Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

R. Garcia-Gomez



Author of

  • +

    MO25 - NSCLC - Combined Modality Therapy II (ID 112)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Mesothelioma
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO25.01 - Interim analysis of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) randomized phase II trial of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) concurrent with cisplatin (P) plus oral vinorelbine (OV) or etoposide (E) for unresectable locally advanced (LA) stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (GECP10/02). (ID 2658)

      10:30 - 10:35  |  Author(s): R. Garcia-Gomez

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Chemoradiation is the standard of care for the treatment of unresectable LA-NSCLC. Cisplatin plus either etoposide or vinorelbine are two of the chemotherapy (CT) regimens widely used for the disease concurrently with radiotherapy. Oral vinorelbine is a formulation which has achieved comparable results to the IV vinorelbine. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin when combined with etoposide or oral vinorelbine with radical radiation for the management of stage III NSCLC.

      Methods
      Patients (pts) between 18 and 75 years, with histologically proven untreated and unresectable LA stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function, ECOG PS 0-1, were randomized to: Arm OV-P: OV 60 mg/m[2] D1, D8 cycle 1 and 80 mg/m[2] cycle 2 (if no grade 3-4 toxicity) plus P 80 mg/m[2] D1 every 3 weeks for 2 cycles as induction; patients without progression received OV 40 mg/m[2] D1, D8, and P 80 mg/m[2] D1 every 3 weeks for 2 more cycles (4 cycles in total). Arm E-P: E 50 mg/m[2] intravenously D1 to D5 plus P 50 mg/m[2] D1, D8 every 4 weeks for 2 cycles. Both regimens administered with concurrent RT 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression free survival using RECIST 1.1, and secondary endpoints were overall response rate, overall survival, and safety profile. To guarantee an overall type-1 α error (one side) no greater than 0.05 and a type II (β) error 0.1 for the primary endpoint of PFS, a sample size of 134 pts allocated in a 1:1 ratio is planned.

      Results
      Since August 2011 77 pts have been recruited. 46 pts have been included in the interim analysis, 23 pts have been randomly allocated to each treatment arm. Patient’s characteristics were: Male 91.3%; median age 64 (range 44-75); PS1 56.5%; smokers 46.8%; adenocarcinoma 40.4% / squamous 55.3%; stage IIIA 46.8% / IIIB 53.2%. Median of months between initial diagnosis and study start was 1 (range 0.3-15.7). Safety: 118 cycles (cy) were analysed, 79 in arm OV-P and 39 in arm E-P. Hematological toxicities arms OV-P/E-P (% cy): grade (g) 3/4 neutropenia 8.9%/13.1%; g3 thrombocytopenia 0%/5.3%; g3 anemia 0%/2.6%; febrile neutropenia 3 cases on OV-P arm (all during induction CT on cy 1) and 1 case on E-P arm (during concurrent chemoradiation). Non-hematological toxicities arms OV-P/E-P (% cy): g3 esophagitis/mucositis 1.3%/15.5%; g3 infection without neutropenia 1.3%/5.1%. No treatment-related deaths were reported. There was no remarkable difference in other toxicities between both arms. 39 pts completed the treatment as per protocol, 19 in arm OV-P and 20 in arm E-P. Overall response rates were 73.7% and 50% for the OV-P and the E-P arm, respectively.

      Conclusion
      This interim analysis shows that OV-P and E-P when administered concurrently with RT have a manageable safety profile with efficacy. Safety data is consistent with other studies reported for both chemoradiation regimens. Based on these positive results for safety, accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information EudraCT 2010-022927-31.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    O16 - NSCLC - Targeted Therapies III (ID 115)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      O16.03 - Cost-utility analysis of first-line treatment with erlotinib versus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): economic analysis of EURTAC trial (ID 1100)

      10:50 - 11:00  |  Author(s): R. Garcia-Gomez

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      The impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC is poorly documented. Two studies (Jacob et al, ISPOR2010, Brown et al, Health Technol Assess, 2010) are based on modelisation and indirect comparisons. The present study reports a cost-utility analysis of a phase III randomized trial (EURTAC).

