Virtual Library
Start Your Search
H.J.M. Groen
Author of
-
+
P1.01 - Poster Session/ Treatment of Advanced Diseases – NSCLC (ID 206)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P1.01-086 - TIGER-3: A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized Study of Rociletinib vs Chemotherapy in NSCLC (ID 949)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): H.J.M. Groen
- Abstract
Background:
Rociletinib (CO-1686) is a novel, oral, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of patients with mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has demonstrated efficacy against the activating mutations (L858R and Del19) and the dominant acquired resistance mutation (T790M), while sparing wild-type EGFR. TIGER-X, a Phase I/II dose-ranging trial, has provided evidence that rociletinib is associated with durable response and is well tolerated in patients with NSCLC and positive T790M status following progression on a TKI.[1 ]Efficacy has also been noted for patients with T790M negative status in TIGER-X.[2] TIGER-3 is designed to investigate single agent rociletinib vs chemotherapy in patients who have failed EGFR therapy and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, which is a setting of acquired resistance and high unmet need for targeted therapeutic options. TIGER-3 will evaluate patients with T790M positive and negative status based on tumor biopsies and plasma, and biomarkers of response and/or resistance.
Methods:
Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable locally advanced NSCLC, with radiological progression on the most recent therapy will be enrolled in this phase 3, randomized, open-label study (NCT02322281). Patients must have documented evidence of a tumor with ≥1 EGFR activating mutations excluding exon 20 insertion, and prior treatment with an EGFR TKI and platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive rociletinib twice daily (500 mg) or single agent cytotoxic chemotherapy (investigator choice specified before randomization) until disease progression according to RECIST 1.1. Patients will be stratified by presence or absence of brain metastases, ECOG performance status (0 vs 1), and race (Asian vs non-Asian). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include safety, objective response rates, duration of response, disease control rate, and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier methodology will assess time to event variables. The stratified log-rank and the hazard ratio will be used for comparing PFS distributions. Serial assessment of safety will be carried out based on standard adverse event reporting. Planned enrolment is 600 patients; enrolment has been open since March 2015. Sequist LV J Clin Oncol. 2014 Soria J-C EORTC-NCI-AACR 2014
Results:
Not applicable
Conclusion:
Not applicable
-
+
P3.01 - Poster Session/ Treatment of Advanced Diseases – NSCLC (ID 208)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P3.01-044 - FDG-PET/CT Based Response Prediction of Stage IV NSCLC Treated with Paclitaxel-Carboplatin-Bevacizumab with or without Nitroglycerin (ID 1229)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): H.J.M. Groen
- Abstract
Background:
A prospective study in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was performed to assess the predictive value of early response of the primary tumor evaluated by [18F]FDG-PET/CT to bevacizumab containing combination therapy with or without nitroglycerin (NTG) patches as first line treatment. NTG is a vasodilator which is hypothesized to increase tumor blood flow thereby decrease hypoxia, and 1) leading to a decrease in [18F]FDG uptake, and 2) facilitating early response assessment using [18F]FDG to predict treatment outcome.
Methods:
In total, 223 patients were randomized between carboplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab (PCB) with or without NTG (day -2 to +3; NVALT12 trial, NCT01171170). 78 patients were available for image analysis having undergone an [18F]FDG-PET/CT scan prior to the first cycle of chemotherapy and a second (optional) [18F]FDG-PET/CT scan at day 1-2 after start of the second cycle. The primary gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on both PET/CT scans. On the [18F]FDG-PET scan, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV), mean SUV, peak SUV and total lesion glycolysis (TLG defined as SUVmean*CTvolume) were calculated and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Early response assessment was quantified using relative changes in [18F]FDG-PET uptake parameters of the GTV expressed as delta. The median of the parameter of interest was used as cut-off value for both study arms for analysis using cox regression. Furthermore response was assessed according to PERCIST and RECIST.
Results:Hazard ratio os SUV parameters > versus < the median for PFS and OS
1) On average no decrease in [18F]FDG-PET uptake was observed for the experimental NTG group. However, patients in the experimental group showed a significantly larger variation in most SUV parameters of the second PET/CT scan compared to control group without NTG. 2) In table 1 the hazard ratios are shown for the relative delta SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and TLG for both study arms. In the experimental group, patients with a small delta TLG (<64%) had a shorter PFS than patients with a larger change in TLG (HR:1.064; 95% CI 1.002-1.131; p=0.043). Response assessed by PERCIST and RECIST did not predict for a longer PFS or OS.SUV parameter median PFS OS HR (p-value) 95% CI HR (p-value) 95% CI Delta PCB+NTG (%) SUVmax 40.4 1.026 (0.408) 0.966-1.090 1.006 (0.844) 0.945-1.071 SUVmean 39.9 1.048 (0.127) 0.987-1.113 1.034 (0.279) 0.973-1.099 SUVpeak 42.3 1.035 (0.258) 0.975-1.100 1.016 (0.615) 0.955-1.082 TLG 64.5 1.064 (0.043) 1.002-1.131 1.039 (0.221) 0.977-1.106 Delta PCB (%) SUVmax 53.2 1.027 (0.454) 0.957-1.103 1.009 (0.810) 0.939-1.084 SUVmean 51.6 1.027 (0.465) 0.957-1.102 1.011 (0.766) 0.941-1.086 SUVpeak 53.9 1.040 (0.281) 0.969-1.116 1.018 (0.623) 0.947-1.094 TLG 75.9 0.994 (0.873) 0.927-1.066 0.998 (0.951) 0.928-1.072
Conclusion:
Adding NTG did not result in a decrease in [18F]FDG-PET uptake compared to patients without NTG although NTG increased variability of the measured SUV parameters. Patients in the experimental NTG arm without an early response on [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging had a worse PFS than patients with a response. For the group without NTG no difference was observed. Also, RECIST and PERCIST were not predictive.
