Virtual Library
Start Your Search
M. Vyfhuis
Author of
-
+
P1.03 - Poster Session/ Treatment of Locoregional Disease – NSCLC (ID 212)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Treatment of Locoregional Disease – NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P1.03-029 - Obesity Is Associated with Long-Term Improved Survival in Definitively Treated Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LA-NSCLC) (ID 2958)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): M. Vyfhuis
- Abstract
Background:
Limited studies suggest that obese patients (pts) with NSCLC paradoxically have improved survival. However, characterization of factors influencing Body Mass Index (BMI) at disease presentation and the impact that it may have on outcomes in NSCLC patients remains incomplete. We evaluated the prognostic effect of BMI in a retrospective cohort treated for LA-NSCLC (AJCC 7[th] edition stage III).
Methods:
From January 2000 to December 2010, 311 consecutive LA-NSCLC pts were definitively treated at our institution with chemotherapy and radiotherapy ± surgery. Radiation was most commonly administered with concurrent chemotherapy. After excluding pts for whom pre-treatment BMI was not available, we evaluated 291 pts who were stratified into four BMI groups based on World Health Organization criteria: underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 to < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 to < 30 kg/m2), and obese (>= 30 kg/m2). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with log-rank test-for-trend. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used for univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results:
Baseline characteristics were similar between obese and normal weight pts (Table 1). Median survival was 17 months (mo), 19 mo, 23 mo, and 29 mo for each BMI group respectively. A trend for improved survival with increasing BMI was highly significant (P=0.009) and persisted even when underweight cases were excluded, suggesting that the survival benefit is not driven by unfavorable prognostic factors in the underweight cases. There was a sustained 31% to 58% reduction in mortality of obese relative to normal weight pts (HR 0.68±0.21, 0.61±0.19, and 0.42±0.19, for each year post-treatment respectively). Additionally, there was no correlation between BMI and smoking pack-years, even when underweight pts were excluded. (correlation coefficient 0.033 [95% CI 0.09 – 0.15, P=0.59]). Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of Study Cohort Figure 1
Conclusion:
In this retrospective study of definitively treated LA-NSCLC patients, obese pts had significantly improved survival relative to normal weight pts. This favorable prognostic effect was independent of stage and was significantly more durable than previously reported in advanced NSCLC patients. Additionally, the putative relationship between BMI and smoking history was not observed in this cohort. These new findings suggest that the protective effect of obesity in NSCLC is not solely due to short-term treatment effects or decreased smoking exposure. We plan to investigate additional parameters such as histology, chemoradiation course, subsequent surgery, and metformin use to further clarify the role of obesity in survival of NSCLC pts.
-
+
P2.01 - Poster Session/ Treatment of Advanced Diseases – NSCLC (ID 207)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P2.01-082 - Pathological Response with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 2156)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): M. Vyfhuis
- Abstract
Background:
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) are among the most common medications in the treatment of hypertension and diabetes. These drugs are under evaluation as a means to mitigate radiation pneumonitis/fibrosis likely mediated by anti-inflammatory and endothelial effects. Their collateral impact on oncological outcomes is unknown. We retrospectively evaluate the effect of ACEi and ARB usage on pathological response during preoperative platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with high-dose radiotherapy (≥59.4 Gy) in a cohort of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods:
Between June 2000 and December 2009, 79 patients with stage III NSCLC (AJCC 7[th] ed.) were treated with preoperative CCRT at our institution. Data on ACEi/ARB usage during CCRT and pathological response was available for 72 patients. The primary end-point was pathological complete response (pCR), in both the primary site and involved lymph nodes. X[2] analysis was to assess distribution of categorical variables, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log rank test for univariate and Cox regression multivariate (age, gender, race, stage, RT dose and chemotherapy regimen) analysis of overall survival (OS) and freedom-from recurrence (FFR) was performed.
Results:
The median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 38-78) with 56% males, 74% Caucasians and 96% smokers. Stage distribution was IIIA (72%), IIIB (28%), T1/2 (54%), T3/4 (46%), N0/1 (14%) and N2/3 (86%). The median radiation dose was 66.6 Gy (range 59.4-69.6 Gy) with the most common CCRT regimen being carboplatin-paclitaxel (54%). At a median follow up of 3.8 years for all patients and 6.8 years for surviving patients, the median OS and FFR of the entire cohort were 4.9 years (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 3.5-6.5) and 3.1 years (95% CI: 1.3-4.9), respectively with overall pCR rate of 44%. During CCRT, 11 patients (15%) were taking ACEi/ARB and 61 patients (85%) were not taking ACEi/ARB. No statistical differences were seen in the distribution of baseline variables between the two cohorts. None of the patients developed acute radiation pneumonitis in the time interval between radiotherapy completion and surgery (median 55 days; range, 33-105 days). The pCR rate without and with ACEi/ARB was 46% vs 36% (p=0.56). The median FFR without and with concurrent ACEi/ARB use was 3.1 years vs. not reached, p = 0.35, while the corresponding median OS values were 4.8 years and 5.5 years, p = 0.59, respectively. On multivariate analysis, an improved OS was associated with younger age (HR: 0.39, 95%CI: 0.2-0.8, p<0.01), an improved FFR was associated with lower stage (HR: 0.3, 95%CI: 0.15-0.76, p<0.01) and Caucasian race (HR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.88, p=0.02), with no impact of ACEi/ARB use on either outcome.
Conclusion:
The use of ACEi/ARB did not have any apparent influence the rates of pCR in this small cohort of advanced stage NSCLC patients treated with trimodality therapy following preoperative platinum-based CCRT with high-dose radiotherapy. As the role of these drugs in mitigating radiation pneumonitis continues to be evaluated, simultaneous assessment of lack of a negative impact on disease outcomes needs to be validated in larger, prospective analyses.
-
+
P2.04 - Poster Session/ Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing (ID 234)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P2.04-058 - Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as a Prognostic Marker in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LANSCLC) (ID 2404)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): M. Vyfhuis
- Abstract
Background:
NLR is a measure of systemic inflammation which appears prognostic in localized and advanced NSCLC. Increased systemic inflammation portends a poorer prognosis in cancer patients. We hypothesize that low NLR measured at diagnosis is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in patients with LANSCLC.
Methods:
Records from 276 patients with stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation with or without surgery at our institution between 2000 and 2010 with adequate data were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline patient demographic data and pre-treatment absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were collected. Patients were grouped into quartiles based on NLR. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the logrank test was used to compare mortality between groups. A linear test-for-trend was used for the NLR quartile groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for other prognostic factors in a multivariable analysis. Distributions of NLR in subgroups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. All P-values are 2-tailed.
Results:
NLR was a highly prognostic factor for overall survival (p<0.0001). Median survival [95% CI] for the first, second, third and fourth quartile groups of the population distribution of NLR were 27 months [19-36], 28 months [22-34], 22 months [12-31] and 10 months [8-12], respectively. NLR correlated with race, gender, stage and performance status. Even after adjusting for stage (IIIA vs. IIIB), NLR remained predictive of overall survival (p=0.001). Figure 1 Figure 2
Conclusion:
To our knowledge, this is the first large series evaluating NLR as a prognostic indicator in LANSCLC. Pre-treatment NLR is strongly associated with OS in LANSCLC. NLR is an inexpensive biomarker which is significantly prognostic even after adjusting for race, gender and stage. It can be easily utilized at the time of LANSCLC diagnosis to help predict life expectancy. As an indicator of inflammatory response, it should be explored in the context of immunomodulatory therapy.