      Methods
      A three state Markov model (first line PFS, second line PD and death) was built. Clinical data and resource assessment (drugs, drug administration, adverse events, second-line treatment) were collected from the trial. Utility values were derived from Nafees et al, as previously published (Vergnenegre et al. JTO 2011). Incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were calculated for the first-line treatment and the overall strategy until death from the perspective of different countries (2013 actualized euros). Sensitivity analyses researched the main cost drivers.

      Results
      The quality-adjusted life-years gained was 0.124 with erlotinib, which showed an improvement in the quality of life for these patients. Despite the extra treatment costs of second-line erlotinib in the chemotherapy arm, there was a cost benefit for erlotinib first, resulting in fewer patients receiving second-line pemetrexed along with other therapy. Cost gain in favor of first-line erlotinib was 8,918 Euros. The main results are depicted in Table1.

      First-line erlotinib First-line chemotherapy
      Average cost of first-line (euros 2013)
      Drugs 21,679 1030
      Administration 329 4,455
      Adverse events 546 2,686
      Cost of post-first progression care 40,467 67,281
      ICUR (erlotinib versus chemotherapy)
      ICUR France negative
      ICUR Spain negative
      ICUR Italy negative
      Sensitivity analyses will be presented at the meeting.

      Conclusion
      ICUR favored first-line erlotinib in EGFR-mutant patients with advanced NSCLC, which is the widely accepted treatment compared to chemotherapy. The cost-utility of the overall strategy remained beneficial in three different European countries. On behalf GFCP,GEPC and AIOT groups

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.09 - Poster Session 2 - Combined Modality (ID 213)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Combined Modality
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.09-004 - Phase II study of sequential versus concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in poor risk patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): final results of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group 00-05 study (ID 1102)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): R. Garcia-Gomez

      • Abstract

      Background
      Inoperable stage III NSCLC is increasingly diagnosed in poor-risk patients for whom there is not yet a standard treatment. We conducted a randomized two-stage phase II study to assess whether sequential or concurrent chemoradiation was feasible, tolerable and showed efficacy.

      Methods
      Patients with inoperable stage IIIA and B NSCLC and at least one of the following conditions: age ≤ 75 years, ECOG PS=2, weight loss > 5%, creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min, a comorbid condition precluding the patient from being treated in a protocol for fit patients,were randomized to receive either carboplatin AUC 2.5 and vinorelbine 15 mg /m[2] both on days 1,8,22, and 29, and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) total dose 60 Gy starting day 1 (CT arm) or, carboplatin AUC 5, days 1 and 22 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m[2] days 1, 8, 22, and 29, followed by TRT 60 Gy starting day 43 to 50 (ST arm). The primary end-point was response rate.

      Results
      From June 2001 to June 2006, 70 patients from 8 centers were included : 47 in CT arm and 23 in ST arm. Forty-eight of these patients were randomized during the first stage of the trial. By September 2004, due to a decrease in treatment compliance and an increase in early deaths in the ST arm, accrual was continued in the second stage of the trial only in the CT arm. Patient characteristics: median age 74 (49-84), Male 96%, Stage IIIB 65%; ECOG =2, 28%; Weight loss >5%, 29%; Creatinine clearence <60, 26%; Comorbidity, 70%. More than one poor risk inclusion criteria: 59 %. Fifty-eight patients completed treatment 93 % in CT arm, and 73% in ST arm. There were 2 CR and 25 PR (RR 60%) in CT arm, and 10 PR (RR 45.5%) in ST arm. Grade 3- 4 hematological toxicity was absent in CT arm and was 14% (neutropenia) in ST arm. Grade 3 and 4 non-hematological toxicities experienced by more than 5% of patients were asthenia (7%) and dyspnea (9%) in CT arm and anorexia (9%), asthenia(14%), and dyspnea (14%) in ST arm. Only one patient developed grade 3 esophagitis (CT arm) There were five deaths during treatment: two in CT arm and three in ST arm. Median PFS and overall survival rate were 6.7 (95% CI:4.9-8.5) and 16.8 months (95% CI 9.5-24), and 7.9 (95% CI:3.9-16.2) and 5.6 months (95% CI:2.7-8.9 ), for the CT arm and ST arm, respectively.

      Conclusion
      In poor-risk patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy outperformed sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and was feasible, very well tolerated, and provided efficacy. The survival outcome with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was notably longer than anticipated.

  • +

    P3.06 - Poster Session 3 - Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers (ID 178)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Biology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.06-035 - Study of the correlations between SNPs in angiogenic genes and treatment response/ outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC (non-squamous histology) treated in first line with carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab (CPB). The ANGIOMET study. (ID 2664)

      09:30 - 09:30  |  Author(s): R. Garcia-Gomez

      • Abstract

      Background
      It has been demonstrated that the addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel plus carboplatin (CPB) in the treatment of advanced NSCLC improves survival. Even though, there is a high variability in drug efficacy between patients, leading to different response rates. ANGIOMET is an exploratory study promoted by the SLCG in advanced NSCLC, non-squamous histologies (NS-NSCLC) treated in first line with a combination scheme based in CPB, designed to investigate the relationship between angiogenic mediators and the outcome and response to treatment. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end-points are the follows: OS, response-rates and toxicity profiles.

      Methods
      In this multicentric study, patients with stage IIIB/IV NS-NSCLC (ECOG status 0–2) were included and treated in first line with CPB. Peripheral blood samples were collected before treatment administration and DNA was purified from the leukocyte fraction. Ten SNPs of VEGF-pathway genes were genotyped in 186 samples by RT-PCR in duplicate. SNPs were related to PFS and OS (Kaplan-Meir method, log-rank test) and to response rate.

      Results
      10 SNPs were determined in 186 DNA samples. In this preliminary analysis there were data from 108 patients valid for PFS and OS analysis. Baseline characteristics of the patients were: median age, 63 years [37-80]; 74.5% male; 94.1% ECOG PS 0-1; 14% never-smokers, 100% caucasian; 89.7% adenocarcinomas, 2.8% large cell carcinomas; median number of CPB cycles was 4. There was no response assessment in 27 patients (25%), 30.6% PR, 31.5% SD and 13.0% PD. The SNP rs833061 (CC) in VEGFA correlated with lower response rates to CPB than the other genotypes (p=0.07). SNPs in KRAS and VEGFR2 were associated with PFS and/or OS in our cohort. The KRAS SNP rs10842513 (TT+CT) was associated with shorter PFS compared with the CC genotype (median: 5.39 vs 6.81 months; p=0.04, respectively). The VEGFR2 SNP rs2071559 (AA) was significantly associated with longer PFS and OS (Table 1). No significant differences in PFS or OS were observed according to other SNPs analyzed. Table 1: PFS and OS for VEGFR2 SNPrs2071559.

      PFS
      % Median (months) 95%CI p
      VEGFR2 (rs2071559)
      AA 25.6 9,408 5,084 - 13,732 0.01
      GG+AG 74.0 5,724 4,902 - 6,546
      OS
      % Median (months) 95%CI p
      VEGFR2 (rs2071559)
      AA 25.6 NR ---- 0.001
      GG+AG 74.0 12,270 8,760 – 15.780

      Conclusion
      These preliminary data indicate that genetic variation in VEGFR2, SNP rs2071559 variant AA, is associated with prognosis in advanced NS-NSCLC patients treated with CPB and may have predictive implications as biomarkers in patients treated with chemotherapy with bevacizumab. On behalf of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG)