Author of

• 12021

  +

  MO12 - Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers III (ID 96)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
  • Track: Medical Oncology
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:B. Han, M. Edelman
  • Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 10:30 - 12:00, Parkside Ballroom B, Level 1

  • 12032

    +

    MO12.11 - The predictive role of common BIM deletion polymorphism and BIM expression on the EGFR-TKI therapy in never-smoking lung adenocarcinoma (ID 2161)

    11:30 - 11:35  |  Author(s): S.R. Goo
    • Abstract
    • Presentation
    • Slides

    Background
    The BCL-2 homology domain 3 (BH3)-only protein, B-cell lymphoma 2 interacting mediator of cell death (BIM) is a potent pro-apoptotic protein. Recent data suggest that pretreatment BIM level may predict responsiveness to EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, a common BIM deletion polymorphism contributes to the heterogeneity of response to EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We investigated whether BIM expression and BIM deletion polymorphism (BIM-DEL) are predictive for response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS) to EGFR-TKI therapy in never-smoking lung adenocarcinoma (NSLA).

    Methods
    We analyzed EGFR mutation status by Sanger sequencing, BIM-DEL genotyping by polymerase-chain reaction and BIM expression by immunohistochemistry using archival tissues or blood from 203 patients who participated in the FIRST-SIGNAL trial (1[st] line gefitinib vs. Gemcitabine/cisplatin in advanced NSLA).

    Results
    EGFR mutation test, BIM-DEL genotyping and BIM-IHC analysis were available in 82, 126 and 60 patients, respectively. Forty-five (55%) patients had EGFR mutations, 22 (18%) showed BIM-DEL and 22 (37%) showed negative BIM expression. BIM expression was significantly associated with EGFR mutation status; more patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC showed negative BIM expression (48% vs. 21%, P=0.030). BIM-DEL was not associated with EGFR mutation status or BIM expression. Among 181 patients who received EGFR-TKI as 1[st] or 2[nd]-line therapy, EGFR mutation, BIM-DEL and BIM expression data were available in 74, 11, 56 patients, respectively. EGFR mutation was predictive for higher RR (66% vs. 15%, P<.001) and longer PFS (4.5 vs. 1.9 months, P=.061) to EGFR-TKI therapy. Negative BIM expression also showed a trend toward higher RR (68% vs. 42%, P=.061) and longer PFS (6.9 vs. 2.3 months, P=.233) with EGFR-TKI. However, BIM-DEL was not predictive for RR (41% vs. 47%, P=.645) or PFS (3.5 vs. 3.7 months, P=.892) to EGFR-TKI.

    Conclusion
    Both BIM-DEL and BIM expression were not predictive for responsiveness to EGFR-TKI in NSLA. The trend between negative BIM expression and favorable response to EGFR-TKI may be resulted from higher frequency of EGFR mutation in these patients.

    Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

    Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.