Author of

• 12592

  +

  P3.10 - Poster Session 3 - Chemotherapy (ID 210)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Poster Session
  • Track: Medical Oncology
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 10/30/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level

  • 12637

    +

    P3.10-045 - Combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab, docetaxel and carboplatin for chemotherapy-naive patients with non-squamous cell lung carcinoma: Phase II study. (ID 2660)

    09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): M. Ando
    • Abstract

    Background
    Some clinical studies suggested a possible advantage of bevacizumab combined with taxanes. Although carboplatin is slightly inferior to cisplatin in terms of survival, addition of bevacizumab to carboplatin may overcome this disadvantage. The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy consisting of bevacizumab, docetaxel and carboplatin in the 1st line chemotherapy for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

    Methods
    Patients who are untreatable with thoracic curative radiotherapy, with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, age ranging from 20 to 74 years, PS 0 or 1, adequate organ functions, measurable lesions, and written informed consents were eligible. Combination chemotherapy consisting of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg), docetaxel (60 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC=6) on day 1 was administered every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles (induction phase). Unless PD, bevacizumab maintenance therapy was performed until PD (maintenance phase). The primary endpoint was median PFS to prove its superiority to the previous standard combination chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel and cisplatin with its historical median PFS of 4.6 months. With =0.05 and =0.20, calculated minimum sample size was 37, and the final determined sample size was 40. This trial was registered to the clinical trial registration system with the ID of UMIN000004524.

    Results
    Forty patients enrolled and 39 patients were analyzed. They included women in 31%, patients with PS of 0 in 67%, stage IV in 92%, EGFR mutations in 13% and unknown EGFR status in 8%. The median age was 62 years. The induction phase was delivered for 4 cycles in median (range: 1-6), and 21 patients (54%) received maintenance phase with median 4 cycles (range: 2-24). Frequent toxicities ≥ grade 3 during the induction phase in completely analyzed patients (n=32) included neutropenia (50.0%), anemia (9.4%), thrombocytopenia (9.4%), febrile neutropenia (25.0%) and hypertension (37.5%). Other toxicities ≥ grade 3 were cholecystitis, increased ALP, hyperpotassemia, proteinuria, diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea, constipation, infection, stomatitis, and cancer pain in 3.1%, respectively. Interim external reviews of 35 pts revealed ORR of 74% (26/35) and median PFS of 6.4 months (95% CI: 4.8-9.9).

    Conclusion
    The primary endpoint was met because the lower end of the 95%CI exceeded the threshold of 4.6 months. This combination chemotherapy seems promising in terms of safety and effectiveness, warranting phase III studies.