% predicted), medical inoperability (89%), PET (94%) or any invasive mediastinal staging (6%). T1 patients were slightly younger (73.5y T1 v 76.0y T2, p<0.01) and had mildly better ECOG (80% 0-1 T1 v 71% 0-1 T2, p=0.001). T2 tumors were more often biopsied (74% T2 v 63% T1, p<0.001), less often non-squamous (74% v 83%, p=0.002), had higher SUVmax (10.3 T2 v 6.4 T1, p<0.001), more often central (0236) (19% T2 v 11% T1, p=0.001) and treated to a median prescription dose of 53.8Gy T2 v 52.2Gy T1, p<0.001. 3% received chemotherapy (T1 2.6% v T2 4.4%, p=0.11). Although LR was similar between groups, large tumors had a higher risk of RR, DM and death (Table 1). On univariate analysis, LR was predicted by multiple BED parameters (p<0.001), baseline SUVmax (p=0.003) and squamous histology (p=0.012); RR was higher for lower lobe tumors (p=0.008); DM (p=0.006) was higher while OS and CSS lower for central tumors (p=0.03, 0.01).Clinical Outcome Tumor < 3 cm Tumor > 3 cm p-value Local recurrence 3y 7% 11% 0.13 5y 11% 13% Regional Recurrence 3y 9% 13% 0.006 5y 11% 24% Distant Metastasis 3y 11% 16% <0.001 5y 16% 18% Cause-Specific Survival 3y 88% 73% <0.001 5y 81% 66% Overall Survival 3y 61% 45% <0.001 5y 42% 28%
Conclusion:
Large tumors had a higher risk of RR, DM and death after SBRT. These data have implications for consideration and study of pre-SBRT invasive nodal staging and/or systemic therapy in this population. OS and CSS were lower for central tumors warranting further analysis.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
