Virtual Library
Start Your Search
H.T. Kim
Author of
-
+
MINI 07 - ChemoRT and Translational Science (ID 110)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Treatment of Locoregional Disease – NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:D. Raben, B. Kavanagh
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, 201+203
-
+
MINI07.09 - Incorporating Erlotinib Into Chemoradiation Therapy for Unresectable Stage IIIA/B NSCLC: Interim Results of Ongoing Phase II Randomized Trial (ID 1761)
17:30 - 17:35 | Author(s): H.T. Kim
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Combined chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) improves long-term outcome of patients (pts) with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most pts die from distant failure due to preexisting occult metastases. Based on the premise that EGFR-TKI would improve the outcome of pts with stage III NSCLC that harbors sensitive EGFR mutations, as for the pts with stage IV NSCLC, we initiated a randomized phase II pilot trial that incorporated erlotinib (E) into CCRT treatment paradigms.
Methods:
Eligible pts over 18 years old with unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC, ECOG PS 0–1, and adequate organ function were screened for EGFR mutation in axons 18–21 in the tumor sample. Those with EGFR mutation (+) tumors were randomized upfront to receive 3 cycles of 3-weekly E 150 mg/day treatment, and then either E x2 cycles concurrently with CCRT and x6 more cycles after CCRT (Arm A) or CCRT with 2 cycles of irinotecan-cisplatin (IP) but no additional therapy after CCRT (Arm B). When disease progression (PD) is documented during follow-up, E was re-instituted. Pts with EGFR mutation (-) or unknown tumors were randomized to receive either 3 cycles of IP induction followed by CCRT concurrently with 2 cycles of IP (Arm C) or CCRT with IP x2 first then consolidation with IP x3 (Arm D). IP chemo dose-schedule was irinotecan 60 mg/m[2] and cisplatin 30mg/m[2] iv on days 1 and 8 when given concurrently with RT (2.4 Gy/fx, total 60 Gy); irinotecan 65 mg/m[2] and cisplatin 30 mg/m[2] iv on days 1 and 8 when given every 3 weeks as induction or consolidation. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), toxicity, and overall survival (OS).
Results:
From 02/2008 to 03/2015, 59 pts (44 men and 8 women) with median age of 62 years (range: 37-78) were enrolled. There were 13 never smokers, 28 had adenocarcinoma, and 44 had IIIB tumors. EGFR mutation was (+) in 12, (-) in 28, and unknown in 19. There was apparent imbalance in histology and smoking status between the pts assigned to Arms A&B and C&D. ORR after induction E therapy was 75.0% for the 12 pts with EGFR mutation(+) tumors (Arm A, n=7; B, n=5). ORR after IP induction therapy was 63.6% for pts with EGFR mutation(-) or unknown tumors in Arm C (n=22). After completion of upfront CCRT therapy with IP in Arm D (n=25), ORR was 68.0%. There were no noticeable unusual side-effects. Median PFS for Arm A, B, C, and D, was 11.84, 8.09, 8.36, and 11.81 months respectively, with a trend toward better OS for pts with EGFR mutation(+) tumors (Arm A: not reached, B: 31.18 mos) than those EGFR mutation(-) or unknown tumors (Arm C: 17.93 mos, Arm D: 25.33 mos).
Conclusion:
The combined-modality treatment by molecular diagnostics is feasible in stage III NSCLC patients. Although the number is rather small, pts with EGFR mutation (+) tumors seem to be a distinct subset with better overall survival than the others, which warrants careful consideration in chemoradiation therapy trial design and outcome evaluation.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL 32 - EGFR WT and MT Targeting (ID 144)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:K.J. O'Byrne, D.R. Gandara
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, Four Seasons Ballroom F3+F4
-
+
ORAL32.07 - Randomized Phase II Trial of Sequential Gefitinib and Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Stage IIIB/IV Lung Adenocarcinoma in Never Smokers (ID 1332)
17:50 - 18:01 | Author(s): H.T. Kim
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
While concurrent administration of EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy failed to improve the survival outcome, preclinical and clinical data suggested that sequential administration of EGFR-TKI within a chemotherapy cycle might improve the clinical outcome by avoiding the putative antagonism of TKI-induced G1 arrest of the cell cycle phase-dependent activity of chemotherapy. This study was designed to evaluate this idea with gefitinib and Pemetrexed/Cisplatin (Pem/Cis), the best known regimen for lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), in never-smokers with chemo-naive ADC of the lung.
Methods:
Eligible patients (pts) were never-smokers with chemo-naive stage IIIB/IV ADC, performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ functions, who were randomized after stratification by the EGFR mutation status (positive vs. negative/unknown) to receive either gefitinib (G) 250 mg/day or placebo (P) on days 5-18 of a 3-weekly cycle of chemotherapy, which consisted of Pem 500 mg/m[2] and cisplatin(Cis) 75mg/m[2] given iv on day 1, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 9 cycles. Responding patients continued to receive either G or P every day until PD or unacceptable toxicity. After documentation of PD, pts who had been on P arm were crossed over to receive G. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Results:
Between 06/2012 and 12/2014, 76 pts (M/F: 9/67) with median age of 58.0 years (range 32-75) were enrolled; 72 pts had stage IV and 4 had IIIB tumors. EGFR mutation was (+) in 29, (-) in 43, and unknown in 4. As of 03/17/2015, while randomization code is not broken yet, 53 pts are off treatment (48 due to PD, 2 deaths, 2 patient’s refusal, and 1 due to intercurrent brain tumor) and 19 pts are known dead (17 due to PD and 2 due to other causes). Overall, more pts with EGFR mt(+) tumor received 6 cycles of therapy than those with EGFR mt(-) tumor [28/29 (97%) vs. 32/43 (73%)] and completed 9 cycles of therapy as planned [19/29 (66%) vs. 14/43 (33%)]. The treatment was well tolerated with less G-associated skin toxicities, due to intermittent administration schedule of G per protocol. The most common G3/4 adverse events were: anemia (17.1%), neutropenia (15.8%), vomiting (5.3%), thrombocytopenia (3.9%), and peripheral neuropathy (3.9%). There was no unexpected safety issue except for more Cis-associated peripheral neuropathy which became more noticeable as the treatment continued beyond 6 cycles of therapy. Median PFS was 8.2 months (mos) for the entire group, and 10.6 mos and 6.6 mos for EGFR mt(+) and mt(-) groups, respectively. Overall median survival has not been reached yet with an estimated 2-year survival rate of 56.3%.
Conclusion:
First-line sequential administration of G with Pem/Cis chemotherapy was well tolerated with no undue side effects or any compromise in efficacy parameters. Detailed data will be presented to see whether this strategy warrants further investigation in a certain subset of pts with advanced NSCLC.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
