Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Y. Ohe
Author of
-
+
P2.10 - Poster Session 2 - Chemotherapy (ID 207)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Poster Session
- Track: Medical Oncology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level
-
+
P2.10-016 - Phase II study of gefitinib and inserted cisplatin plus docetaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutation (ID 1107)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Y. Ohe
- Abstract
Background
Gefitinib yields a longer progression-free survival (PFS) period than platinum-doublet chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutation, but most patients develop resistance against gefitinib after the initial response. We hypothesized that the insertion of platinum-doublet chemotherapy during the initial response could prevent the emergence of acquired resistance and prolong survival, compared with gefitinib monotherapy.Methods
We performed a phase II study of the following first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation. Gefitinib (250 mg) was administrated on days 1-56. After a two-week rest, three cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m[2]) and docetaxel (60 mg/m[2]) were administered on days 71, 92, and 113. Gefitinib was re-started on day 134 and was continued until progression. The primary endpoint was the two-year PFS rate. The sample size was estimated at 33, and this treatment was considered worthy for further development if more than 11 of the 33 patients who started treatment had a 2-year PFS.Results
Thirty-three Japanese patients were enrolled. Twenty-five patients could recieve the second gefitinib, 12 achieved a PFS period of over 2 years, and 7 continued to receive the protocol treatment without experiencing progression. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year estimated PFS rates were 67.0%, 40.2%, and 36.9%, respectively, and the median PFS time was 19.5 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year estimated survival rates were 90.6%, 71.9%, and 64.8%, respectively, and the median survival time had not been reached at the time of analysis. Treatment-related deaths and unexpected severe toxicities were not seen.Conclusion
Our results indicated that first-line treatment consisting of gefitinib and inserted cisplatin plus docetaxel is promising in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation. A phase III study of this treatment compared with gefitinib monotherapy is warranted.
-
+
P3.06 - Poster Session 3 - Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers (ID 178)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Poster Session
- Track: Biology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/30/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level
-
+
P3.06-016 - Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression in cancer cells could have prognostic value for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are treated with neoadjuvant therapy: identification of prognostic microenvironmental factors after chemoradiation (ID 1726)
09:30 - 09:30 | Author(s): Y. Ohe
- Abstract
Background
Prognostic biomarkers for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have been treated with neoadjuvant therapy have not been fully assessed. Identifying biological prognostic markers may help to distinguish patients who are likely to benefit from additional postoperative chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to analyze prognostic biomarkers in surgically resected NSCLC after treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, with special reference to the immunophenotypes of both the cancer cells and the stromal cells.Methods
A series of 66 patients with NSCLC who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or radiotherapy followed by complete resection at our hospital between April 1992 and December 2009 were reviewed. Among the 66 surgically resected specimens, case with viable tumor cells remained in the specimens were included in this study (n =52). We examined the expressions of geminin and cleaved caspase 3 (proliferation and apoptosis markers), E-cadherin and vimentin (epithelial mesenchymal transition related molecules), ALDH1 and CD44v6 (Stem cells related molecules) in the cancer cells. Furthermore in the stromal cells, the expressions of podoplanin and CD90 in cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and CD204 in tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) were also examined.Results
The 5-year disease-free survival rate of patients with high ALDH1 expression levels in their cancer cells was significantly lower than those with a low ALDH1 level (47.3% vs. 21.5%, respectively; P =0.023). The expression statuses of geminin, cleaved caspase 3, E-cadherin, vimentin, and CD44v6 in the cancer cells had no prognostic impact. The 5-year disease-free survival rate of patients with low or high podoplanin and CD90 levels in CAFs and CD204 levels in TAMs expression levels were not any prognostic impact in the stromal cells (37.9% vs. 29.1%, 33.8% vs. 37.5%, 38.4% vs. 29.0%, P =0.90, P = 0.75, P =0.98). In NSCLC without neoadjuvant therapy matching for clinical stage and histopathology (case control, n =104), the 5-year DFS rate of the patients with a high ALDH1 expression level was 48.3%, while that of the cases with a low ALDH1 expression level was 59.8%. The expression of ALDH1 in cancer cells was not correlated with the prognosis in NSCLC without neoadjuvant therapy (P =0.507). A multivariate analysis identified ALDH1 expression in cancer cells as significantly independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (P =0.045).Conclusion
The presence of ALDH1-positive cancer cells was an independent recurrence predictor in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, while CAFs and TAMs did not provide any predictors. Although prospective studies with a larger number of patients are required to confirm the prognostic significance of ALDH1 expression in cancer cells in validation populations with neoadjuvant therapy, our results suggest that the immunophenotypes of ALDH1 expression can serve as a guide to additional treatment after surgical resection in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy.