Author of

• 11692

  +

  P2.10 - Poster Session 2 - Chemotherapy (ID 207)

  • Event: WCLC 2013
  • Type: Poster Session
  • Track: Medical Oncology
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 10/29/2013, 09:30 - 16:30, Exhibit Hall, Ground Level

  • 11705

    +

    P2.10-013 - Randomized non comparative multicenter phase II study of sequential erlotinib with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of first line chemotherapy (TARSEQ): a GFPC 10.02 study. (ID 972)

    09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): D. Paillotin
    • Abstract

    Background
    Erlotinib and docetaxel are approved in second line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Concomitant administration of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKi) of EGFR with standard chemotherapy in first line did not improve survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Preliminary studies support a possible efficacy of sequential administration of EGFR TKi and chemotherapy. Objective: This open randomized phase II trial (Tarseq) was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of second-line sequential erlotinib plus docetaxel in advanced NSCLC.

    Methods
    Patients were randomized (1/1, stratified by center, disease status: recurrent or refractory (no response observed after 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy))between sequential erlotinib 150 mg/d (day 2-16) + docetaxel (75 mg /m2 d1- 21) (arm A) versus docetaxel (75mg/m2 d1) alone (arm B) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the rate of patients with progression-free survival at 15 weeks (PFS15) ; second endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and tolerability. Main eligibility criteria were advanced NSCLC, EGFR wild type or unknown, performance status 0 to 2, failure of first line cisplatin based chemotherapy; main exclusion criteria were more than 2 lines of treatment, previous anti-EGFR or docetaxel treatment. Statistical analysis was based on a Simon’s optimal two stage design . The primary endpoint is rejected if the number of efficacy is less 33 over 66 pts (25+ 41) at the end of the two stages.

    Results
    147 patients were randomized by 33 centers: median age: 60 ± 8 years, PS 0/1/2 (44/83/20 pts) ; male: 78%, EGFR status: wild type 66%, unknown: 34%; recurrent patients: 65% (arms A/B :66%/65%), nonsquamous: 86% (arms A/B : 84%/90%), smoking status: smokers 35%, formers 57,5%, never 7,5%. Baseline characteristics were balanced between 2 arms. In ITT, the primary objective was not meet with 18/66 pts without progression at 15 weeks in arm A, 17 /66 pts in arm B. In arm A and B, median PFS was 2,2 (CI95% 1,6-2,8) and 2,5 (CI 95% 1,7-2,8) months and median OS was 6,6 (CI 95% 4,3-10,3) and 8,4 (CI 95% 4,5-11,3) months respectively. Toxicity was acceptable in both arms with 60.2 % and 54% of G3/4 toxicity in arms A and B, respectively.

    Conclusion
    The sequential combination of erlotinib with docetaxel did not demonstrate any benefit in second-line treatment of EGFR wild type or unknown advanced NSCLC, despite acceptable toxicity. The Pharmacological hypothesis of synergism between erlotinib given sequentially and standard chemotherapy is not confirmed in the present study. Clinical trial information: NCT01350817 / Supported by an academic grant from Roche, Chugai, Sanofi Aventis,with the help of clinical research direction ( Limoges University Hospital)